Delhi Court April 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajbala vs.dena Bank & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
$~24 * + W.P.(C) 3518/2017 & CMs 15365-66/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RAJBALA Through : Mr. Sunil K. Jha with Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocates ........ Petitioner DENA BANK & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Karan Khanna with Ms. Asmita Kumar, Advocates for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % ORDER2404.2017 1. The petitioner has assailed the order dated 11.4.2017 passed by the DRT-I, Delhi in the present proceedings without approaching the DRAT by preferring an appeal.2. The present petition has been listed subject to an office objection with regard to its maintainability.3. Counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition, while reserving the right of his client to file an appeal before the DRAT, as per law.4. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn along with the pending applications. APRIL24 2017/sk HIMA KOHLI, J SANGITA DHI...
Bhagwati Devi vs. Union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgement delivered on:24. h April, 2017 + W.P.(C) No.8517/2015 & CM No.18338/2015, 32880/2016 BHAGWATI DEVI Through : Mr.Anuroop P.S., Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for L&B/LAC. Mr.Arjun Pant, Advocate for DDA. Ms.Anjali Chopra, Advocate applicant in CM No.32880/2016 for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(Oral) CM No.32880/2016 (for impleadment by Saini Cooperative House Building Society) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applicant is impleaded as respondent in these proceedings. Let amended memo of parties be placed on record. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) No.8517/2015 & CM No.18338/2015 WP(C) No.8517/2015 Page 1 of 4 1. The petitioner claims a direction that the acquisition by the respondents of her land in Khasra No.607, admeas...
State vs.wasim & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
$~44 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. L.P. 242/2017 STATE Date of Judgment:24. h April, 2017 Through : Mr.Rajat Katyal, APP for State along Insp.Yogesh, SHO & ASI ....... Petitioner with Jaiveer, PS Khajuri Khas. versus WASIM & ANR. CORAM: Through : None. ....... RESPONDENTS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 6688/2017 (for Condonation of Delay) 1. This is an application filed by the State/petitioner seeking condonation of delay of 297 days in filing the leave to appeal. Though the application does not satisfactorily explain the reasons for the delay, however, since we have heard the matter on merits as well, we condone the delay.2. Application stands disposed of. Crl. L.P. 242/2017 3. The present leave to appeal has been filed by the State under Section 378 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.P.C.) being aggrieved by the judgment dated 22.03.2016 passed by the Trial Court in Sessions Case...
Hrd Corporation (Marcus Oil and Chemical Division) vs.gail (India) Lim ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 22/2017& IA Nos. 3579-3580/2017 Judgment delivered on:24. 04.2017 HRD CORPORATION (MARCUS OIL AND CHEMICAL DIVISION) versus GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED (FORMERLY GAS AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD.) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 23/2017& IA Nos. 3581-3582/2017 AND HRD CORPORATION (MARCUS OIL AND CHEMICAL DIVISION) versus GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED (FORMERLY GAS AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD.) Advocates who appeared in these cases: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent : Mr Arvind K. Nigam, Senior Advocate with Mr Shailendra Swarup, Ms Bindu Saxena and Ms Aparajita Swarup. : Mr Abhisaar Bairagi. VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 HRD Corporation (Marcus Oil and Chemical Division) (hereafter HRD), a Corporation organised and existing under the laws of the State O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) Nos.22/2017 & 23/2017 Page 1 of 30 of Texas, USA, has filed the present petitio...
Govt of Nct of Delhi Thr Secretary (Land & Building Department) vs.paw ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
$~15 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA5592016 and CM Nos.37773-37774/2016 Date of Decision:24. 04.2017 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI THR SECRETARY (LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT) ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain and Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates versus PAWAN KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr.R.S.Tiwari, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral) 1. The appellant assails the order dated 25th August, 2015 by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) 7688/2015 wherein the learned Single Judge was pleased to accept the explanation given by the respondents for the delay in seeking allotment of an alternate plot against acquisition of his land which had been rejected by the appellant on the sole ground that it was beyond the one year calculated from the date when the compensation was received by him towards the acquisition.2. By the order dated 25th August, 2015, the learned Single Judge had directed the appellant herein to iss...
M/S Pushpanjali Sales (P) Ltd vs.govt. Of Nct Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
$~3&4 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement delivered on:24. h April, 2017 CONT.CAS(C) 23/2017 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through : Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus Mr. Siddharth Panda, Adv. for L&B ASHISH KISHORE ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Mr.B. Tripathy and Mr. Randhir Pandey, Advocates With + W.P.(C) 2251/2015 & CM Nos.4021, 29010/2015 M/S PUSHPANJALI SALES (P) LTD. ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Mr.B. Tripathy and Mr. Randhir Pandey, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT DELHI & ORS Through : Mr. Siddharth Panda, Adv. for L&B ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, Adv. DDA for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(Oral) 1. One Amar Dass s/o late Shri Tulsi Dass, a displaced person Cont.CAS (C) No.23/2017 and WP(C) No.2215/2015 Page 1 of 6 from West Bengal was allotted the land by the Home Ministry against his verified claims. As per the policy of t...
Urgen Dorjee vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
$~87 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 3450/2017 Judgment delivered on:24. 04.2017 URGEN DORJEE versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : : Mr Simarpal Singh and Mr Sidhant Krishan Singh Mr Rajesh Gogna for R-1 to 3. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2404.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.15106/ 2017(exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 3450/2017 1. The petitioner, by the present petition, seeks a direction to the respondents to issue a passport to the petitioner.2. It is contended that petitioner was born in India on 28.03.1973 and is a citizen of India in terms of Section 3(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act, 1955. W.P.(C) No3450/2017 Page 1 of 2 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies on the decision of this Court delivered on 13.04.2017 in W.P.(C) No.254/2017 titled Tenzin Passang versus Union of India & Other...
Nirlep Kaur vs. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
$~54 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement delivered on:24. h April, 2017 + W.P.(C) No.1627/2016 & CM No.7039-40/2016 NIRLEP KAUR ........ Petitioner Through : Ms.Deepika V. Marwaha & Ms.Worthing Kasar, Advocates for petitioner. versus GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS. Through : Mr.Yeeshu ........ RESPONDENTS Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for L&B/LAC. Mr.M.K.Singh, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(Oral) 1. Learned counsel for L&B/LAC seeks to tender the counter today in the Court. The same is hereby being taken on record.2. The petitioner Nirlep Kaur filed this petition through her constituted attorney Smt.Rekha Rachna Sharma. It is alleged that on 30.06.1982 the petitioner became the owner of the agricultural land admeasuring 1 bigha 7 biswas out of 16 bigha and 4 biswas (being WP(C) No.1627/2016 Page 1 of 7 shares in 43 bigha and 4 biswas...
Rattan Singh & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
$~32 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement delivered on:24. h April, 2017 + W.P.(C) No.7468/2015 & CM No.13786/2015 RATTAN SINGH & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr.B.S.Mathur, Mr.Rajat Mathur and Ms.Aditee Mathur, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr.R.C.Bhatiya, Advocate for UOI/Respondent No.1. Ms.Mrinalini Sen & Ms.Kritika Gupta, Advocates for DDA. Mr.Pawan Mathur, Advocate DDA. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for L&B/LAC. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(Oral) 1. Late Bharat Singh, the father of the petitioners was a recorded owner of the land bearing khasra No.9//2(4-16), 3(4-16), 7(4-16), 8(4- 16), 9(4-16), 13(4-11), 14(4-16), 17(4-16), 18(4-16), 27(0-5), 30//9(4- 16), 11(4-16), 20/1(2-4), 31//16(4-11), 26(0-5) total measuring 59 bighas 16 biswas situated in the revenue estate of Village...
Hrd Corporation (Marcus Oil and Chemical Division) vs.gail (India) Lim ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 22/2017& IA Nos. 3579-3580/2017 Judgment delivered on:24. 04.2017 HRD CORPORATION (MARCUS OIL AND CHEMICAL DIVISION) versus GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED (FORMERLY GAS AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD.) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 23/2017& IA Nos. 3581-3582/2017 AND HRD CORPORATION (MARCUS OIL AND CHEMICAL DIVISION) versus GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED (FORMERLY GAS AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD.) Advocates who appeared in these cases: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent : Mr Arvind K. Nigam, Senior Advocate with Mr Shailendra Swarup, Ms Bindu Saxena and Ms Aparajita Swarup. : Mr Abhisaar Bairagi. VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 HRD Corporation (Marcus Oil and Chemical Division) (hereafter HRD), a Corporation organised and existing under the laws of the State O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) Nos.22/2017 & 23/2017 Page 1 of 30 of Texas, USA, has filed the present petitio...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »