Delhi Court April 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Kumar vs.mitter Sain Gupta and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
$~J- * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. 04.2017 + RC.REV. 326/2016 and CM No.23852/2016 RAM KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.A.K. Singla, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Pankaj Gupta & Ms.Rimpy Gupta, Advocates for the petitioner versus MITTER SAIN GUPTA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Amit Gupta & Mr.Puneet Sharma, Advocates for the respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. The present revision petition is filed under Section 25 B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred as the DRC Act) seeking to impugn the order dated 03.03.2016 by which the application filed by the petitioner/tenant seeking leave to defend was dismissed. An eviction order was passed in favour of the respondents/landlords under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act.2. The respondents/landlords filed the eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act stating that the premises comprising one room and bathroom on the first floor and one ...
Rampali vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % RAMPALI FAO No.184/2017 24th April, 2017 Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Kartar Singh, Advocate with appellant in person. versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this first appeal the appellant impugns the order of the trial court dated 18.1.2017 dismissing her application for revocation of the succession certificate. The succession certificate was granted to Smt. Sonia Yadav and Sh. Bhim Singh, respondent nos. 2 and 3 in this appeal, and who are the daughter and husband of the deceased Smt. Kamla Devi. Respondent nos. 2 and 3, Smt. Sonia Yadav and Sh. Bhim Singh were granted the succession certificate on account of they being the daughter and husband of late Smt. Kamla Devi who died on 25.4.2015, and hence the legal heirs of Smt. Kamla Devi under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Appellant applied...
Harkrishan Das Nijhawan vs.satyavir Katar, Cpio Delhi Police Licensing ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1882/2017 HARKRISHAN DAS NIJHAWAN ........ Petitioner SATYAVIR KATAR, CPIO DELHI POLICE LICENSING UNIT & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner... Petitioner in person. : For the Respondent : Mr. Arun Panwar and Mr. Akshay Choudhary, Advocates for GNCTD CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2404.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner by the present petition seeks quashing of order dated 29.12.2017 whereby the application of the petitioner under Section 20(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been rejected. The petitioner further seeks initiation of disciplinary inquiry against the respondent No.1 to 4 in response to show cause notice under Section 20(1) of the Act. WP(C) 1882/2017 Page 1 of 5 2. The petitioner had sought certain information from the respondents under the Act. The information was denied. The pet...
Om Prakash & Ors vs. Union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~25 * % + W.P.(C) No.4654/2015 & CM No.8424/2015 Judgement delivered on:24. h April, 2017 OM PRAKASH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through : Mr.Daleep Dhayani and Mr.M.P. Bhargava, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Rajesh Kumar and Ms.Santwana, Advocate for UOI. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for LAC/ L&B Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Adv. for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioners are the legal heirs of the recorded owner - namely Chandgi Ram, who has since expired, on 31.07.1994.2. On 23.01.1965 a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Act) was issued by respondent No.4 notifying that khasra No.2208/15(2-9) & 2490/1204 (3-3), situated in village Mehrauli, NCT of Delhi are to be acquired for the planned development of Delhi. On 07.12.1966 a notification under WP(C) No.4654/2015 Page 1 of 4...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.lalit Mohan Madhan & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
$~5 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA5232016 & CM Nos. 34567, 47096/2016, 3234, 13769, 14196/2017 Date of decision :24. h April, 2017 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, SC with Ms. Vasundhara Nayyar and Ms. Anushruti, Advs. versus LALIT MOHAN MADHAN & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Raman Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aviral Tiwari, Adv.for R-1 Mr. Y.K. Gupta, Son of R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The instant appeal has been filed by the South Delhi Municipal Corporation assailing the order dated 30th March, 2016 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.6522/2010 whereby, inter alia, the learned Single Judge was pleased to direct the appellant to pass a formal order showing the portions of the property no.B-1/26, Vasant Vihar, New LPA No.523/2016 Page 1 of 5 % Delhi described as the front and rear portions thereof which...
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd vs.rezwana Kauser & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO No.184/2016 + % RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate. 24th April, 2017 versus REZWANA KAUSER & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vivek Kumar, Advocate for R-1 to 4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this first appeal under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923, the appellant/Reliance General Insurance Company Limited impugns the judgment of the Employees Compensation Commissioner dated 29.2.2016 which has allowed the claim petition filed by the claimants/respondent nos. 1 to 4 herein.2. The facts of the case are that the deceased Md. Tauqir was employed as a helper with the respondent No.5/M/s Satkar Logistics Private Limited herein, respondent no.1 before the Employees Compensation Commissioner. Md. Tauqir on 15.7.2010 died while falling from the vehicle bearing No.HR-55-J-8545. On account of fal...
Tarawati and Ors. Vs.bank of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
TARAWATI AND ORS. $~27 * + W.P.(C) 3540/2017 versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Anand Aggarwal, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashish Rana, Advocate for R-1/Bank of India. BANK OF INDIA AND ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % ORDER2404.2017 CM154432017 (exemption) Subject to the petitioners filing the certified/typed/legible copies of the documents annexed with the petition within four weeks, the application is allowed and disposed of. W.P.(C) 3540/2017 1. The petitioners are aggrieved by the action of the respondent No.1/Bank of India of approaching the Receiver appointed by the learned CMM vide order dated 28.2.2017, in Application No.150/1/16, filed by the respondent No.1/Bank for taking over physical possession of their residential premises RZ-48, Street No.1, Nasirpur, Durga Park, Delhi.2. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that aggrieved by the action of the respo...
Lata Tyagi vs.registrar Co Operative Society and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~28 * + W.P.(C) 3545/2017 & C.M. No.15459/2017 (stay) Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate LATA TYAGI ........ Petitioner versus REGISTRAR CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY AND ANR...Respondents Through: Mr. Ankur Chibber, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % ORDER2404.2017 CM154602017 (exemption) Subject to the petitioner filing the certified/typed/legible copies of the documents annexed with the petition within four weeks, the application is allowed and disposed of. W.P.(C) 3545/2017 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing the order dated 14.10.2016, passed by the Delhi Co-operative Tribunal dismissing her appeal filed under Section 112 of Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), preferred against an order dated 3/4.06.2015 passed by the learned Dy. Registrar under Section 70 of the Act in an arbitration case filed by the respondent...
Ishar Dass vs.mitter Sain Gupta and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
$~J- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV. 333/2016 Date of Decision:24. 04.2017 ISHAR DASS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.A.K. Singla, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Pankaj Gupta & Ms.Rimpy Gupta, Advocates for the petitioner Versus MITTER SAIN GUPTA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Amit Gupta & Mr.Puneet Sharma, Advocates for the respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.CAVEAT CAV.547/2016 Since the learned counsel for the respondents has entered appearance, the caveat stands discharged. RC.REV. 333/2016 1. The present revision petition is filed under Section 25B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 seeking to impugn the order of the Additional Rent Controller dated 03.03.2016 by which the application filed by the petitioner/tenant seeking leave to defend was dismissed and an eviction order was passed against the petitioner.2. The Additional Rent Controller by a common order disposed of two eviction petitions. Against the dismissal of the oth...
M/S Planman Media Pvt. Ltd. Vs.sh. Pragnesh Patel
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO No.180/2017 + % M/S PLANMAN MEDIA PVT. LTD. 24th April, 2017 ..... Appellant Mr. Hem C. Vashist and Ms. Ritu, Advocates. Through: versus SH. PRAGNESH PATEL Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.15154/2017 (delay of 436 days in filing the appeal) In view of the fact that time was lost by the appellant/defendant in pursuing a wrong remedy before this very Court, having wrongly filed an RFA earlier, accordingly this application is allowed and delay in filing of the present appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of FAO No.180/2017 & C.M.No.15151/2017 (stay) 1. By this first appeal, the appellant/defendant impugns the order of the court below dated 13.10.2015 whereby the application of FAO No.180/2017 Page 1 of 4 the appellant/defendant under Order IX Rule 13 was dismissed and the court below refused to set aside the ex-parte judgment and de...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »