Delhi Court April 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Kumar vs.new Delhi Municipal Corporation (Ndmc) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
$~26 to 35 & 45 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:25. h April, 2017 W.P.(C) No.11592/2016 + SHEETLA PRASAD GUPTA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv. with versus Ms.Monika Singh, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (NDMC) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra & Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC along with Mr.Narayan Kumar, ALO, NDMC, in person. Mr.Ashish Mohan, Adv. with Mr.Mohit Kumar, Adv. for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. Mr.O.P.Agarwal, Adv. with Mr.Deepak Agarwal, Adv. for applicants. W.P.(C) No.12016/2016 SURAJ DEV PASWAN ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv. with versus Ms.Monika Singh, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (NDMC) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra & WP(C) No.11592/2016 & others Page 1 of 12 Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC along with Mr.Narayan Kumar, ALO, NDMC, in person. Ms.Jyoti Tan...
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.rubi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO No.146/2017 + % NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. 25th April, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ravinder Singh, Advocate. versus RUBI AND ORS. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.12644/2017 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. FAO No.146/2017 and C.M. No.12645/2017 (stay) 2. This first appeal under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) impugns the judgment of the Employees Compensation Commissioner dated 6.2.2017 allowing the claim petition filed by the claimant/respondent no.1. The claim petition was filed on account of the death of Sh. Ajit Singh who was working as a driver.3. The facts of the case are that the deceased driver was driving the vehicle bearing No.MH-12TR-BWV-874 for delivery from Pune to FAO No.146/2017 Page 1 of 4 Dehradun...
Priyanka vs.pankaj Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
$~37 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS(C) 218/2017 PRIYANKA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, Advocate. versus PANKAJ SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % Appearance has been entered by the respondent, who hands over the ORDER2504.2017 proof of his identity, which is taken on record. He confirms that he has received a complete set of the paper book.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that first motion of divorce in the present case was jointly moved by the parties before the Principal Judge, Family Court, East, Vishwas Nagar, Delhi on 18.05.2015 as the parties had arrived at a settlement recorded on 25.03.2015. The first motion was granted by the Principal Judge, Family Court on 09.07.2015. Thereafter, the Respondent had abruptly stopped appearing before the Family Court and as a result, the second motion could not be moved.3. The respondent s...
Sushree Swarupa Tripathy vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:25. 04.2017 $~36 * % + W.P.(C) 12078/2016 SUSHREE SWARUPA TRIPATHY ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Ashok Gurnani, Adv.. : Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Bhuvnesh Satija, Adv. for R-2 and 3 Mr. Raghav Awasthi, Adv. for R-4 Mr. Jaideep Singh and Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Advs. for R-5 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT1 The petitioner by the present petition, inter-alia, seeks a direction to respondent No.2 to investigate and adjudicate upon the complaint dated 25.05.2016 filed by the petitioner under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 and also to investigate into the issuance of the certificate of analysis annexed to P-19, P- 21, P-23, P-27 and P-29 and to withdraw the same if incorrectly issued. The p...
Manoj Kumar vs.m/s Central Ayurvedic Drug Store & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 25, 2017 MANOJ KUMAR W.P.(C) 4793/2013 Through: Mr. Pankaj Tripathi, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus M/S CENTRAL AYURVEDIC DRUG STORE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Ms. Niti Jain, Advocate and Dr. Yogita Munjal, Deputy Director, Directorate of Ayush CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) JUDGMENT Impugned Award of 8th March, 2013 holds that no Inquiry was conducted before terminating the service of petitioner, who was employed as part-time sweeper with respondent-Management in the year 2003. Due to attendance register being stolen away, the attendance chart provided by petitioner was relied upon and in the absence of any notice prior to termination, the removal of petitioner from job of a part-time Sweeper is held to be illegal. Instead of reinstatement, trial court while relying upon decisions Rameshwar Dayal v. Presiding Officer Labour Court No.VI, Delhi & Anr., 2007 (3) LLJ72...
Pramod Gupta vs.new Delhi Municipal Corporation (Ndmc) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
$~26 to 35 & 45 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:25. h April, 2017 W.P.(C) No.11592/2016 + SHEETLA PRASAD GUPTA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv. with versus Ms.Monika Singh, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (NDMC) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra & Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC along with Mr.Narayan Kumar, ALO, NDMC, in person. Mr.Ashish Mohan, Adv. with Mr.Mohit Kumar, Adv. for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. Mr.O.P.Agarwal, Adv. with Mr.Deepak Agarwal, Adv. for applicants. W.P.(C) No.12016/2016 SURAJ DEV PASWAN ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv. with versus Ms.Monika Singh, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (NDMC) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra & WP(C) No.11592/2016 & others Page 1 of 12 Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC along with Mr.Narayan Kumar, ALO, NDMC, in person. Ms.Jyoti Tan...
Union of India & Ors. Vs.haryana Power Generation Corporation Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:25. 04.2017 O.M.P. (COMM) 505/2016 + UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus ........ Petitioners HARYANA POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners For the Respondent : Mr Jagjit Singh and Mr Ashok Singh, Advocates with Mr Anil Gill and Mr Kunal Hardawan Lal, from the Railways. : Mr R. P. Bhatt, Senior Advocate with Mr R. C. Chugh. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners (hereafter referred to as the Railways) have filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning an arbitral award dated 27.07.2016 (hereafter the impugned award) made and published by the sole arbitrator, Sh. M.C. Srivastava, Member Traffic (Retired), Railway Board.2. The respondent (hereafter HPGCL) is a Government Company engaged in the generation of electricity. HPGCL owns a coal based...
Sunil Yadav vs. All India Institute of Medical Science
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
$~77 & 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgement delivered on:24. h April, 2017 + W.P.(C) 3492/2017, CM No.15288/2017 SUNIL YADAV ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Sudhir Makkar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Harish Shukla, Adv. versus ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Brajesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1 + W.P.(C) 11952/2016 & CM Nos.47093/2016, 4980/2017 DIN BANDHU DASS Through : Mr.A.K.Mata, ........ Petitioner Sr. Adv. with Mr.J.Sarma, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Waize Ali Noor, Adv. for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(Oral) Both petitioners are aggrieved by the action of the respondent All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) in processing their bids for tea/coffee vending kiosks at two centres trauma centre and emergency ward. WP(C) Nos. 3492/2017 & 11952/2016 Page 1 of 5 Both petitioners contend that their bids were compliant and they ...
Federation of All India Icmr Employees vs.indian Council of Medical Re ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
$~10 + 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10023/2005 & W.P.(C) 10045/2005 1. FEDERATION OF ALL INDIA ICMR EMPLOYEES ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. M.C. Dhingra with Mr. Piyush Kant Roy, Advocates versus INDIAN COUNCIL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH & ORS. Through : Mr. Vaibhav Kalra, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % This order is in continuation of the order dated 15.2.2017, whereby ORDER2404.2017 the respondents were directed to file an additional affidavit in view of the plea taken by the counsel for the respondents that the exercise in the present petitions is only academic in nature for the reason that the members of the petitioner/Association are already getting a basic pay of Rs.50,000/-, which is higher than the pay scale of Rs.5500-9000/-, as on 2.9.2005. Apart from the affidavit that the respondents were directed to file, the petitioner/Association was also directed to file a list of me...
Pushpa Devi vs.rajesh Bhatia and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + W.P.(C) 3460/2017 and CM APPL.15141/2017 (stay) Decided on:24. 04.2017 PUSHPA DEVI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Sachin Kumar Jain, Adv. versus RAJESH BHATIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA (ORAL) CM APPL. 15142/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 3460/2017 and CM APPL.15141/2017 (stay) 1. Vide this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 27.03.2013 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), whereby her contempt petition (CP No.548/2016) was dismissed.2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner had applied in response to the advertisement No.02/2012 for the Post of TGT (Code No.109/2012) and she was issued the E-Admit card No.45000830. Later on, she also applied for the said Post published in advertisement no.- P...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »