Delhi Court April 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anil Singh vs.new Delhi Municipal Corporation (Ndmc) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
$~26 to 35 & 45 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:25. h April, 2017 W.P.(C) No.11592/2016 + SHEETLA PRASAD GUPTA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv. with versus Ms.Monika Singh, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (NDMC) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra & Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC along with Mr.Narayan Kumar, ALO, NDMC, in person. Mr.Ashish Mohan, Adv. with Mr.Mohit Kumar, Adv. for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. Mr.O.P.Agarwal, Adv. with Mr.Deepak Agarwal, Adv. for applicants. W.P.(C) No.12016/2016 SURAJ DEV PASWAN ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv. with versus Ms.Monika Singh, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (NDMC) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra & WP(C) No.11592/2016 & others Page 1 of 12 Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC along with Mr.Narayan Kumar, ALO, NDMC, in person. Ms.Jyoti Tan...
Sandeep Sharma vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : April 25, 2017 CRL.REV.P. 821/2016 SANDEEP SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Mr.Sumit Bansal, Ms.Richa Oberoi & Mr.Harsh Kumar, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.JUDGMENT1 By this revision petition filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr. P.C. the petitioner seeks for setting aside the order dated 03.10.2016 passed by the learned Additional Session Judge, (Special Fast Track Court), East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, in S.C. No.392/2016 (S.C. No.95/2015) whereby the petitioner has been the under Sections 376/376(2)(n)/377 of IPC. punishable offences charged for In nutshell, the facts of the case as mentioned in the impugned 2. order on charge are that the prosecutrix came in contact with the appellant Sandeep Sharma in January 2003, thro...
Deepansh Kalra vs.registrar Co-Operative Societies
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~1 * + W.P.(C) 2327/2017 & CM No.15132/2017 DEEPANSH KALRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Moni Cinmoy with Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocates. versus REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Varun Nischal with Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL ORDER2504.2017 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner claiming that he is % 1. the President of Bairwa Bharti CGHS Ltd. and praying inter alia for issuing directions to the Respondent/RCS amongst others, for restraining the Administrator from interfering in the affairs of the society.2. Accompanying the petition, is an application filed by the Respondent (CM No.15132/2017) praying inter alia that as an interim measure, operation of the Agenda notices dated 31.03.2017 and 04.04.2017 issued by the Administrator, appointed by the Respondent/Registrar Co-Operative Societies and the election process set in...
Ajay Pal & Ors vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.69/2000 Date of Decision : April 25th, 2017 AJAY PAL & ORS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Aditya Vikram, Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Mr. Harjeet Singh Sachdeva, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sundershan Joon, Additional Public Prosecutor the State with Sub-Inspector Ramesh, Police Station Sultanpuri, Delhi. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT P.S.TEJI, J1 Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 12.01.2000 convicting the appellants, namely, Ajay Pal, Yashoda and Deepa finding them guilty under Sections 498-A/304B IPC and order on sentence dated 14.01.2000 vide which the appellants were sentenced to undergo seven years rigorous imprisonment for the offence under Section 304B IPC and also to undergo three years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.1,500/- each for the offence under Section 498A IPC, in default of payment of fine they were Crl.A. No.69/2000 Page 1 of 12 ordered to further undergo simple...
Balbir Singh & Ors. Vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
$~16 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3293/2016 & CRL.M.A.No.140DECIDED ON :25. h APRIL, 2017 BALBIR SINGH & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr.Manish Vats, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP with SI Krishan Gopal, PS Jaffar Pur Kalan. S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioners to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 09.06.2016 whereby costs `30,000/- were imposed at the time of examination of PW-23 (Mr.S.S.Parihar). Status report is on record.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. It is a matter of record that in case FIR No.190/2007 registered under Sections 147/148/149/186/188/323/332/3IPC at PS Jaffar Pur Kalan. PW-23 (Mr.S.S.Parihar) appeared as a witness on 09.06.2016. At the time of his cross-examination, repeat...
Yogesh Srivastava vs.new Delhi Municipal Corporation (Ndmc) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
$~26 to 35 & 45 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:25. h April, 2017 W.P.(C) No.11592/2016 + SHEETLA PRASAD GUPTA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv. with versus Ms.Monika Singh, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (NDMC) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra & Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC along with Mr.Narayan Kumar, ALO, NDMC, in person. Mr.Ashish Mohan, Adv. with Mr.Mohit Kumar, Adv. for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. Mr.O.P.Agarwal, Adv. with Mr.Deepak Agarwal, Adv. for applicants. W.P.(C) No.12016/2016 SURAJ DEV PASWAN ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv. with versus Ms.Monika Singh, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (NDMC) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra & WP(C) No.11592/2016 & others Page 1 of 12 Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC along with Mr.Narayan Kumar, ALO, NDMC, in person. Ms.Jyoti Tan...
Major Shailesh Tiwary vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
$~46. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.3562/2017 Date of decision:25. h April, 2017 MAJOR SHAILESH TIWARY ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Barkha Babbar & Ms. Dipanjali Tyagi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): As there is urgency in the matter, the respondents, who appear on advance notice, have waived right to reply and argued the matter.2. Learned counsel for the respondents had initially objected to maintainability of the writ petition, but gave up the challenge when it was pointed out that the respondents have been filing writ petitions, in similar situations.3. The petitioner, a member of the Indian Army, had applied in August, 2016 for selection to M. Tech in Computer Science. The selection is governed by Policy No.A/63062/Policy/GS/MT-10 dated 11th December, 2003. As per paragra...
Rajinder @ Surinder & Ors. Vs.bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI25h April, 2017 FAO No.205/2016 + % RAJINDER @ SURINDER & ORS. BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. versus ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Aruna Mehta, Advocate. Through: Ms. Sunanda Nimisha, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal is filed under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 (in short the Act) by the appellants/claimants against the order of the Employees Compensation Commissioner dated 14.1.2016. Appellants/claimants are aggrieved by the impugned order dated 14.1.2016 on the ground that by the impugned order payment of interest has only been ordered from 21.7.2002 till 16.3.2005 i.e the date of deposit of compensation, instead of interest being granted till the actual date of payment and as is required by Section 4A of the Act. FAO No.205/2016 Page 1 of 4 2. In my opinion in fact, the entire impugned order dated...
The State ( Nct of Delhi) vs.neeraj @ Guddu & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + DECIDED ON : APRIL25 2017 CRL.L.P. 330/2016 THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner Through : Ms.Anita Abraham, APP. versus NEERAJ @ GUDDU & ORS Through : None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A.No.9632/2015 (delay) 1. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay in filing the criminal leave petition is condoned.2. The application stands disposed of . CRL.L.P. 330/2016 1. By the present criminal leave petition filed under section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the State seeks leave to file appeal against the judgment dated 08.10.2015 of learned Metropolitan Magistrate (Mahila Court) North-West District, Rohini Courts, New Delhi in Case No.72/2/14 arising out of FIR No.337/03, PS Keshav Puram, whereby the respondents (accused before the trial court) were acquitted of the charges punishable under Sections 323/342/3of the Indian Penal Code. Crl.L.P.330/2016 Page 1 of...
Mahipal Singh Chauhan and Ors. Vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. h April, 2017 $~10 * % + W.P.(C) 5737/2012 & CM106552013 MAHIPAL SINGH CHAUHAN AND ORS. ......... Petitioners Through: Mr.Roshan Lal Saini, Ms.Manisha Rawat, Advocates versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ajjay Aroraa, Mr. Kapil Dutta, Ms.Diksha Lal, Advs. for EDMC. Mr. Rajeev M. Roy, Adv. for respondent no.5. Srivastava, Mr. Manish Mr.Aditya Gupta, Ms.Shagun Trisal, Adv. for respondent- 9/BYPL Mr. Abhishek Pundir, Adv. for DSIIDC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioners are the parents and brothers of late Jaipal Singh Chauhan who suffered electrocution while playing volleyball with his friends in Ramlila Park, Ghazipur on 04th September, 2011. The petitioners are seeking compensation for the death of late Jaipal Singh Chauhan.2. The police registered FIR No.253/2011 under Section 336/304A IPC, P.S. Ghazipur .Vide order dated 1st August, 2016, this Court ...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »