Delhi Court April 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raj Kumar Srivastava vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and Orsnew Delhi M ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
$~26 to 35 & 45 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:25. h April, 2017 W.P.(C) No.11592/2016 + SHEETLA PRASAD GUPTA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv. with versus Ms.Monika Singh, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (NDMC) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra & Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC along with Mr.Narayan Kumar, ALO, NDMC, in person. Mr.Ashish Mohan, Adv. with Mr.Mohit Kumar, Adv. for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. Mr.O.P.Agarwal, Adv. with Mr.Deepak Agarwal, Adv. for applicants. W.P.(C) No.12016/2016 SURAJ DEV PASWAN ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv. with versus Ms.Monika Singh, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (NDMC) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra & WP(C) No.11592/2016 & others Page 1 of 12 Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC along with Mr.Narayan Kumar, ALO, NDMC, in person. Ms.Jyoti Tan...
Ramesh Chand vs.new Delhi Municipal Corporation (Ndmc) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
$~26 to 35 & 45 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:25. h April, 2017 W.P.(C) No.11592/2016 + SHEETLA PRASAD GUPTA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv. with versus Ms.Monika Singh, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (NDMC) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra & Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC along with Mr.Narayan Kumar, ALO, NDMC, in person. Mr.Ashish Mohan, Adv. with Mr.Mohit Kumar, Adv. for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. Mr.O.P.Agarwal, Adv. with Mr.Deepak Agarwal, Adv. for applicants. W.P.(C) No.12016/2016 SURAJ DEV PASWAN ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv. with versus Ms.Monika Singh, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (NDMC) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra & WP(C) No.11592/2016 & others Page 1 of 12 Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC along with Mr.Narayan Kumar, ALO, NDMC, in person. Ms.Jyoti Tan...
Sbi General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.mahashir @ Mehar Singh & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO No.594/2016 + % SBI GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. 25th April, 2017 ..... Appellant Mr. Aman Shukla, Adv. Through: versus MAHASHIR @ MEHAR SINGH & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Pratima N. Chauhan, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA for R-1. To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM Nos. 46954/2016 (delay in re-filing) and 46956/2016 (delay) For the reasons stated in the applications delays in filing and re- filing the appeal are condoned. CMs stand disposed of. FAO No.594/2016 & CM No.46952/2016 (stay) 1. This first appeal under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 is filed by the appellant/insurance company impugning the judgment of the Employees Compensation Commissioner dated 4.7.2016, by which the Employees Compensation Commissioner has allowed the claim petition filed by the respondent FAO No.594/2016 Page 1 of 7 no.1/claimant and awarded compensation of Rs. 9,88,560/- along wit...
Arn Infrastructure India Ltd. Vs.assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
$~ 20 & 21 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) 2768/2016 & CM APPL. 11636/2016 W.P. (C) 2769/2016 & CM APPL. 11637/2016 ARN INFRASTRUCTURE INDIA LTD. ...... Petitioner Through: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anshumaan Sahni, Advocates. Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, NEW DELHI Respondent Through: Mr Rahul Chaudhary, Senior Standing Counsel and Ms Lakshmi Gurung, Junior Standing Counsel ... CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER2504.2017 1. ARN Infrastructures India Ltd. has filed these two writ petitions against the Income Tax Department (the Department) assailing the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) by the Respondent, Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central Circle-28, by issuing the impugned notice dated 23rd July, 2014 and proceeding thereafter to pass an order dated 18th March, 2016 proposing to frame an assessment for ...
Sheetla Prasad Gupta & Ors vs.new Delhi Municipal Corporation (Ndmc) & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
$~26 to 35 & 45 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:25. h April, 2017 W.P.(C) No.11592/2016 + SHEETLA PRASAD GUPTA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv. with versus Ms.Monika Singh, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (NDMC) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra & Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC along with Mr.Narayan Kumar, ALO, NDMC, in person. Mr.Ashish Mohan, Adv. with Mr.Mohit Kumar, Adv. for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. Mr.O.P.Agarwal, Adv. with Mr.Deepak Agarwal, Adv. for applicants. W.P.(C) No.12016/2016 SURAJ DEV PASWAN ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv. with versus Ms.Monika Singh, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (NDMC) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra & WP(C) No.11592/2016 & others Page 1 of 12 Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC along with Mr.Narayan Kumar, ALO, NDMC, in person. Ms.Jyoti Tan...
Mohd. Ahsan vs.new Delhi Municipal Corporation (Ndmc) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
$~26 to 35 & 45 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:25. h April, 2017 W.P.(C) No.11592/2016 + SHEETLA PRASAD GUPTA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv. with versus Ms.Monika Singh, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (NDMC) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra & Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC along with Mr.Narayan Kumar, ALO, NDMC, in person. Mr.Ashish Mohan, Adv. with Mr.Mohit Kumar, Adv. for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. Mr.O.P.Agarwal, Adv. with Mr.Deepak Agarwal, Adv. for applicants. W.P.(C) No.12016/2016 SURAJ DEV PASWAN ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv. with versus Ms.Monika Singh, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (NDMC) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra & WP(C) No.11592/2016 & others Page 1 of 12 Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC along with Mr.Narayan Kumar, ALO, NDMC, in person. Ms.Jyoti Tan...
Union of India & Ors vs.v.k. Sharma & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + W.P.(C) 109/2016 & C.M. No.488/2016 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Decided on:25. 04.2017 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC for UOI. versus V.K. SHARMA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Nisha Priya Bhatia, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA (ORAL) 1. The petitioners have challenged the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal dated 18.09.2015 passed in the O.A. No.1622/2014 filed by the respondents. Vide this order the Tribunal quashed the communication No.1/2/2009-Pers.6-6028 dated 18.04.2012 and directed the petitioners to implement their orders dated 22.10.2009 and 10.11.2009 and 12.02.2010.2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondents belong to Central Secretariat Stenographers Service (CSSS) and they joined the Cabinet Secretariat (SW) in 1970s (also known as Research and Analysis Wing (R&AW). They joined as Personal Assistan...
Apeejay School & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: April 19, 2017 Judgment delivered on: April 25, 2017 + W.P.(C) 9390/2015, CM No.21896/2015 APEEJAY SCHOOL & ANR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. H.L. Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Yashmeet Kaur & Mr. Amit Dogra, Advs. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Vinod Kumar Bhati, Adv. for Mr.Devesh Singh, ASC for R1 Mr. C.S. Parasher, Adv. with Mr.Mohit Kumar, Mr.S.K.Badal, Adv. for R2 Ms.Sumeeta Bahl, DEO Zone 23 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The challenge in this writ petition is to the order passed by the Delhi School Tribunal in Appeal No.43 of 2012 filed by the respondent No.2 on the ground that he was not allowed to enter the premises of the petitioner No.1 School on June 23, 2012 and was informed that his services have been dispensed with. The Tribunal vide the impugned order has held that the respondent No.2 was a regular employee of the petitioner No.1 ...
Sushil Kumar Jolly vs.chola Mandlam Investment and Finance Company Ltd ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
$~29. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3510/2017 and CM APPL. 15314-15315/2017 1. SUSHIL KUMAR JOLLY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Nikhil Malhotra, Advocate with Mr. Vinod Malhotra, Advocate versus CHOLA MANDLAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD AND ORS Through: Ms. Shweta Kapoor, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 18.04.2017 passed by ORDER2504.2017 the learned DRAT in Misc. Appeal No.125/2017, whereunder he has challenged the order dated 31.03.2017, passed by the DRT-I, Delhi, dismissing his application praying inter alia for restraining the respondent No.1 from dispossessing him from the first floor of premises No.F-1082, Chitranjan Park, New Delhi.2. Vide order dated 14.03.2017 passed by the DRAT, it was directed that the petitioner would not be dispossessed from the subject premises, subject to his making a deposit of Rs.3 crores. Aggr...
Vishal and Company vs. Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
$~07 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement delivered on:25. h April, 2017 + W.P.(C) No.5296/2016 & CM No.22140/2016 VISHAL AND COMPANY ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.D.K.Rustagi, Ms.Medha Arya, & Mr.Apoorv Rastogi, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR Through : Mr.Amit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner seeks a direction that it should be given the supply order in terms of the tender conditions in its favour.2. The brief facts are that the Central Government issued notice calling for tenders from eligible bidders for supply of 16,300 blazers. The tender notice spelt out the specifications in respect of the fabric and other dimensions. It is not disputed that the petitioner participated in the process; its bid was technically and otherwise evaluated. Although the petitioner had bid for a higher amount, but during negotiations, it agreed...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »