Delhi Court April 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Suraj Dev Paswan vs.new Delhi Municipal Corporation (Ndmc) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
$~26 to 35 & 45 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:25. h April, 2017 W.P.(C) No.11592/2016 + SHEETLA PRASAD GUPTA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv. with versus Ms.Monika Singh, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (NDMC) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra & Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC along with Mr.Narayan Kumar, ALO, NDMC, in person. Mr.Ashish Mohan, Adv. with Mr.Mohit Kumar, Adv. for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. Mr.O.P.Agarwal, Adv. with Mr.Deepak Agarwal, Adv. for applicants. W.P.(C) No.12016/2016 SURAJ DEV PASWAN ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv. with versus Ms.Monika Singh, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (NDMC) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra & WP(C) No.11592/2016 & others Page 1 of 12 Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC along with Mr.Narayan Kumar, ALO, NDMC, in person. Ms.Jyoti Tan...
Virender and Ors vs.new Delhi Municipal Corporation (Ndmc) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
$~26 to 35 & 45 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:25. h April, 2017 W.P.(C) No.11592/2016 + SHEETLA PRASAD GUPTA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv. with versus Ms.Monika Singh, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (NDMC) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra & Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC along with Mr.Narayan Kumar, ALO, NDMC, in person. Mr.Ashish Mohan, Adv. with Mr.Mohit Kumar, Adv. for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. Mr.O.P.Agarwal, Adv. with Mr.Deepak Agarwal, Adv. for applicants. W.P.(C) No.12016/2016 SURAJ DEV PASWAN ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv. with versus Ms.Monika Singh, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (NDMC) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra & WP(C) No.11592/2016 & others Page 1 of 12 Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC along with Mr.Narayan Kumar, ALO, NDMC, in person. Ms.Jyoti Tan...
Nijamuddin Mansoori vs.girish Chand Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % NIJAMUDDIN MANSOORI RSA No.17/2017 25th April, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.P.Chakraborty, Advocate. versus GIRISH CHAND GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ansar Ahmad, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.1883/2017 (for condonation of delay) For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 71 days in filing the appeal is condoned. CM stands disposed of. RSA No.17/2017 and CM No.1881/2017 (Stay) 1. This regular second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the appellant/defendant impugning the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the Trial Court dated 14.10.2014 and of the First Appellate Court dated 29.7.2016; by which the courts below have dismissed the leave to RSA No.17/2017 Page 1 of 5 defend application filed by the appellant/defendant and decreed the suit for a sum of Rs. 1,30,000/- along ...
Janak Raj Choudhary vs.rajender Prakash Choudhary & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
% + *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h April,2017 CS(OS) No.1361/2008 JANAK RAJ CHOUDHARY .... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Swastik Singh and Mr. Himanshu Dagar, Advs. Versus RAJENDER PRAKASH CHOUDHARY & ORS. .....Defendants Through: None. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff, a minor acting through his mother, instituted this suit pleading (i) that the defendant no.1 father of the plaintiff has abandoned the plaintiff, the plaintiffs mother and the plaintiffs sister, and is in illegitimate relationship with defendant no.7 Nitasha; (ii) that the defendant no.2 Prashant Choudhary is the brother of the plaintiff; (iii) Daya Ram Chaudhary, late paternal grandfather of the plaintiff and the father of the defendants no.1, owned various moveable and immoveable properties mostly consisting of land and farmhouses in Delhi, Rajasthan and Haryana; (iv) Daya Ram Chaudhary, paternal grandfather of the plaintiff, besides the defendant no.1 had three ot...
Prem Devi vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.675/2001 Date of Decision : April 25th, 2017 PREM DEVI Through: Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sundershan Joon, Additional Public Prosecutor the State with Sub-Inspector Ramesh, Police Station Sultanpuri, Delhi. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J JUDGMENT1 Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 27.02.2001 convicting the appellant-Prem Devi finding her guilty under Sections 304 Part-I IPC and order on sentence dated 28.02.2001 vide which the appellant was sentenced to undergo eight years rigorous imprisonment for the offence under Section 304 Part-I IPC with fine of Rs.1000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for one month, the present appeal has been preferred.2. The factual matrix emerging from the record is that the Crl.A. No.675/2001 Page 1 of 8 appellants husband was a habitual drinker and the same was the main reas...
Ridhm Rana & Anr vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1474/2017 + RIDHM RANA & ANR Date of Hearing & Order: April 25th , 2017 ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Vinay Kumar, Adv. versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP with ASI V.P. Chauhan, PS Greater Kailash-I. Respondent no.2 in person with Mr.Aditya Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Ridhm Rana, and Sh. Mayank Malhotra for quashing of FIR No.10/2016, under Sections 354/5IPC registered at Police Station Greater Kailash-1, Delhi on the basis of compromise deed arrived at between the petitioners and Respondent No.2, namely, Smt. Priyanka Sharma. respondent-State 2. submitted that the respondent No.2 present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant in the FIR in question. Learned Additional Standing Counsel for Crl. M.C14742017 Page1 of 7 3. The factual matri...
Manohar Lal and Ors vs.new Delhi Municipal Corporation (Ndmc) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
$~26 to 35 & 45 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:25. h April, 2017 W.P.(C) No.11592/2016 + SHEETLA PRASAD GUPTA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv. with versus Ms.Monika Singh, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (NDMC) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra & Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC along with Mr.Narayan Kumar, ALO, NDMC, in person. Mr.Ashish Mohan, Adv. with Mr.Mohit Kumar, Adv. for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. Mr.O.P.Agarwal, Adv. with Mr.Deepak Agarwal, Adv. for applicants. W.P.(C) No.12016/2016 SURAJ DEV PASWAN ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv. with versus Ms.Monika Singh, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (NDMC) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra & WP(C) No.11592/2016 & others Page 1 of 12 Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC along with Mr.Narayan Kumar, ALO, NDMC, in person. Ms.Jyoti Tan...
Info Edge (India) Ltd. & Anr vs.sumanta Bhattacharya & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:-25th April, 2017. CS(OS) No.2169/2003 & IA No.850/2013 (u/S124of Trade Marks Act). INFO EDGE (INDIA) LTD. & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mrs. Pratibha M. Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sudeep Chatterjee, Ms. Nupur Lamba and Ms. Drishti Chatterjee, Advs. Versus SUMANTA BHATTACHARYA & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Niloy Dasgupta, Adv. for D-1 with D-1 in person. Ms. Divya Krishnan, Adv. for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The two plaintiffs Info Edge (India) Ltd. and Sanjeev Bikhchandani, claiming to be proprietor / owner and lawful user since March, 1997 of the mark / name NAUKRI and the domain name NAUKRI.COM, and carrying on business as a career website / jobsite under the domain name NAUKRI.COM, instituted this suit to restrain the defendant Sumanta Bhattacharya from using the mark NAUKRIE.COM or any other domain name which is identical or deceptively similar to the plaintiffs domain name NAUKRI.COM an...
Jagdish Singhal & Anr. Vs.ram Bhaj Bansal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Ex.FA No.4/2017 and C.M. No.9055/2017 (stay) + % JAGDISH SINGHAL & ANR. 25th April, 2017 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. P.K. Rawal, Advocate. Versus RAM BHAJ BANSAL & ORS. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Execution First Appeal impugns the judgment of the executing court dismissing the objections of the present appellants. The impugned judgment dated 21.1.2017 deals with objections of various persons, and the objections of the present appellants namely Sh. Jagdish Singhal and Sh. Manoj Singhal are referred to in para 11 onwards of the impugned judgment. The objections on merits have been dealt with in para 28 onwards of the impugned judgment.2. The facts of the case are that with respect to the suit property being H.No.2074, Old Anaj Mandi, Narela, Delhi, the subject suit for partition was filed by the respondent no.1/plaintiff/Sh. Ra...
M/S Multitex Filtration Engineers Ltd vs. M/S Fernas Construction Comp ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
$~5 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement delivered on:25. h April, 2017 FAO(OS) (COMM) 61/2017 M/S MULTITEX FILTRATION ENGINEERS LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr.Arun Kumar Varma, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Abhay Raj Varma, Mr.Ashish Joshi, Ms.Priyanka Ghosh, Mr.Himanshu and Mr.Nikhil Arya, Advs. versus M/S FERNAS CONSTRUCTION COMPNAY INC & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr.Krishna Chandra Dubey, Adv. with Mr.Bharat Saini, Adv. for R-1 Mr.Sandeep Mr.Ashish Mukhi, Advs. for R-3 Mahapatra and CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(Oral) The appellants (Multitex Filtration Engineers Ltd.) grievance is that despite an interim order restraining the encashment of the bank guarantee (which was reduced in value to US Dollar 145,000.00), the third respondent - Turkiye Garanti Bankasi, Turkey, which had issued a counter guarantee, claimed to have paid out the amount of USD290000.00. This statement became the basis of the impugned or...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »