Delhi Court April 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
Land & Building Department vs.sh.dinesh Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2017
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA3022017 Date of Decision:28. 04.2017 LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Bijara Mahapatra, Advocate versus SH.DINESH KUMAR & ORS. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA ANU MALHOTRA, J CM No.15523/2017 (for exemption) JUDGMENT (ORAL) Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. CM No.15522/2017 (condonation of delay) Having heard learned counsel for the appellant, we are satisfied that the appellant has adequately explained the delay of 184 days which has occasioned in filing the appeal within the statutory period of limitation. The delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application is allowed. LPA3022017 1. The appellant assails the order dated 9th September, 2016 by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) 5486/2015 wherein the learned Single LPA3022017 Page 1 of 4 Judge was pleased to accept the explanation given by the respondents for the delay in se...
Columbia Sportswear Company vs.harish Footwear & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2017
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :25. 4.2017 Judgment delivered on :28. 4.2017 + CS(COMM) 1611/2016 COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR COMPANY ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Neeraj Grover, Mr. Himanshu Deora and Mr. Ashwani Pareek, Advs. versus HARISH FOOTWEAR & ANR ..... Defendants Through Mr.S.K.Bansal and Mr.Ajay Amitabh Suman, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.I.A. No.16583/2014 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of the Code) & I.A. No.23361/2014 (under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the Code) 1 The plaintiff is the Columbia Sportswear Company registered under the laws of United States of America. In the year 1938, it had conceived and adopted the mark COLUMBIA as its trade name and trade mark. It CS(COMM) No.1611/2016 Page 1 of 17 continues to be a global leader in the design, sourcing, marketing and distribution of active outdoor apparel and footwear. It has developed an international reputation for its quality, performance and value. Its ...
State vs.rakesh Dhawan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2017
$~30 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h April, 2017 CRL.M.C. 4064/2016 STATE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP for the State with SI Kamal Singh, PS Amar Colony. versus RAKESH DHAWAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Saket Sikri, Advocate with Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petition at hand invokes the inherent power of this court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) to challenge the order dated 11.03.2016 of the court of Additional Sessions Judge-04, (South-East), in criminal revision no.161/2015 whereby the petition under Section 397 Cr.P.C., also of the petitioner/State, challenging the order dated 25.02.2015 of the court of Metropolitan Magistrate-08 (South-East) on the file of criminal case arising out of First Information Report (FIR) No.04/2014 under Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) of Police Station Amar Colony was dismissed. Crl. M.C....
Mohsin @ Vicky vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:28. h April, 2017 Crl. A. No.167/2016 $~26 * % + MOHSIN @ VICKY Through: Mr.R.S.Juneja, Adv. with Mr.Shiv ..... Appellant Kumar, Adv. STATE NCT OF DELHI Versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is an appeal under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed against the impugned judgment dated 22.12.2015 and order on sentence dated 08.01.2016 passed by the learned Trial Court in FIR No.448/2009, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as IPC), by which the appellant has been convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month. Crl. A. No.167/2016 Page 1 of 34 2. The case of the p...
Ranjeet vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RANJEET Reserved on:11. h April, 2017 Decided on:28. h April, 2017 CRL.A. 513/2015 Represented by: Ms. Shivani Luthra Lohiya and Mr. Prateek Yadav, Advocate. ..... Appellant Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok K. Garg, APP for CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA the State.1. Ranjeet challenges the impugned judgment dated 13th February, 2015 convicting him for offences punishable under Sections 451 IPC and 376 IPC and the order on sentence dated 23rd February, 2015 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of `10,000/- for offence punishable under Section 451 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of `10,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 376 IPC.2. Assailing the conviction, learned counsel for the appellant submits that there are material improvements and glaring contradictions in the testimony of the...
Ravinder and Ors vs.govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2017
$~60 & 67 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 3613/2017 Judgment delivered on:28. 04.2017 RAVINDER AND ORS GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI versus + W.P.(C) 3653/2017 PANNA LAL SHAHU AND ORS GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI versus ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr M.Hasibuddin, Advocate. Mr Parvinder Chauhan and Mr Nitin Jain, Advocates for DUSIB. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2804.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.15863/2017 (exemption) in W.P.(C) No.3613/2017 CM No.16084/2017(exemption) in W.P.(C) No.3653/2017 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) No 3613 & 3653/2017 Page 1 of 4 W.P.(C) 3613/2017 & W.P.(C) 3653/2017 1. The petitioners, by the present petition, seek a direction to the respondent to re-consider the case of the petitioners based on the fresh documents that they have been able to trace out and filed with the resp...
Makhan Singh vs.kaushal K Rana
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h April, 2017 CRL.M.C. 4267/2016 and Crl. M.A. No.17790/2016 (Stay) MAKHAN SINGH ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. A.K. Singh, Advocate. versus KAUSHAL K RANA ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal and Mr. Neeraj K. Jha, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner is facing trial in a complaint filed by the respondent being complaint case No.2001/2004 titled as Kushal Kumar Rana vs. Makhan Singh under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short NI Act). The petitioner is also facing trial in FIR No.195/2013 registered at PS Economic Offence Wing also on the complaint of respondent herein.2. During the pendency of the above noted trial under Section 138 NI Act, the petitioner was produced as an accused from judicial custody as he was in custody in FIR No.195/2013 from 15th February, 2014 to 22nd September, 2016.3. Pursuant to service of su...
Anil @ Hunny vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:28. h April, 2017 $~23 * % + ANIL @ HUNNY Crl. A. No.423/2016 ..... Appellant Through Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate STATE OF NCT OF DELHI versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.Rajat Katyal, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 05.02.2016 and the order on sentence dated 08.02.2016 passed by the learned Trial Court in FIR No.145/2011, Sessions Case No.78/15(Old No.89/2011), by which the appellant stands convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.20,000/- and further sentenced to simple imprisonment for a period of six months in case of default of payment of fine.2. The case of the prosecution is that a DD no.42A dated 14.06.2011 was received, upon which SI Jai Parkash along with Constable Mahesh went to Bhagwan Mahavir Hospital, Pitampura, Delhi and collect...
Govt of Nct of Delhi Thr dy.secretary (Land & Building Department) vs. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2017
$~29 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA3082017 Date of Decision:28. 04.2017 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI THR DY.SECRETARY (LAND & ..... Appellant BUILDING DEPARTMENT) Through: Mr. Biraja Mahapatra, Advocate DEEPAK versus Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA ANU MALHOTRA, J CM No.15896/2017 (for exemption) JUDGMENT (ORAL) Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. CM No.15895/2017 (condonation of delay) Having heard learned counsel for the appellant, we are satisfied that the appellant has adequately explained the delay of 217 days which has occasioned in filing the appeal within the statutory period of limitation. The delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application is allowed. LPA3082017 1. The appellant assails the order dated 9th August, 2016 by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) 5345/2016 wherein the learned Single LPA3082017 Page 1 of 4 Judge was pleased to accept the explanation given by the respondent f...
Delhi Transport Corporation vs.m/s. Vidya Mandir Classes Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Ex. S.A. No.6/2016 + % DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through:28. h April, 2017 ..... Appellant Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Advocate with Mr. Ataur Rehman, Advocate. M/S. VIDYA MANDIR CLASSES LTD. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The appellant before this Court in this Execution Second Appeal was the plaintiff in the suit. The appellant/plaintiff/decree holder challenges the impugned judgment dated 22.1.2016 of the first appellate court below deciding the appeal filed by the present respondent, the objector before the executing court. The first appeal in the court below was filed by the present respondent against the order of the executing court dated 6.11.2013 dismissing the objections. The scope of the hearing before the first appellate court was thus necessarily confined to whether or not objections filed in the e...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »