Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Amit Kumar & Ors vs.charu Makin
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h March, 2017 CRL.M.C. 1755/2016 and Crl. M.A. No.7418/2016 AMIT KUMAR & ORS ........ Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Prashant Mendiratta and Mr. Anirudh K. Mudgal, Advocates. versus CHARU MAKIN ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Shradha Karol, Amicus Curiae with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. The respondent filed a complaint case being CC No.217/4/2014 under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (in short PWDV Act) before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate inter alia seeking restraint against the petitioner from approaching or visiting the house of the respondent or her workplace and restraining him from committing any act of domestic violence. Prohibition was also sought against the petitioner from having any access to the minor child or coming to school of the child or to any other place where the minor child went for her extracurric...
Manu Ramchandani vs.m/s Three N Constructions Pvt Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2017
$~A-5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. 03.2017 CM(M) 305/2017 MANU RAMCHANDANI ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Gaurav Dubey and Mr.Shashwat V.Dubey, Advocates versus M/S THREE N CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD & ORS.... Respondent Through Mr.Ashish Mohan and Mr.Mohit Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH * % + JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) CM No.10450/2017 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM(M) 305/2017 & CM No.10449/2017 1. By the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks to impugn the order dated 28.01.2017 by which the trial court disposed of three applications filed by the respondent/plaintiff under Section151 CPC, under Section 152 and 153 CPC and under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC.2. The background facts are that the respondents filed a suit for recovery of possession, recovery of money, mesne profit, damages, use and occupation charges against the petitioner...
Monsanto Technology Llc and Ors. Vs.nuziveedu Seeds Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2017
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on:15. th February, 2017 Pronounced on:28th March, 2017 CS (COMM) 132/2016 - IA No.2406/2016 (O.39 R. 1 & 2 CPC), IA No.9070/2016 (O.39 R. 2A CPC), IA No.4277/2016 (O. 39 R. 4 CPC) MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC AND ORS. ..... PLAINTIFFS Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Ms. Prathiba M. Singh, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Chander M. Lall, Ms. Bitika Sharma, Ms. Namrita Kochhar, Ms. Deepshikha Malhotra, Mr. Aadarsh Ramanujan and Mr. Anil Dutt, Advocates. Versus NUZIVEEDU SEEDS LIMITED & ORS. ...DEFENDANTS Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra Agarwala and Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Abhai Pandey, Ms. Manisha Singh, Ms. Swati Setia, Mr. Obhan, Mr. Abhishek Saket & Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocates for D-1 to D-3. Mr. Abhishek Saket and Ms. Vijaya Singh, Advocates for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER1 The commercial cause, registered as CS(Comm) No.132/2016, in the course of which prayer for ad interim injunction CS (Comm) 132/2016 Page 1 of 96 un...
Ansar Ahmed Jafri vs.directorate of Education & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.508/2017 & CM No.2322/2017 + % ANSAR AHMED JAFRI Through:28. h March, 2017 ........ Petitioner Mr. Javed Ahmad and Mr. Anis Ahmad, Advocates. DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Varun Nischal, Adv. for R- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA12 and 5. To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner, who is a teacher in the respondent no.4/Fatehpuri Muslim Sr. Secondary School, seeks three reliefs. The first relief is for constitution of a DPC for appointment of the petitioner to the post of Principal. The second relief claimed is for consideration of the petitioner to be appointed on the post of Principal w.e.f 19.8.2016 and the third relief claimed for is for quashing of the Resolution dated 3.9.2016 appointing one Mr. Faiyaz Mir Khan as the Head of the School (HOS) up to 20.7.2017. W.P.(C) N...
Sunita Khatolia vs.delhi Sc/St/Obc/Minorities & Handicapped Financial ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % SUNITA KHATOLIA W.P.(C) No.2060/2004 28th March, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. K.C. Mittal and Ms.Ruchika versus Mittal, Advocates. DELHI SC/ST/OBC/MINORITIES & HANDICAPPED FINANCIAL & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat and Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advocate for R-1. Mr. N.S. Arora, Advocate for R CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J C.M. Appl. No.7103/2016 (for restoration) 1. This is an application seeking restoration of the W.P. (C) No.2060/2004 which was dismissed for non-prosecution.2. For the reasons stated in the application and no opposition on behalf of the opposite counsel, the application is allowed and W.P. (C) No.2060/2004 is restored to its original number.3. C.M. stands disposed of. W.P.(C) No.2060/2004 Page 1 of 13 W.P.(C) No.2060/2004 4. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, peti...
Bal Kishan vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.864/2017 Reserved on :3. d February, 2017 Date of decision:28. h March, 2017 BAL KISHAN ........ Petitioner Through Mr. L.B. Rai & Mr. Mohit Kumar Sharma, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.: The petitioner-Bal Kishan impugns the order dated 9th December, 2015 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) dismissing OA No.1660/2014. The petitioner has also challenged the order dated 2nd December, 2016, which dismisses the Review Application No.136/2016 filed pursuant to liberty granted by this Court in Writ Petition (C) No.2065/2016.2. The petitioners primary challenge is to the penalty of reduction of pay by one stage in the time-scale of pay for a period of two years, with the stipulation that he would not earn increments d...
Syed Ali Furkhan vs.uoi Rep. Its Joint Secretary Ministry of Finance N ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2017
$~8 to 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:28. h March, 2017 + W.P.(CRL) 2129/2016 SHAIKH MOHAMMED RIZWAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradeep Jain, Advocate with Mr.Shubhankar Jha, Mr. Rahul Raheja, Mr.Ashish Bansal, Mr. Vikas Sarin and Ms. Mansi Awasthi, Advocates. versus UOI & ANR. Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with ........ RESPONDENTS Ms.Divya Kapur, Advocate for UOI. + W.P.(CRL) 2305/2016 ABDUL AZEEM SALAMTI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradeep Jain, Advocate with Mr.Shubhankar Jha, Mr. Rahul Raheja, Mr.Ashish Bansal, Mr. Vikas Sarin and Ms. Mansi Awasthi, Advocates. versus UOI REP. ITS JOINT SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE NEW DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr.Abhishek Ghai, Advocate for UOI. + W.P.(CRL) 2306/2016 SYED ALI FURKHAN ........ Petitioner W.P. (CRL) 2129/2016 & 6 Others Page 1 of 15 Through: Mr. Pradeep Jain, Advocate with Mr.Shubhankar Jha, Mr. Rahul Raheja, Mr.Ashish Bansal, Mr. Vikas S...
Shri Krishan Kumar Sehrawat vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2017
* + :1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Rev. Pet. No.214/2016 in LPA1692014 SHRI KRISHAN KUMAR SEHRAWAT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. N.S. Dalal with Ms.Ruchika Sharma with Mr.Aman Mudgal, Advs. Versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal and Mr.Sanjeev Sagar, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH ORDER2803.2017 MS. G. ROHINI, CHIEF JUSTICE The main appeal was dismissed by us by order dated 05.02.2016 holding as under:"10. On account of various reasons stated below, we see no merits in the present appeal. Firstly, the writ petition is completely silent about the locus of Sh.Umed Singh to make the application. The recorded owner of the acquired land was the grandfather of Sh.Umed Singh, i.e. Sh.Sita Ram. There are other legal heirs to the plot that was acquired. As to how, only Sh.Umed Singh is entitled to make the application for allotment is not explained or stated. H...
Divya Sharma vs.delhi Jal Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI28$~ * + W.P.(C) 2831/2017 & CM APPL. 12348/2017 DIVYA SHARMA Through: Mr. Sudeep Dey, Advocate with ........ Petitioner Ms. Rashmi, Advocate. versus DELHI JAL BOARD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit Pushkarna, Advocate. Date of Decision:28. h March, 2017 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondent- DJB to grant a new water connection to the petitioner in property bearing No.A-5/63-D, Fourth Floor, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi.2. It has been averred in the petition that since November, 2014, occupant of the ground floor of the aforesaid building is preventing the petitioner from using water from the connection provided by the respondent- DJB.3. It has been further averred that petitioner filed a civil suit being RCA No.5/2015 with regard to the aforesaid grievance, but the same was dismissed vide order dated 20th January, 2016 on the ground that property...
Sanjay Kumar Sharma vs.mir Akhtar Hussain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2017
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA3152017 & C.M. No.11138/2017 (stay) SANJAY KUMAR SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.K. Jha, Advocate with the appellant in person. versus MIR AKHTAR HUSSAIN ..... Respondent Through: Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER2803.2017 1. After negotiations, the parties have arrived at a settlement in the following terms:-"(a) The respondent has agreed to permit the appellant continue occupying the suit premises till 30.6.2017. (b) In view of the aforesaid concession given by the respondent, the appellant has agreed to pay the outstanding rent/use and occupation charges in respect of the suit premises @ Rs.18,000/- per month with effect from April, 2016. (c) The arrears of rent/use and occupation charges with effect from April, 2016 till March, 2017, shall be paid by the appellant to the respondent within two weeks. (d) With effect from April, 2017, the appellant shall continue paying to the respondent the us...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »