Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. Vs.official Liquidator of M/S Ga ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On :February 23, 2017 Judgment Delivered On : March 01,2017 CO.APP.16/2013 NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE OF INDIA LTD. .....Appellant Represented by: Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Sanjay Bhatt, Mr.Abhishek Anand, Mr.Mikhil Sharda and Mr.Akshay Bhandari, Advocates versus * % + OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF M/S GANGA YAMUNA FINVEST PVT.LTD. .....Respondent Represented by: Mr.Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for Official Liquidator CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The present appeal impugns the order dated January 23, 2013 passed by the learned Company Judge, allowing Co.App.(C) No.4/2011 filed by the Official Liquidator and dismissing Co.App.No.401/2012 filed by the appellant in C.P.No.42/2009, and directing the appellant to deposit the amount of `1.10 crores with interest, if any, with the official liquidator.2. The applications came to be filed before the learned Compa...
Dharambir Singh vs.director of Education and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % DHARAMBIR SINGH W.P.(C) No.2506/2004 1st March, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Dinesh Agnani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jitender Verma, Advocate. versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Siddhartha Shankar Ray, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Mayank Yadav, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J1 By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, a teacher in respondent No.2/Dhanpatmal Virmani Senior Secondary School, impugns the order of the respondent No.1/Director of Education (DOE) dated 5.2.2004 whereby the respondent No.1/ DOE has stopped with immediate effect grant-in- aid for payment of salary to the petitioner. Respondent No.2/school is an aided school, i.e 95% of the funds for the respondent No.2/school are provided by the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) through responden...
Union of India vs.satyam Caterers Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
$~26 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 101/2017 UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through Mr J.K. Singh, Standing Counsel Railways Mr Praveen Kumar, Advocate for UOI. versus SATYAM CATERERS LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr Jayant Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr Manish Bishnoi, Ms Reeja Varghese, Mr Ankit Nigam, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % VIBHU BAKHRU, J ORDER0103.2017 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. IA Nos. 2656/2017 1.2. IA Nos. 2654/2017 (delay 29 days) IA Nos. 2657/2017 (condonation of delay in re-filing) This is an application filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking 3. condonation of delay of 29 days in filing the present petition.4. The arbitral award (hereafter 'the impugned award') was made on 09.09.2016, however, the petitioner claims that the same was received on 12.09.2016. Admittedly, the impugned award was sent by hand. The arbitrator was one of the serving employees of the Railwa...
State vs.rahul
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
$~14 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % STATE RAHUL CRL.L.P. 8/2017 & Crl.M.A.No.275/2017 Date of decision :1. t March, 2017 Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for ........ Petitioner the State with SI Inderveer Singh from PS Karawal Nagar versus Through: None ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, J.Crl.M.A.275/2017 1. Heard.2. We are satisfied that the State was prevented by sufficient cause from bringing this leave petition within the statutory period of limitation. Delay in filing the leave petition is condoned. This application is allowed. Crl.L.P.8/2017 Page 1 of 9 CRL.L.P. 8/2017 3. The instant petition has been filed under Section 378(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code praying for leave to assail the judgment dated 11th May, 2016 whereby the trial court has acquitted the respondent for commission of the offence with which he was charged in the case being SC No.44864/2015 arising from FIR No.324...
M/S Pawan Hans Helicopters Ltd vs.m/s Maritime Energy Heli Air Service ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:01. 03.2017 O.M.P. (COMM) 281/2016 & IA No.6564/2016 + M/S PAWAN HANS HELICOPTERS LTD ........ Petitioner versus M/S MARITIME ENERGY HELI AIR SERVICES PVT LTD Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Puneet Taneja. : Mr Jayant K. Sud, Ms Priya Puri, Mr Umang Kumar Singh and Mr Swatantra Rai. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 M/s Pawan Hans Helicopters Limited (hereafter PHHL) has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) challenging the arbitral award dated 24.02.2016 (hereafter 'the impugned award') made by the sole arbitrator in connection with the disputes between PHHL and M/s Maritime Energy Heli Air Services Pvt. Ltd. (hereafter Maritime').2. The impugned award is rendered in the context of the disputes that had arisen between PHHL and Maritime in connection with...
M/S S S Food Industries vs.ashish Popli & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
$~41 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:01. 03.2017 CONT.CAS(C) 179/2017 M/S S S FOOD INDUSTRIES versus ASHISH POPLI & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Sanchar Anand with Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Ms. Madhuri Dhingra, Adv. for R-1 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0103.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for violating order dated 29.08.2016 passed in W.P.(C) No.7556/2016, titled as M/s S.S. Food Industries Vs. Integrated Headquarters of MOD (Army). CONT. CAS. (C) 179/2017 Page 1 of 3 2. By order dated 29.08.2016, it was directed that the fixed deposit receipt, if not already encashed, be not encashed. It was further directed the fixed deposit receipt will be retained in the respondents custody.3. Learn...
Gsba Builder Pvt. Ltd. Vs.radha Soami Satsang Beas
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 774/2016 & IA Nos.15151/2016 & 2090/2017 GSBA BUILDER PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr S. K. Jain, Ms Khushboo Bhardwaj, Ms Stuti Jain, Mr Ranjan Kumar Rai and Ms Reetika Wadhwa, Advocates. versus RADHA SOAMI SATSANG BEAS ..... Respondent Through: Mr Anish Kapur and Mr Navroop Bakshi, Advocates. Mr Vikas Dutta, Mr Siddhanth Silwal, Ms Neha for Impleader (Fortis Hospital Limited). Jain, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % VIBHU BAKHRU, J ORDER0103.2017 1. The petitioner (hereafter GBPL) has filed the present petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) praying that an arbitrator be appointed to decide the disputes between the petitioner and the respondent in relation to the agreements dated 03.12.2010 and 03.03.2011 entered into between the parties. The respondent (hereafter RSSB) disputes the existence of an 2. arbitration clause as it claims that the agreement...
- ‹ Prev
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- Next ›