Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R. P. Luthra vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA3402016 Date of Pronouncement:01. 03.2017 R. P. LUTHRA Appellant Through: Mr. R. P. Luthra, appellant in person. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Respondents Versus * + Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MS. G. ROHINI, CHIEF JUSTICE:1. The unsuccessful petitioner in W.P.(C) No.4229/2016, who is a practicing advocate, is the appellant before us.2. The said writ petition was filed challenging the recommendation of four names by the Supreme Court Collegium in May, 2016 and certain other reliefs including a declaration that the judgments passed by the Supreme Court from time to time with regard to mechanism of appointment of judges are unconstitutional.3. The writ petition was dismissed by the learned Single Judge by order dated 13.05.2016 observing:-"Consequently, this court is of the opinion that a High Court cannot declare Supreme Courts ju...
Sanjeet Singh Dabas vs.state Election Commission & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
$~32 * + W.P.(C) 1887/2017 & CMs 8384-85/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SANJEET SINGH DABAS ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Sanat Kumar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Y.S. Chauhan, Advocate with petitioner in person. STATE ELECTION COMMISSION & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER0103.2017 1. Mr. Pushkarna, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 states that the same issues are raised in the present petition as are pending before the Division Bench in WP(C)No.1291/2017 entitled We the Citizens, through its Secretary vs. UOI & Ors., which is listed on 8.3.2017. He states that it would be appropriate if the petitioner is directed to approach the Division Bench for agitating his grievance as raised in the present petition.2. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of, while granting leave to the petitioner to file a fresh petition raising the gr...
Shyam Kumar vs.state ( Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:1. t March, 2017 CRL.REV.P. 424/2016 & Crl.M.A. 9539/2016 SHYAM KUMAR ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Shivam Chowdhary, Adv. versus STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with Insp. Raman Kumar, ATO/ Uttam Nagar with W/ASI Sushma, PS Uttam Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present revision petition, the... Petitioner seeks setting aside of the order dated 1st March, 2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge framing charge against the... Petitioner under Sections 363/366A IPC, Section 109 IPC read with Section 376D IPC and Section 17 read with Section 6 of Protection of Children against Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (in short 'POCSO Act'). The prosecution case springs out of FIR No.78/2015 registered at PS Uttam Nagar under Section 363 IPC lodged by the mother of the prosecutrix.2. After the prosecutrix was recovered, her statement was ...
Ashok Alagh vs.neelam Alagh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On : February 20, 2017 Judgment Delivered On : March 01, 2017 RFA (OS) No.125/2015 ASHOK ALAGH ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Ravinder Sethi, Sr. Advocate instructed by Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Mr.Rajiv Kumar Ghawala and Hussain, Advocates. Mr.Arbaaz versus NEELAM ALAGH & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr.Tariqui Siddiqui, Ms.Reedika Gupta, Mr.Tanveer Ahmad, Ms.Raksha Ahmad and Mr.Harish Priya, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The appellant was the plaintiff. Suit seeking partition of ground floor of property bearing No.N-215, Greater Kailash I, New Delhi as also rendition of accounts filed against the wife and children of appellants brother Subhash Alagh, who expired on October 07, 2005, has been dismissed vide a impugned judgment and decree dated September 30, 2015. The suit was instituted in the year 2006 i.e. soon after the death o...
Competent Automobiles Co. Ltd. Vs.commissioner of Service Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:01. 03.2017 + W.P.(C) 6560/2015 COMPETENT AUTOMOBILES CO. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Sh. S.C. Ladi, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Rajesh Jain and Sh. Virag Tiwari, Advocates. Versus COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX ..... Respondent Through: Sh. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The petitioner in these writ proceedings seeks an order for quashing of summons, requiring it to appear and produce documents in connection with the service tax demands outstanding against it.2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is an authorized dealer inter alia of Maruti Suzuki India Limited (MSIL) and in that capacity sells its cars. In the course of business, Maruti Finance, a unit of Maruti Udyog Limited (MUL) paid certain amounts of commission to the petitioner; the commercial activity underlying this transaction falls within the description of ...
Sanjeev Kumar Saxena vs.union of India & Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.953/2016 % SANJEEV KUMAR SAXENA Reserved on:27. h January, 2017 Date of Decision:1. t March, 2017 ....Petitioner Through Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Tinu Bajwa & Mr. Amandeep Joshi, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS .Respondents Through Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, Ms.Anubha Bhardwaj & Ms. Meena Pathak, Advocates for UOI. Mr. S. Rajappa, Dr. Puran Chand & Ms.Shalini A.P., Advocates for the respondent. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.Sanjeev Kumar Saxena in this writ petition impugns the orders dated 20th January, 2015 and 27th November, 2015 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) dismissing OA No.3889/2012 and RA No.23/2015, respectively.2. The petitioner who is working as a Post-Graduate Teacher in Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti since 1st July, 2008, had applied for selection to the post of Principal ...
M/S Allied Blenders & Distillers Pvt. Ltd vs.prag Distillery Pvt. Ltd ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:01. 03.2017 % + M/s ALLIED BLENDERS & DISTILLERS PVT. LTD ... Appellant FAO (OS) No.49/2017 & CM Nos.6951-54/2017 versus PRAG DISTILLERY PVT. LTD & ANOTHER Advocates who appeared in this case:-"For the Appellant ...... RESPONDENTS : Mr Rajiv Nayyar, Sr Advocate with Mr Praving Anand, Mr Sanjay Chhabra, Mr Saurabh Seth, Ms Kanak Bose, Mr Pundreek Dwivedi, Ms Vijay Laxmi & Mr Umar Khan For the Respondent 1 : Mr Hemant Singh with Ms Mamta Jha, Mr Manish K. Mishra & Mr Waseem Shauaib Ahmed CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J1 This appeal is directed against the judgment and / or order dated 06.01.2017 delivered by a learned single Judge of this court in IA No.19059/2015, which was an application filed by the respondent No.1 / defendant No.1 under Order VII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the Code). By virtue of the impu...
Ms. Kirti Jain vs.kulachi Hansraj Model School & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % MS. KIRTI JAIN W.P.(C) No.3573/2015 1st March, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Advocate with Ms. Aarushi Aggarwal, Advocate. versus KULACHI HANSRAJ MODEL SCHOOL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Senior Advocate with Mr. Tanuj Khurana, for respondent No.1. Ms. Isha Khanna, Advocate for respondent No.3. Through: Ms. Advocate Singh, Jyoti CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner claims the relief of being granted monetary emoluments in terms of 6th Pay Commission Report which became applicable to Schools in Delhi by virtue of the order of dated 11.2.2009 of the respondent no.3/Director of Education (DOE).... Petitioner pleads that she was appointed as a Nursery Teacher with the respondent no.1/Kulachi Hansraj Model School vide appointment letter dated W.P.(C) No.3573/2015 Pag...
Anupam Aggarwal vs.sudesh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 01, 2017 RSA672017 ANUPAM AGGARWAL versus Through: Mr.Satish Kumar, Advocate ..... Appellant $~14 * % + SUDESH & ORS Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT (Oral) CM No.7766/2017 1.2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM No.7767/2017 1. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 67 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned.2. The application is disposed of. RSA No.67/2017 1. The appellant/defendant is invoking the jurisdiction of this Court impugning the concurrent finding of the Courts below i.e judgment dated 30th August, 2016 passed in RCA No.68/2016 and judgment dated 2nd May, 2016 passed in Civil Suit No.4937/2015 whereby the suit for recovery filed by the respondents/plaintiffs has been decreed.2. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that instant appeal raises substantial question of law as the respon...
Simran Singh vs.rajinder Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) 478/2012 SIMRAN SINGH Date of decision:01.03.2017 .Petitioner $~A-9 * % + Through Mr.P.K.Mishra, Adv. versus RAJINDER SINGH & ORS. .Respondents Through Mr.Amit P.Deshpandey, Adv. for R-1 and R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks to impugn the order dated 2.4.2012 passed by the trial court on the application filed by the plaintiff/respondent Nos.1 and 2 under section 151 CPC for directions to the petitioner/defendant No.1 to deposit user charges at the rate of Rs.60,000/- per month for the period 1.3.2009 to 31.3.2012 and to continue to deposit the same month by month for the suit property.2.... RESPONDENTS No.1 and 2/plaintiffs filed a suit for recovery of possession, arrears of rent and mesne profits regarding property Ground Floor C-91, Defence Colony, New Delhi. The property was admittedly owned by the father of...
- ‹ Prev
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 66
- Next ›
- Last »