Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. Mukesh Sharma & Ors vs.dr. Maheshwar Nath Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:1. t March, 2017 + CS(OS) 2475/2007 & IAs No.20732/2011 (u/O XII R-6 CPC) & 6952/2016 (u/O XXIII R-1 CPC) + DR. MUKESH SHARMA & ORS. Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh, Adv. ..... Plaintiffs Versus DR. MAHESHWAR NATH SHARMA Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra ..... Defendant and Ms. Shivangi Singh, Advs. AND TEST.CAS. 27/2008 & IAs No.4936/2008 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & 21981/2015 (for condonation of 30 days delay in compliance) DR. MAHESHWAR NATH SHARMA Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra ........ Petitioner and Ms. Versus Shivangi Singh, Advs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS 1. CS(OS) No.2475/2007 (suit) was filed on 10th December, 2007 by (i) Dr. Mukesh Sharma, (ii) Promila Tiwari, (iii) Veena Kaushik, (iv) Rekha Sharma & (v) Neera Sharma against Dr. Maheshwar Nath Sharma for partition of property No.10 Todarmal Lane, Bengali Market, New Delhi (Bengali Mark...
Harish Chand Dhupar vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
$~30 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + W.P.(C) 1878/2017 & CMs 8350-51/2017 HARISH CHAND DHUPAR Through : Mr. G.D. Parashar, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Arpit Shukla, Advocate for R-1. Mr. N.S. Arora, Advocate for R-2. Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, Advocate for R-3. Mr. G.D. Mishra, Advocate for R-6. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER0103.2017 1. Mr. Pushkarna, learned counsel for the respondent No.3 states that the same issues are raised in the present petition as are pending before the Division Bench in WP(C)No.1291/2017 entitled We the Citizens, through its Secretary vs. UOI & Ors., which is listed on 8.3.2017. He states that it would be appropriate if the petitioner is directed to approach the Division Bench for agitating his grievance as raised in the present petition.2. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of, while granting leave to the petitioner to file a fresh petition raising the ...
S N Bansal & Anr vs.nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
7# * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on: March 01, 2017 CRL.M.C. 790/2012 and Crl. M.A. No.2765/2012 (Stay) S N BANSAL & ANR ........ Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Dinesh Priani, Advocate with petitioner No.2 in person. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Pawan, EOW. Respondent No.2 in person NCT OF DELHI & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1.2. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. By the present petition the two petitioners S.N. Bansal and G.J.Varadarajan seek quashing of FIR No.1111/1998 under Sections 420/467/468/471 IPC registered at PS Kalkaji, Delhi and the proceedings pursuant thereto on the ground that the parties have settled the matter.3. A perusal of the record would reveal that the respondent No.2 Rakesh Kapoor filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short the NI Act) wherein S.N. Bansal, petitioner No.1 was convicted. The con...
Benara Bearings & Pistons Ltd vs.mahle Engine Components India Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
% + THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:01. 03.2017 FAO(OS) (COMM) 66/2016 & CM No.31593/2016 BENARA BEARINGS & PISTONS LTD ... Appellant versus MAHLE ENGINE COMPONENTS INDIA PVT LTD Advocates who appeared in this case:-"For the Appellant ... Respondent For the Respondent : Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr Kartik Nayar, Mr Prakhar Deep, Mr Saurabh Seth, Mohd Umar Iqbal Khan and Mr Rishab Kumar : Mr Arvind K. Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Mr Sudhir Sharma, Mr Sanjeev K. Sharma, Mr Abhishek Swaroop, Mr Anirudh K Gandhi and Ms Abhilasha Vij CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J1 The present appeal is directed against the judgment and/or order dated 26.08.2016 delivered by a learned Single Judge of this Court in OMP(I) (COMM) 153/2016 which was a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). The present appeal has been preferred under Sect...
B Block Harinagar Resident Welfare Association vs.delhi State Election ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1883/2017 & CMs 8356-57/2017 B BLOCK HARINAGAR RESIDENT WELFARE ASSOCIATION Through : Mr. Jatin Sapra, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus DELHI STATE ELECTION COMMISSION ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, Adv. for R-1. Mr. N.S. Arora, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER0103.2017 1. Mr. Pushkarna, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 states that the same issues are raised in the present petition as are pending before the Division Bench in WP(C)No.1291/2017 entitled We the Citizens, through its Secretary vs. UOI & Ors., which is listed on 8.3.2017. He states that it would be appropriate if the petitioner is directed to approach the Division Bench for agitating his grievance as raised in the present petition.2. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of, while granting leave to the petitioner to file a fresh petition raising the grievance as raised in the present petition,...
Nirmala Devi & Ors. Vs.jai Dutt
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on: March 01, 2017 Judgment Reserved on: February 21, 2017 RSA2212016 NIRMALA DEVI & ORS. Through: Mr.S.C.Singhal, Advocate ..... Appellants * % + versus JAI DUTT ..... Respondent Through: Mr.T.R.Kashyap, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT RSA2212016 1. By way of this Regular Second Appeal, the appellants are invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure impugning the judgment and order of the First Appellate Court passed in Civil Appeal No.RCA-02/2014 whereby the appeal filed by the respondent herein (defendant in Civil Suit No.177/2012) was allowed and the judgment and decree dated 4th January, 2014 passed by the learned Trial Court was set aside.2. The facts in brief are that the Civil Suit No.177/2012 was filed by Sh.Anand Dev Sharma (deceased now represented through his legal heirs Smt.Nirmala Devi, the appellant No.1 and their children, appellant Nos.2 to1...
Union of India Thr Postal Department of Delhi vs.aruna Gupta & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
$~A-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:01. 03.2017 RC.REV. 78/2017 UNION OF INDIA THR POSTAL DEPARTMENT OF DELHI Through Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal and Mr.Hem ........ Petitioner versus Kumar, Advocates ARUNA GUPTA & ANR JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) ..... Respondent Through Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Advocate CAVEAT1552017 Since the learned counsel for the respondent has entered appearance, the caveat stands discharged. CM No.6478/2017 (exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. RC REV.78/2017 & CM No.6477/2017(stay) 1. By the present petition filed under section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) the petitioner seeks to impugn the eviction order dated 13.10.2016 passed against the petitioner/postal department.2. The petitioner states that it is the tenant of the property since 1953. It is urged that the said post office which is situated at Chawri Bazar is an iconic location for the entire area and is a landmark in the a...
Dr. Maheshwar Nath Sharma vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:1. t March, 2017 + CS(OS) 2475/2007 & IAs No.20732/2011 (u/O XII R-6 CPC) & 6952/2016 (u/O XXIII R-1 CPC) + DR. MUKESH SHARMA & ORS. Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh, Adv. ..... Plaintiffs Versus DR. MAHESHWAR NATH SHARMA Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra ..... Defendant and Ms. Shivangi Singh, Advs. AND TEST.CAS. 27/2008 & IAs No.4936/2008 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & 21981/2015 (for condonation of 30 days delay in compliance) DR. MAHESHWAR NATH SHARMA Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra ........ Petitioner and Ms. Versus Shivangi Singh, Advs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS 1. CS(OS) No.2475/2007 (suit) was filed on 10th December, 2007 by (i) Dr. Mukesh Sharma, (ii) Promila Tiwari, (iii) Veena Kaushik, (iv) Rekha Sharma & (v) Neera Sharma against Dr. Maheshwar Nath Sharma for partition of property No.10 Todarmal Lane, Bengali Market, New Delhi (Bengali Mark...
Sant Ram vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct) Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :6. h FEBRUARY, 2017 DECIDED ON :1. t MARCH, 2017 + CRL.A.47/2015 SANT RAM ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Pramod K.Dubey, Advocate with versus Mr.T.Vishnu & Mr.Rahul Tripathi, Advocates. THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Arun K.Sharma, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Aggrieved and dissatisfied by a judgment dated 09.07.2014 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.arising out of FIR No.3PS Dabri by which the appellant Sant Ram was convicted for committing offences punishable under SectionsIPC and Sections 3, 4, 5 & 6 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (In short ITP Act), the instant appeal has been preferred by him. By an order dated 17.07.2014, the appellant was sentenced to undergo various prison terms with fine.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as reflected in the charge- sheet was that a month prior to 03.10.2012, Madan Lal Rana and Raman Kumar (since acqu...
National Insurance Co Ltd vs.smt. Sunila Gupta and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: March 01, 2017 + MAC.APP. 4/2009 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Manoj R. Sinha, Advocate. Versus SMT. SUNILA GUPTA & ORS. Through: Nemo. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL1 JUDGMENT In this Appeal, Appellant/Insurer seeks to wriggle out of the liability to pay the awarded compensation. Vide impugned Award of 27th September, 2008, compensation of `12 lacs with interest at the rate of 9% per annum has been awarded to respondent-claimant on account of death of Dr. C.B. Gupta in a road accident on 17th January, 1994. Vide subsequent order of 31st October, 2008, the arithmetical mistake in calculation of awarded amount stands corrected by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the 'Tribunal') and the rectified compensation granted is `11,02,000/- with the same rate of interest.2. The facts of this case are already noted in the impugned Award an...
- ‹ Prev
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 65
- 66
- Next ›
- Last »