Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs.rajeev Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2017
$~5 & 17 * + + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA2032017 & CM65622017 RFA1622017 & CM58142017 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. Through : Ms. Renu Gupta, Advocate ..... Appellants versus ..... Respondent ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Aditya Sharda, Advocate RAJEEV JAIN RAJ RANI CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % Learned counsel for the appellants states that the decretal amounts ORDER0203.2017 have already been released in favour of the respondents/contractors, which fact is confirmed by counsel for the respondents. She therefore states that the present appeals may be disposed of, as having been rendered infructuous.2. Ordered accordingly. Both the appeals are disposed of, as infructuous, along with the pending applications. MARCH02 2017 sk HIMA KOHLI, J...
Inderjit Mehta Const Pvt Ltd vs.union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:07. 02.2017 Judgment delivered on:02. 03.2017 * % + W.P.(C) 683/2017 INDERJIT MEHTA CONST PVT LTD UNION OF INDIA AND ANR versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr Praveen For the... RESPONDENTS Chauhan, Mr Abhishek Gupta, Ms Janhavi Mahana & Ms Arpita. : Mr Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr Abhishek Ghai. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR JUDGMENT ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J CM31372017 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 683/2017 1. The petitioner, which is a construction company, is aggrieved by the issuance of a fresh tender for construction of family quarters at group centre, CRPF, Siliguri by respondent No.2 (CPWD through Executive W.P(C) 683/2017 Page 1 of 10 Engineer, Gangtok Central Division, Gangtok, Sikkim) on behalf of respondent No.1 (Union of India through Mini...
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.usha Nagar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2017
$~36. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA2482017 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Satyajit Patra, Advocate ..... Appellant versus USHA NAGAR & ORS Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER0203.2017 CM APPL. 8454/2017 (exemption) Subject to the appellant filing the certified/typed/legible copies of the documents annexed with the appeal within four weeks, the application is allowed and disposed of. RFA2482017 and CM APPL. 8453/2017 (stay) 1. The appellant/defendant is aggrieved by the judgment dated 08.11.2016 passed by the learned trial court in a suit for recovery of possession, damages/mesne profits etc. instituted by the respondents/plaintiffs.2. The Court has carefully perused the impugned judgment and considered the arguments addressed by learned counsel for the appellant, but RFA2482017 Page 1 of 3 is not persuaded to issue notice.3. At this stage, learned counsel for the appellant states that instead of pressing the appeal ...
Radhey Shyam Gupta vs.government of n.c.t. Of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.13099/2004 + % RADHEY SHYAM GUPTA2d March, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. K.C. Mittal and Ms. Ruchika Mittal, Advocates. versus GOVERNMENT OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. N.K. Jha, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.3264/2017 (for restoration) and C.M. Appl. No.3265/2017 (for condonation of delay) 1. Considering that the present writ petition was an old matter of the year 2004 and which came up only on two occasions for hearing in Regular Board, with the second hearing order being an order of dismissal in default, accordingly, for the reasons stated in the applications for condonation of delay and restoration application are accepted and the applications are allowed by restoring the present writ petition to its original number.2. C.M.s stand disposed of. W.P.(C) No.13099/2004 Page 1 of 10 W.P.(C)...
M/S Brij Gopal Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. & M/S Ramky Infrastructure L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2017
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 10471/2016 & CM Nos. 41071/2016 and 44266/2016 Judgment delivered on:02. 03.2017 M/S BRIJ GOPAL CONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD. & M/S RAMKY INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. (CONSORTIUM) ...... Petitioner versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case:-"For the... Petitioner : Mr Dushyant Dave and Mr Balbir Singh, Senior Advocates with Mr Bhupesh Narula, Mr Gaurav Kakar, Mr Mayank Jain, Mr Gautam Jain and Mr Madhur Jain : Mr Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Ms Gunjan Sinha Jain and Mr Mukesh Kumar For the Respondent For applicant in CM4426616: Mr S. Ganesh, Senior Advocate with Mr Priyabrat CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Tripathy and Mr Ajay Saroya JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J1 This writ petition pertains to the Request for Proposal (RFP) concerning the International Competitive Bidding under a Single Stage Bidding Process for development of the DelhiMeerut ...
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited & Anr vs.anant Raj Agencies Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2017
$~ * R-173 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI OMP6372008 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED & ANR Through: Ms. Geeta Luthra, Senior Advocate with Ms. Srishti Gupta, Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advocates along with Mr. Azad, official in person. ........ Petitioners % versus ANANT RAJ AGENCIES PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Biji Rajesh with Ms. Eshita and Ms. Aditi Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR ORDER0203.2017 1. This petition by Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL), challenges an Award dated 9th August, 2008 passed by the learned sole Arbitrator in the dispute between MTNL and the Respondent, Anant Raj Agencies Private Limited, arising out of the agreement/lease deed dated 1st June, 1992 whereby the area measuring 5046 sq. ft. comprising the first and mezzanine floors in the premises known as A.R.A. Centre, E-2, Jhandewalan Extension (hereafter 'premises in question') was given on lease by the Respondent to MTNL for a period of five years.2. The admitted position i...
Om Prakash Pathak & Ors vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~4, 6 & 7 * % + W.P. (C) 559/2017 & C.M. No.2591/2017 BALWANT SINGH Date of Judgment:2. d March, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through Mr.S.K.Singh, Adv. with versus Ms.Renu Singh, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay K. Mishra & Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC. Mr.Ashish Mohan, Adv. with Mr.Chetan Rai Wahi, Adv. for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. + W.P. (C) 959/2017 & C.M. No.4404/2017 OM PRAKASH PATHAK & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv. with Ms.Monika Singh, Adv. versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay K. Mishra & Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC. Mr.Devesh Singh, ASC with Mr.Vinod Kumar Bhati, Adv. For GNCTD. W.P. (C ) No.559/2017 and others Page 1 of 4 Mr.Ashish Mohan, Adv. with Mr.Chetan Rai Wahi, Adv. for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. + W.P. (C) 1301...
National Highways Authority of India vs.baharampore-farakka Highways L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on: March 02, 2017 FAO(OS) (COMM).47/2017 & CM Nos.7153/2017 (for stay) NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: Mr. S. Nandakumar, Mr. M.S. Saran Kumar ........ Petitioner and Mr.P. Srinivasan, Advocates. versus BAHARAMPORE-FARAKKA HIGHWAYS LTD. Through: MR. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with ......... RESPONDENTS Ms. Malavika Lal and Ms. Aakashi Lodha, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA ORDER INDIRA BANERJEE, J1 This appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, hereinafter referred to as the 1996 Act, is against a judgment and order dated 22.11.2016 passed by the learned Single Bench, rejecting the application of the appellant under Section 34 of the 1996 Act, inter alia holding that the petition under Section 34 was misconceived as the order dated ===================================================================== FAO(OS)COMM.47/20...
Kanwar Singh Gurjar vs.commissioner of Police, Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:2. d March, 2017 + CRL.M.C. 1218/2015 KANWAR SINGH GURJAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.M.M. Kashyap, Adv. versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State S.I. Puneet, P.S. Sarai Rohilla Mr.J.K. Singh, Standing Counsel with Mr.Praveen Kumar, Adv. for R-2 to R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT I.S. MEHTA, J.1. By virtue of the present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. the petitioner seeks to quash FIR No.969 dated 27.09.2014 under Sections 419, 468 and 471 IPC registered at Police Station Sarai Rohila, Delhi.2. The brief facts stated are that, the petitioner had applied for the post of Constable in Railway Protection Force on 28.03.2011, in pursuance of an advertisement issued by Chief Secretary, Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, Gorakhpur in the Employment Notification No.01/2011. Subsequently, the petitioner CRL.M.C. 1218/2015 Page 1 of 8 ...
Priyanka Mittal vs.federation of India Export Organisations and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~33 * + W.P.(C) 269/2016 & CM10872016 PRIYANKA MITTAL FEDERATION OF INDIA EXPORT ORGANISATIONS AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Pradeep Dewan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Anupam Dhingra, Advocate versus ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Shyam Moorjani, Advocate for R-1 and 3. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate for R-2. Mr. Rohit Puri, Advocate for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER0203.2017 1. It is stated in unison by learned counsels for the parties that during the pendency of the present petition, the elections to the Managing Committee of the respondent No.1 for filling up the existing vacancies, was conducted in January, 2017 and the results have been declared on 23.2.2017 wherein, the petitioner herein has been declared as elected to the office of Regional Chairman (Northern Regions). In view of the aforesaid development, they state that the present petition may be disposed of as the petitioner cannot hold two posts simultaneou...
- ‹ Prev
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- Next ›
- Last »