Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Wianxx Impex Pvt. Ltd vs.modern (India) Architects (Pvt.) Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2017
$~28 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 108/2017 M/S WIANXX IMPEX PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Vibhor Garg, Mr Sumit Kumar Mishra, Ms Ishita Bist and Ms Puja Aggarwal, Advocates. Versus MODERN (INDIA) ARCHITECTS (PVT.) LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Abhijat and Mr Nikhil Parikshith, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU ORDER0303.2017 % VIBHU BAKHRU, J IA No.2771/2017 1.2. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. O.M.P. (COMM) 108/2017 & IA No.2770/2017 3. M/s Wianxx Impex Pvt. Ltd. (hereafter Wianxx') has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) challenging the arbitral award dated 10.11.2016 (hereafter the impugned award) made by the sole arbitrator in connection O.M.P. (COMM) 108/2017 Page 1 of 9 with disputes that had arisen between Wianxx and Modern (India) Architects Pvt. Ltd. (hereafter Modern Architects).4. Mod...
Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi vs.sangeeta Misra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2017
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. 01.2017 Pronounced on:03. 03.2017 ITA1192004 COMMR.OF INCOME TAX, DELHI (CENTRAL-I)..... Appellant PINAKI MISRA ..... Respondent versus ITA4232004 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX SANGEETA MISRA versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Through : Sh. Dileep Shivpuri, Sr. Standing Counsel with Sh. Sanjay Kumar, Jr. Standing Counsel and Sh. Vikrant. A. Maheshwari, Advocate, for appellants. Sh. Akhil Sibal with Ms. Rashmi Chopra, Advocates, for respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. These appeals concern common questions of law. The question of law framed for decision by this court is: Whether the ITAT was correct in law in deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer (hereinafter also referred to as AO) on the ground that the AO has no jurisdiction to pass the order under section 158BC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also referred to ...
Shoshit Majdoor Sanghthan (Regd.) & Anr vs.director of Education and O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.3812/2010 + % SHOSHIT MAJDOOR SANGHTHAN (REGD.) & ANR....... Petitioners 3rd March, 2017 Through: None. versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Satyakam, ASC. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 12 petitioners who are members of the petitioner no.1/Union, seek the relief of being granted the pay scales as per the 6th Pay Commission Report which became applicable to schools in Delhi w.e.f 1.1.2006.... Petitioners claim to be the employees of the respondent no.2/Darshan Academy Public School.2. In support of the contention that petitioners are employees of the respondent no.2/school, no documents showing any employment of the petitioners by the respondent no.2/school have been filed. The only reason given for the petitioners to claim employment W.P.(C) No.38...
Shubit Education Society vs.d.d.A.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2017
24 $~ * + W.P.(C) 1985/2013 D.D.A. versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SHUBIT EDUCATION SOCIETY Through: Mr. Ram Kumar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Birbal, Advocate with ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advocate. Date of Decision:03. d March, 2017 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking restoration of allotment initially made in Pocket-B, Sector-C, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, in favour of the petitioner-Society on 28th March, 2003.2. The admitted facts are that petitioners initial writ petition being W.P.(C) 2360/2006 seeking the similar relief was dismissed as infructuous vide order dated 08th August, 2012 in view of the amendment in the DDA (Disposal of Developed Nazul Land) Rules, 1981, whereby the mode of allotment of institutional land to educational institutions was changed from allotment to auction mode vide Gazette Notification dated 19th April, 2006 W.P.(C) 1985/2013 Page 1 ...
Bhoum Singh & Anr vs.sant Kaur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. 03.2017 CM(M) 253/2017 and CM No.8460-62/2017 $~A-36 * % + BHOUM SINGH & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Md.Azam Ansari, Advocate with petitioner No.1-in-person. versus Through Mr. Puneet Agarwal, Advocate. ..... Respondent SANT KAUR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) By the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of 1. India, the petitioners seek to impugn the order dated 27.01.2017 by which the application filed by the petitioners for being impleaded under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC was dismissed.2. The suit is filed by the respondent/plaintiff against one Sh.Manjeet Singh (not impleaded as a party to the present petition) who is her brother for possession, permanent injunction and mesne profits. As per the plaint, the respondent claims to be the owner of property No.WZ122Gali No.7, Shiv Nagar, Janak Puri Delhi. It is urged that she gave the second floor of the property as described ...
Amit Rawat vs.national Seeds Corporation Limited and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % AMIT RAWAT W.P.(C) No.10223/2016 2nd March, 2017 Through: Mr. Adarsh K. Advocate. ........ Petitioner Tiwari, versus NATIONAL SEEDS CORPORATION LIMITED AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. G. Joshi, Advocate with Mr. Chirag Joshi, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:-"a) to issue a writ of mandamus or any other order directing the Respondent No.1 Corporation to grant pay protection to the... Petitioner while granting the appointment to the post of Assistant (Vigilance) under Respondent No.1; b) to quash the impugned letter No.1(10)/14-HR/NSC/3008 dated 20.09.2016 issued by the HR Department of National Seeds Corporation Ltd. To the... Petitioner [Annexure P-1].; and/or...
Ajay Juyal vs.state Election Commission Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2017
$~42. * + W.P.(C) 1925/2017 and CM APPL. 8536-37/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI AJAY JUYAL Through: Mr. Mukesh Rana, Advocate with Ms. Aarti Bhalla and Ms. Mansi Bajaj, Advocates versus ........ Petitioner STATE ELECTION COMMISSION NCT OF DELHI .... Respondent Through: Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER0203.2017 1. Mr. Pushkarna, learned counsel for the respondent states that the same issues are raised in the present petition as are pending before the Division Bench in WP(C)No.1291/2017 entitled We the Citizens, through its Secretary vs. UOI & Ors., which is listed on 8.3.2017. He states that it would be appropriate if the petitioner is directed to approach the Division Bench for agitating his grievance as raised in the present petition.2. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of, while granting leave to the petitioner to file a fresh petition raising the grievance as raised in the present petition, for being plac...
Mauzi @ Mozi @ Md. Islam vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~4, 6 & 7 * % + W.P. (C) 559/2017 & C.M. No.2591/2017 BALWANT SINGH Date of Judgment:2. d March, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through Mr.S.K.Singh, Adv. with versus Ms.Renu Singh, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay K. Mishra & Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC. Mr.Ashish Mohan, Adv. with Mr.Chetan Rai Wahi, Adv. for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. + W.P. (C) 959/2017 & C.M. No.4404/2017 OM PRAKASH PATHAK & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv. with Ms.Monika Singh, Adv. versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay K. Mishra & Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC. Mr.Devesh Singh, ASC with Mr.Vinod Kumar Bhati, Adv. For GNCTD. W.P. (C ) No.559/2017 and others Page 1 of 4 Mr.Ashish Mohan, Adv. with Mr.Chetan Rai Wahi, Adv. for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. + W.P. (C) 1301...
Sanjiv Aggarwal vs.bharat Scouts and Guides and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SANJIV AGGARWAL Through : Mr. P.R. Chopra, Advocate. ........ Petitioner BHARAT SCOUTS AND GUIDES AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Santosh Krishanan and Mr. Gaurav Aggarwal, Advocates for R-1 & 2. $~26 * + W.P.(C) 7993/2016 versus CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER0203.2017 1. As per the Registry, respondents No.3 to 9 have been duly served. However, none has appeared on their behalf, nor have the counter affidavits been filed. Accordingly, the respondents No.3 to 9 are proceeded against ex- parte.2. 3. Pleadings qua the respondent No.1 and 2 are complete. The petitioner prays for striking down a list of Life Members of the respondent No.1, as declared on 03.8.2016. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent No.1 had prepared a list of 23 Life Members of the respondent No.1/Association as on 03.8.2016 and the petitioner and the respondents No.3 to 9 are a part of the said list. At the same time, the names of ...
Balwant Singh vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~4, 6 & 7 * % + W.P. (C) 559/2017 & C.M. No.2591/2017 BALWANT SINGH Date of Judgment:2. d March, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through Mr.S.K.Singh, Adv. with versus Ms.Renu Singh, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay K. Mishra & Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC. Mr.Ashish Mohan, Adv. with Mr.Chetan Rai Wahi, Adv. for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. + W.P. (C) 959/2017 & C.M. No.4404/2017 OM PRAKASH PATHAK & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv. with Ms.Monika Singh, Adv. versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay K. Mishra & Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for NDMC. Mr.Devesh Singh, ASC with Mr.Vinod Kumar Bhati, Adv. For GNCTD. W.P. (C ) No.559/2017 and others Page 1 of 4 Mr.Ashish Mohan, Adv. with Mr.Chetan Rai Wahi, Adv. for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. + W.P. (C) 1301...
- ‹ Prev
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- Next ›
- Last »