Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Suchitra Singh vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2017
$~64 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 3193/2015 Judgment delivered on:03. 03.2017 SUCHITRA SINGH ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr Aditya Singh, Advocate. Mr Rahul Mehra, Advocate. : : JUDGMENT0303.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner, by the present petition, had challenged the selection of the petitioner in the National Games. When the petition was filed on 06.04.2015, this Court had issued a limited notice to the respondents seeking their view on paragraph 5 of the said order.2. Paragraph 5 of the order dated 06.04.2015 reads as under:-"the learned counsel Having heard the petitioner and respondent no.2, I am prima facie of the view that a mechanism has to be put in place, which enables complaints to be lodged for W.P.(C) No.3193/2015 Page 1 of 3 3. much prior to the date when games are sl...
Vinod Kumar Soran vs.the Delhi Public School & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.1873/2011 VINOD KUMAR SORAN3d March, 2017 ........ Petitioner None. Through: versus THE DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Puneet Mittal, Ms. Arushi Tangri and Mr. Sagar Mittal, Advocates for R-1 and 2. Mr. Nitish Negi and Mr. Ankur Chhiber, Advs. for R/GNCTD. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who was employed as a teacher/TGT (Maths) with the respondent no.1/Delhi Public School w.e.f 6.7.2001, seeks the benefit of ACP Scheme by seeking to combine the services of the petitioner rendered with the respondent no.1/school with the earlier period of services of the petitioner from 25.10.1991 to 5.7.2001 with earlier school namely Col. Satsangi Kiran Memorial Public School, Satbari, Delhi. W.P.(C) No.1873/2011 Page 1 of 4 2. It is not in dispute ...
Chottan Kumar vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :2. d MARCH, 2017 DECIDED ON :3. d MARCH, 2017 CHOTTAN KUMAR CRL.A. 555/2014 ..... Appellant Through : Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through : Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + S.P.GARG, J.1. Present appeal has been preferred by the appellant Chottan Kumar to challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 11.02.2014 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.arising out of FIR No.1PS Jaitpur by which he was convicted for committing offence punishable under Section 376 IPC and was sentenced to undergo RI for seven years with fine `10,000/-.2. The prosecution case as set up in the charge-sheet was that on 09.04.2012 at around 12.30 p.m. in a room at first floor, House No.FB/II, J.J.Colony, Madanpur Khadar, New Delhi, the appellant committed rape upon the prosecutrix X (assumed name) aged around 21 years without her consent. The information a...
Suman Yadav vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : March 03, 2017 BAIL APPLN. 258/2017 SUMAN YADAV ........ Petitioner Through Mr.S.K. Kaushik and Mr.Rohit Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Mr.Ashish Dutta, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub- Inspector Roshan Lal, Police Station Nangloi, Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT % P.S. TEJI, J.1. By this petition filed under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Cr. P.C.) the petitioner seeks 498-A/304- B/302/4of IPC, at Police Station Nangloi, Delhi. in FIR No.285/2012 under Section bail 2. The case at hand, is yet another case in which a married lady took her life in her matrimonial home by hanging herself and that too within 7 years of her marriage with the petitioner herein. The present case was registered at the instance of Mrs.3. Satyawati, i.e. mother of the deceased Satyam Yadav. It is stated that...
Dinesh Saini vs.devashish Ghosh and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 03, 2017 MAC.APP. 487/2008 DINESH SAINI Through: Ms. Aruna Mehta, Advocate ..... Appellant versus .....Respondents DEVASHISH GHOSH & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Through: Mr. Shoumik Mazumdar, Advocate for Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3 * + % (ORAL) JUDGMENT Impugned Award of 3rd March, 2008 grants compensation of `3,55,180/- with interest at the rate of 7% to appellant, who had sustained grievous injuries in a road accident on 20th July, 2004. The facts are already noted in impugned Award and so, need no reproduction. Suffice to note that appellant, a driver by profession, aged about 24 years, was driving Maruti Van on the day of accident in question and when he reached near Atta Chowk, Sector 27, Noida, his vehicle was hit by a Maruti Zen, which came from left side road. Apart from the evidence of appellant-Claimant, there is evidence of eye-witness-Sandeep Sharma Mac.App. 487/2008 Page ...
Shri Vishwa Bandhu vs.central Vigilance Commission and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI3d March, 2017 W.P.(C) No.7730/2015 + % SHRI VISHWA BANDHU CENTRAL VIGILANCE COMMISSION AND ORS. versus Through: Mr. I.S. Bakshi, Advocate. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha and Mr. A.S. Sinha, Advocates for R-1. Mr. A.K. Gautam, Advocate for R-2. Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) W.P.(C) No.7730/2015 and C.M. Appl. No.15155/2015 (for stay) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:-"i) records of the case; A Writ of Certiorari or any Writ, Order or Direction calling for the ii) A Writ of Mandamus for issuing appropriate directions to the Respondent No.2 for filing the Reply of the concerned Officers along with his Comments to Intensive Examination Report Dt. 21.06.2012 to the Respondent No.1, in accordance with law and the Guidelines ...
Ratul Puri vs.central Bank of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2017
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1975/2017 & CMs 8729-31/2017 1. RATUL PURI Through : Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rishi Aggarwala, Ms. Niyati Kohli and Mr. Vaibahav Tyagi, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA Through : Mr. O.P. Gaggar, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The present petitioner has been filed by the petitioner praying inter ORDER0303.2017 alia for setting aside/quashing a notice to show cause dated 7.2.2017, issued by the respondent/Bank calling upon him and other addressees to state as to why they should not be treated as wilful defaulters.2. The records reveals that the petitioner has already filed a reply dated 22.2.2017 to the aforesaid notice to show cause which is admittedly pending consideration at the end of the respondent/Bank.3. Learned counsel for the respondent/Bank, who appears on advance notice, states that the present petition is premature as the reply of the petitioner...
Rani Mishra vs.rohsani Sharma & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2017
$~8 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. d March, 2017 FAO362017 and C.M. Appl. 2502/2017, 2505/2017 RANI MISHRA Through: Ms. Vibha Mahajan Seth, Adv. ..... Appellant for DHLSC versus ROHSANI SHARMA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. J.P. Sharma, Adv. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA ORDER1 The appellant has challenged the order dated 27th October, 2016 whereby the learned Trial Court vacated the interim order dated 26th September, 2012 restraining the appellant from creating third party interest or parting with the possession of the suit property.2. The appellant present in Court along with her counsel appointed by Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee submits that respondent no.1 has amended the plaint to add the prayer of the refund of earnest money along with the liquidated damages from the appellant.3. Learned counsel for respondent no.2 submits that appellant availed loan from respondent no.2 by mortgaging the suit property and...
Union of India vs.the National Commission for Schedule Castes & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI3d March, 2017 W.P.(C) No.9547/2015 + % UNION OF INDIA THE NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR SCHEDULE CASTES & ANR. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sameer Agarwal, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.K. Mohanty, Advocate for R-1. Dr. K.S. Chauhan, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner/Union of India impugns the order dated 18.8.2015 passed by the National Commission for Scheduled Castes. The order is in the nature of Minutes of Meeting. The said Minutes of Meeting dated 18.8.2015 reads as under:-" No.R-7/I&B-1/2013-SSW-I National Commission for Scheduled Castes. Minutes of hearing held on 18/8/2015 in the Commission. The matter relating to representation of Shri Ratan Singh, Surveyor of Works (E), CCW, AIR, New Delhi for his promotion was discussed on 18/08/2015. S...
Nisha Jindal & Anr vs.ram Prag Koiree & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2017
$~11. * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA4302016 and CM APPL. 23868/2016, 23871/2016 NISHA JINDAL & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate versus RAM PRAG KOIREE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amarjit Singh, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The present appeal is listed for arguments to be addressed on its ORDER0303.2017 maintainability.2. The appellants, who are not parties in the suit proceedings, state that they are aggrieved by the judgment dated 28.04.2015, passed by the trial court in a suit for possession, recovery of damages and mesne profits instituted by the respondent No.1/plaintiff against the respondent No.2/defendant, which was decreed in favour of the respondent No.1/plaintiff alongwith a decree of damages and mesne profits. The appellants state that they are the lawful owners of the suit premises, claiming to have purchased the same in the year 1999 from the respondent N...
- ‹ Prev
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- Next ›
- Last »