Skip to content

Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 29 2017

Court on Its Own Motion vs.mahender Singh Manan & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-29-2017

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CRL.REV.P.No._____/2017 (to be numbered) COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION ........ Petitioner Through : Nemo versus 1. MAHENDER SINGH MANAN alias MAHENDER SHARABI s/o PALE RAM r/o RZ-7A/18, PURAN NAGAR, PALAM COLONY, DELHI2 RAM KUMAR s/o YAD RAM r/o H.No.WZ-43, PALAM VILLAGE, NEW DELHI. (Address of private respondents as per the composite final report dated 25th March, 1985) 3. STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) 4. BALJIT KAUR (Complainant) (address to be ascertained by the State) ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Nemo (Regarding : SC No.33/86) CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA Re: SC No.Page 1 of 85 % 1. While ORDER2903.2017 hearing Crl.A.Nos.715/2013, 753/2013, 831/2013, 851/2013, 861/2013, 1099/2013 and 710/2014 (challenging the judgment dated 30th April, 2013 in Sessions Case No.arising out of RC242005-SIU-I/SIC- 1/CBI/ND) ld. counsels for the private parties have relied upon judgments in Sessions Case No.dated 29th Apri...


Mar 29 2017

Sanjay Sehgal & Anr. Vs.state & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-29-2017

+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1009/2017 Date of Hearing & Order: March 29th, 2017 SANJAY SEHGAL & ANR. ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Manzar Anis, Adv. for Mr.Manjeet Singh Ahluwalia, Adv. versus STATE & ORS. Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP with SI ..... Respondent Lokesh Singh, PS Bharat Nagar. Respondent no.2 and 3 in person with Mr.K.K. Vijay and Mr.Asheem Bhardwaj, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Sanjay Sehgal and Romil Sehgal for quashing of FIR No.189/2014, under Section 341/323/354/354-B/34 IPC registered at Police Station Bharat Nagar, Delhi on the basis of an amicable settlement between the petitioners and respondents No.2 and 3 namely, Sh. Yogesh Lakhotia and Smt. Gayatri Devi.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent no.2 present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant in the criminal complaint in question....


Mar 28 2017

Sumana Rakshit vs.cambridge School Sriniwaspuri & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-28-2017

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % SUMANA RAKSHIT W.P.(C) No.2766/2017 28th March, 2017 Ms. Indrani Ghosh, Advocate. ........ Petitioner Through: versus CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL SRINIWASPURI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Goel, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Rizwan, Adv. for Mr. Santosh Kr. Tripathi, ASC for R-2/DOE. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Two issues are raised in this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, and two reliefs claimed by the petitioner, who is a teacher with the respondent no.1/school. The first relief is claimed by the petitioner of entitlement to work till 30.4.2017 of the academic year in question and which is 2016-17. The second relief is with respect to consideration of the petitioner for re- employment up to the age of 62 years.2. So far as the first relief is concerned, counsel for the petitioner places reliance upon Rule 110 (2) proviso of the Delhi W...


Mar 28 2017

Lokesh Bhadana vs.state (The Nct of Delhi)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-28-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on 28th March, 2017 BAIL APPLN. 128/2017 & Crl.M.A.Nos. 27& 37LOKESH BHADANA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.K.K.Manan, Sr.Advocate with Versus Mr.Ankush Narang, Ms.Anjali Rajput, Ms.Shweta Sain, Mr.Devyani Khosla and Mr.Jatin Sharma, Advocates. ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Kamal Kr.Ghei, APP. SI Raj Kumar, PS K.M.Pur. $~29 * + STATE (THE NCT OF DELHI) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P. GARG, J.(Oral) 1. The instant bail application filed on behalf of the petitioner was taken up for hearing on 23.01.2017. After directing the State to file Status Report, it was adjourned to 16.03.2017. Crl.M.A.No.2719/2017 for withdrawal of the bail application was taken up for hearing on 15.02.2017 as the petitioner had already been granted bail by the Sessions Court on 13.02.2017.2. Trial Court record was requisitioned to ascertain as to how two bail applications one before the Sessions Court and the other before this Court were pending at the sa...


Mar 28 2017

Shirley Nita Singh vs.sanjay Lal & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-28-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~1 * % + Date of Decision:28. h March, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. G.B. Sewak, Adv. FAO372011 SHIRLEY NITA SINGH versus SANJAY LAL & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manish Aggarwal, Ms.Priyanka Kathuria, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant filed a suit for recovery of Rs.4,69,000/- under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure against the respondent, which was dismissed on 7th January, 2010 by the Trial Court for non- prosecution. The appellant filed an application under Order IX Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure for restoration which was dismissed by the Trial Court on 29th November, 2010. The application for review of the order dated 29th November, 2010 was also dismissed on 18th December, 2010.2. The appellant filed an appeal against the order dated 29th November, 2010 which was dismissed by this Court on 25th February, 2011. The appellant filed SLP (C) No.16186/2011 (which was conv...


Mar 28 2017

Abdul Azeem Salamti vs.uoi Rep. Its Joint Secretary Ministry of Financ ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-28-2017

$~8 to 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:28. h March, 2017 + W.P.(CRL) 2129/2016 SHAIKH MOHAMMED RIZWAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradeep Jain, Advocate with Mr.Shubhankar Jha, Mr. Rahul Raheja, Mr.Ashish Bansal, Mr. Vikas Sarin and Ms. Mansi Awasthi, Advocates. versus UOI & ANR. Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with ........ RESPONDENTS Ms.Divya Kapur, Advocate for UOI. + W.P.(CRL) 2305/2016 ABDUL AZEEM SALAMTI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradeep Jain, Advocate with Mr.Shubhankar Jha, Mr. Rahul Raheja, Mr.Ashish Bansal, Mr. Vikas Sarin and Ms. Mansi Awasthi, Advocates. versus UOI REP. ITS JOINT SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE NEW DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr.Abhishek Ghai, Advocate for UOI. + W.P.(CRL) 2306/2016 SYED ALI FURKHAN ........ Petitioner W.P. (CRL) 2129/2016 & 6 Others Page 1 of 15 Through: Mr. Pradeep Jain, Advocate with Mr.Shubhankar Jha, Mr. Rahul Raheja, Mr.Ashish Bansal, Mr. Vikas S...


Mar 28 2017

National Commission for Women vs.kunal Chauhan & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-28-2017

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:28. h March, 2017 + LPA2742016 & C.M. No.15941/2016 DEVIKA SINGH Versus KUNAL CHAUHAN & ANR. Appellant Respondents + LPA4402016 & C.M. No.28284-86/2016 NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR WOMEN ...Appellant Versus KUNAL CHAUHAN & ANR. Respondents Present:-"Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG with Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC, Ms.Somya Rathore, Advocate for NCW in LPA4402016. Mr. Kailash Vasudev, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shailendra Swarup, Mr.K. K. Patra, Ms. Aparajita Swarup, Mr. Sumer Singh Sandhu, Mr. Dhruv Chand Saxena, Ms. Divija Rajkhowa, Mr.Umrad Singh Rawat, Advocates for the appellant in LPA2742016 and for R-2 in LPA4402016. Ms.Rebecca M. John, Senior Advocate with Mr.Vishal Gosain, Ms.Srilina Roy, Mr. Harsh Bora, Ms. Rudrani Tyagi, Advocate for R CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT Ms. G. ROHINI, CHIEF JUSTICE These two appeals arising out of the order of the learned Single Judge :1. dated 31.03.2016 in W.P...


Mar 28 2017

Prem Lal vs.dharam Bir Jain

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-28-2017

$~A-34 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. 03.2017 RC.REV. 392/2016 and CM No.29183/2016 PREM LAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Javed Ahmad and Mr.Anis Ahmad, Advocates versus DHARAM BIR JAIN ..... Respondent Through Mr. Surendra Mishra and Mr.Sonal Mishra, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) By the present petition filed under Section 25 B (8) of the Delhi Rent 1. Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act), the petitioner seeks to impugn the eviction order dated 14.05.2016 passed by the Additional Rent Controller (hereinafter referred to as the ARC) in the eviction petition filed by the respondent/landlord under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act.2. The respondent/landlord filed the present eviction petition for property being Shop No.5981, Chhalani Market, Gali Matkewali, Sadar Bazar, Delhi-110006. As per the eviction petition, it is stated that the respondent is the owner of the tenanted shop and is a resident...


Mar 28 2017

M/S Dolphin Mart Limited & Anr. Vs.amit Lamba

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-28-2017

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: March 20, 2017 Judgment Delivered on: March 28, 2017 RSA1262016 M/S DOLPHIN MART LIMITED & ANR. Through: Mr.Birendra Mishra & Ms.Poonam ..... Appellants Atej, Advocates versus AMIT LAMBA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ankit Miglani, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT RSA1262016 1. This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the concurrent findings of the Courts below i.e. of the trial Court dated 3rd February, 2015 and of the First Appellate Court dated 5th November, 2015 by which the suit of the respondent/plaintiff has been decreed for a sum of `1,77,798/- along with simple interest @ 9% per annum with effect from 31st October, 2009 till recovery of decretal amount.2. The respondent/plaintiff as proprietor of M/s Goodwill Plastic Sign filed the civil suit No.231/2012 for recovery of `2,88,436/- along with interest pleading that he deals in p...


Mar 28 2017

K. Asokan vs.nuclear Science Centre & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-28-2017

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.1813/2003 28th March, 2017 ........ Petitioner Mr. Krishna Kumar, Advocate + % K. ASOKAN Through: versus NUCLEAR SCIENCE CENTRE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Malvika Trivedi, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA for R-1. To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1.... Petitioner, by this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeks the relief of grant of higher pay grade in the scale of Rs.3000-4500/- as payable to a Scientist-D instead of the pay grade of Rs.2200-4000/- at which the petitioner was appointed as Scientist-C/Scientist Coordinator.2. The facts of the case are that the respondent no.1 issued an advertisement in December, 1993 for various posts including the post of Scientist Coordinator. As per the subject advertisement, the pay grade/scale for the post in question was specifically advertised at Rs.2200-4000/-.... Petitioner was selected and petition...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial