Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Maninder Singh vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P (CRL) 553/2017 Date of Hearing & Order: March 6th, 2017 MANINDER SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Piyush Sachdeva, Adv. versus STATE & ORS. ..... Respondent Through Ms.Kamna Vohra, ASC for State with SI Mangal Ram, PS Rajouri Garden. Respondent no.2 in person. The present petition under Article 226 & 227 of CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.(Oral) 1. the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Sh. Maninder Singh for quashing of FIR No.569/2014 dated 22.05.2014, under Sections 354-A/509 IPC registered at Police Station Rajouri Garden, Delhi on the basis of an amicable settlement arrived at between the petitioner and Respondent No.2, namely, Ms. Shalu Arora. Learned Additional Standing Counsel 2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2 present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant in the FIR in question by SI Mangal Ram. for W....
Nalin Bhushan Chandiok & Anr vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :02. 3.2017 Judgment delivered on :06. 3.2017 + W.P.(C) 5087/2014 and C.M.No.10152/2014 NALIN BHUSHAN CHANDIOK & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr.R.P.Sharma, Mr. Vaibhav Mehra, Advocates. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through Ms.Geeta Malhotra, Advocate. + W.P.(C) 5088/2014 & C.M. No.10154/2014 RAM LAL KAUSHALYA DEVI TRUST ........ Petitioner Through Mr.R.P.Sharma, Mr. Vaibhav Mehra, Advocates. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through Ms.Geeta Malhotra, Advocate. + W.P.(C) 5538/2014 & C.M. No.13753/2014 KANTA CHANDHIOK ........ Petitioner Through Mr.R.P.Sharma, Mr. Vaibhav Mehra, Advocates. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through Ms.Geeta Mehrotra, Advocate. WP(C) Nos.5087/2014, 5088/2014 & 5538/2014 Page 1 of 9 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 There are three petitioners before this Court. They all are aggrie...
Dr. Ashwani Maichand vs.delhi Medical Council and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
$~49 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:06. 03.2017 W.P.(C) 1991/2017 DR. ASHWANI MAICHAND ........ Petitioner versus DELHI MEDICAL COUNCIL AND ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. K.G. Sharma with Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw, Advocates. : Mr. Praveen Khattar, Advocate for respondent No.1 with Mr. LDS Uppal, Asstt. Secretary, DMC. Mr. T. Singhdev with Ms. Puja Sarkar, Ms. Biakthansangi and Mr. Tarun Verma, Advocates for respondent No.2. Mr. Abhinav Shrivastava with Mr. Sameer Jain and Mr. Harmeet Singh Ruprah, Advocates for respondent No.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % ORDER0603.2017 CM No.8795/2017 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 1991/2017 & CM No.8794/2017 (stay) Issue notice. Notice is accepted by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 as also by the learned counsel appearing for the WP(C) 1991/2017 Page 1 of 3 resp...
Surender Singh and Others vs.state Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : March 06th, 2017 Crl. A. No.458/2001 SURENDER SINGH AND OTHERS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. R.S. Mishra, Advocate versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT P.S.TEJI, J1 The present appeal has been filed being aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 29.06.2001 convicting the appellants, namely, Surender Singh, Nafe Singh and Smt.Shama Kaur under Sections 498-A/304-B/34 IPC and order on sentence dated 03.07.2001 vide which the appellants were sentenced to undergo seven years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.200/- each for the offence under Section 304-B IPC and also to undergo three years rigorous imprisonment for three years with fine of Rs.200/- each for the offence under Section 498A IPC. In default of Crl.A. No.458/2001 Page 1 of 18 payment of fine, the appellants have been ordered t...
Harsh Vardhan Tyagi vs.state Election Commission & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~30. * + W.P.(C) 1996/2017 and CM APPL. 8803/2017 HARSH VARDHAN TYAGI Through: Mr. Mohan Singh, Advocate with Mr. Siddharth, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus STATE ELECTION COMMISSION & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, Advocate with Mr. Siddhartha Nagpal, Advocate for R-1/SEC. Mr. Amit Singh, Advocate for R-2/GNCTD. Ms. Rajul Jain, Advocate for R-3/UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER0603.2017 1. Mr. Pushkarna, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 states that the same issues are raised in the present petition as are pending before the Division Bench in WP(C)No.1291/2017 entitled We the Citizens, through its Secretary vs. UOI & Ors., which is listed on 8.3.2017. He states that it would be appropriate if the petitioner is directed to approach the Division Bench for agitating his grievance as raised in the present petition.2. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of, while granting leave t...
Sagar Gambhir vs.sukhdev Singh Gambhir (Since Deceased) Thr His Legal ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On :March 02, 2017 Judgment Delivered On : March 06, 2017 RFA(OS) 46/2016 SAGAR GAMBHIR .....Appellant Represented by: Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Aastha Dhawan and Mr.Harsh Kumar, Advocates versus * % + SUKHDEV SINGH GAMBHIR (SINCE DECEASED) THR HIS LEGAL HEIRS & ANR .....Respondents Represented by: Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.J.K.Chawla and Mr.Rajan Chawla, Advocates for R-1(i) to R-1(v) Mr.Rajesh Yadav, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The appellant is the grandson of late Sukhdev Singh Gambhir, whom he impleaded as defendant No.1 in a suit seeking partition. Appellants uncle : Anil Gambhir was the second defendant. The appellant is the son of late Sh.Sunil Gambhir, the second son born to Sukhdev Singh Gambhir. The appellant claims 1/3rd share through his father in properties bearing municipal No.B-Poorvi...
Om Prakash vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
$~46 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 1933/2017 Judgment delivered on:06. 03.2017 OM PRAKASH versus UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Ms Zubeda Begum and Ms Sana Ansari with petitioner in person. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr Abhishek Khanna for UOI. JUDGMENT0603.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.8584/2017 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 1933/2017 & CM No.8583/2017(interim direction) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking a direction to the respondent to allot a ground floor or first floor Quarter instead of third floor Quarter in Sadiq Nagar on medical grounds. W.P.(C) No1933/2017 Page 1 of 3 2. It is contended that petitioner was earlier allotted a Quarter in Nauroji Nagar, however, in view of the Re-development Plan of Nauroji Nagar, the petitioner was allotted an alternative Quarter at Sadiq Nagar. ...
M/S Oss Air Management Pvt. Ltd. Vs.s.k. Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:06. 03.2017 O.M.P. (COMM) 398/2016 + M/S OSS AIR MANAGEMENT PVT. LTD. Versus S.K. SINGH Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Mr Puneet Singh Bindra, Mr Aslam Ahmed, Mr Rohan Kaushal, Mr Sharad Kharra and Mr Sumanta Kumar Nayak. Mr D. P. S. Dagar and Mr Lokendra Singh. For the Respondent CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU : VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 OSS Air Management Pvt. Ltd. (hereafter OSS) has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) for setting aside the arbitral award dated 03.06.2016 (hereafter the impugned award).2. The impugned award was rendered in the context of disputes that had arisen between the parties in connection with the Agreement dated 07.12.2010 (hereafter 'the Agreement') entered into between the parties whereby Raj Aviation acting through the respondent agreed to sell t...
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.r.d.kaushik & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 6, 2017 Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. + MAC.APP.301/2009 & C.M.8672-73/2009 R.D. KAUSHIK & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Through: Nemo. versus % (ORAL) JUDGMENT Impugned Award of 7th February, 2009 grants compensation of 1,01,000/- with interest @ 9% p.a. to respondent-claimant on account of death of one Satish Kaushik, aged around 37 years in a road accident on 15thOctober, 1996. The facts are already noted in the impugned order and so needs no reproduction. Suffice to note that deceased was unmarried and was earning 5000/- per month. Learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the 'Tribunal') while taking the minimum wages for unskilled labour has assessed the income of deceased as 1,680/- p.m. As per order of 2nd March, 2010, service is complete. None has appeared on behalf of respondents on last so many dates of he...
Lift and Shift India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Warehousing Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 64/2009 Reserved on: January 4, 2017 Decided on: March 6, 2017 LIFT AND SHIFT INDIA PVT. LTD. Through: Mt. Atul Y. Chitale, Senior Advocate with Ms. Tanvi Kakar, Mr. Gurjyot Sethi and Ms. Shivangi Khanna, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K.K. Tyagi, Mr. Iftekhar Ahmed and Mr. Anoop Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT0603.2017 1. This is a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) by Lift and Shift India Pvt. Ltd. challenging an Award dated 4th November, 2008 passed by the sole Arbitrator in the disputes arising out of the award of a contract by the Respondent Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) to Natwar Parikh Industries Ltd. (NPIL) by a letter dated 11th June, 1993.2. At the outset, it requires to be noted that pursuant to a demerger order dated 11th December, 2006 passed by the High Court of Gujarat in Comp...
- ‹ Prev
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- Next ›
- Last »