Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shailesh Kumar and Ors. Vs.punjab National Bank and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.2066/2017 + % SHAILESH KUMAR AND ORS. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS. versus 6th March, 2017 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. P. Sureshan, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. B.S. Shukla and Mr. Shambhu Chaturvedi, Advocate for R-2 & 3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) W.P.(C) No.2066/2017 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 9071-72/2017 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, three petitioners seek the relief of being appointed as Managers (Security) with the respondent No.1/Punjab National Bank as per its advertisement dated 20.8.2016 calling candidates for appointment to various posts including the posts of Managers (Security). The requirement/eligibility criteria for appointment to the post of Manager (Security) as per the advertisement dated 20.8.2016 is as under:-"W.P.(C) No.2066/2017 Page 1 of 3 Post Code Name of Post Grade/scale...
Yogesh Kumar vs.the Public Information Officer/Executive Engineer and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 2020/2017 Judgment delivered on:06. 03.2017 YOGESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner versus THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER/EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : Mr. G.S. Sharma, Mr. V.K. Sharma and Mr. R.A. Sharma, Advocates : Mr. Santosh Kr. Tripathi, ASC with Mr. Rizwan, Adv. for GNCTD JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning the order dated 08.06.2016 whereby the Central Information Commission (CIC) has closed the appeal filed by the petitioner by noting that sufficient information has already been furnished to the petitioner (appellant in the appeal filed before the CIC).2. It is submitted that the notice of listing of the appeal dated 30.05.2016 was received by the petitioner on 08.06.2016 in the evening when the matter was listed before the C...
Anil Lamba & Ors. Vs. Govt. Of Nct & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.1958/2017& conn. + % W.P.(C) No.1958/2017 ANIL LAMBA & ORS. Through: versus GOVT. OF NCT & ORS. 6th March, 2017 ........ Petitioners Mr. Pawan K. Bahl and Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Saurabh Chaddha and Mr. Ishan Kashyap, Advocates for R-1 and 2. Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. With Mr. Siddharth Panda and Mr. Govind Kr. Advocates for R-3. W.P.(C) No.2001/2017 JEENA JOSEPH & ORS. Through: ........ Petitioners Mr. Pawan K. Bahl and Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocates. GOVT. OF NCT & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Saurabh Chaddha and Mr. Ishan Kashyap, Advocates for R-1 and 2. Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. With Mr. Siddharth Panda and Mr. Govind Kr. Advocates for R-3. W.P. (C) No.1958/2017& conn. Page 1 of 30 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By these writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitio...
United India Insurance co.ltd. Vs.preeti Mohan & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: March 06, 2017 + MAC.APP. 99/2009 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Zahid Ali, Advocate for Mr. Versus A.K. De, Advocate PREETI MOHAN & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate for respondent-claimant CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL JUDGMENT Impugned Award of 25th October, 2008 grants compensation of `5,04,500/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum on account of death of one Jayant Jagdish Menon in a road accident on 11th June, 2009. The facts as already noted in impugned Award need no reproduction. Suffice to note that vehicle in question was having a third party insurance. On the basis of evidence recorded, impugned Award has been rendered. Impugned Award declines appellants prayer for grant of recovery rights on the ground that decisions cited do not advance the case of appellant. However, it is noted in impugned Award that the vehicle in question was being driven by deceased...
Director General Civil Aviation & Anr. Vs.iqbal Singh Vedi & Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + W.P. (C) 5687/2007 % Reserved on:8. h February, 2017 Pronounced on:6. h March, 2017 DIRECTOR GENERAL CIVIL AVIATION & ANR. ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Anjana Gosain, Advocate & Mr. Vishu Aggarwal, Advocate. Mr. D.S. Rawat, Deputy Director Administration for DGCA. Versus IQBAL SINGH VEDI & OTHERS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Malaya Kumar Chand, Advocate with Mr. Rohit Sharma, Advocate with respondent no.1 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.1.... Petitioners have filed this Writ Petition (C) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of the writ of Certiorari or any other writ of appropriate nature, order or direction for quashing of the order dated 04.06.2007 passed in OA No.1640/2006 by the Central WP (C) 5687/2007 Page 1 of 13 Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as Tribunal).2. The factual matrix of the Writ Petition are that the...
Tulsi Ram vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Crl. A. No.1146/2016 Judgment reserved on:13. h February, 2017 Judgment pronounced on:6th March, 2017 TULSI RAM STATE Through: Mr. O.P.Saxena, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State along with Insp. Kuldeep Singh and SI Sushil Malik, P.S. Moti Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.1. The appellant has filed the present appeal under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment dated 12.05.2016 by which the appellant has been convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as IPC). By virtue of the order on sentence dated 16.05.2016, the appellant was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for one year for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC.2. The case of the prosecution as ...
Geeta @ Gita Devi vs.uco Bank Karkardooma Court Complex Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2036/2017 & CM89852017 1. GEETA @ GITA DEVI ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Dalip Kumar Santoshi, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus UCO BANK KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Md. Khairul Hussain, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia ORDER0603.2017 for issuing directions to UCO Bank, Karkardooma Court Branch to release a sum of Rs.2,10,527/- placed in a FDR in terms of an order passed in the MACT proceedings.2. Prior to filing the present petition, the petitioner had approached the learned MACT court asking for pre-mature release of the FDR. The said application was however rejected vide order dated 28.1.2017 wherein, it was recorded that an accident had taken place on 3.6.2015, when the petitioners husband had lost his life. A sum of Rs.11,65,000/- was paid as compensation to his family members in the course of...
Anil Sachdeva & Anr vs.nirmal Kanta & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
$~A-29 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:06. 03.2017 + C.R.P. 58/2017 ANIL SACHDEVA & ANR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Manoranjan, Advocate NIRMAL KANTA & ORS Through versus ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) CM No.8897/2017 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.R.P. 58/2017 & CM No.8898/2017 (stay) 1. By the present petition filed under section 115 of CPC the petitioners seek to impugn the order dated 5.11.2016 by which an application filed by the petitioners/defendants under Order 14 Rule 2 CPC/ Order 14 Rule 5 CPC has been dismissed.2. The brief facts are that the respondents/plaintiffs had filed a suit for declaration declaring the General Power of Attorney dated 8.1.1999 allegedly executed by Late Shri Amrit Lal (father of petitioner No.1 and respondents No.2 and 3 and and husband of respondent No.1) as null and void and two sale deed dated 14.01.1999 executed by defendant No.2/petit...
Gurmeet Singh & Anr. Vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. h February, 2017 Decided on:6. h March, 2017 BAIL APPLN. 1707/2016 GURMEET SINGH & ANR. ........ Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhishek Amritanshu and Mr. Amit Pawan, Advs. for P-1. Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhishek Amritanshu and Mr. Amit Pawan, Advs. for P-2. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Spl. PP with Ms. Garima Singh Yadav, Adv. with IO Mr. Anil Rawat. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 The petitioners Gurmeet Singh and Subrata Bhattacharya seek bail in RC-BDI/2014/E/0004 under Sections 120B r/w Sections 409/411/420/ 467/468/471/474 IPC & 4 & 5 read with Section 6 of the Prize Chits & Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act 1978.2. Before proceeding in the matter, this Court brought to the notice of learned counsels for both sides, the order of the Honble Supreme Court dated 2nd May, 2016 allowing prayer a in I...
s.k.tripathi vs.secretary Agricultural Produce Market Committee & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % S.K.TRIPATHI W.P.(C) No.5515/1998 6th March, 2017 ........ Petitioner None. Through: versus SECRETARY AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE & ORS. Through: Ms. Latika Chaudhary, Adv. For ........ RESPONDENTS R-1. Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Adv. For R-3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought the relief of regularization of services with the respondent no.1.2. This writ petition was earlier dismissed by a judgment dated 22.7.2013, and a review petition was also dismissed vide order dated 13.11.2013, however, this matter has been remanded by a Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 15.7.2015 in LPA No.104/2014 by observing as under:-"W.P.(C) No.5515/1998 Page 1 of 6 2. Vide the impugned order dated July 22, 2013 the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition, that is, W.P.(...
- ‹ Prev
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- Next ›
- Last »