Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Bhagwan Dass Khanna Jewellers vs.bhagwan Das Khanna Jewellers Pvt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2017
% + THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:08. 03.2017 FAO(OS) 551/2015 BHAGWAN DASS KHANNA JEWELLERS PVT LTD & ORS M/S BHAGWAN DAS KHANNA JEWELLERS versus ... Appellants ... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellants For the Respondent : Mr Sudhir Chandra, Sr Advocate with Mr Hemant Singh, Ms Mamta Jha, Manish K. Mishra and Mr Waseem Shuaib Ahmed : Mr J.Sai Deepak, Ms Rachel Mamatha M. and Mr Avijit Sharma AND FAO(OS) 67/2016 + M/S BHAGWAN DASS KHANNA JEWELLERS Appellant versus BHAGWAN DAS KHANNA JEWELLERS PVT LTD & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant ... RESPONDENTS : Mr J.Sai Deepak, Adv. with Ms Rachel Mamatha, Mr Avijit Sharma : Mr Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr Manish K. Mishra, Mr Waseem Shuaib Ahmed and Mr Pranav Narain For the... RESPONDENTS FAO (OS) 551/2015 & FAO(OS) 67/2016 Page 1 of 21 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J CM No.217...
Bayer Intellectual Property Gmbh & Anr vs.alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2017
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h March, 2017. W.P.(C) 1971/2014 BAYER CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Ms. Arpita Sawhney and Mr. Arun Kumar Jana, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. T.P. Singh, Adv. for R-1 & 6. Mr. Prashant Tyati and Mr. P. Venkat Reddy, Advs. for R-7. Mr. Anand Grover, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Rajeshwari, Ms. Aparna Gaur, Mr. Tahir A.J.and Mr. Gajendra, Advs. for R-5. AND CS(COMM) No.1592/2016 BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH & ANR ....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Ms. Archana Shanker, Mr. Aditya Gupta and Mr. Utkarsh Srivastava, Advs. Versus ALEMBIC PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. ..... Defendant W.P.(C) No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM) No.1592/2016 Page 1 of 40 Through: Ms. Prathiba M. Singh, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Saya Chaudhary Kapur, Mr. Vivek Ranjan, Mr. Rohin Koolwal, Ms. Sutapa Jana and Mr. Devanshu Khanna, Advs. CORAM: ...
Dr. Pramesh Ratnakar & Anr. Vs.deen Dayal Upadhyaya College and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % DR. PRAMESH RATNAKAR & ANR. W.P. (C) No.7587/2002 8th March, 2017 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Jatin Zaveri and Mr. Neel Kamal Mishra, Advocates. versus DEEN DAYAL UPADHYAYA COLLEGE AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the two petitioners seek the relief of quashing of the communications dated 16.10.2002 and 30.10.2002 issued by the respondent no.1. By these communications the respondent no.1/Deen Dayal Upadhyaya College/employer has sought to make recoveries from the petitioners for the increments received by the petitioners during the periods of their study leaves. The impugned communications dated 16.10.2002 read as under:-"Two Communications dated 16.10.2002 DEEN DAYAL UPADHYAYA COLLEGE (UNIVERSITY OF DELHI)...
Magma Hdi General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.kusum and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: March 08, 2017 + MAC.APP. 155/2016 MAGMA HDI GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Navneet Kumar & Mr. Vikash Bhadana, Advocates Versus KUSUM & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Prashar, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL1 JUDGMENT Impugned Award of 28th November, 2015 grants compensation of `13,74,960/- with interest @12% p.a. on account of death of one - Virender Singh @ Birender, in a road accident on 25th June, 2013. The facts are already noted in the impugned Award and so, needs no reproduction. Suffice to note that deceased, aged 44 years, was a driver on a private truck and he has left behind six legal heirs who are parents, widow, two daughters and a son. On the basis of evidence led, impugned Award has been rendered. The breakup of compensation awarded by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the "Tribunal") is as under:-"MAC....
Union of India and Ors vs.k.k. Bhardwaj
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2017
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2113/2017 Date of Decision :8. h March, 2017 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Vijay Joshi, Advocate Versus K.K. BHARDWAJ ..... Respondent Through Mr. A. K. Behera and Mr. R. K. Shukla, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Caveat No.215/2017 Caveator will be heard when the application for stay is taken up for hearing. The caveat stands disposed of. CM No.9248/2017 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 2113/2017 and CM No.9247/2017 (Stay) The Union of India and its functionaries have challenged the impugned order dated 21.11.2014 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal, whereby O. A. No.1189/2012 filed by K. K. Bhardwaj, the respondent before us, has been allowed.2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, we are not WP(C) No.2113/2017 Pag...
M/S Caravan Commercial Company Ltd vs.yashashwi Aggarwal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: March 08, 2017 Judgment reserved on: September 30, 2016 + FAO(OS) 385/2014 & CM No.14139/2014 M/S CARAVAN COMMERCIAL COMPANY LTD Through: Mr. Arvind Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Mr.K. Datta & Mr.Manish Srivastava, Advs. ..... Appellant versus YASHASHWI AGGARWAL & ORS Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Jeevesh Nagrath, Ms.Monica Manchanda, Mr.Chetan Gautam & Ms.Meghna Bal, Advs. for R-1 & 2. Mr. Manish Vashist, Adv. for R-3 & 4 Mr.Deepak Sahni, Adv. for R-11. Mr.Lalit Gupta with Mr.Gaurav Lavaria, Advs. for R-12 to 18. + FAO(OS) 386/2014 & CM Nos. 14143/2014 & 14145/2014 SMT. PUSHPA DEVI Through: Mr.Deepak Sahni, Adv. versus SHRI YASHASHWI AGGARWAL & ORS ..... Appellant ....... RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) 385/2014 & connected matter Page 1 of 61 Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Jeevesh Nagrath, Ms.Monica Manchanda, Mr.Chetan Gautam & Ms.Meghna Bal, Advs. for R-1 & 2. Mr. Manish Vashist, Adv. for ...
R K Madhwani vs.sanjeev Garg
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2017
$~7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA2822016 & C.M. No.17331/2016 (stay) R K MADHWANI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.C. Singhal, Advocate. versus SANJEEV GARG ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akhilesh Pradhan, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER0803.2017 1. The appellant/defendant is aggrieved by the impugned judgment dated 12.1.2016, passed by the learned trial court in a suit for recovery of possession, arrears of rent, mesne-profits, damages and permanent injunction instituted by the respondent/plaintiff in respect of a flat situated in Vasant Kunj.2. The court is informed that during the pendency of the suit, the appellant/defendant had handed over the vacant peaceful possession of the subject premises to the respondent /plaintiff on 07.7.2014. As a result, the impugned judgment is confined to the money decree.3. In the course of submissions, it was enquired from learned counsels for the parties as to whether they would be in a position to settle the ...
Sh. Shailender Arora vs.steel Authority of India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2017
+ % SH. SHAILENDER ARORA Through: versus STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. 8th March, 2017 ........ Petitioner Dr. N. K. Khetarpal, Advocate. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.1258/2003 ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Advocate with Mr. Wasim Ashraf, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks the relief that the respondent/Steel Authority of India Ltd/employer should accept his request of voluntary retirement made vide letters dated 27.3.2001 and/or 31.12.2002. When petitioner submitted his letter dated 27.3.2001 Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS), 2001 was in force, and when petitioner submitted his letter dated 31.12.2002, another VRS Scheme 2002-03 was in force. Through the writ petition, petitioner states that although petitioner was on sabbatical leave and the VRS Scheme excluded app...
Union of India & Anr. Vs.central Administrative Tribunal and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2017
$~R-38 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:08. h March, 2017 + W.P. (C) 6093/2002 & C.M. No.10391/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.T.P. Singh and Mr.Sahaj Garg, Advs. versus CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL AND ANR .....Respondents Through None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 28th September, 2001 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter 2.3. referred to as the Tribunal). Rule DB was issued in this matter on 24th September, 2002. The necessary facts to be noticed for disposal of this writ petition are that respondent No.2 (applicant before the Tribunal) had approached the Tribunal assailing the order dated 12th October, 1999 whereby his representation to stay the departmental inquiry during the pendency of the criminal proceedings was rejected. Respondent No.2 W.P. (C ) N...
Dipak Das & Ors. Vs.uoi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + WP (C) 5657/2010 Judgment reserved on : December 14, 2016 Judgment pronounced on: March 08, 2017 ........ Petitioners DIPAK DAS & Ors. versus Through : Ms.Madhu Tewatia, Mr.Adhirath Singh and Mr.Sachin Saini, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA UOI & Ors. ........ RESPONDENTS Through :Mr.Rajan Sabharwal and Mr.Abhishek Kumar Abhinav, Advs. for R-1 to 3. Ms.Anjana Gosain, Mr.Rahul Singhal and Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advs. for R-4 to 7. A. K. CHAWLA, J.JUDGMENT1 By the petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to regularise their ad-hoc promotions as Head Constables (Band) RPSF in terms of the policy directive No.18 dated 27.02.1997 framed under Rule 28 of the RPF Rules 1987 in short "the subject rules" read with Section 8 of the Railway Protection Force Act, 1957 in short "the subject Act"; WP(C) 5657/2010 Page...
- ‹ Prev
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- Next ›
- Last »