Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
J-Amada Remedies vs.employees State Insurance Corporation & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 2801/2016 & CM No.11797/2016 Judgment delivered on:08. h March, 2017 J-AMADA REMEDIES ........ Petitioner Versus EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ RESPONDENTS : For the... Petitioners For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr Santosh Kumar with Mr Rajiv R. Mishra. Mr K.P. Mavi with Mr. B.P. Mishra for R-1 Mr. Jasmeet Singh with Ms. Nidhi Mohan Parashar for R-2 & R-3 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J1 The petitioner by the present petition seeks quashing of Clause VII (b) of e-Tender enquiry dated 16.02.2016 and a direction to respondent No.1 (Employee State Insurance Corporation) to issue a corrigendum and incorporate the terms and conditions as laid down in policy/order dated 23.03.2012 issued by respondent No.2 (Development Commissioner, Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises) with respect to Micro & Small Enterprises. F...
Leela Gaur vs.president General Council Iph and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % LEELA GAUR W.P.(C) No.7373/2002 8th March, 2017 Through: ........ Petitioner Mr. Mahesh Kasana and Ms. Aparna Rohtagi Jain, Advs. versus PRESIDENT GENERAL COUNCIL IPH AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Bansal and Ms. Arpita, Advs. for R-1 to 4. Mr. Naveen Jakkhar, Adv. for Mr. Satyakam, ASC, GNCTD for R-5. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. In this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, though several prayers were made, all the prayers have become infructuous on account of the petitioner having already retired during the pendency of this writ petition, and the only relief now prayed on behalf of the petitioner, is the prayer No.(iii) for grant of benefits of senior scale to the petitioner w.e.f. 1.1.1996 of Rs.5,500-9000.2. It is undisputed that petitioner is entitled to the senior scale. The issue however is what is the first pa...
Muslim & Anr. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : March 08, 2017 CRL.A. 442/2001 MUSLIM & ANR. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Dalal, Ms. Payal Juneja, for Ms. Garima Goel, Advocates appellant No.1. Mr. Sheikh Israr Ahmad, Advocate for appellant No.2 versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT P.S.TEJI, J.1. Present appeal has been filed by the appellants being aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 04.06.2001, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi, thereby convicting the appellant Muslim for the offence punishable under Section 306/498- A of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as I.P.C.) and the appellant Yusuf for the offence under Section 498-A of IPC. Consequent thereto, vide order on sentence dated 07.06.2001, the appellant Muslim was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 4 years with fine of Rs....
Suncity Sheets Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. 09.2016 Pronounced on:08. 03.2017 + W.P.(C) 3544/2016, C.M. NOS. 15209/2016 & 25402/2016 SUNCITY SHEETS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Sh. Tarun Gulati, Sh. Kishore Kunal, Sh. Manish Rastogi, Sh. Pranav Bansal, Sh. Shashi Mathews and Sh. Anupam Mishra, Advocates, for... Petitioner No.1. Sh. Naresh Thakkar and Sh. Somnath Shukla, Advocates, for... Petitioner No.2. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Sh. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Sh. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC, Ms. Natasha Thakur, GP, Sh. Srivats Kaushal, Ms. Aastha Jain and Sh. Sumit Mishra, Advocates, for UOI. Sh. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Jitendra Singh, Sh. Nikhil Rohatagi and Ms. Kritka Sharma, Advocates, for Respondent No.4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The... Petitioner challenges a Notification, dated 19.02.2016 which initiates investigation into the alleged c...
Dinesh Kumar Gupta vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2017
$~02 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 10052/2016 Date of decision:8. h March, 2017 DINESH KUMAR GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. A.K. Singla, Sr. Advocate with Mr. H.D. Sharma, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sarat Chandra, Advocate for the UOI. Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Senior Standing Counsel Customs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.1968/2017 This is an application for production of Annexures A and B i.e. RTI correspondence with the postal authorities and the original envelop posted on 13th December, 2012 along with the enclosure i.e. letter dated 2nd November, 2012, received by the petitioner on 14th December, 2012. We take the said documents on record, but the effect thereof will be examined and considered independently. The application is accordingly disposed of. W.P. (C) 10052/2016 Page 1 of 12 Review Petition No.526/2016 Dinesh Kumar Gupta, the applic...
Punj Lloyd Ltd vs.gvk Power (Goindwal Sahib) Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2017
% + + + THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:08. 03.2017 FAO(OS) 222/2015 & CM75782015 FAO(OS) 223/2015 & CM75812015 FAO(OS) 224/2015 & CM75842015 PUNJ LLOYD LTD ..... Appellant versus GVK POWER (GOINDWAL SAHIB) LIMITED ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case:-"For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr Rajiv Nayar and Mr A. S. Chandhiok, Senior Advocates with Mr Rishi Agrawala, Mr Akshay R., Mr Karan Luthra, Mr Mayank Bamniyal and Mr Ritesh Kumar : Mr Kapil Sibal and Mr Parag P Tripathi, Senior Advocates with Ms Kanika Singh, Ms Heena Khan, Mr Arunabh Ganguli and Mr Salim A. Imamdar + + + FAO(OS) 221/2015 & CM752627/2015 FAO(OS) 231/2015 & CM771516/2015 FAO(OS) 232/2015 & CM771718/2015 GVK POWER (GOINDWAL SAHIB) LTD versus PUNJ LLYOD LTD ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case:-"For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr Kapil Sibal and Mr Parag P Tripathi, Senior Advocates with Ms Kanika Singh, Ms Heena Khan, Mr Arunabh Ga...
M/S. Metal Closures & Ors vs.religare Finvest Ltd. & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on : January 27,2017 Decided on: March 08, 2017 Review Pet. No.531/2016 and CM Appl. Nos. 44824/2016 (stay) and 44825/2016 (delay) in FAO(OS)(COMM). 50/2016 M/S. METAL CLOSURES & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Pritha Srikumar Iyer and Ms. Neha Mathen, Advocates. versus RELIGARE FINVEST LTD. & ORS. ..... RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT INDIRA BANERJEE, J1 This is an application filed by the appellants under Section 114 read with Order 47 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, for review of a judgment and order dated 7.10.2016, whereby the appeal being FAO(OS)(COMM) 50/2016 filed by the appellants under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation =====================================================================. FAO(OS)(COMM). No.50/2016 Page 1 of 8 Act, 1996, hereinafter referred to as the 1996 Act, has been dismissed.2) The re...
Nityanand Raut vs.jyoti Ram Sahu & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2017
$~3. * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA2412017 and CM APPL. 8132-8133/2017 NITYANAND RAUT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Aashutosh Dubey, Advocate with Mr. Y.R. Gautam, Advocate versus JYOTI RAM SAHU & ANR Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % Pursuant to the order dated 28.02.2017 on which date, this Court had ORDER0803.2017 expressed its reservations about entertaining the present appeal as there did not appear any ground for interfering in the impugned judgment and decree dated 29.09.2016 passed by the trial court in favour of the respondents/plaintiffs, directing the appellant/defendant to hand over vacant peaceful possession of the suit premises and pay damages/mesne profits to the respondents/plaintiffs, learned counsel for the appellant states that he has obtained instructions from his client to the effect that he does not wish to press the appeal on merits. Instead, he requests that a limited notice be issued to the respondents...
Rajni & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2017
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:8. h March, 2017 + MAC.APP. 723/2015 RAJNI & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vivekanand Mishra, Adv. for... RESPONDENTS No.1 and 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.29,32,776/- has been awarded to the appellants. The appellants seek enhancement of the award amount.2. On 25th August, 2012 at about 02:10 p.m., Naveen Kumar Singh was going on his motorcycle near Swatantra Bharati Karyalaya, Gopinath Bazar, Delhi Cantt when an army truck bearing No.11C092076H (332) took a left turn towards Swatantra Bharati Karyalaya and hit the motorcycle which resulted in the death of Naveen Kumar Singh.3. The deceased was aged 23 years at the time of the accident and was survived by his parents and two sisters, who filed the claim before the Claims Tribun...
Oncquest Laboratories Limited Vs.-
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:09. 12.2016 Judgment pronounced on:08. 03.2017 CO.PET. 413/2016 IN THE MATTER OF:-"ONCQUEST LABORATORIES LIMITED ... Petitioner Through: Meenakshi Singh & Rohan Malik, Advocates for the... Petitioner, Ms. Aparna Mudiam, Assistant ROC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present petition under Sections 100 to 104 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by Oncquest Laboratories Limited (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner Company) seeking sanction of this court for the proposed reduction of its share capital.2. The registered office of the... Petitioner Company is situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court.3. The... Petitioner Company was incorporated as a Private Limited Company under the Act, vide Certificate of Incorporation dated 29.11.2007, CO.PET. 413/2016 Page 1 of 1 issued by the Registrar of Companies, N.C.T. of Delhi & Haryana. Subs...
- ‹ Prev
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- Next ›
- Last »