Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gail (India) Ltd. Vs.osram India Pvt Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2017
$~ * 12. + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 478/2016 GAIL (INDIA) LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sridharan Ramkumar, Dr. Sheetal Vohra and Mr. Manvendra Gaur, Advocates. versus OSRAM INDIA PVT LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Diwakar Maheshwari, Mr. V Gupta Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER0903.2017 % 1. The challenge by GAIL (India) Ltd. (GAIL) in this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is to an Award dated 25th September 2014 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal (AT) in the disputes between GAIL and Osram India Pvt. Ltd. (OIPL) in the disputes arising out of a gas transmission agreement (GTA) dated 1st May 2000. Background facts 2. The GTA was for a period of 15 years i.e. up to 31st December 2022. In the GTA, OIPL is described as the Shipper and GAIL as the Transporter. In terms of Clause 2.2 of the GTA, the Shipper and the Transporter were to enter into transactions in ...
Jindal Steel & Power Limited vs.union of India & Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2017
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:09. 03.2017 % + W.P.(C) 973/2015 and CM Nos. 1719/2015, 4969/2015 GVK POWER (GOINDWAL SAHIB) LIMITED & ANR ... Petitioners -versus- ... RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & ANR Advocates who appeared in the case:-"For the... Petitioners For the Respondent/UoI : Mr P. Chidambaram, Sr Advocate with Mr Amit Kapur, Mr Vishrov M., Mr Rohit Venkat and Mr Apoorva Misra : Mr Sanjay Jain, ASG, Mr Akshay Makhija, CGSC, Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC, Mr Sanjeev Narula, CGSC, Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr Manik Dogra, CGSC, Mr Shresth Jain, Mr Vidur Mohan and Ms Aastha Jain + W.P.(C) 1300/2015 and CM Nos. 2296/2015, 2632/2015, 7054/2015 JAYASWAL NECO INDUSTRIES LTD. ... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in the case:-"For the... Petitioner : Mr Kapil Sibal Mr Ramji Srinivasan, Sr Advocates, Mr Devashish Bharuka, Ms Rita Jha, Mr Jatin Sehgal and Mr Ravi Baruka : Mr Sanjay Jain, ASG, Mr Akshay Makhija, CGSC, Mr Amit...
Narinder Batra & Anr vs.kirti Azad
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2017
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:9. h March, 2017 CS(OS) No.72/2016 NARINDER BATRA & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Shyel Trehan, Ms. Manjira Dasgupta & Mr. Nikhil Ratti Kapoor, Advs. Versus KIRTI AZAD ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Manish Tiwari, Mr. Amit A. Pai, Mr. Rahat Bansal & Mr. Anshuman Ashok, Advs. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.8473/2016 (of the defendant under Order VII Rule 11 CPC).1. The sole defendant in the suit seeks rejection of the plaint in this suit by the two plaintiffs i.e. Shri Narinder Dhruv Batra and Hockey India against the defendant for (i) recovery of damages in the sum of Rs.10,00,00,000/- for defamation; and, (ii) for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from in future defaming the plaintiffs.2. The suit was entertained and the defendant, besides filing the written statement (to which replication has been filed), has filed this application under Order VII Rule 11 o...
Tikka Brijender Singh Bedi vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2017
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :02. 3.2017 Judgment delivered on :09. 3.2017 + W.P.(C) 6336/2010 & C.M. No.12590/2010 TIKKA BRIJENDER SINGH BEDI ........ Petitioner Through Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Preet Pal Singh, Mr.Dipender Chauhan and Mr.Priyam and Ms.Sukhneet Dhir, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sanjeev Narula, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1... Petitioner is the recorded owner of property bearing No.132, Golf Links, New Delhi. The first owner of this property was Prem Kumari. The father of the petitioner had purchased this property from Prem Kumari on 02.8.1956. This sale deed recorded the area of the land as 335 sq. yards or thereabouts. Contention of the petitioner being that the factum of mentioning thereabouts clearly indicates that the authorities were themselves not certain about the exact area of WP(C) 6336/2010 Page 1 of 24 the plot at the site. In the proposed...
Den Networks Ltd. Vs.government of National Capital Territory of Delhi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2017
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:09. 03.2017 % + W.P.(C) 427/2014 & CM No.851/2014 SITI CABLE NETWORKS LIMITED Petitioner versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:-"For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr Naushad Ahmad Khan, : Mr S.K. Bagaria, Sr. Adv. with Mr Vivek Sarin, Mr Mohd. Danish, Mr Virender Thakur Mr Mohit Paul, Mr Kunal Bahri and Ms Astha Nigam + W.P.(C) 475/2014 & CM Nos. 933/2014, 2648/2014, 6401/2014, 21185/2014 & 6571/2015 INDUSIND MEDIA AND COMMUNICATIONS LTD. Petitioner versus GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS. Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:-"For the... Petitioner : Mr Salman Khurshid, Sr. Adv. with Ms Vandana Jaisingh, Ms Meghna Mishra, Ms Kanupriya, Ms Jasmeet Singh and Mr Naman Joshi For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr Naushad Ahmad Khan, Mr Mohit Paul, Mr Kunal Bahri and Ms Astha ...
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.umesh Giri & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~3 * % + Date of Decision:09. h March, 2017 FAO2722016 and C.M. Appl. 22217/2016 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajat Brar, Advocate versus UMESH GIRI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. J.P. Sikka and Mr. M.K. Rathee, Advocate for respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the order of the Commissioner, Employees Compensation whereby compensation of Rs.4,54,944/- has been awarded to respondent No.1.2. The accident dated 27th April, 2008 resulted in grievous injuries to respondent No.1. Respondent No.1 suffered 52% disability in respect of left upper limb. The Commissioner, Employees Compensation took the loss of earning capacity as 100% to award compensation of Rs.4,54,944/-.3. Learned counsel for the appellant urged at the time of hearing that the compensation awarded to respondent No.1 is on a higher side and the same is liable to be reduced by reduc...
Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd. Vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2017
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:09. 03.2017 % + W.P.(C) 973/2015 and CM Nos. 1719/2015, 4969/2015 GVK POWER (GOINDWAL SAHIB) LIMITED & ANR ... Petitioners -versus- ... RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & ANR Advocates who appeared in the case:-"For the... Petitioners For the Respondent/UoI : Mr P. Chidambaram, Sr Advocate with Mr Amit Kapur, Mr Vishrov M., Mr Rohit Venkat and Mr Apoorva Misra : Mr Sanjay Jain, ASG, Mr Akshay Makhija, CGSC, Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC, Mr Sanjeev Narula, CGSC, Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr Manik Dogra, CGSC, Mr Shresth Jain, Mr Vidur Mohan and Ms Aastha Jain + W.P.(C) 1300/2015 and CM Nos. 2296/2015, 2632/2015, 7054/2015 JAYASWAL NECO INDUSTRIES LTD. ... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in the case:-"For the... Petitioner : Mr Kapil Sibal Mr Ramji Srinivasan, Sr Advocates, Mr Devashish Bharuka, Ms Rita Jha, Mr Jatin Sehgal and Mr Ravi Baruka : Mr Sanjay Jain, ASG, Mr Akshay Makhija, CGSC, Mr Amit...
Mp Amrl (Bicharpur) & Anr. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2017
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:09. 03.2017 % + W.P.(C) 973/2015 and CM Nos. 1719/2015, 4969/2015 GVK POWER (GOINDWAL SAHIB) LIMITED & ANR ... Petitioners -versus- ... RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & ANR Advocates who appeared in the case:-"For the... Petitioners For the Respondent/UoI : Mr P. Chidambaram, Sr Advocate with Mr Amit Kapur, Mr Vishrov M., Mr Rohit Venkat and Mr Apoorva Misra : Mr Sanjay Jain, ASG, Mr Akshay Makhija, CGSC, Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC, Mr Sanjeev Narula, CGSC, Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr Manik Dogra, CGSC, Mr Shresth Jain, Mr Vidur Mohan and Ms Aastha Jain + W.P.(C) 1300/2015 and CM Nos. 2296/2015, 2632/2015, 7054/2015 JAYASWAL NECO INDUSTRIES LTD. ... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in the case:-"For the... Petitioner : Mr Kapil Sibal Mr Ramji Srinivasan, Sr Advocates, Mr Devashish Bharuka, Ms Rita Jha, Mr Jatin Sehgal and Mr Ravi Baruka : Mr Sanjay Jain, ASG, Mr Akshay Makhija, CGSC, Mr Amit...
Sh. Zile Singh vs.food Corporation of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % SH. ZILE SINGH W.P.(C) No.5289/2007 9th March, 2017 Through: ........ Petitioner Mr. Arun Bhardwaj and Mr. Mimansak Bhardwaj, Advs. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Deepak Dewan, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner had challenged the orders passed by the departmental authority and the appellate authority, respective order being dated 20.6.2005 and 25.09.2006, by which petitioner was imposed a punishment of recovery of Rs.2 lacs on account of loss caused by the petitioner to the respondent no.1/Food Corporation of India/employer with respect to bad quality of rice loaded in the special train on 13.4.1994 Ex. Talwandi Bhai to Durgapur. The figure of Rs.2 lacs is calculated being 7% of the amount of the total loss of Rs.19,30,678.24 as out o...
Manoj Kumar Garg vs.vijay Kumar Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2017
$~11 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 09, 2017 RSA2332016 MANOJ KUMAR GARG Through: Mr.Shiv Charan Garg, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI Through: Mr.T.C.Sharma, Advocate. ..... Respondent JUDGMENT (Oral) RSA No.233/2016 1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure has been filed by the appellant impugning the judgment 04th May, 2016 passed by the First Appellate Court whereby RCA No.80/2015 preferred by the respondents herein has been partly allowed.2. Mr.Shiv Charan Garg, learned counsel for the appellant has placed on record the copy of the judgment dated 20th July, 2016 whereby RSA No.179/2016 filed by the respondent herein assailing the judgment dated 04th May, 2016 passed by the First Appellant Court in RCA No.80/2016 (which is also impugned in this appeal by the appellant herein) stands dismissed.3. Learned counsel for the appellant has also placed on rec...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »