Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sunil Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2017
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + + Reserved on :23. d February, 2017 Date of decision :9. h March, 2017 CRL.A. 37/2017 & Crl.M.B.No.60/2017 SUNIL KUMAR Through: Mr.Sumeet Verma, Adv. ..... Appellant with Mr.Abhijeet Sharma, Adv. STATE versus Through: Mr.Varun Goswami, APP ..... Respondent for State. S.I. Karamvir, P.S. Narela. CRL.A. 46/2017 & Crl.M.B.No.73/2017 ARVIND ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Gaurav Bhattacharya, Adv. for Mr. Ajay Verma, Adv. STATE versus Through: Mr.Varun Goswami, APP ..... Respondent for State. S.I. Karamvir, P.S. Narela. CRL.A. 95/2017 & Crl.M.B.No.151/2017 DINESH STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey and Mr.Akshay Sehgal, Advs. versus ..... Respondent Crl.A. Nos.37, 46 & 95/2017 Page 1 of 28 Through: Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for State. S.I. Karamvir, P.S. Narela. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT GITA MITTAL, J.Crl.A.Nos.37/2017, 46/2017 and 95/2017 1. Sunil Kumar (appellant in Crl.A.N...
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.rajvati Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:09. h March, 2017 $~12 * % + MAC.APP. 113/2013 and C.M. Appl. 16055/2016 RAJVATI DEVI & ORS. versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD...... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.C. Anand and Mr. R.P.S. Bhatti, Advocates for respondents No.1 to 7 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.25,69,000/- has been awarded to respondents No.1 to 7.2. The accident dated 26th May, 2008 resulted in the death of Shish Pal Singh. The deceased was aged 39 years at the time of the accident and was working as a Header Setter earning Rs.12,500/- per month. The deceased was survived by his widow, three daughters, two minor sons and mother who filed the claim petition before the Claims Tribunal. The Claims Tribunal added 50% towards future prospects of the deceased, deducted 1/4th towards the personal e...
Den Adn Network Pvt Ltd. Vs.government of the Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2017
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:09. 03.2017 % + W.P.(C) 427/2014 & CM No.851/2014 SITI CABLE NETWORKS LIMITED Petitioner versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:-"For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr Naushad Ahmad Khan, : Mr S.K. Bagaria, Sr. Adv. with Mr Vivek Sarin, Mr Mohd. Danish, Mr Virender Thakur Mr Mohit Paul, Mr Kunal Bahri and Ms Astha Nigam + W.P.(C) 475/2014 & CM Nos. 933/2014, 2648/2014, 6401/2014, 21185/2014 & 6571/2015 INDUSIND MEDIA AND COMMUNICATIONS LTD. Petitioner versus GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS. Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:-"For the... Petitioner : Mr Salman Khurshid, Sr. Adv. with Ms Vandana Jaisingh, Ms Meghna Mishra, Ms Kanupriya, Ms Jasmeet Singh and Mr Naman Joshi For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr Naushad Ahmad Khan, Mr Mohit Paul, Mr Kunal Bahri and Ms Astha ...
Jindal Power Limited & Anr vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2017
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:09. 03.2017 % + W.P.(C) 973/2015 and CM Nos. 1719/2015, 4969/2015 GVK POWER (GOINDWAL SAHIB) LIMITED & ANR ... Petitioners -versus- ... RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & ANR Advocates who appeared in the case:-"For the... Petitioners For the Respondent/UoI : Mr P. Chidambaram, Sr Advocate with Mr Amit Kapur, Mr Vishrov M., Mr Rohit Venkat and Mr Apoorva Misra : Mr Sanjay Jain, ASG, Mr Akshay Makhija, CGSC, Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC, Mr Sanjeev Narula, CGSC, Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr Manik Dogra, CGSC, Mr Shresth Jain, Mr Vidur Mohan and Ms Aastha Jain + W.P.(C) 1300/2015 and CM Nos. 2296/2015, 2632/2015, 7054/2015 JAYASWAL NECO INDUSTRIES LTD. ... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in the case:-"For the... Petitioner : Mr Kapil Sibal Mr Ramji Srinivasan, Sr Advocates, Mr Devashish Bharuka, Ms Rita Jha, Mr Jatin Sehgal and Mr Ravi Baruka : Mr Sanjay Jain, ASG, Mr Akshay Makhija, CGSC, Mr Amit...
M/S Nilachal Iron & Power Limited vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2017
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:09. 03.2017 % + W.P.(C) 973/2015 and CM Nos. 1719/2015, 4969/2015 GVK POWER (GOINDWAL SAHIB) LIMITED & ANR ... Petitioners -versus- ... RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & ANR Advocates who appeared in the case:-"For the... Petitioners For the Respondent/UoI : Mr P. Chidambaram, Sr Advocate with Mr Amit Kapur, Mr Vishrov M., Mr Rohit Venkat and Mr Apoorva Misra : Mr Sanjay Jain, ASG, Mr Akshay Makhija, CGSC, Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC, Mr Sanjeev Narula, CGSC, Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr Manik Dogra, CGSC, Mr Shresth Jain, Mr Vidur Mohan and Ms Aastha Jain + W.P.(C) 1300/2015 and CM Nos. 2296/2015, 2632/2015, 7054/2015 JAYASWAL NECO INDUSTRIES LTD. ... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in the case:-"For the... Petitioner : Mr Kapil Sibal Mr Ramji Srinivasan, Sr Advocates, Mr Devashish Bharuka, Ms Rita Jha, Mr Jatin Sehgal and Mr Ravi Baruka : Mr Sanjay Jain, ASG, Mr Akshay Makhija, CGSC, Mr Amit...
East Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr vs.m/s Tomar Construction & Co
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA1852017 and CM APPL. 6218/2017 RFA1862017 and CM APPL. 6224/2017 RFA1872017 and CM APPL. 6227/2017 RFA1892017 and CM APPL. 6247/2017 RFA1912017 and CM APPL. 6261/2017 RFA1922017 and CM APPL. 6268/2017 EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR..... Appellants Through: Mr. G.D. Mishra, Standing Counsel $~10 to 15. * + + + + + + versus M/S TOMAR CONSTRUCTION & CO WILSON BHATI SUDEEP SUBAKSH ..... Respondent ..... Respondent ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ankit Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Akhil Verma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER0903.2017 1. Appearance is entered by the counsel for the respondents in all the appeals. He states that he has received a complete set of the paper book. The money payable towards the costs imposed in the present appeals is being handed over to the counsel for the respondents.2. Counsel for the respondents states that he does not have any objection to the present appeals being disposed of in terms of th...
Smt. Tara Devi vs.laxmi Narain & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2017
$~A-10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CM(M) 235/1992 SMT. TARA DEVI Date of decision:09. 03.2017 ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Sanjeev Sr.Advocate Sehgal, Advocate. Sindhwani, with Ms.Minal versus LAXMI NARAIN & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Brajesh Kr.Srivastava & Mr.Dinesh Gaur, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to impugn the order dated 05.01.1991 passed by the Additional Rent Controller (hereinafter referred to as the ARC) under Section 14(1)(h) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (in short the DRC Act) regarding premises bearing No.1665, Lekh Raj Bhawan, Kucha Dakhni Rai, Darya Ganj, New Delhi- 110002.2. It is averred that the premises were let out to the husband of the petitioner, namely Sh.R.L.Deo. After his death, the petitioner has become the tenant of the demised premises. It was stated in the eviction petition that the pe...
Jammu & Kashmir State Power Development Corporation vs.k J M C Global ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2017
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:07. 02.2017 Judgment delivered on:09. 03.2017 FAO(OS) 263/2016 + JAMMU & KASHMIR STATE POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ..... Appellant K J M C GLOBAL MARKET (INDIA) LIMITED..... Respondent versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr Shashank Garg with Mr Zaid Ali. : Mr Bishwajit Bhattacharya, Sr.Adv. with Mr Chandrachur Bhattacharya. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR JUDGMENT ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J FAO(OS) 263/2016 & CM39422017 1. The appeal namely FAO(OS) No.263/2016 has been filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the judgment dated 09.05.2016 passed by a learned single Judge of this court in OMP No.1159/2012 whereby the arbitral award dated 03.07.2012 passed by the learned sole arbitrator was upheld. Along with the said appeal, an application for condonation of delay of 35 days (CM No.33535/2016) for...
Court on Its Own Motion vs.dsp Jayant Kashmiri & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2017
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on :21. t February, 2017 Date of decision :9. h March, 2017 CCP(REF)No.3/2016 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Amicus Curiae with Ms. Aditi Mohan, Adv. versus DSP JAYANT KASHMIRI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, ASG with Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl.PP for the Central Bureau of Investigation. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT GITA MITTAL, J. We ought never to forget that the power to punish for contempt large as it is, must always be exercised cautiously, wisely and with circumspection. Frequent or indiscriminate use of this power in anger or irritation would not help to sustain the dignity or status of the court, but may sometimes affect it CCP(Ref.)No.3/2016 Page 1 of 58 adversely. Wise Judges never forget that the best way to sustain the dignity and status of their office is to deserve respect from the public at large by ...
Siti Cable Networks Ltd vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2017
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:09. 03.2017 % + W.P.(C) 427/2014 & CM No.851/2014 SITI CABLE NETWORKS LIMITED Petitioner versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:-"For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr Naushad Ahmad Khan, : Mr S.K. Bagaria, Sr. Adv. with Mr Vivek Sarin, Mr Mohd. Danish, Mr Virender Thakur Mr Mohit Paul, Mr Kunal Bahri and Ms Astha Nigam + W.P.(C) 475/2014 & CM Nos. 933/2014, 2648/2014, 6401/2014, 21185/2014 & 6571/2015 INDUSIND MEDIA AND COMMUNICATIONS LTD. Petitioner versus GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS. Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:-"For the... Petitioner : Mr Salman Khurshid, Sr. Adv. with Ms Vandana Jaisingh, Ms Meghna Mishra, Ms Kanupriya, Ms Jasmeet Singh and Mr Naman Joshi For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr Naushad Ahmad Khan, Mr Mohit Paul, Mr Kunal Bahri and Ms Astha ...
- ‹ Prev
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- Next ›
- Last »