Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kanika Sanwal vs.university of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.2219/2017 and C.M. No.9690/2017 (stay) KANIKA SANWAL10h March, 2017 Through: ........ Petitioner Mr. Anuj Bhandari, Advocate with Mr. Naveen Kumar Gautam, Advocate. UNIVERSITY OF DELHI versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges the selection process for appointment to the post of Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Law in the University of Delhi on the ground that criteria for selection which is laid down wrongly excludes Advocates having experience of practice, and instead only giving weightage to teaching experience of a candidate, and it is argued that resultantly there is arbitrariness, discrimination of excluding Advocates experience and violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Putti...
Kripa Narain Shahi and Anr vs.new Delhi Municipal Council
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2193/2017 Date of decision:10. h March, 2017 Through Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner KRIPA NARAIN SHAHI AND ANR NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR Through versus ..... Respondent SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Kripa Narain Shahi and Abdul Bari Khan, in this writ petition, impugn order dated 21st April, 2016, whereby OA No.1448/2012 filed by them has been dismissed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal, for short). The order dated 21st September, 2016, by which Review Application No.145/2016 was dismissed, has also been challenged.2.... Petitioners-Kripa Narain Shahi and Abdul Bari Khan came on the Temporary Muster Roll of the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) with effect from 5th April, 1991 and 9th May, 1994, respectively. Both of them were brought on Regular Muster Roll with effect from 11th June, 2002. The two petition...
Alka vs.surjeet Singh Gujral
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 10, 2017 RFA192009 ALKA Through: Mr. B L Chawla, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus SURJEET SINGH GUJRAL Through: Nemo. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) JUDGMENT Appellant is the plaintiff whose suit for specific performance has been dismissed vide impugned judgment of 17th September, 2008 while granting alterative relief i.e. compensation of 4 lacs which includes part of sale consideration of 2 lacs. A decree for alternate relief has been granted by learned trial court with interest @ 10% p.a. In this appeal, relief of specific performance of Agreement to Sell of 17th August, 2006 in respect of immovable property bearing No.37/2, Double Storey, Ashok Nagar, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as suit property) is sought. During the pendency of this appeal, it was directed that status quo in respect of suit property be maintained. It is evident from order of 27th April, 2009 that respondent h...
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited vs.garg Builders
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2017
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. 03.2017 O.M.P. (COMM) 28/2017 + BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED Versus GARG BUILDERS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the Respondent : Mr Sanjeev Anand, Mr Pallav Kumar, Mr Gautam Manu and Mr Akshay Kapoor. Mr Sanjay Bansal. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (hereafter 'BHEL') has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter 'the Act') assailing the arbitral award dated 15.07.2016 (hereafter 'the impugned award').2. The impugned award was rendered by the sole arbitrator in respect of disputes that had arisen between the parties in relation to an agreement dated 24.10.2008 (hereafter the Agreement).3. BHEL floated a tender for construction of Complete Plant Boundary Wall including Gates at 2X750 MW Pragati III Combined Cycle Power at...
Sitanta Das vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2017
$~25. * + W.P.(C) 2168/2017 & CM94332017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI1 SITANTA DAS Through: Mr. Pardeep Dahiya, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Shruti Munjal, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate for R-2. Mr. Ajay Pal Singh, Advocate for R-3. Mr. T. Singhdev, Advocate for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % After addressing arguments for some time, learned counsel for the ORDER1003.2017 petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition, while reserving the right of his client to file a fresh petition for directions to the respondent No.1/Govt. of NCT of Delhi to define remote/difficult areas, as contemplated in Regulation 9 (VII) of the Postgraduate Medical Education Regulation, 2000.2. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. As and when the petitioner files a fresh petition, the same shall be considered in accordance with law. Liberty is granted to the respondents ...
Sripal vs.south Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2017
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P. (C) 9249/2016 SRIPAL Date of Judgment:10. h March, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Ramesh Kumar Mishra and Mr.Rajnish Kumar Singh, Advocates versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms.Puja Kalra, Advocate for SDMC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondent not to dispossess, disturb him in any manner from the vending site being Footpath, Khoka Market, Pushp Vihar, Sector-1, Saket, New Delhi.2. The petitioner claims to be vending at the aforesaid site and in 2007, the petitioner applied for issuance of tehbazari licence. Thereafter, since his application was not considered, he approached Zonal Vending Committee by filing application no.9729. By an...
Jindal Power Limited and Another vs.union of India & Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2017
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P. (C) No.3001/2015 & CM Nos.5379/2015, Judgment delivered on:09. 03.2017 6595/2015, 10130/2015 JINDAL POWER LIMITED AND ANOTHER ...... Petitioners versus ...... RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS Advocates who appeared in this case:-"For the... Petitioners : Mr Kapil Sibal, Sr Advocate and Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr Advocate with Mr Sanjeev Kapoor, Mr Aakash Bajaj and Ms Anusha Nagrajan : Mr Sanjay Jain, ASG, Mr. P.S. Narsimha, ASG with Mr Akshay Makhija, Mr Rohitendra Deb and Mr Shreshth Jain. : Mr Sandeep Sethi, Sr Advocate with GP Capt. K. S. Bhati and Mr Adarsh K. Tiwari, Ms Monika Sharma and Mr Amit Verma For the Respondent/UoI For the... RESPONDENTS 3 & 4 AND + W.P.(C) No.3002/2015 & CM No.5381/2015 JINDAL POWER LIMITED AND ANOTHER ...... Petitioners versus ...... RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER Advocates who appeared in this case:-"For the... Petitioners : Mr Kapil Sibal, Sr Advocate and Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr Advocate with Mr Sanjeev Kapoor...
State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) vs.shammi Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2017
$~8 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on :27. h February, 2017 Date of decision :9. h March, 2017 CRL.L.P.No.72/2017 STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..Petitioner Through : Mr. Varun Goswami, APP for State with Insp. Satya Bir Singh, P.S. Binda Pur. versus SHAMMI GUPTA Through : None. .Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT GITA MITTAL, J.1. This petition has been filed by the State under Section 378(1) of the Cr.P.C. praying for leave to assail the judgment dated 26th August, 2016 passed by the ld. Additional Sessions Judge-03, Dwarka District Courts, Delhi in SC No.arising out of FIR No.7P.S. Binda Pur under Sections 3IPC whereby the ld. Trial Judge has acquitted the respondent of the charges leveled against him.2. The record of the Trial Court has been received. Crl.L.P.No.72/2017 Page 1 of 13 3. It appears that telephonic information was received at 10:45 pm on the 31st of July 2014 by P.S. Binda Pur from the pol...
Shahne Alam vs.m/s i.k Polymers Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:09. h March, 2017 CRL.M.C. 310/2015 & CRL.M.A.1200/2015 SHAHNE ALAM ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.A.H.Pasha, Adv. versus M/S I.K POLYMERS PVT. LTD. Through: Mr.Pranay Trivedi, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT I.S. MEHTA, J.1. The instant petition under Sections 482 Cr.P.C. is preferred by the petitioner for setting aside the summoning order dated 29.08.2012 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, NI Act (West)/Delhi in C.C. No.387and further delete/remove the name of the petitioner in C.C. No 387wherein the learned Metropolitan Magistrate has framed notice under Section 251 Cr.P.C. against the petitioner arrayed as accused No.3.2. The brief facts stated are that a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was filed by the respondent/complainant on 05.10.2011 before the Court of learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, (West) Delhi, against the CR...
Mandakini Coal Company Ltd vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2017
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:09. 03.2017 % + W.P.(C) 973/2015 and CM Nos. 1719/2015, 4969/2015 GVK POWER (GOINDWAL SAHIB) LIMITED & ANR ... Petitioners -versus- ... RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & ANR Advocates who appeared in the case:-"For the... Petitioners For the Respondent/UoI : Mr P. Chidambaram, Sr Advocate with Mr Amit Kapur, Mr Vishrov M., Mr Rohit Venkat and Mr Apoorva Misra : Mr Sanjay Jain, ASG, Mr Akshay Makhija, CGSC, Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC, Mr Sanjeev Narula, CGSC, Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr Manik Dogra, CGSC, Mr Shresth Jain, Mr Vidur Mohan and Ms Aastha Jain + W.P.(C) 1300/2015 and CM Nos. 2296/2015, 2632/2015, 7054/2015 JAYASWAL NECO INDUSTRIES LTD. ... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in the case:-"For the... Petitioner : Mr Kapil Sibal Mr Ramji Srinivasan, Sr Advocates, Mr Devashish Bharuka, Ms Rita Jha, Mr Jatin Sehgal and Mr Ravi Baruka : Mr Sanjay Jain, ASG, Mr Akshay Makhija, CGSC, Mr Amit...
- ‹ Prev
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- Next ›
- Last »