Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Narain Dass vs.delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. 03.2017 ........ Petitioner versus ..... Respondent $~68 * % + W.P.(C) 4739/2015 NARAIN DASS DELHI URBAN SHELTER IMPROVEMENT BOARD Advocates who appeared in the case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms Noopur Singhal and Mr Akhilesh Arora, Advocates. Mr Parvinder Chauhan, Advocate for DUSIB. JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL) CM No.9501/2017(early hearing) Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for the respondent. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. The Writ Petition is taken up for hearing today. The application stands disposed of accordingly. W.P.(C) 4739/2015 The petitioner has impugned the order dated 17.09.2014, inter alia, on the ground that the petitioner was not given an opportunity of W.P.(C) Nos. 4739 /2015 Page 1 of 2 representing the case. Learned counsel for the respondent, under instructions, submits that...
Satish Kumar Khetarpal vs.director General Cisf and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on:10. h March, 2017 W.P.(C) 571/2016 SATISH KUMAR KHETARPAL versus ........ Petitioner DIRECTOR GENERAL CISF AND ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner: Mr Azhar Alam Advocate. For the... RESPONDENTS: Ms. Saroj Bidawat Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA INDIRA BANERJEE, J JUDGMENT1 The short question in this writ petition is whether the petitioner should be deemed to have been promoted with effect from 01.01.2011 being the date of the vacancy, in the post of Assistant Commandant, to which he has been promoted vide a notification dated 03.01.2014.2. The petitioner was appointed as Assistant Sub Inspector of Police in the Central Industrial Security Force in July 1978, and thereafter promoted to the post of Sub Inspector on 30.09.1985. The ===================================================================== WP(C) 571/2016 ...
Rakesh Jain & Ors vs.karnail Singh Kler & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2017
$~A-43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CM(M) 284/2017 RAKESH JAIN & ORS Date of decision:10. 03.2017 ........ Petitioner Through Mr.S.K.Bhaduri, Ms.Kirti Parmar and Mr.Mehul Jain, Advocates versus KARNAIL SINGH KLER & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH Through ..... Respondent JAYANT NATH, J, (ORAL) CM No.9619/2017 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM(M) 284/2017 & CM No.9620/2017 1. By the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks to impugn the order dated 9.12.2016 by which an application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC filed by the plaintiff/respondent No.1 was allowed.2. The background facts are that respondent No.1 has filed a suit for cancellation of sale deed dated 13.6.2005 allegedly executed by petitioner No.1 and respondent No.4. A decree of declaration is also sought that the sale of property bearing No.R-115, Greater Kailash, Part-I, New Delhi by defendant No.2 (petitioner No.1) in favour of defenda...
Karamjit Jaiswal vs.anand Pershad Jaiswal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Delivered on:10. h March, 2017 + FAO (OS) 457/2014 & Review Petition 102/2016 SHAKUN JAISWAL ..... APPELLANT VERSUS ANAND PERSHAD JAISWAL & ORS. ..... RESPONDENTS + FAO (OS) 459/2014 & Review Petition 103/2016 KARAMJIT JAISWAL ..... APPELLANT VERSUS ANAND PERSHAD JAISWAL & ORS. ..... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant: For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocates with Mr. Amit Aggarwal, Ms Malini Sud and Ms Shagun Parashar, Advocates. Mr. Arvind Nigam, Senior Advocate with Mr. Akshay Makhija with Mr. Saurabh Seth, Mr. Vikas Bhadauria and Ms Amisha Gupta, Advocates for Review... Petitioner. Mr. Vinod Goel, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT & ===================================================================== FAO(OS) 457/2014 & Review Petition 102/2016 FAO(OS) 459/2014 & Review Petition 103/2016 ...
Tema India Limited vs.engineers India Limited and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2017
$~88 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2259/2017 Judgment delivered on:10. 03.2017 TEMA INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus ENGINEERS INDIA LIMITED AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Akhil Sibal with Mr. Salim Inamdar, Mr. Hasan Murtaza and Mr. Nikhil Chawla, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Ms. Anuradha Mukherjee, Ms. Mekhla Anand, Ms. Shreya Som and Ms. Mimansa Ambastha, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % W.P.(C) 2259/2017 & CM No.9778/2017 (for interim relief) ORDER1003.2017 1. The petitioner seeks quashing/setting aside of the action of the respondents placing the petitioner in the Holiday List and to re-induct the petitioner in the Approved Vendor List and, consequently, to consider the petitioners bid for the Notice Inviting Tender for WP(C) 2259/2017 Page 1 of 4 upgradation of the existing 10.5 MMTPA Manali Refinery at Chennai.2. The contention of the ...
Constable Veer Singh vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:10. h March, 2017 + WP(C) 4958/2016 CONSTABLE VEER SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. K. Ramesh (Retd) and Ms. Archna Ramesh, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT % INDIRA BANERJEE, J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioner, a constable of the Border Security Force has sought orders on the respondents to modify an order dated 01.05.2006 of the Commandant, 121st Battalion of the Border Security Force and an order dated 15.07.2010 of the Director General, Border Security Force, annexed to the writ petition as Annexures P1 and P3, WP (C) 4958/2016 1 respectively, so that the petitioner could be deemed to have been discharged from service and granted waiver of shortfall of service so that he could be eligible for pension.2. The facts giving rise to the writ petition are very briefly enumerated hereinafter....
Supreme Housing and Hospitality pvt.ltd.& Ors. Vs.srs Private Investme ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS)(Comm)102/2016 Reserved on : December 08, 2016 Pronounced on: March 10, 2017 SUPREME HOUSING AND HOSPITALITY PVT.LTD.& ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. P.Chadambaran, Senior Advocate, Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Karan Luthra and Ms. Niyati Kohli, Advocates. versus SRS PRIVATE INVESTMENTS PAWAI LTD.& ANR. ......... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Senior Advocate with Ms. Himanie Kotoch and Mr. Samaksh Goel, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA INDIRA BANERJEE, J JUDGMENT1 This appeal is against a judgment and order dated 03.10.2016, passed by the learned Single Judge allowing the application being OMP(I) (Comm). No.216 of 2016, filed by the respondent No.1 under Section 9 of the Arbitration and =====================================================================. FAO(OS)(Comm). No.102/2016 Page 1 of 32 Conciliation Act 1996, hereinafter referred to as the ...
All India Railway Employees Confederation vs.the Chairman, Railway Boa ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2017
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h March, 2017 W.P.(C) No.8212/2007 ALL INDIA RAILWAY EMPLOYEES CONFEDERATION ........ Petitioner Through: Dr. Pradeep Asthana & Mr. T.D. Singh, Advs. Versus THE CHAIRMAN, RAILWAY BOARD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha & Mr. R.N. Singh, Advs. for R-1&2. AND W.P.(C) No.2203/2013 ALL INDIA RAILWAY EMPLOYEES CONFEDERATION ........ Petitioner Through: Dr. Pradeep Asthana & Mr. T.D. Singh, Advs. Versus THE CHAIRMAN, RAILWAY BOARD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha & Mr. R.N. Singh, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Advs. for R-1&2. The questions for adjudication in both the petitions (as confined to 1. during the hearing on 17th February, 2016 and as recorded in order of that day) are (I) whether Clause 2(a) of the Modalities for conducting secret ballot for the purpose of granting recognition to registered Railway Trade W.P.(C) Nos.8212/2007 & 2203/2013 Page 1 of 21 Unions representing a...
M/S Sapphire Foods India Private Limited vs.the Secretary, Delhi Pollu ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2017
$~71 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 2154/2017 Judgment delivered on:10. 03.2017 M/S SAPPHIRE FOODS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED........ Petitioner versus THE SECRETARY, DELHI POLLUTION CONTROL COMMITTEE AND ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr Abhay Kumar. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr Sanjeev Rali and Mr Prabhav Ralli for R-1. Mr Mukesh Gupta, Mr Chetan Gautam and Mr Praney Jain for R-2. Mr Sangram Singh for R-3. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1003.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C) 9367/2017(exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 2154/2017 & CM No.9368/2017(stay) 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 13.02.2017, whereby the respondent No.1 Delhi Pollution Control Committee has directed the petitioner to close down the Unit with immediate effect. The concerned authority, i.e., the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) W.P.(C) No.2154 /2017 Page 1 of 11 has been directed to disco...
M/S. Gupta Synthetics Ltd vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on: March 10, 2017 * % + W.P.(C) 87/2017 & CM APPLN.No.2232/2017 M/S. GUPTA SYNTHETICS LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Somesh Tiwari and Mr. Pulkit, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. Abhishek Anand, Advocate for IDBI. Ms. Sonal Jain and Mr. S. Jauhari, for... RESPONDENTS 10 & 11. Mr. Sahil, Advocate respondent No.12. Advocates for CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA ORDER INDIRA BANERJEE, J1 In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged an order dated 26.10.2016 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial Financial Reconstruction, hereinafter referred to as AAIFR, in ===================================================================== W.P.(C) No.87/2017 Page 1 of 9 Appeal No.19/2015, whereby the AAIFR has upheld an order of the Board for Industrial and Financial Construction, hereinafter refer...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »