Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sarwan Kumar vs.sandeep Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 14, 2017 MAC. APP. 618/2008 & C.M.17772/2008, 791/2010 SARWAN KUMAR Through: Mr. Yashpal Laroya, Advocate ..... Appellant versus SANDEEP SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate for respondent-Insurer CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) JUDGMENT Appellant, a fruit seller aged about 27 years, had sustained grievous injuries in a road accident on 30th July, 2005. Impugned Award of 30th May, 2008 grants compensation of `1,08,681/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum to appellant on account of injuries sustained by him in this accident. The facts are already noted in impugned Award and so, need no reproduction. Suffice to note that appellant was driving a two- wheeler scooter when he was hit by Tata Sumo from behind. Apart from the evidence of appellant-Injured, there is evidence of an official of respondent-Insurer. On the basis of evidence led, impugned Award has been rendered. ...
Super Bazar Karamchari Hitaishi Sangatan vs.the Cooperative Stores Ltd ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.6426/2012 14th March, 2017 SUPER BAZAR KARAMCHARI HITAISHI SANGATAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravindra Singh, Advocate. THE COOPERATIVE STORES LTD SUPER BAZAR versus Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, Advocate for UOI. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by a Trade Union of Super Bazar seeking the relief of quashing of the order dated 5.10.2012 terminating the services of the employees of Super Bazar, who are admittedly workmen, inasmuch as I have put a query to the counsel for the petitioner that whether the members of the petitioner Union are managers or working in a supervisory position or are workmen, and to which query the response is that the members of the petitioner are workmen. The impugned order dated 5.10.2012 reads as under:-"2. W.P.(C) No.6426/2012 Page...
Dr. Sanjeev Goyal vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
$~48. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2398/2017 and CM APPL. 10350/2017 1. DR. SANJEEV GOYAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Adarsh Kumar Tiwari, Advocate with Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Tasneem Ahmadi, Advocate with Ms. Shubhi Khare, Advocate for R-3/CCIM. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The present petition has been placed before this Court on urgent ORDER1403.2017 mentioning.2. The petitioner seeks directions to the respondent No.3/Central Council of Indian Medicine (in short CCIM) to debar the members of the Council who are surviving on extensions, from participating in the proposed elections, contrary to the directions issued by the Supreme Court in the judgment dated 24.02.2012 passed in Writ Petition No.33/2009 entitled KB Nagur vs. Union of India 3. Ms. Ahmadi, learned counsel for the respondent No.3/CCIM, who appears on advance notice, states that the present petition has rendered i...
Brahm Singh @ Brahm Parkash vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
$~38 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11881/2015 & CM315822015 Judgment delivered on:14. 03.2017 BRAHM SINGH @ BRAHM PARKASH versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent UOI For the Respondent L&B/LAC : Ms Ruchika Rathi For the Respondent DDA : Ms Richa Oberoi with Mr Prateek Kohli : Mr Chiranjiv Kumar : Mr Dhanesh Relan with Ms Isha Garg CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 By way of this writ petition the petitioner is seeking the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioner, consequently, seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated WP(C) 11881/2015 Page 1 of 3 under the Land Acq...
Gurdeep Singh vs.gurmail Singh and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
$~9 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. 03.2017 RC.REV. 65/2017 & CM No.5592/2017 GURDEEP SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Prabhat Ranjan, Advocate versus GURMAIL SINGH AND ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH Through ........ RESPONDENTS JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present revision petition filed under section 25-B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control, Act, 1958(hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) the petitioner seeks to impugn the order dated 05.10.2016 by which the Additional Rent Controller (in short the ARC) dismissed the application of the petitioner seeking leave to defend and passed an eviction order against the petitioner.2. The respondents filed the present eviction petition under section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act regarding the property being No.2348-B1, Raja Park, Shakur Basti, Delhi- 110 034. It was urged in the petition that the petitioner is a tenant of the ground floor @ Rs.320/- per month. The respondents No.1 to 4 are joint owne...
Shakun Jaiswal vs.anand Pershad Jaiswal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Delivered on:10. h March, 2017 + FAO (OS) 457/2014 & Review Petition 102/2016 SHAKUN JAISWAL ..... APPELLANT VERSUS ANAND PERSHAD JAISWAL & ORS. ..... RESPONDENTS + FAO (OS) 459/2014 & Review Petition 103/2016 KARAMJIT JAISWAL ..... APPELLANT VERSUS ANAND PERSHAD JAISWAL & ORS. ..... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant: For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocates with Mr. Amit Aggarwal, Ms Malini Sud and Ms Shagun Parashar, Advocates. Mr. Arvind Nigam, Senior Advocate with Mr. Akshay Makhija with Mr. Saurabh Seth, Mr. Vikas Bhadauria and Ms Amisha Gupta, Advocates for Review... Petitioner. Mr. Vinod Goel, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT & ===================================================================== FAO(OS) 457/2014 & Review Petition 102/2016 FAO(OS) 459/2014 & Review Petition 103/2016 ...
Ajay Bansal vs.commissioner of Police & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2017
$~83 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 2249/2017 Judgment delivered on:10. 03.2017 AJAY BANSAL ........ Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Arvind Sah, Adv. Mr. Swaty Singh Malik and Mr. Himanshu Latwal, Advs. with Inspr. Sandeep Malik for R-1. Mr. Vikrant Yadav, Adv. for R-2 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1003.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.9766/2017 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 2249/2016 & CM No.9765/2017 (stay) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking a mandamus thereby directing the Respondent No.1 to provide access to the Liquor vend situated at Shop No G-1 & G-2. Vardhman Centre W.P.(C) No.2249/2017 Page 1 of 3 Market, Plot No2, CSC, Sector 3, Dwraka, New Delhi and to provide security to the shop as well as to the employees and to prevent any possible damage to the shop ow...
Ashok Singh of Cisf vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:10. h March, 2017 + WP(C) 2870/2016 ASHOK SINGH OF CISF ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anubhav Mehrotra and Ms. Meenu Sharma, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Arun Bhardwaj with Mr. Mimansak Bhardwaj, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT % INDIRA BANERJEE, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the alleged refusal of the respondent authorities to give to the petitioner the benefits of financial upgradations under the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS) for the Central Government civilian employees.2. Assured Career Progression Scheme had been introduced in the CISF vide Circular No.16/2000 dated 18.02.2000 issued WP (C) 2870/2016 1 by the CISF Head Quarters. This Circular was in accordance with instructions contained in Government of India, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions.3. Paragraph 2 (b)...
Dong Jae Oh vs.m/s i.k Polymers (North) Pvt Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2017
$~21. * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA2782017 & CMs 9577-78/2017 DONG JAE OH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Yadav, Advocate. versus M/S I.K POLYMERS (NORTH) PVT LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The appellant/plaintiff is aggrieved by the judgment dated 01.9.2016, ORDER1003.2017 passed by the learned trial court dismissing his suit for recovery of Rs.10 lakhs instituted against the respondent.2. The relevant facts germane for deciding the present appeal are that the appellant/plaintiff, as the Managing Director of M/s Samwon Precision Mould Mfg. Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Company), used to purchase goods from the respondent No.1/defendant No.1 Company from time to time.... RESPONDENTS No.2 and 3 are the Directors of the respondent No.1/Company. The appellant/plaintiff has pleaded that in the month of October, 2011 the respondents No.2 and 3 had approached him with a request to lend them some mone...
All India Railway Employees Confederation vs.the Chairman, Railway Boa ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2017
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h March, 2017 W.P.(C) No.8212/2007 ALL INDIA RAILWAY EMPLOYEES CONFEDERATION ........ Petitioner Through: Dr. Pradeep Asthana & Mr. T.D. Singh, Advs. Versus THE CHAIRMAN, RAILWAY BOARD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha & Mr. R.N. Singh, Advs. for R-1&2. AND W.P.(C) No.2203/2013 ALL INDIA RAILWAY EMPLOYEES CONFEDERATION ........ Petitioner Through: Dr. Pradeep Asthana & Mr. T.D. Singh, Advs. Versus THE CHAIRMAN, RAILWAY BOARD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha & Mr. R.N. Singh, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Advs. for R-1&2. The questions for adjudication in both the petitions (as confined to 1. during the hearing on 17th February, 2016 and as recorded in order of that day) are (I) whether Clause 2(a) of the Modalities for conducting secret ballot for the purpose of granting recognition to registered Railway Trade W.P.(C) Nos.8212/2007 & 2203/2013 Page 1 of 21 Unions representing a...
- ‹ Prev
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- Next ›
- Last »