Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.dharam Pal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MAC.APP. 165/2015 Date of decision: March 30, 2017 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. P. Acharya, Advocate ..... Appellant versus DHARAM PAL & ORS Through: Nemo .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL JUDGMENT Vide impugned Award of 2nd January, 2015, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) grants compensation of `14,45,027/- with interest @ 9% per annum to respondent-Claimant on account of injuries sustained by Dharam Pal in a road accident on 13th October, 2011. The facts as noted in impugned Award need no reproduction for the reason that the limited challenge in this appeal is to impugned Award on the ground of quantum of compensation. Suffice to note that apart from respondent-Injured, there is evidence of Dr.Radha Raman (PW-2), who has proved the Disability Certificate of respondent-Injured indicating permanent disability to be 80% in left lower limb. Pertinently, no evidence wa...
M/S. Telenor (India) Communications Private Limited vs.assistant Commi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:29. 03.2017 + W.P.(C) 2539/2017, C.M. APPL.10957-10958/2017 M/S. TELENOR LIMITED COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED (INDIA) COMMUNICATIONS PRIVATE (EARLIER KNOWN AS M/S. TELEWINGS ........ Petitioner Through: Sh. Balbir Singh, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Prakash Kumar, Ms. Rubal Maini and Ms. Rashmi Singh, Advocates. Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE251), NEW DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Sh. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Sh. Rahul Chaudhary, Sr. Standing Counsel, Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Jr. Standing Counsel, Ms. Rhea Verma and Sh. Kartik Rai, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The petitioners grievance is that this courts order in W.P.(C) 1874/2017 (decided on 1st March, 2017) has not been given effect to. It contends that the Assessing Officer (hereafter AO, one of the respondents arrayed in these writ proceedings) whilst seem...
National Insurance Co Ltd vs.shankar Pandit & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: March 29, 2017 + MAC.APP. 587/2008 & C.M.No.16998/2008 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate Versus SHANKAR PANDIT & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. J.S. Kanwar, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL1 JUDGMENT Impugned Award of 10th September, 2008 grants compensation of `6,20,000/- to respondents-claimants with interest @8% p.a. on account of death of Tetra Devi in a road accident on 29th June, 2005.2. In this appeal, appellant-Insurer seeks reduction of quantum of compensation granted. As per order of 6th October, 2010, service is complete. The facts already noted in impugned Award needs no reproduction for the reason that challenge to impugned Award is only on the quantum of compensation awarded. Suffice to note that respondents- claimants are husband and three daughters and two sons of deceased, who was 41 years of age and a housewife...
Court on Its Own Motion vs.vidyanand & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2017
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CRL.REV.P.No._____/2017 (to be numbered) COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION ........ Petitioner Through : Nemo versus 1. VIDYANAND s/o RAM KUMAR r/o RZ-28A, RAJ NAGAR, PALAM COLONY, DELHI2 BALWAN SINGH KHOKHAR s/o PURAN SINGH r/o WZ-245, RAJ NAGAR, PALAM COLONY, DELHI3 MAHENDER SINGH YADAV s/o TEJ RAM r/o VILLAGE BAGDOLA P.S. NAJAFGARH, DELHI (Address of private respondents as per the composite final report dated 25th March, 1985) 4. STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) 5. SMT. JAGIR KAUR (Complainant) w/o LATE S. JOGA SINGH (address to be ascertained by the State) ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Nemo (Regarding : SC No.31/86) Re: SC No.Page 1 of 80 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA ORDER2903.2017 % 1. While hearing Crl.A.Nos.715/2013, 753/2013, 831/2013, 851/2013, 861/2013, 1099/2013 and 710/2014 (challenging the judgment dated 30th April, 2013 in Sessions Case No.arising out of RC242005-SIU-I/SIC- 1/CBI/ND) ld. counsels for ...
Zakat Foundation of India & Anr vs.lt Governor of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF INDIA & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Raghvendra Bajaj and Mr. Garima Bajaj, Advocates. $~2 * + W.P.(C) 2241/2017 versus LT GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS Through: Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advocates for R-1, R-3 and R-5. Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, SC with Mr. O.P. Arora, Advocates for R-2/DSEC. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER2903.2017 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition while reserving the right of the petitioner to raise the grievance with regard to the issues raised in the note dated 29.3.2017 before the respondent No.2/DSEC. A copy thereof has been submitted to the learned counsel for the respondent No.2/DSEC.2. 3. Leave as prayed for is granted, the petition is disposed of. The respondent No.2/DSEC shall consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner, as expeditiously as is possible. MARCH29 2017/ap HIMA KOHLI, J...
Som Datt Builders-Ncc-Nec (Jv) vs.national Highways Authhority of Indi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:9. h January, 2017 Judgment pronounced on :29th March, 2017 + O.M.P. 146/2009 SOM DATT BUILDERS-NCC-NEC (JV) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.B. Upadhyay, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anusuya Salwan, Ms. Anisha Upadhyay, Ms. Renuka Arora, and Mr. Kunal Kohli, Advocates versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHHORITY OF INDIA Through: Ms. Gunjan Sinha Jain, Advocate .....Respondent AND + O.M.P. 298/2009... Petitioner NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHHORITY OF INDIA ..... ITD-SDB (JV) versus Through: Ms. Gunjan Sinha Jain, Advocate. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S.B. Upadhyay, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anusuya Salwan Ms. Anisha Upadhyay and Ms. Renuka Arora, Mr. Kunal Kohli, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR % Introduction JUDGMENT2903.2017 1.These are the two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) which raise a common question of law O.M.P. 146/2009 & O.M.P. 298/2009 Page 1 of 19 i.e., the correct int...
Court on Its Own Motion vs.dhanpat & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2017
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CRL.REV.P.No._____/2017 (to be numbered) COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION ........ Petitioner 1. DHANPAT Through : Nemo versus s/o ARJUN SINGH r/o F/539, RAJ NAGAR, DELHI2 VED PARKASH s/o ARJUN SINGH r/o F/540, RAJ NAGAR, DELHI3 SHIV CHARAN s/o BALLU RAM r/o RZF/1475, RAJ NAGAR, DELHI4 RAMJI LAL SHARMA s/o RAMPAT r/o RZF/419, RAJ NAGAR, DELHI (Address of private respondents as per the composite final report dated 25th March, 1985) 5. STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) 6. SMT. SWARAN KAUR (Complainant) w/o LATE S. HARBHAJAN SINGH (address to be ascertained by the State) Through : Nemo ........ RESPONDENTS (Regarding : SC No.11/86) Re: SC No.Page 1 of 81 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA % 1. While ORDER2903.2017 hearing Crl.A.Nos.715/2013, 753/2013, 831/2013, 851/2013, 861/2013, 1099/2013 and 710/2014 (challenging the judgment dated 30th April, 2013 in Sessions Case No.arising out of RC242005-SIU-I/SIC- 1/CBI/ND) ld. couns...
Sunil Kumar vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : MARCH02 2017 DECIDED ON : MARCH29 2017 CRL.A. 765/2013 ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Navin Sharma, Advocate with Mr.Divyaa Garg, Advocate. VERSUS SUNIL KUMAR + STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Kamal K.Ghei, APP. Mr.Sunil Ahuja, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 to 5 and 7. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Present appeal under Section 372 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the victim/injured Sunil Kumar to challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 13.12.2012 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.229/1/2010 arising out of FIR No.72/2010 registered at Police Station Ranholla whereby respondents No.2 to 7 (hereinafter referred to as respondents) were held guilty for committing offence punishable under Section 3IPC. By an order dated 19.01.2013, they were released on Crl.A.765/2013 Page 1 of 6 probation of good conduct; they were directed to pay `7,000/- each ...
Swaraj India vs.state Election Commission and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2017
IN THE MATTER OF: SWARAJ INDIA * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2409/2017 Reserved on:24. 03.2017 Date of decision:29. 03.2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shanti Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Mr. P.S. Sharda, Mr. Shakti Bardhan and Ms. Amiy Shukla, Advocates STATE ELECTION COMMISSION AND ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, Standing Counsel with Mr. Siddhartha Nagpal, Advocate and Mr. O.P. Arora (Consultant) for R-1/SEC. Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for R-2/GNCTD. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The petitioner herein, Swaraj India, a registered unrecognized political party, had originally filed the present petition praying inter alia for issuing directions to the respondent No.1/State Election Commission, NCT of Delhi, (in short SEC) and the respondent No.2/Govt. of NCT of Delhi W.P.(C) 2409/2017 Page 1 of 45 (in short GNCTD) to modify/quash Para 4(d) of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi Election Sym...
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.shakina & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 29, 2017 + MAC.APP. 312/2009 & C.M.9112/2009 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD...Appellant Through: Mr. Rajat Brar, Advocate versus Through: Nemo SHAKINA & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR .....Respondents % ORAL JUDGMENT Vide impugned Award of 20th April, 2009, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as Tribunal) grants compensation of `3,61,000/- with interest @7.5% per annum on account of death of Sadre Alam in a road accident on 10th February, 2007. Recovery rights are also granted by learned Tribunal to appellant-Insurer against respondent No.4- owner of the vehicle in question. In this appeal, challenge is to impugned Award on the ground that instant case is not of typical road accident but is of murder and so, appellant-Insurer is not liable to pay the awarded amount. To appreciate the stand taken by appellant-Insurer, the brief facts need to be considered, which are reproduced from ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »