Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mukesh Chand Sharma vs.the District & Session Judge (Incharge) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2310/2017 & CMs No.9929-30/2017 1. MUKESH CHAND SHARMA Through : Mr. Harsh Kumar, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus THE DISTRICT & SESSION JUDGE (INCHARGE) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER1403.2017 Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition, while reserving the right of his client to seek his remedies against the respondents, by filing a civil suit.2. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, along with the pending applications. MARCH14 2017 sk/ap HIMA KOHLI, J...
Union of India & Ors. Vs.reena Tandon
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
$~10. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.5848/2016 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Date of decision:14. h March, 2017 Through Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr. Waize Ali Noor & Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Advocates. versus REENA TANDON ..... Respondent Through Mr. A.K. Behera & Mr. J.Tripathi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The Union of India and its functionaries impugn the order dated 7th September, 2015 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) whereby OA No.4678/2014 filed by Reena Tandon was allowed, and the order dated 31st May, 2016 whereby RA No.40/2016 filed by the writ petitioners was dismissed.2. 3. The respondent is an officer of the Indian Defence Accounts Service. The respondent was entitled to be considered for grant of Senior Administrative Grade of the Indian Defence Accounts Service for the vacancy year 2014...
Sudhanshu Giri vs.the Vice Chancellor Delhi University Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. h March, 2017 In person. ........ Petitioner Through: % + W.P.(C) 11061/2016 SUDHANSHU GIRI versus THE VICE CHANCELLOR DELHI UNIVERSITY DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal and Ms. Disha Malhotra, Advs. for Delhi University / R1. Mr. Ankur Chibber, Adv. for R2 & R3. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: In view of the above said facts and circumstances the petitioner most respectfully humbly prays before this Honble Court:-"a) to issue appropriate order or writ directing the Respondent no.1 to 6 to grant / allow the case of the petitioner for migration on the basis of merit and medical need to the morning of Moti Lal Nehru College from Motilal Nehru College Evening. Any other relief as this Honble Court may deem b) fit and proper in the interest of justice. W.P.(C) No.11061/2016 Page 1 of 10 ...
Kamal Ahmed Khan vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and Order: March 14, 2017 BAIL APPLN. 450/2017 KAMAL AHMED KHAN Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Mr.Arbaaz Hussain, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Inspector Sushil Kumar, Sub-Inspector Janak Singh, Police Station New Friends Colony, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI ORDER P.S.TEJI, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A. No.4236/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. Bail Appln. No.450/2017 1. By this petition filed under Section 439 read with Section 482 of Cr. P.C., the petitioner is seeking bail in a case registered vide FIR No.322/2016 under Section 4of IPC, at Police Station New Friends Colony, Delhi.2. The facts as enumerated in the charge-sheet are that on 06.09.2016 a complaint was lodged by Shri Dhirender Kumar Yadav Bail. Appln. No.450/2017 Page 1 of 6 an...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr vs.deepak Manchanda
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
$~7, 8, 20, 22, 23, 24 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA2042017 and CM APPL. 6576/2017 RFA2052017 and CM APPL.6580/2017 RFA1552017 and CM APPL.5588/2017 RFA1632017 and CM APPL.5818/2017 RFA1642017 and CM APPL.5822/2017 RFA1652017 and CM APPL.5826/2017 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR Through: Ms. Renu Gupta, Advocate ..... Appellants versus DEEPAK MANCHANDA SUNIL GUJRAL JYOTI BALA SHAKUNTALA DEVI ASHWANI KUMAR RAJIVE CHAUDHARY ..... Respondent in RFA2042017 ..... Respondent in RFA2052017 ..... Respondent in RFA1552017 ..... Respondent in RFA1632017 ..... Respondent in RFA1642017 ..... Respondent in RFA1652017 Through: Mr. Aditya Sharda, Advocate in RFA2042017 and 205/2017. Mr. Vishesh Wadhwa and Ms. Bandana Grover, Advocates in RFA1552017, 163/2017 and 164/2015. Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate in RFA1652017. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % Appearance is entered by the counsels for the respondents in all the ORDER1403.2017 appeals, who state that they have re...
Shaheed Udham Singh Smarak Shiksha Samiti and Ors. Vs.santosh Verma & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) No.193/2011 14th March, 2017 SHAHEED UDHAM SINGH SMARAK SHIKSHA SAMITI AND ORS. Through: Ms. Padma Priya, Advocate. ........ Petitioners versus SANTOSH VERMA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashok Aggarwal and Ms. Aarushi Agrawal, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Adv. for R- 2/GNCTD. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition was dismissed by a judgment dated 9.9.2013. The writ petition had impugned the judgment of the Delhi School Tribunal dated 25.11.2010. By the impugned judgment the Tribunal had held that the appellant before the Tribunal, and who is the respondent no.1 in this case, was wrongly terminated from services of the petitioner no.3/school because there was no departmental enquiry conducted before removing the respondent no.1 from the services of the petitioner no.3/school. W.P.(C) No.193/2011 Page 1 of 13 2. The judgment pa...
K M Gupta & Ors. Vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 712/2017 & C.M.Nos.3281-3282/2017 K M GUPTA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Mohan K.Kukreja with Mr.B.L.Khatri, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through Mr.Rajiv Bansal with Ms.Rukhmini % Bobde, Ms.Arpita and Mr.Anurag Tripathi, Advocates. Date of Decision:14. h March, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 07th January, 2016 issued by the Chief Engineer, DDA on the ground that the respondent-DDA has no power to frame a lift policy.2. Mr.Mohan K.Kukreja, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that under Section 6 of the Delhi Development Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the Act 1957) only such amenities can be dealt with and provided by DDA as are mentioned in Section 2(a) of the said Act. Since considerable emphasis was laid on Section 2(a) of the Act 1957, by learned counsel for petiti...
Nirmal Singh vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 7202/2015 & CM No.13231/2015 Judgment delivered on:14. 03.2017 NIRMAL SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ....... Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr Vijay Joshi with Ms Minakshi Pandey, Advocates for : Mr N.S. Chechi, Advocate. UOI Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak with Mr Sunil Kumar Jha, Advocates for respondents LAC/L&B/GNCTD. Mr Arun Birbal with Mr Sanjay Singh, Advs. for DDA CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (here...
Corsan Corviam Construccion s.a vs.national Highways Authority of Indi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
$~36 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI OMP (I) (COMM.) 102/2017 CORSAN CORVIAM CONSTRUCCION S.A. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Akhil Sibal, Advocate. versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Ms Kanika Tandon and Ms Madhu Sweta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1403.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J Corsan Corviam Construccion S.A. (hereafter Corsan) has filed the 1. present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) inter alia praying as under :-"dated 22.02.2017 a) Pass an order staying the effect and operation of the letter No.NHAI/11012/CDTIEPC/2014/ the Respondent to the... Petitioner herein whereby the... Petitioner has notified its intent to terminate the Contract Agreement dated 27.01.2015; (bearing issued44) by b) Pass an order restraining the Respondent from taking any coercive steps against the... Petitioner in respect of the Contract Agr...
Pradeep Kumar Gupta vs.state (Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and Order: March 14, 2017 BAIL APPLN. 321/2017 PRADEEP KUMAR GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shantanu Sagar, Mr. Roopak Sahu, Advocates versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Inspector Manoj (Crime) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI ORDER P.S.TEJI, J.(Oral) 1. By this petition filed under Section 438 read with Section 482 of Cr. P.C., the petitioner is seeking bail in a case registered vide FIR No.0158 dated 14.09.2016 under Section 20/NDPS Act, at Police Station Crime Branch, Delhi.2. The facts as enumerated in the status report filed on behalf of the State are that on 14.09.2016 a secret information was received in Narcotics Cell that a truck driver, carrying ganja in Truck No.UP63 9752 from Chhatishgarh and Odisha was coming to supply ganja near Pitampura, Delhi. The information was reduced in writing vide DD No.3 dated 14.09.2016, Nar...
- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »