Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mrs. Seema Bansal vs.university of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.1771/2003 + % MRS. SEEMA BANSAL Through: versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. 14th March, 2017 ........ Petitioner Ms. Dalveer Kaur, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anurag Mathur, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Peeyush Kaushik, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks the relief of her being regularized to the post of Lecturer in the Department of Mathematics with the respondent no.2/Maharaja Agrasen College. The petitioner pleads that the post in question was advertised as a permanent post in the year 1995 but petitioner was appointed only on temporary basis in terms of the letter of the respondent no.2 dated 31.8.1995.... Petitioner further pleads that petitioner was selected by the due process against a clear substantive vacancy......
State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) vs.varun Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CRL.L.P.No.279/2016 & Crl.M.A.No.8362/2016 Date of decision :14. h March, 2017 STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. versus VARUN KUMAR Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, J.Crl.M.A.No.8362/2016 1. Heard.2. We are satisfied that the State was prevented by sufficient cause from bringing this leave petition within the statutory period of limitation. Delay in filing the leave petition is condoned. This application is allowed. CRL.L.P.No.279/2016 3. We have heard Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, learned APP for the petitioner-State and MR. S.N. Parashar, learned counsel for the Crl.L.P.279/2016 Page 1 of 6 respondent in this petition under Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by the State seeking leave to appeal against the judgment dated 11th December, 2015 whe...
Avinash Sharma vs.v K Kathuria
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV. 121/2017 Date of Decision:14. 03.2017 ........ Petitioner AVINASH SHARMA Through Mr.Deepak Bashta, Adv. $~A-54 * % + versus V K KATHURIA ..... Respondent Through Mr.Satya Priya Kamrah and Mr.Sachin Mittal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) Caveat 236/2017 Since the learned counsel for the respondent has entered appearance, the caveat stands discharged. CM No.10071/2017 (exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. RC.REV. 121/2017 & CM No.10070/2017(stay) 1. By the present Revision Petition filed under section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) the petitioner seeks to impugn order dated 28.7.2016 by which order the application filed by the petitioner seeking leave to defend was dismissed and an eviction order was passed. The respondent/landlord has filed the present eviction petition for eviction of property No.A-11/85, Sector-18, Second RC.REV.121/20...
Dalmia Solar Power Ltd. Vs.ntpc Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
$~ * 23 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 120/2017 DALMIA SOLAR POWER LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal with Mr.Dinesh Goyal, Mr. Ankur Mahindro and Ms. Smita Mohan, Advocates versus NTPC VIDYUT VYAPAR NIGAM LTD. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER1403.2017 % 1. The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) filed by Dalmia Solar Power Ltd. challenges an arbitral Award dated 24th November, 2016 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal (AT) in the disputes between the... Petitioner and the Respondent, NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Ltd.2. The facts in brief are that the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, Government of India (hereafter 'Ministry') floated the Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission, under which it proposed to purchase solar power and power from other non-conventional sources, through the Respondent, on a long term basis at a fixed tariff to be determined by the Central Electricity Regula...
Shri n.n. Kabiraj vs.university of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.2420/2003 14th March, 2017 SHRI N.N. KABIRAJ Through: Mr. Navin Chawla Siddharth, Advocates. ........ Petitioner and Mr. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate for University of Delhi/R-1. Mr. C. Mohan Rao, Advocate for R CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks the relief of promotion to the post of Senior Technical Assistant. Promotion to the post of Senior Technical Assistant is sought because of the post of Senior Technical Assistant falling vacant on 30.4.1999 on account of Sh. R.L. Chawla who was a Senior Technical Assistant getting promoted as a Technical Officer. The three posts in the hierarchy are the posts of Technical Assistant at the lowest, then the next W.P.(C) No.2420/2003 Page 1 of 12 higher post of...
Narender Sen Ahuja & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
% + *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DATE OF DECISION:14. MARCH, 2017 TEST.CAS. 57/2016 NARENDER SEN AHUJA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Leena Tuteja and Ms. Diksha Bhatia, Advs. STATE & ANR Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain and Mr. Deepak Income Tax for Anand, Advs. Department. Mr. Amit Mahajan, Adv. Enforcement Directorate. for CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The three petitioners namely (i) Mr. Narender Sen Ahuja; (ii) Mr. Sandeep Ahuja; and, (iii) Mrs. Kamla Devi Ahuja seek probate of a document dated 11th May, 2004 stated to be the validly executed last Will of the deceased Sh. Amar Nath Ahuja son of Late Sh. Nanak Chand Ahuja resident of 10, Jaipur Estate, Nizamuddin East, New Delhi who died on 31st October, 2007 pleading, (a) that the deceased at the time of his death had a fixed place of abode at 10, Jaipur Estate, Nizamuddin East, New Delhi; (b) that the three petitioners have been named as the joint executors of the docume...
Surender Singh & Anr vs.avtar Kaur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
$~41 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA2842017 & C.M. Nos. 10015-16/2017 SURENDER SINGH & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Ajai Kumar, Advocate with appellants in person. versus AVTAR KAUR Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER1403.2017 1. The appellant No.1/defendant No.1 and the appellant No.2/defendant No.2(husband and wife) have filed the present appeal against the judgment and decree dated 24.11.2016, passed in a suit for possession and permanent injunction instituted by the respondent/plaintiff (step-mother of the appellant No.1) in respect of an immovable property.2. The Court has carefully perused the impugned judgment and considered the arguments addressed by learned counsel for the appellants, but is not persuaded to issue notice.3. At this stage, learned counsel for the appellants states that instead of pressing the appeal on merits, the appellants be granted a reasonable time of at least six months to vacate the suit prem...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr vs.kuldeep Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
$~18, 30, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37 and 38. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA1282017 and CM APPL. 4368/2017 RFA512017 and CM APPL. 1710/2017 RFA542017 RFA602017 and CM APPL. 1957/2017 RFA632017 and CM APPL. 2045/2017 RFA642017 and CM APPL. 2061/2017 RFA9462016 RFA9522016 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. Through: Mr. Sunil Goel, Standing Counsel with Ms. Supreet Bimbra, Advocate ..... Appellants versus .... Respondent in RFA1282017 KULDEEP SINGH ..... Respondent in RFA512017 DEEPAK MANCHANDA ..... Respondent in RFA542017 JYOTI BALA ..... Respondent in RFA602017 DEEPAK MANCHANDA ..... Respondent in RFA632017 DEEPAK MANCHANDA ..... Respondent in RFA642017 KARTAR SINGH ..... Respondent in RFA9462017 VIKAS VERMA ..... Respondent in RFA9522017 VIKAS VERMA Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate in RFA1282017, 946/2016 and 952/2016. Mr. Aditya Sharda, Advocate in RFA512017, 60/2017 and 63/2017. Mr. Vishesh Wadhwa and Ms. Bandana Grover, Advocates in RFA542017 and 64/2017. CORAM: HON...
A.s Gaur (Since Deceased) Thr His Legal Heirs vs.lakshmi Devi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. 03.2017 CM(M) 287/2017 and CM Nos. 10009-11/2017 $~A-42 * % + A.S GAUR (SINCE DECEASED) THR HIS LEGAL HEIRS ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.S.Dalal, Ms.Toral Banerjee and Mr.Aman Mudgal, Advocates versus LAKSHMI DEVI & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH Through ........ RESPONDENTS JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek to impugn the order dated 20.12.2016 by which four applications were decided i.e. one under Order 22 Rule 4 & Rule 10A CPC moved on 06.06.2009, second one under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC moved on 21.02.2015 and two applications under Section 5 of the Limitation Act dated 21.02.2015 and 13.05.2016 for condonation of delay in moving the above two applications.2. The plaintiff/respondent No.1 has filed the present suit for cancellation, declaration and permanent injunction praying that the sale deed executed by defendant No.1...
Ms. Yasmeen Praveen vs.vice Chancellor Jamia Millia Islamia University ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2017
* + % MS. YASMEEN PRAVEEN IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.2019/2003 14th March, 2017 Through: Mr. S.K. Rungta, ........ Petitioner Senior Advocate with Mr. Prashant Singh, Advocate. versus VICE CHANCELLOR JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohd. Shah Nawab Hasan, CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA Advocate. To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1.... Petitioner by means of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeks the relief of quashing of the decision dated 20.12.2002 of the executive council of the respondent no.1/Jamia Millia Islamia University whereby the pay-scale of the petitioner has been downgraded. This impugned order being the decision of the executive council dated 20.12.2002 reads as under:-" E.C. dt.20.12.2002 Resolution No.UV: E.C. decision of down-gradation of pay scale of the post of Director, Balak Mata Centre (J.M.I.) from Rs.2200-4000 to Rs.164...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »