Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajiv Kumar & Anr. Vs.devendra Singh@chote & Anr. (M/S Cholamandalam G ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 15, 2017 MAC.APP. 783/2016 & C.M.35831/2016 RAJIV KUMAR & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Alok Bhachawat and Ms. Tavishi Chandra, Advocates Versus DEVENDRA SINGH @ CHOTE & ANR (M/S CHOLAMANDALAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate for respondent No.1 Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate for respondent No.2 + MAC.APP. 791/2016 RAJIV KUMAR & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Alok Bhachawat and Ms. Tavishi Chandra, Advocates Versus BUDHPAL SINGH & ANR (M/S CHOLAMANDALAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD) .....Respondents Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate for respondent No.1 Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) JUDGMENT The above captioned two appeals are directed against common MAC.APPS. 783/2016 & 791/2016 Page 1 of 6 impugned Award of 8th July, 2016 which grants compensation of 9,42,000/- with interest @ 9% p.a. to respondent-claima...
V3s Infratech Ltd. Vs.nbcc & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: January 19, 2017 Date of decision: March 15, 2017 CS (OS) 352/2015 V3S INFRATECH LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr Sunil Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Praveen Kumar Singh, Mr. Utkarsh Singh, Md. Ziauddin Ahmad, Advocates. versus NBCC & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Sanjeev Mahajan, Advocate for D-1. Ms. Archana Gaur, Advocate for Defendant Nos. 2 and 4. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % JUDGMENT1503.2017 IA No.2786/2015 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC) IA No.7330/2015 (Objections filed by the Defendants to the report of the LC) IA No.16470/2015 (under Order XII Rule VI CPC by Plaintiff seeking decree against admission) IA No.24532/2015 (under Section 51 for refraining Defendant No.1 from encashing the Bank Guarantee) Background facts 1. The background to these four applications is that the Plaintiff, V3S Infratech Ltd., which is engaged in the business of civil construction, was CS (OS) No.352 of 2015 Page 1 of 33 awar...
Bee Gee Enterprises vs.pushpinder Singh Religare Finvest Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS(C) 161/2017 & CM APPL. 7307/2017 BEE GEE ENTERPRISES Through: Ms. Rubal Maini, Advocate. ........ Petitioner PUSHPINDER SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Uppal, Advocate. 6 to 10 $~ * + + + versus WITH versus CONT.CAS(C) 163/2017 & CM APPL. 7313/2017 BEE GEE ENTERPRISES Through: Ms. Rubal Maini, Advocate. ........ Petitioner PUSHPINDER SINGH SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED Through: Mr. Ajay Uppal, Advocate. ..... Respondent WITH CONT.CAS(C) 164/2017 & CM APPL. 7314/2017 SAI APARTMENTS & INFRASTRUCTURES Through: Ms. Rubal Maini, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus PUSHPINDER SINGH SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED Through: Mr. Ajay Uppal, Advocate. ..... Respondent CONT.CAS(C) 161/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 6 + + % WITH CONT.CAS(C) 165/2017 & CM APPL. 7315/2017 BEE GEE ENTERPRISES Through: Ms. Rubal Maini, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus PUSHPINDER SINGH RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED Through: Mr...
s.n. Sunderson & Company vs.m/s. Chandok Machineries
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB. PET. NO.365/2015 & IA24082017 S.N. SUNDERSON & COMPANY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr Pulkit Agarwal and Mr Abhijeet Srivastava, Advocates versus M/s. CHANDOK MACHINERIES ..... Respondent Through: Mr Avi Singh with Ms Megha, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR ORDER1503.2017 IA No.9/2017 In Arb. Pet. No.365/2015 1. An interesting question of law concerning the interpretation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) and, in particular, the powers and jurisdiction of the Court to interfere with a procedural order of the Arbitral Tribunal (AT) fixing its fee arises for consideration in the present application.2. The background to the present application is that on 27th December, 2014, the Respondent M/s. Chandok Machineries sent a notice to the... Petitioner - S.N. Sunderson & Company - seeking reference of the disputes that had arisen between them pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) da...
Ramesh Pershad Seth vs.mcd and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2017
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :10. 3.2017 Judgment delivered on :15. 03.2017 + W.P.(C) 13402/2009 RAMESH PERSHAD SETH ........ Petitioner Through Mr. J.C. Mahendroo, Advocate versus MCD AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Mr. Praney Jain and Mr. Chetan Gautam, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The petitioner, the proprietor of a hotel City Hotel (premises bearing No.3990, Ajmeri Gate, Delhi) is running this business since the year 1982. Various permissions/licences were required by the petitioner which had been obtained from the local bodies. They were being issued to him from time to time. His last licence was renewed for the period 2005-06 vide a communication dated 31.3.2005. Separate applications for renewal of his heath trade licence had also been submitted which had accordingly been issued. On 23.3.2009 the WP(C) 13402/2009 Page 1 of 14 petitioner again applied for renewal of his health...
Sh. Amarpreet Singh Oberoi & Ors vs.m/s A. N. Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2017
40 to 43 & 48 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced On:15. 03.2017 + CO.APPL.(M) 115/2016 SUNIL GANDHI & ANR. ........ Petitioners versus A.N. BUILDWELL PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent + CO.PET. 704/2014 SH. AMARPREET SINGH OBEROI & ORS......... Petitioner versus M/S A. N. BUILDWELL PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent + CO.PET. 948/2016 NEMIKA JHA ........ Petitioner versus A.N. BUILDWELL PRIVET LIMITED ..... Respondent + CO.PET. 1061/2016 VINEET GOEL versus ........ Petitioner A.N. BUILDWELL PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent CO.APPL.(M) 115/2016 & ORS. Page 1 of 37 + CRL.O.(CO.) 11/2016 A.N. BUILDWELL PVT.LTD.(IN PROV.LIQN.)........ Petitioner versus SURENDER KUMAR HOODA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P.V. Kapur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajit Warrier, Mr. Sidhant Kapur, Mr. Angad Kochhar, Ms. Pankhuri Bhardwaj and Ms. Bani Brar, Advocates for Spirewoods Residents Association. Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shreyans Singhvi and Ms. Ekta in CO.APPL.2089/2016 in CO.PET.70...
Leelawati & Anr vs.sunny Paul
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2017
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS(C) 921/2016 & CM APPL. 28339/2016 LEELAWATI & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Ashutosh Gupta, Advocate versus SUNNY PAUL Through Mr. Viresh B. Sharaya with ..... Respondent Mr. Akshit Agarwal, Advocates 18th January, 2017 Reserved on: Date of Decision:15. h March, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J:1. The present contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 9th May, 2016 passed in W.P.(C) 10463/2015.2. Since the aforesaid order has already been recalled by this Court on 10th January, 2017, the present contempt petition and pending application have become infructuous and they accordingly stand disposed of. MANMOHAN, J MARCH15 2017/rn...
Iqbal Hussain vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2017
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement delivered on:15. 03.2017 W.P.(C) 3148/2016 IQBAL HUSSAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Sangita Bhayana, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwala and Mr. Amish Aggarwala, Advocates for... RESPONDENTS No.1 and 2. Ms. Kavita proxy for Mr.Pramod Bahuguna, Advocate for... RESPONDENTS No.3 and 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.:-"By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the 1. petitioner has impugned the order dated 14.08.2015, whereby the gold brought into India by him was seized by the customs authorities. It is the petitioners case that after having worked for a few years in the UAE, on his way homewards he purchased from his earnings, gold weighing 580.67 grams for the purpose of his sons marriage. On his arrival at the Delhi Airport, while he was still waiting to receive his luggage from the c...
Harsh Gogia vs.the state.govt Nct of Delhi & Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:15. 03.2017 TEST.CAS. 62/2013 HARSH GOGIA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms Meena Chaudhary, Adv. versus THE STATE.GOVT NCT OF DELHI & OTHERS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Section 270 of the Indian Succession Act has been filed by Smt. Harsh Gogia for Probate of Will dated 18.11.2010 of late Shri Santosh Bankshi, W/o Shri Vishwa Nath, in respect of her estate DDA S.F.S. Flat bearing No.22, Neeti Bagh, New Delhi. The petitioner has assessed the total value of the property at Rs. 80 lakhs. It is submitted that the attesting witnesses of the said Will were Smt.Payal Malik, W/o Shri Sudhir Shah, R/o A-704, Sukhsagar Apartments, 52, I.P. Extension, Delhi- 92 and it is submitted that the witnesses had signed the Will in the presence of Testatrix and the Testatrix also signed the Will in their presence and the Will was also registered in the office...
Mahesh Kumar vs.directorate (Medical), Delhi e.s.i. Corporation New De ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.1743/2016 % MAHESH KUMAR Reserved on:6. h January, 2017 Date of Decision:15. h March, 2017 ....Petitioner Through Mr. O.P. Gehlaut, Advocate. Versus DIRECTORATE (MEDICAL), DELHI E.S.I. CORPORATION NEW DELHI & ORS .Respondents Through Mr. Yakesh Anand and Ms. Sonam Anand, Advocates for the ESIC. Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Ms. Vanya Khanna, Advocate for the UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.The Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESI Corporation, for short), had issued an advertisement dated 2nd June, 2010, pursuant to which the petitioner-Mahesh Kumar had applied for selection to the post of Librarian Grade-II.2. The petitioner was called for an interview and had appeared before the Selection Board on 21st September, 2010.3. As per the selection list dated 5th October, 2010, four candidates were selected and shortlisted. The petitioner's name did not figure in...
- ‹ Prev
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Next ›
- Last »