Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vikas Gupta @ Bobby vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
CRL.A. No.13/2013 VIKAS GUPTA @ BOBBY * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:16. 03.2017 ....... Petitioner Through: Mr.Ajit Sharma, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA GITA MITTAL, J (Oral) 1. By the instant appeal, the appellant assails the judgment dated 17th July, 2012 passed in SC No.04/2010 arising out of FIR No.462/2010 registered by Police Station Mandawali, holding the appellant guilty of commission of the offence under Section 302 of the IPC with which he was charged as well as the order dated 20th July, 2012 awarding sentence of imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine, ordering simple imprisonment for six months.2. The facts giving rise to the present appeal are within a narrow compass and to the extent necessary, we note the same hereafter.3. On 21st September, 2009, telephonic information was re...
Bee Gee Enterprises vs.pushpinder Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS(C) 161/2017 & CM APPL. 7307/2017 BEE GEE ENTERPRISES Through: Ms. Rubal Maini, Advocate. ........ Petitioner PUSHPINDER SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Uppal, Advocate. 6 to 10 $~ * + + + versus WITH versus CONT.CAS(C) 163/2017 & CM APPL. 7313/2017 BEE GEE ENTERPRISES Through: Ms. Rubal Maini, Advocate. ........ Petitioner PUSHPINDER SINGH SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED Through: Mr. Ajay Uppal, Advocate. ..... Respondent WITH CONT.CAS(C) 164/2017 & CM APPL. 7314/2017 SAI APARTMENTS & INFRASTRUCTURES Through: Ms. Rubal Maini, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus PUSHPINDER SINGH SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED Through: Mr. Ajay Uppal, Advocate. ..... Respondent CONT.CAS(C) 161/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 6 + + % WITH CONT.CAS(C) 165/2017 & CM APPL. 7315/2017 BEE GEE ENTERPRISES Through: Ms. Rubal Maini, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus PUSHPINDER SINGH RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED Through: Mr...
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited vs.aarti Steel Ltd. (Steel & Power)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:15. 03.2017 O.M.P. 427/2015 & IA Nos.6351-6352/2016 + BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus AARTI STEEL LTD. (STEEL & POWER) ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Somiran Sharma and Mr Raghu Chandra. : Mr Abhinav Agarwal and Mr Rohit Jolly. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (hereafter BHEL) has filed the present petition assailing the arbitral award dated 25.04.2015 (hereafter the impugned award) entered by the arbitral tribunal comprising of Mr Ashwini Mata, Senior Advocate, Mr V.K. Uppal and Justice P.K. Bahri (Retired) as presiding arbitrator. The impugned award was rendered in context of the disputes that had arisen between the parties in connection with a contract dated 04.08.2005 (hereafter the Agreement), whereby BHEL agreed to supply 1x40 MW Steam Turbine Generator (STG) fo...
Bhupal Singh Negi vs.khushal Singh Rawat
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2017
$~39 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA2922017 & CMs 10270-72/2017 and Caveat No.245/2017 BHUPAL SINGH NEGI ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Gaur, Advocate with appellant in person. versus KHUSHAL SINGH RAWAT Through : Mr. Nitin Soni, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The appellant/defendant is aggrieved by the judgment and decree ORDER1503.2017 dated 21.10.2016 passed by the trial court in a suit for possession, permanent injunction and mesne profits instituted by the respondent/plaintiff in respect of the ground floor of premises bearing No.808 Block-C, Vikas Puri, New Delhi.2. Mr. Sindhwani, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the appellant states that the appellant and the respondent are related to each other, being co-brothers and they have been able to negotiate an out of court settlement whereunder, the respondent has agreed to permit the appellant to remain in occupation of the suit p...
Sanjay vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2017
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:15. h March, 2017 CRL.A. 435/2002 RAJU STATE CRL.A. 445/2002 SANJAY STATE ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Adv. versus Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the ..... Respondent State. ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Adv. versus Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the ..... Respondent State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Vide impugned judgment dated 21st March, 2002, Raju and Sanjay were convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 366/3IPC, however, the co - accused Sadanand and Ram Pal Singh were acquitted for offences punishable under Sections 368/376/201 IPC. Vide order on sentence dated 5th April, 2002, Raju and Sanjay were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of four years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- for offence punishable under Section 3IPC and rigorous Crl. A. 435/2002 and 445/2002 Page 1 of 3 imprisonme...
Union of India & Ors vs.r.p. Tiwari
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2017
$~R-35 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:15. h March, 2017 + W.P. (C) 5913/2002 UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through : Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates R.P. TIWARI CORAM: versus Through : Mr. L.R. Khatana, Advocate ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Rule DB was issued in this matter on 01.10.2002.2. While issuing notice in the application for stay, the operation of the impugned order was stayed and was made absolute till the disposal of the writ petition on 24.02.2003.3. Challenge in this writ petition is to the orders dated 19.04.1999 in OA12091987 and 19.04.2002 in RA1451999 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (in short the Tribunal) whereby the OA filed by the applicant/respondent herein was allowed and the consequent review by the petitioners has been dismissed.4. Aggrieved by the order dated 11.07.1986 passed by the disciplinary author...
Rishabh Enterprises & Anr vs.ameet Lalchand Shah & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. h March, 2017. CS(COMM) No.195/2016. RISHABH ENTERPRISES & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan & Mr. Amit Sibal, Sr. Advs. with Dr. Saif Mahmood, Mr. Anish Dayal, Mr. Amit Bhandhari, Mr. Sumant De, Mr. Vivek Agarwal & Mr. Ishwar Mohanty, Adv., Advs. Versus AMEET LALCHAND SHAH & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Yatindra Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Dubey, Mr. Udit Malik, Mr. Aman Singh & Mr. Varun Mathur, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.4158/2016 (of defendants u/S8of Arbitration Act r/w O-VII R-11 CPC).1. The application of the five defendants, under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for reference of the parties to this suit to arbitration, is for adjudication.2. The two plaintiffs have instituted this suit inter alia pleading: (i) that the defendants No.1,4&5 proposed that the plaintiffs should invest in the defendants business of solar energy plant and ...
Suresh Kumar Verma vs.jamia Millia Islamia University and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.1502/2017 15th March, 2017 In person. ........ Petitioner * + % SURESH KUMAR VERMA Through: versus JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) Review Petition No.96/2017 in W.P.(C) No.1502/2017 with C.M. Appl. Nos. 10341/2017 (for stay) and C.M. Appl. No.10342/2017 (for exemption) 1. By this review petition under Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) review is sought of the order dated 20.2.2017 by which the writ petition, after arguments, was disposed of as not pressed. The impugned order dated 20.2.2017 reads as under:-"1. After arguments, counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner, states that in view of the fact that there is now a long delay the petitioner does not wish to press the present writ petition.2. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as ...
ex.head Constable Moti Singh vs.uoi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2017
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on 22nd December, 2016 Decided on:15. h March , 2017 + W.P.(C) 3847/2006 EX.HEAD CONSTABLE MOTI SINGH Through: Mr. M.G. Kapoor, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus UOI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA INDIRA BANERJEE, J JUDGMENT1 The short question involved in this writ petition is whether the Summary Security Force Court constituted under Section 64 of the Border Security Force Act 1968, was justified in imposing on the petitioner the sentence of rigorous imprisonment for 6 months in civil prison and dismissal from service for alleged possession of money disproportionate to his known sources of =====================================================================. WP(C) No.3847/2006 Page 1 of 10 income. The sentence has been commuted to dismissal from service.2. The petitioner was enrolled as a constable in the Border...
Pension Fund Regulatory & Development Authority (Pfrda) vs.subroto Das
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.6981/2015 % Reserved on:16. h January, 2017 Date of Decision:15. h March, 2017 PENSION FUND REGULATORY & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PFRDA) SUBROTO DAS Through: Mr. Shanker Raju, Advocate. Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Prateek Tushar Mohanty, Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC & Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Advocate for respondent No.3-UOI. ........ Petitioner W.P.(C) 113/2016 Through: Mr. Anand Nandan, Advocate. DR. PRAFULLA RANJAN & ANR. PENSION FUND REGULATORY & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ORS. Versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shanker Raju, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Prateek Tushar Mohanty, Advocate for respondent No.3. Mr. A.K. Behera & Mr. Amar Pandey, Advocates for respondent Nos. 4 and 5. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.W.P. (C) Nos. 6981/2015 & 113/2016 Page 1 of 20 This common order and judgment would ...
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »