Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jagdish Pawar vs.state Election Commission & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
$~45 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2444/2017 Date of decision:16. h March, 2017 JAGDISH PAWAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Sudhir Naagar, Mr. Vijay Kasana, Ms. Priyanka Khattar and Mr. Prashant Khatana, Advocates. versus STATE ELECTION COMMISSION & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Summet Pushkarna, Standing Counsel, Mr. Siddhartha Nagpal, Advocate and Mr. Girish Pandey, Deputy Secretary, State Election Commission. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Jagdish Pawar has filed the present Public Interest Litigation on two grounds. Firstly, it is asserted that the twelve thousand voters of Constituent Assembly No.31 have not been included in any of the Wards carved out of the Constituent Assembly, thereby denying them voting right. Secondly, objection is raised as to the Ward numbers awarded to Ranhola, Vikas Nagar, Vikas Puri, Sainik Enclave, Bapraula and Hastsal. To highlight the importance of number...
Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs.c.p.singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on:16. h August, 2016 Judgment Delivered on:16. h March, 2017 + W.P.(C) 3533/2012 MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI ........ Petitioner C.P.SINGH versus ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: For the Respondent: Ms Mini Pushkarna, Ms Namrata Mukim, Ms Anushruti and Ms. Vasundhara, Advocates. Mr Lalit Kumar, Advocate with respondent in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J1 The petitioner Municipal Corporation of Delhi impugns order dated 25.08.2011, passed by the Competent Authority (DUSIB) in Petition No.CA/1517/2005. By the impugned order, the Competent Authority has allowed the application filed by the respondent under Section 19 of the Slum Areas (Improvement & Clearance) Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) granting permission to the respondent to initiate eviction proceedings against the petitioner. ==================================...
C. Gopinathan vs.office of the Comptroller & Auditor General of India ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % C. GOPINATHAN W.P.(C) No.9186/2015 16th March, 2017 Through: ........ Petitioner Ms. Pooja Dhar, Adv. and Mr. Zeeshan Diwan, Adv. versus OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER & AUDITOR GENERAL OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Biji Rajesh, Adv. for Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Adv. for R-1. Mr. A.K.Behera, A.P.Singh, Advocates for R-3. and Mr. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. In this writ petition, the following reliefs are prayed:-"A) B) C) D) the Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing the impugned Order No.G-679/CPF/AC (P)/2011 dated 29.4.2013 issued by the Respondent No.1 Office of the Comptroller & Auditor General of India; Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing impugned Letter No.BMRCL/Fin/ex- DF/2014 dated 7.11.2014 issued by the Respondent No.3 Bangalore Metro Rail Cor...
Ramesh Ganeriwal vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
$~33 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 2144/2017 Judgment delivered on:16. 03.2017 RAMESH GANERIWAL ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr Sunil Fernandes and Ms Mithu Jain Mr Rajesh Gogna for R-1 & 2. JUDGMENT1603.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C) 2144/2017 & CM No.9340/2017(stay) 1. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that a Review Petition has already been filed by the petitioner and the same is pending consideration.2. In view of the fact that petitioner has already filed a Review Petition, I deem it expedient to direct the respondents to dispose of the Review Petition expeditiously.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition be treated as an additional submission in the Review Petition filed by the W.P.(C) No.2144 /2017 Page 1 of 2 petitioner.4. The petitioner is...
United India Insurance Co Ltd vs.sarupi Devi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:16. h March, 2017 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Mr.Pankaj versus ..... Appellant Gupta, Advs. SARUPI DEVI & ORS $~3 & 4 * % 3 + MAC.APP. 465/2012 4 + MAC.APP. 1064/2016 SARUPI DEVI versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Pandey, Adv. for respondent no.1. Mr. Sukh Dev Singh, Adv. for Mr.Jagjit Singh, Adv. for respondent no.3. Through: Mr. Rajesh Pandey, Adv. for respondent no.1. ..... Appellant UNITED INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Mr.Pankaj ........ RESPONDENTS Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The accident dated 4th September, 2002 resulted resulted fracture on her right leg with de clubbing injuries. She suffered a non- MAC.APP.465-2012, MAC.APP.1064-2016 Page 1 of 5 union tibia with shooting and stiff ankle and right knee which resulted in 45% disability in respect of lower right limb. The appellant remained hospitalized from 4th September,...
Islamic Research Foundation vs.union of India .....
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
* IN THE HIGH CO URT O F DE L HI AT NEW DE LHI % Judgment reserved on:01. t February, 2017 Judgment delivered on:16. h March, 2017 + W.P.(C) 264/2017 & CM No.1254/2017 ISLAMIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION UNION OF INDIA versus Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the... Petitioners : Mr. D.C. Mathur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Satish Tamta, Mr. Hari Haran and Mr. Dhruv Tamta, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Ravi Prakash, CGSC, Mr. Farman Ali, Ms. Rajul Jain, Ms. Ruchi Jain and Mr. Vignaraj Pasayat, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGEMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J1 The... Petitioner (Islamic Research Foundation) seeks setting aside of the notification dated 17th November, 2016, bearing No.S.O. 3460 (E) issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs (hereinafter referred to as the Notification) and a declaration that the ban imposed by the notification is ultra vires Articles 14, 19 & 21 of the Constitution of India. ...
Khazan Singh vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
$~2. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.950/2017 KHAZAN SINGH ........ Petitioner Date of decision:16. h March, 2017 Through Mr. D.K. Garg, Mr. Dhananjay Garg & Mr. Abhishek Garg, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rakesh Kumar,CGSC & Mr. Dushyant Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Rajinder Wali, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Khazan Singh in this writ petition impugns the order dated 8th November, 2016 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) whereby OA No.4400/2012 filed by him has been dismissed on the ground of delay and laches/limitation and estoppel.2. The petitioner herein was engaged as a casual worker on daily wages. The engagement was without following any selection process.3. The petitioner had filed Writ Petition No.1995/1993 seeking regularisation. ...
Shri Zile Singh vs.food Corporation of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.7548/2007 + % SHRI ZILE SINGH16h March, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj and Mr. Nikhil and Mr. Sriram A, Bhardwaj Advocates. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. P.L. Chopra, Advocate for FCI. Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks the relief of payment of pay-scale at IDA pattern for the post of Assistant Manger (Quality Control).... Petitioner pleads and contends that petitioner was granted promotion to the post of Assistant Manager (Quality Control) vide order dated 29.10.1988 with the pay-scale of Rs.650-30-740-35-880-1200/- and this pay-scale was as per IDA pattern. There was however an issue which arose with respect to the claim of the petitioner for pay-scale not as per IDA pattern but as per CDA pattern, how...
P Roychaudhuri vs.j Rajesh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
$~18, 19 & 20 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 2813/2016 & CM No.11854/2016 Judgment delivered on:16. 03.2017 P ROYCHAUDHURI J RAJESH & ORS versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS and + W.P.(C) 3077/2016 & CM No.13035/2016 P ROYCHAUDHURI versus NEMI CHAND JAIN & ORS and ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 3078/2016 & CM No.13036/2016 P ROYCHAUDHURI DR. KISHORE CHANDKI & ORS versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in these cases: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Prakash Gautam and Mr. Vivek Ojha, Advocates Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC with Mr. Giri Raj Shjarma, PRO for R-3/UOI Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC for CIC CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA WP(C) 2813/2016, WP(C) 3077/2016 & WP(C) 3078/2016 Page 1 of 4 JUDGMENT1603.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner who is a practising Advocate is aggrieved by certain personal remarks recorded by the CIC in paragra...
Foundation for Organisational Research & Education Fore School of Mana ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:16. 03.2017 + W.P.(C) 8467/2015 FOUNDATION FOR ORGANISATIONAL RESEARCH & EDUCATION FORE SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rakesh Khanna, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vinod Kumar, Mr. R. K. Joshi, Mr. Saurabh Joshi, Ms. Mahima Rathi, Ms. Shefali Jain and Mr. Bushra Kazim, Advocates versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel with Mr. Praney Jain, Advocate for SDMC Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Ms. Isha Garg and Mr. Amit Mehta, Advocates for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(oral) 1 The petitioner before this Court is the Foundation of Organisational Research and Education Fore School of Management (herein after referred to as the FORE) located at Qutub Institutional WP(C) 8467/2015 Page 1 of 9 Area, New Delhi. On 10.10.2008 respondent no.1 / South Delhi Municipal Corporation had issued a notification for fixing of rates to...
- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »