Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shiv Nath Rai Harnarain (India) Ltd vs.abdul Ghffar Abdul Rehman
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~14 & 16 * 14+ CS(OS) 2554/2008 LAL MAHAL LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Davinder N. Grover, Mr. Vishrutraj, Mr. Vishal K. Panwar, Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Mr. Narinder Chandila, Mr. Shailend Choudhary and Mr. Prateek Aggarwal, Advs. Versus ABDUL GHAFFAR & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shreyans Singhvi, Ms. Ekta Mehta and Mr. Umrao Singh Rawat, Advs. 16+ O.M.P. 300/2001 & IA No.8552/2010 (u/S151CPC) SHIV NATH RAI HARNARAIN (INDIA) LTD. AND ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Davinder N. Grover, Mr. Vishrutraj, Mr. Vishal K. Panwar, Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Mr. Narinder Chandila, Mr. Shailend Choudhary and Mr. Prateek Aggarwal, Advs. Versus ABDUL GHFFAR ABDUL REHMAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shreyans Singhvi, Ms. Ekta Mehta and Mr. Umrao Singh Rawat, Advs. CS(OS) No.2554/2008 & OMP No.300/2001 Page 1 of 18 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER1603.2017 % IA No.9251/200...
Khalsa Gymnastics Works vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
* IN THE HIGH CO URT O F DE L HI AT NEW DE LHI % Judgment reserved on:19. h January, 2017 Judgment delivered on:16. h March, 2017 + W.P.(C) 1438/2015 & CM No.2527/2015 KHALSA GYMNASTICS WORKS versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Mathur, Adv. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Ms. Vanya Khanna, Adv. for UOI Mr. Anil Grover with Ms. Noopur Singhal, Advs. for R-2 & 3 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGEMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J1 The petitioner impugns the directions of the respondent in banning the petitioner for a period of three years from entering into any business dealings with the respondent-Sports Authority of India and all its Regional Centres / Sub-Centres /Academic Institutions / SAG / SYC Centres etc. under the administrative control of Sports Authority of India.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the banning order as well as the period of thr...
Nbcc (India) Ltd vs.m/s Sharma Enterprises
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
$~ * 26 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (COMM) 1521/2016 NBCC (INDIA) LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Ginny J.Rautray with Ms. Bhawna Pal, Advocates. versus M/S SHARMA ENTERPRISES ..... Defendant Through: Ms. Anusuya Salwan with Mr. Kunal Kohli, Mr. Abhishek Pundir, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER1603.2017 % 1. This is an application under Section 14 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter 'the 1940 Act) filed by the... Petitioner, NBCC (India) Limited (NBCC) praying that this Court should direct the learned Arbitrator appointed by the Supreme Court of India by its order dated 3rd August 2011 in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.27203 of 2008 to file the Award dated 28th July 2016.2. In the present suit, on 22nd November 2016, notice was issued to the learned Arbitrator to file the original arbitral Award as well as the entire arbitral record.3. At the next date of hearing, i.e., 30th January 2017 Ms. Anusuya Salwan, learned counsel appearing for M/s. Shar...
P Roychaudhuri vs.nemi Chand Jain & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
$~18, 19 & 20 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 2813/2016 & CM No.11854/2016 Judgment delivered on:16. 03.2017 P ROYCHAUDHURI J RAJESH & ORS versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS and + W.P.(C) 3077/2016 & CM No.13035/2016 P ROYCHAUDHURI versus NEMI CHAND JAIN & ORS and ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 3078/2016 & CM No.13036/2016 P ROYCHAUDHURI DR. KISHORE CHANDKI & ORS versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in these cases: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Prakash Gautam and Mr. Vivek Ojha, Advocates Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC with Mr. Giri Raj Shjarma, PRO for R-3/UOI Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC for CIC CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA WP(C) 2813/2016, WP(C) 3077/2016 & WP(C) 3078/2016 Page 1 of 4 JUDGMENT1603.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner who is a practising Advocate is aggrieved by certain personal remarks recorded by the CIC in paragra...
Ratnesh Kumar vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C)1127/2017 % Reserved on :10. h February, 2017 Pronounced on:16. h March, 2017 RATNESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Abhay Kumar and Mr.Saurabh Mishra, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Alakh Kumar, Advocate for respondents no.2 to 7 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.The petitioner-Ratnesh Kumar impugns the order dated 13th July, 2016 passed by the Principal bench of Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal, for short), dismissing OA No.3511/2014.2. The selection and appointment of Ratnesh Kumar as Assistant (Coordination) for the upcoming steel processing unit in Bokaro Steel Plant, along with other selections, came under cloud and scanner on account of deception and for reasons noticed below. Crl.A.No.1127/2017 Page 1 of 6 3. The memorandum of charge dated 4th January, 2012, was issued to the petitioner, to which he submitted his r...
Vikram Singh vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
$~11. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.717/2017 Date of decision:16. h March, 2017 VIKRAM SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Neha Kapur, Advocate. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey, Advocate alongwith SI Ram Tirath & ASI Praveen Kumar, Traffic. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Vikram Singh in this writ petition impugns the order dated 9th August, 2016 whereby OA No.1402/2013 filed by him has been dismissed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal, for short).2. This is the second round of litigation as the petitioner had earlier filed OA No.4118/2010, which was disposed of vide order dated 9th December, 2011, observing as under:-"10. We have given due consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel for applicant and we are of the view that it was not permissible for the disciplin...
Lal Mahal Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
* IN THE HIGH CO URT O F DE L HI AT NEW DE LHI % Judgment reserved on:13. h January, 2017 Judgment delivered on:16. h March, 2017 + W.P.(C) 12251/2016 & CM APPL. No.48317/2016 LAL MAHAL LTD. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Diljit Singh with Mr. Anubhav Mehrotra, Advocate. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Anil Dabas, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. P C Aggarwal, Advocate for Respondent no.2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGEMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J1 The... Petitioner by the present petition seeks quashing of letter dated 23.12.2016 whereby the Respondent No.2 /Directorate of Revenue Intelligence has directed the Respondent No.3 and 4 (Banks) to cease all banking activities of the bank accounts of the petitioner. The... Petitioner also seeks quashing of letter dated 26.12.2016 whereby the petitioner has been informed by the Banks that all accounts of the petitioner have bee...
Delhi Transport Corporation vs.adwel Advertising & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:16. 03.2017 O.M.P. (COMM) 66/2016 + DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ........ Petitioner versus ADWEL ADVERTISING & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT : Mrs Avnish Ahlawat. : Mr Ajit Warrier and Mr Sandeep Grover. VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 Delhi Transport Corporation (hereafter 'DTC') has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) assailing an interim award dated 10.12.2015 (hereafter the impugned award) made by the arbitrator with respect to the disputes between the parties. The disputes between the parties relate to the licence fee payable for shelters available to Adwel Advertising (hereafter Adwel). According to Adwel, the number of shelters in existence were less than as advertised and allotted and, therefore, Adwel claimed that licence fee was pa...
P Roychaudhuri vs.dr. Kishore Chandki & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
$~18, 19 & 20 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 2813/2016 & CM No.11854/2016 Judgment delivered on:16. 03.2017 P ROYCHAUDHURI J RAJESH & ORS versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS and + W.P.(C) 3077/2016 & CM No.13035/2016 P ROYCHAUDHURI versus NEMI CHAND JAIN & ORS and ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 3078/2016 & CM No.13036/2016 P ROYCHAUDHURI DR. KISHORE CHANDKI & ORS versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in these cases: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Prakash Gautam and Mr. Vivek Ojha, Advocates Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC with Mr. Giri Raj Shjarma, PRO for R-3/UOI Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC for CIC CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA WP(C) 2813/2016, WP(C) 3077/2016 & WP(C) 3078/2016 Page 1 of 4 JUDGMENT1603.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner who is a practising Advocate is aggrieved by certain personal remarks recorded by the CIC in paragra...
Sarupi Devi vs.united Insurance Co Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:16. h March, 2017 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Mr.Pankaj versus ..... Appellant Gupta, Advs. SARUPI DEVI & ORS $~3 & 4 * % 3 + MAC.APP. 465/2012 4 + MAC.APP. 1064/2016 SARUPI DEVI versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Pandey, Adv. for respondent no.1. Mr. Sukh Dev Singh, Adv. for Mr.Jagjit Singh, Adv. for respondent no.3. Through: Mr. Rajesh Pandey, Adv. for respondent no.1. ..... Appellant UNITED INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Mr.Pankaj ........ RESPONDENTS Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The accident dated 4th September, 2002 resulted resulted fracture on her right leg with de clubbing injuries. She suffered a non- MAC.APP.465-2012, MAC.APP.1064-2016 Page 1 of 5 union tibia with shooting and stiff ankle and right knee which resulted in 45% disability in respect of lower right limb. The appellant remained hospitalized from 4th September,...
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »