Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ishan Education Research Society vs.national Commission for Minority E ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
$~13 to 15 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Pronounced on: March 16,2017 + + + LPA7732015 CMs 25394/2015, 25395/2015, 25397/2015 ISHAN EDUCATION RESEARCH SOCIETY .....Appellant versus NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR MINORITY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS & ORS. .....Respondents LPA7742015 & CMs 25398/2015, 25399/2015, 25401/2015 ISHAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY (REGD) & ANR. .....Appellants versus NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR MINORITY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS THR ITS REGISTRAR & ANR. .....Respondents LPA7762015 & CMs 25408/2015, 25409/2015, 25411/2015 ISHAN EDUCATION RESEARCH SOCIETY .....Appellant versus NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR MINORITY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS & ANR. .....Respondents Appearance : Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ajay Saroya, Advocate. Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, Advocate for respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J1 The present appeals are being preferred against the common judgment date...
Lal Mahal Limited vs.abdul Ghaffar & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~14 & 16 * 14+ CS(OS) 2554/2008 LAL MAHAL LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Davinder N. Grover, Mr. Vishrutraj, Mr. Vishal K. Panwar, Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Mr. Narinder Chandila, Mr. Shailend Choudhary and Mr. Prateek Aggarwal, Advs. Versus ABDUL GHAFFAR & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shreyans Singhvi, Ms. Ekta Mehta and Mr. Umrao Singh Rawat, Advs. 16+ O.M.P. 300/2001 & IA No.8552/2010 (u/S151CPC) SHIV NATH RAI HARNARAIN (INDIA) LTD. AND ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Davinder N. Grover, Mr. Vishrutraj, Mr. Vishal K. Panwar, Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Mr. Narinder Chandila, Mr. Shailend Choudhary and Mr. Prateek Aggarwal, Advs. Versus ABDUL GHFFAR ABDUL REHMAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shreyans Singhvi, Ms. Ekta Mehta and Mr. Umrao Singh Rawat, Advs. CS(OS) No.2554/2008 & OMP No.300/2001 Page 1 of 18 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER1603.2017 % IA No.9251/200...
Kanwar Pal@mama vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. No.495/2001 Date of Decision :16. h MARCH, 2017 KANWAR PAL@MAMA ..... APPELLANT Through Mr.Sunil Tiwari, Adv. versus STATE ..... RESPONDENT Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 12th July, 1. 2001 convicting the appellant finding him guilty under Sections 21/of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as NDPS Act, 1985) and order on sentence dated 12th July, 2001 vide which the sentence was passed against the appellant to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- for the offence punishable under Sections 21 of the NDPS Act, in default of payment of fine, convict was ordered to further undergo simple imprisonment for three years, the present appeal has been filed.2. The facts in brief are that a secret information was re...
Association of Mes Contractors and Traders and All Members vs.director ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
$~36 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 7703/2016 Judgment delivered on:16. 03.2017 ASSOCIATION OF MES CONTRACTORS AND TRADERS AND ALL MEMBERS versus ........ Petitioner DIRECTORATE OF CONTRACT MANAGEMENT MILITARY ENGINEERING SERVICES ENGINEER IN CHIEFS BRANCH INTEGRATED HQ OF MOD AND ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS: Ms Seema Singh ........ RESPONDENTS Mr Nitish Gupta, Mr Farman Ali and Mr Brajesh Kumar for Mr Ravi Prakash for UOI. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1603.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.31779/ 2016(exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 7703/2016 & C.M. No.31778/2016(stay) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning the action of the respondent in mandating that for all bids to be submitted, the EPF code W.P.(C) No7703 /2016 Page 1 of 2 should be uploaded.2. The contention of the petitioner is that in certain organizations, which employ les...
Dk Warehouse Pvt. Ltd. Vs.brainbridge Advertising and Marketing Pvt. L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
* + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. 05.2016 Pronounced on:16. 03.2017 CO.APP.50/2013 & C.M. NOS. 11516/2013 & 11518/2013 VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA VIJAY KUMAR KAPOOR AND ORS. Versus ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS EFA (OS) 9/2012 YUSUF ENGINEERING CO. PVT. LTD. MR. VIJAY KUMAR KAPOOR AND ANR. Versus EFA (OS) 12/2012 YUSUF ENGINEERING CO. PVT. LTD. MR. VIJAY KUMAR KAPOOR AND ORS. Versus ..... Appellants ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS CO. APP.61/2013 & C.M. NOS. 13310-13312/2013 D.K. WAREHOUSE PVT. LTD. BRAINBRIDGE ADVERTISING AND MARKETING PVT. LTD. AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant Versus Through: Sh. Hitender Kapur and Sh. Sagar Chawla, Advocates, for D.K. Warehouse in Co.App.50/2013, EFA(OS) 9/2012, EFA (OS) 12/2012 & Co.APP.61/2013. Sh. Aruneshwar Gupta and Ms. Parul Bose, Advocates, for D.K. Warehouse, in EFA (OS) 12/2012. Sh. Vivek Gupta, Advocate, for D.K. Warehouse, in Co.App.50/.2013. Sh. Manjit Singh Ahluwalia,...
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.subhash Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 16, 2017 MAC.APP. 334/2015 & C.M.No.6413/2015 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD versus Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate ..... Appellant REETA & ORS Through: Nemo .....Respondents MAC.APP. 336/2015 & C.M.No.6427/2015 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD versus Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate ..... Appellant Through: Nemo SUBHASH SINGH & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR .....Respondents % ORAL JUDGMENT The above captioned two appeals relate to a road accident, which took place on 10th October, 2009, in which driver of Dumper and the helper, who was travelling in that Dumper, had died after collision with another Dumper. Two separate claim petitions were filed by legal heirs of driver and helper of Dumper in question, whose Insurer is appellant herein. Evidence was led by Claimants, but no evidence was led by respondents herein. On the basis of evidence led, Motor Accident Claims MAC. APPs.3& 5Page 1 of 5 Tribunal (herein...
Rama Devi vs.state Nct Govt of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : MARCH16 2017 BAIL APPLN. 408/2016 RAMA DEVI Through : Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate along with petitioner in person. ........ Petitioner $~ * + versus ........ RESPONDENTS STATE NCT GOVT OF DELHI & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. Mr.Umesh Gupta, Advocate for the complainant along with complainant and her husband in person. S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.51/2016 registered under Sections 384/385/355/120B/34 IPC at Police Station Welcome. Status report/Additional status report are on record.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. On perusal of the file, it reveals that the complainants husband-Prem Chand was involved in case FIR No.47/2016 registered under SectionIPC and Section 10 of POCSO at Police Station Welcome lodged by one Geeta on 22.01.2016. Allegations against the petitioner are that she and her asso...
Dr. Kanti Prasad vs.indian Institute of Technology & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
* + % W.P.(C) No.5598/2011 16th March, 2017 ........ Petitioner DR. KANTI PRASAD IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through: Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj and Mr. M.D. Jangra, Advocates. versus INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS and Ms. Through: Mr. T. Singh Dev Baikthansangi, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Ms. Nisha Sharma, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks the relief of quashing of the order/letter dated 27.12.2010 of the Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of Higher Education, by which the Ministry informed the petitioner that as regards the petitioners services with the respondent No.1/Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) there was no pending claim of the petitioner. W.P.(C) No.5598/2011 Page 1 of 6 2. The facts of the case are that the petitioner ...
Yusuf Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs.mr. Vijay Kumar Kapoor and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
* + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. 05.2016 Pronounced on:16. 03.2017 CO.APP.50/2013 & C.M. NOS. 11516/2013 & 11518/2013 VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA VIJAY KUMAR KAPOOR AND ORS. Versus ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS EFA (OS) 9/2012 YUSUF ENGINEERING CO. PVT. LTD. MR. VIJAY KUMAR KAPOOR AND ANR. Versus EFA (OS) 12/2012 YUSUF ENGINEERING CO. PVT. LTD. MR. VIJAY KUMAR KAPOOR AND ORS. Versus ..... Appellants ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS CO. APP.61/2013 & C.M. NOS. 13310-13312/2013 D.K. WAREHOUSE PVT. LTD. BRAINBRIDGE ADVERTISING AND MARKETING PVT. LTD. AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant Versus Through: Sh. Hitender Kapur and Sh. Sagar Chawla, Advocates, for D.K. Warehouse in Co.App.50/2013, EFA(OS) 9/2012, EFA (OS) 12/2012 & Co.APP.61/2013. Sh. Aruneshwar Gupta and Ms. Parul Bose, Advocates, for D.K. Warehouse, in EFA (OS) 12/2012. Sh. Vivek Gupta, Advocate, for D.K. Warehouse, in Co.App.50/.2013. Sh. Manjit Singh Ahluwalia,...
Akshay Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :21. t NOVEMBER, 2016 DECIDED ON :16. h MARCH, 2017 + CRL.A.430/2015 & CRL.M.B. 3265/2015 AKSHAY KUMAR ..... Appellant STATE Through : Mr.Sachin Sangwan, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, APP. Complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant Akshay Kumar impugns a judgment dated 15.01.2015 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.179/2013 arising out of FIR No.224/2013 PS Dabri by which he was held guilty for committing offence punishable under Section 376 IPC. By an order dated 22.01.2015, he was sentenced to undergo RI for seven years with fine `1 lac.2. In nutshell, the prosecution case as reflected in the charge-sheet was that in the year 2010 2011, the appellant committed rape upon the prosecutrix X (changed name) after administering a stupefying substance. Subsequently, he continued to have physical relationship with her on the false pretext to marry....
- ‹ Prev
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- Next ›
- Last »