Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
B. Diwaker vs.jamia Millia Islamia University
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + % B. DIWAKER W.P.(C) No.5643/2015 17th March, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mohd. Zaryab Jamal Rizvi, Advocate with Mrs. Firdouse Q. Wani, Advocate. Versus JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Dr. Amit George, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner seeking the relief of restraining the respondent/employer/Jamia Millia Islamia University from recovering an amount of Rs.23,69,016/- from the petitioner, and which amount was sought to be recovered by the respondent on account of the emoluments paid to the petitioner in the study leave period of two years.2. On the very first date of hearing when this writ petition came up for admission and for consideration of grant of interim orders, W.P.(C) No.5643/2015 Page 1 of 8 a detailed order, encompassing th...
Prem Prakash & Ors vs.uoi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2017
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P. (C) No.5497/2002 PREM PRAKASH & ORS Date of Judgment:17. h March, 2017 ........ Petitioners Through : Mr.U.Srivastava, Adv. with Ms.Neelima Rathore, Adv. versus UOI & ORS Through : Mr.Vijay Joshi, Senior Panel Counsel, ........ RESPONDENTS for R-1/UOI Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Adv. for R-2 & 3/CBI along with Mr.D.P. Singh, AO(P), CBI, in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.8342/2017 (for restoration, by petitioners) 1. This is an application filed by the petitioners seeking restoration of the writ petition which was dismissed on account of non-appearance and non-prosecution on 30.01.2017.2. 3. Notice. Learned counsels for the respondents accept the notice. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The writ petition is restored to its original number and file.4. Application stands disposed of. W.P. (C ) 5497/2002 Page 1 of 6 W.P. (C) ...
Adesh Enterprises Llp & Ors. Vs.vinod Kumar Goswami & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 442/2016 & IA No.16058/2016 $~18 * + ADESH ENTERPRISES LLP & ORS. Through: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Ms. Gurkamal Hora Arora & Mr. Arjun Sehgal, Advocates. versus ........ Petitioners VINOD KUMAR GOSWAMI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Manmeet Arora, Mr Sanjay Mani Tripathi, Mr. Aaditya Vijay Kumar, Ms. Sanam Tripathi & Mr. Ajay A. Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % ORDER1603.2017 1. There is a preliminary objection raised by the learned counsel for the... RESPONDENTS to the entertaining of the present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 ('Act') on the ground that the lands in respect of which the interim relief is sought are located in Uttarakhand, outside the territorial jurisdiction of this Court.2. In particular, reference is made by Ms. Manmeet Arora, learned counsel for the... RESPONDENTS, to the decision in Harshad Chiman Lal Modi v. DLF Universal 2005 (7) SCALE533to st...
k.c. Gupta vs.director of Education & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % K.C. GUPTA W.P.(C) No.2497/2011 16th March, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajeshwar Kumar Gupta, Advocate with Ms. Sonia Khandelwal, Advocate and Ms. Sumati Sharma, Advocate. DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Arora, Advocate with Ms. Preeti Thakur, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks the relief of setting aside the order dated 26.2.2011 passed by the respondent no.1/Director of Education (DOE) whereby petitioner has not been granted the benefit of ACP-II.... Petitioner has been denied the benefit of ACP-II, on the ground that for the pay-scale of ACP-II and which would be the pay-scale of Vice- Principal in this case, there is required the qualification of B.Ed. which qualification petitioner does no...
Yusuf Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs.mr. Vijay Kumar Kapoor and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
* + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. 05.2016 Pronounced on:16. 03.2017 CO.APP.50/2013 & C.M. NOS. 11516/2013 & 11518/2013 VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA VIJAY KUMAR KAPOOR AND ORS. Versus ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS EFA (OS) 9/2012 YUSUF ENGINEERING CO. PVT. LTD. MR. VIJAY KUMAR KAPOOR AND ANR. Versus EFA (OS) 12/2012 YUSUF ENGINEERING CO. PVT. LTD. MR. VIJAY KUMAR KAPOOR AND ORS. Versus ..... Appellants ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS CO. APP.61/2013 & C.M. NOS. 13310-13312/2013 D.K. WAREHOUSE PVT. LTD. BRAINBRIDGE ADVERTISING AND MARKETING PVT. LTD. AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant Versus Through: Sh. Hitender Kapur and Sh. Sagar Chawla, Advocates, for D.K. Warehouse in Co.App.50/2013, EFA(OS) 9/2012, EFA (OS) 12/2012 & Co.APP.61/2013. Sh. Aruneshwar Gupta and Ms. Parul Bose, Advocates, for D.K. Warehouse, in EFA (OS) 12/2012. Sh. Vivek Gupta, Advocate, for D.K. Warehouse, in Co.App.50/.2013. Sh. Manjit Singh Ahluwalia,...
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.reeta & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 16, 2017 MAC.APP. 334/2015 & C.M.No.6413/2015 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD versus Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate ..... Appellant REETA & ORS Through: Nemo .....Respondents MAC.APP. 336/2015 & C.M.No.6427/2015 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD versus Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate ..... Appellant Through: Nemo SUBHASH SINGH & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR .....Respondents % ORAL JUDGMENT The above captioned two appeals relate to a road accident, which took place on 10th October, 2009, in which driver of Dumper and the helper, who was travelling in that Dumper, had died after collision with another Dumper. Two separate claim petitions were filed by legal heirs of driver and helper of Dumper in question, whose Insurer is appellant herein. Evidence was led by Claimants, but no evidence was led by respondents herein. On the basis of evidence led, Motor Accident Claims MAC. APPs.3& 5Page 1 of 5 Tribunal (herein...
Delhi Transports Corporation & Others vs.sunil Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on:10. h November, 2016 Date of Decision:16. h March, 2017 W.P.(C) 9513/2015 DELHI TRANSPORTS CORPORATION & OTHERS....... Petitioners Through Ms. Latika Chaudhury, Advocate for Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate Versus SUNIL KUMAR ..... Respondent Through Mr. Anil Mittal & Ms. Komal Aggarwal, Advocate + WITH W.P.(C) 9885/2015 SUNIL KUMAR Through Mr. Anil Mittal & Ms. Komal ....... Petitioner Aggarwal, Advocate Versus DELHI TRANSPORTS CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through Ms. Latika Chaudhury, Advocate for Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate AND + W.P.(C) 11452/2015 DELHI TRANSPORTS CORPORATION ....... Petitioners Through Ms. Latika Chaudhury, Advocate for Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate W.P.(C) Nos. 9513, 9885 & 11452 of 2015 Page 1 of 12 Versus AMRISH KUMAR ..... Respondent Through Mr. G. S. Charya, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.The above mentioned writ petitions involve id...
Shubhanshu Singh & Ors vs.jawaharlal Nehru University
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: March 07, 2017 Judgment delivered on: March 16, 2017 + W.P.(C) 1557/2017 & CM70182017 SHUBHANSHU SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Arvind K.Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Parijata Bhardwaj, Ms.Vrinda Grover, Mr.Nikhil Sharda, Ms.Padma Priya, Ms.Ratna A., Advs. versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Tushar Mehta, ASG with Ms.Monika Arora, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by five petitioners with the following prayers: WHEREFORE, in the light of the above facts and circumstances, the... Petitioner most respectfully prays that this Honble Court be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction, including a writ of mandamus and / or any other writ: a. Quash and set aside the Admission Policy 2017 dated 11.02.2017; Resolution 10 of the 141st AC meeting, W.P.(C) 1557/2017 Page 1 of 37 Resolution 6.1 of the 266th EC m...
Om Prakash @ Ommi vs.omwati & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS(C) 220/2017 & CM APPLs. 10405-10406/2017 #21 OM PRAKASH @ OMMI ........ Petitioner Through Mr. A.K. Dey, Advocate versus OMWATI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through None Date of Decision:16. h March, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 11th December, 2014 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in CS (OS) 2001/2014 whereby the parties are directed to maintain status quo in respect of the title and possession of the suit properties mentioned in Schedule-A filed along with the plaint till further orders.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that despite the aforesaid order, the respondents have changed the status of the properties mentioned in the Schedule. CONT.CAS(C) 220/2017 Page 1 of 6 3. A perusal of the paper book reveals that the order dated 11th December, 2014 has been passed upon an applica...
Vijay Kumar Sharma vs.vijay Kumar Kapoor and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2017
* + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. 05.2016 Pronounced on:16. 03.2017 CO.APP.50/2013 & C.M. NOS. 11516/2013 & 11518/2013 VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA VIJAY KUMAR KAPOOR AND ORS. Versus ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS EFA (OS) 9/2012 YUSUF ENGINEERING CO. PVT. LTD. MR. VIJAY KUMAR KAPOOR AND ANR. Versus EFA (OS) 12/2012 YUSUF ENGINEERING CO. PVT. LTD. MR. VIJAY KUMAR KAPOOR AND ORS. Versus ..... Appellants ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS CO. APP.61/2013 & C.M. NOS. 13310-13312/2013 D.K. WAREHOUSE PVT. LTD. BRAINBRIDGE ADVERTISING AND MARKETING PVT. LTD. AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant Versus Through: Sh. Hitender Kapur and Sh. Sagar Chawla, Advocates, for D.K. Warehouse in Co.App.50/2013, EFA(OS) 9/2012, EFA (OS) 12/2012 & Co.APP.61/2013. Sh. Aruneshwar Gupta and Ms. Parul Bose, Advocates, for D.K. Warehouse, in EFA (OS) 12/2012. Sh. Vivek Gupta, Advocate, for D.K. Warehouse, in Co.App.50/.2013. Sh. Manjit Singh Ahluwalia,...
- ‹ Prev
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- Next ›
- Last »