Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kumudam Publications Pvt. Ltd. Acting Through Its Managing Director Mr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:08. 03.2017 Pronounced on:30. 03.2017 + W.P.(C) 11216/2016 KUMUDAM PUBLICATIONS PVT. LTD. ACTING THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR. P. VARADARAJAN ..... Appellant Through: Sh. S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Pooja Mehra Saigal, Sh. Jitendra Ratta and Ms. Jasmine Kottai, Advocates. Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES AND ORS. Through: Sh. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel with Sh. Puneet Rai, Jr. Standing Counsel. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The petitioner impugns an order dated 16th September 2016 of the third respondent which failed to give credit for advance tax deposited for AY20102011 and AY20162017 and tax deducted at source (TDS) to a total extent of ` 16.49 crores.2. The petitioner-company incorporated under the Companies Act, has its registered office at Chennai. It has been filing its Return of Income till the financia...
Harjot Kaur Rajpal vs.the Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2017
$~2. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2898/2017 1. HARJOT KAUR RAJPAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dhruv Grover, Advocate versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND ANR Through: Mr. Gaurang Kanth, CGSC for R-1. Mr. K.S. Parihar, Advocate for R-2/RBI. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % At the outset, Mr. Kanth, learned counsel for the respondent ORDER3003.2017 No.1/UOI states that the present petition, wherein the petitioner seeks directions to the respondents to accept old demonetized notes of the denomination of Rs.500/- and Rs.1,000/- and exchange them with new currency notes, is not maintainable in this court in view of the order dated 16.12.2016 passed by the Supreme Court in W.P.(Civil) No.906/2016 entitled Vivek Narayan Sharma vs. Union of India, wherein it has been clarified that no other Court shall entertain, hear or decide any writ petition/proceedings on the issue or in relation to or arising from the...
Era Infra Engineering Ltd. Vs.geodesic Techniques Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2017
$~29 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 167/2017 ERA INFRA ENGINEERING LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Harish Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Mr Vijay K. Singh, Advocates. versus GEODESIC TECHNIQUES PVT. LTD Through ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER3003.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J IA No.4032/2017 1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.2. IA No.4030/2017 3. The petitioner has filed the above captioned petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter 'the Act') assailing an arbitral award dated 16.04.2014 (hereafter 'the impugned award') passed by the sole arbitrator, Justice Tejinder Singh Doabia (Retired).4. The above captioned petition was filed on 15.07.2014 and was returned under objections on 16.07.2014. It the counsel engaged by the petitioner was suffering from cancer and was thereafter is stated that O.M.P. (COMM.) 167/2017 Page 1 of 6 hospita...
Rajesh Kumar vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2017
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + DECIDED ON : MARCH30 2017 CRL.REV.P. 811/2016 RAJESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Kedar Yadav, Advocate with Mr.S.K.Solanki & Mr.Hemant Sharma, Advocates. VERSUS STATE OF DELHI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, APP. ..... Respondent S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Present Revision Petition under SectionCr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner to impugn a judgment dated 1.12.2016 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Crl.A.No.204341/2016 whereby conviction and sentence recorded by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate by orders dated 23.12.2015 and 23.01.2016 were upheld. The petitioner had suffered conviction in case FIR No.registered at Police Station Okhla for commission of offence punishable under SectionsIPC. He was sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment for six months under Section 354 IPC and to pay fine Rs.5,000/- under Section 341 IPC. The petition is contested by the State. Crl.Rev.P.811/2016 Page 1 ...
Satish Kumar Bhatia vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl.Appeal No.574/2000 Date of Decision:30. h March, 2017 SATISH KUMAR BHATIA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Bhopal Singh, Adv. versus STATE .. Respondent Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 374 Cr.P.C. against judgment dated 06.09.2000 whereby the appellant has been found guilty and convicted for an offence punishable under Section 498A IPC and order on sentence dated 08.09.2000 whereby the appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default to payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year.2. The facts of the case, as per the case of the prosecution, Crl.Appeal No.574/2000 Page 1 of 13 in a nutshell are that on 08.09.1984 at about 4.55 A.M., an information was received at police station Subzi Mandi from one Sh.Vinod Kumar r/o House No.787...
Jasjeet Singh & Anr vs.kuldeep Singh Gujral (Huf) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h March, 2017 $~132 * % + FAO1452017 & CM No.12398-12399/2017 JASJEET SINGH & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Raman Kapoor, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ripu and Mr. Vijay, Advs. versus KULDEEP SINGH GUJRAL (HUF) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manoj Khanna, Adv. for R1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellants have challenged the order dated 04th March, 2017 whereby the learned Trial Court has given the following directions:-"(i) The plaintiff is allowed access to the terrace on Saturdays and Sundays between 10:00 am to 06:00 pm in case of necessity for maintenance of water tank, dish antenna etc on three hours advance notice as per convenience of both the parties and a message can be send by the plaintiff to the mobile of the defendants by SMS. (ii) The defendants are directed to shift old Maruti car in the passage so that it is not more than 6 inches away from the peripheral wall and 6 feet aw...
Brahmaputra Cracker and Polymer Limited vs.rvr Projects Private Limite ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2017
$~35 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 153/2017 & IA No.3789/2017 BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER AND POLYMER LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr N. L. Ganapathi and Mr Mitash Charan, Advocates. versus RVR PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr Sridhar Potaraju and Ms Ankita Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU ORDER3003.2017 % VIBHU BAKHRU, J Brahmaputra Cracker and Polymer Limited (hereafter BCPL) has 1. filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) for partially setting aside the arbitral award dated 11.01.2017 (hereafter the impugned award) to the extent that BCPL has been directed to refund the amount of 1,33,21,601/- deducted as price reduction in terms of price reduction schedule from the amount payable to the respondent RVR). BCPL is also aggrieved with the award of pendente lite and future interest in favour of RVR. (hereafter 2. BCPL had invited bids for Civil,...
Satish Chopra vs.delhi Development Autority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2017
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6602/2015 & C.M.No.12037/2015 % SATISH CHOPRA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Naushad Alam, Advocate. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTORITY ..... Respondent Through Ms.Manika Tripathy Pandey with Mr.Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocates. Date of Decision :30. h March, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking quashing of the computerised draw conducted by the respondent-DDA based on random number technique.... Petitioner has also prayed for allotment of a Janta flat under the physically handicapped category.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that locality-wise implementation of the reservation scheme is contrary to the guidelines under the DDA Housing Scheme, 2010. He submits that locality-wise reservation scheme has been implemented in such a manner that one per cent of surrendered flats have not been allotted to persons falling under the physically handicapp...
Messar Ali vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : March 30th, 2017 CRL.A. 455/2000 MESSAR ALI versus THE STATE Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur, Mr. Nitish Chaudhary, Advocates ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT P.S.TEJI, J1 The present appeal has been filed being aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 25.05.2000 convicting the appellant under Section 397 r/w Section 34 IPC and also Section 411 IPC and order on sentence dated 26.05.2000 vide which the appellant was sentenced to undergo seven years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.5,000/- for the offence under Section 397 read with 34 IPC, in default of payment of fine, the appellant had been ordered to further Crl.A. No.455/2000 Page 1 of 12 undergo simple imprisonment for six months. The appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and a fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default of pay...
Vikas Kumar vs.food Corporation of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.10963/2016 and CM No.42876/2016 + % VIKAS KUMAR30h March, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Dr. L.S. Chaudhary, Ms. Reema Viresh and Mr. Bhola Chowdhary, Advocates FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA versus Through: Mr. Aayush Agarwala ..... Respondent for Mr.Ajit Pudussery, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks compassionate appointment to Group C/AG-III post with the respondent. The appointment is sought in terms of compassionate appointment policy which has been issued in terms of the Government of Indias letter dated 16.1.2013.2. It is high time that Court deal with certain frivolous petitions in a very strict manner. No doubt, seeking compassionate appointment must ordinarily evoke sympathy, however, that sympathy has to necessarily vanish when the same litigant un...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »