Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rishabh Agro Industries Limited vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2017
* % + WP (C) 6300/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on : February 07, 2017 Judgment pronounced on : March 17, 2017 Rishabh Agro Industries Limited Through : Ms. Purti Marwaha, Adv. versus ...... Petitioner ....... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for UOI Union of India & Ors. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA Mr. Vishal Mahajan with Mr. S.S. Rai, Advs. for R-2. JUDGMENT A. K. CHAWLA, J.1. The petitioner invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeks issuance of appropriate writ for setting aside an order dated 12.5.2015 passed by Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (AAIFR), New Delhi in short "the impugned order". WP(C) 6300/2015 Page 1 of 7 2. Facts emerging from the record are that the petitioner company had set up a plant at Roz-ka-Meo, Sohna, Haryana for processing of 2.5 lakh litres of milk per day ...
Versatile Commotrade Private Limited vs.chiranji Lal & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Reserved on:09. 02.2017 % Decided on:17. 03.2017 + CS(COMM) 304/2016 VERSATILE COMMOTRADE PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ratan Kumar Singh, Mr. Nikhilesh Krishnan, Mr Nishank Tyagi and Mr Abhishek Iyer, Advocates versus CHIRANJI LAL & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr Sunil Dalal and Mr Ashish Sharma, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT IA No.23676/2015 (moved by defendants under Order XXXVII Rule 3 (7) CPC r/w S.151 CPC) 1. The present application of the defendants under Order XXXVII Rule 3 (7) of Civil Procedure Code (CPC) relates to grant of leave to defend the present suit, which has been filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXVII CPC for recovery of a sum of `1,03,54,000/- along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum with effect from 02.11.2013 till actual payment. It is submitted by the plaintiff that they are dealing in the business of real estate and were interested in purchasing land in revenue es...
National Insurance Co Ltd vs.menka Lidhoo & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2017
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 17, 2017 MAC. APP. 403/2008 & C.M.7672/2011 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Mr. L. K. Tyagi, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus MENKA LIDHOO & ORS. Through: Mr. S.M. Suri, Advocate .....Respondents MAC. APP. 407/2008 MENKA LIDHOO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.M. Suri, Advocate Versus SAGAR TAUNK & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. L.K. Tyagi, Advocate for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR respondent-insurer % ORAL1 JUDGMENT In the above-captioned first appeal, reduction in quantum of compensation awarded is sought by Insurer whereas in the above- captioned second appeal, its enhancement is sought by Claimant-injured. Both the appeals arise out of common impugned Award of 15th April, 2008 which grants compensation of `42,30,000/- including the interim Award with interest @ 9% per annum on account of injuries sustained by MAC.APPEALS4032008 & 407/2008 Page 1 of 9 Claimant-Menka in a road accident on 16th June, ...
Sanjay Dhankad @ Nakli vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2017
$~R-1, 2, 3 * % + CRL.A. 755/2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:17. h March, 2017 MOHAN SINGH @ BUNTY ..... Appellant Through Mr. R.M. Tufail with Mr. Anwar A. Khan, Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, Mr. Vishal Raj Sehhijpal, Ms. Meenakshi Joshi and Ms. Astha, Advocates + + STATE CRL.A. 1480/2014 versus Through Mr. Varun Goswami, APP ..... Respondent BHAGWAN SAHAI @ CHINTU ..... Appellant Through Mr. Anup Kumar and Mrs. Neha Jaiswal, Advocates STATE versus Through Mr. Varun Goswami, APP ..... Respondent CRL.A. 762/2014 SANJAY DHANKAD @ NAKLI ..... Appellant Through Mr. R.M. Tufail with Mr. Anwar A. Khan, Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, Mr. Vishal Raj Sehhijpal, Ms. Meenakshi Joshi and Ms. Astha, Advocates STATE versus Through Mr. Varun Goswami, APP ..... Respondent Crl.A.Nos.755/2014, 1480/2014 & 762/2014 Page 1 of 24 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. All the three appeals have been heard together. Arguments have been ad...
Gurnam Kaur (Deceased) Through Lrs vs.bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2017
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DATE OF DECISION:17. H MARCH, 2017 + CS(OS) No.2691/2015 GURNAM KAUR (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Manish Vashisht, Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Ms. Trisha Nagpal & Ms. Astha Gupta, Advs. BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. & ORS ..... Defendants Versus Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anupam Varma & Ms. Niti Arora, Advs. for D-1 / Review... Petitioner. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Review Petition No.38/2017 (under Section 114 read with Section 47 Rule 1 and Section 151 CPC) & IA No.1154/2017 (for condonation of 118 days delay in filing Review Petition).1. The defendant no.1 BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. (BSES RPL) seeks review / recall of the order and partial decree dated 14th July, 2016.2. The plaintiff instituted this suit for mandatory injunction directing BSES RPL, South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC) and Divisional Head (O&M) of BSES RPL to remove the transformer and the electric pole installed in the por...
M/S Cement Corporation of India of India Ltd. Vs.m/s Steel Authority o ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2017
$~38 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 10830/2016 & CM No.42479/2016 (stay) Judgment delivered on:17. 03.2017 M/S CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA OF INDIA LTD. ........ Petitioner versus M/S STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Kailash Prashad Pandey, Advocate. Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate. ..... Respondent JUDGMENT1703.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for quashing the award dated 30.01.2012 and the appellate award dated 20.04.2016.2. On 18.11.2016, Dr. Bhardwaj, learned counsel for the petitioner had drawn the attention of the court to a recent decision of the Supreme Court in the case of M/s Northern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Heavy Engineering Corp. Ltd. & Anr. reported as 2016 (6) SCALE820 wherein it has been held that if an award passed under the Permanent W.P.(C) No.10830 /2017 Page ...
National Agricultural Co-Operative Marketing Federation of India Ltd ( ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2017
% + THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:17. 03.2017 FAO(OS) 79/2017 NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION OF INDIA LTD (NAFED)... Appellant versus RAJASTHAN STATE CO-OPERATIVE OILSEED GROWERS FEDERATION OF INDIA LTD Advocates who appeared in this case:-"For the Appellant For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR : Mr Aaditya Vijay Kumar with Mr Ajay Arjun Sharma : Ms Manju Bhagat with Mr Shreshth Nanda ... Respondent JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) CM105262017 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. FAO(OS) 79/2017 & CM105252017(stay) 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and/or order dated 18.01.2017 delivered by a learned Single Judge of this Court in OMP1002010, which was a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). FAO (OS) 79/2017 Page 1 of 6 2. The said petition impugned the Award dated 18.11.2009 p...
Bhagwan Sahai @ Chintu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2017
$~R-1, 2, 3 * % + CRL.A. 755/2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:17. h March, 2017 MOHAN SINGH @ BUNTY ..... Appellant Through Mr. R.M. Tufail with Mr. Anwar A. Khan, Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, Mr. Vishal Raj Sehhijpal, Ms. Meenakshi Joshi and Ms. Astha, Advocates + + STATE CRL.A. 1480/2014 versus Through Mr. Varun Goswami, APP ..... Respondent BHAGWAN SAHAI @ CHINTU ..... Appellant Through Mr. Anup Kumar and Mrs. Neha Jaiswal, Advocates STATE versus Through Mr. Varun Goswami, APP ..... Respondent CRL.A. 762/2014 SANJAY DHANKAD @ NAKLI ..... Appellant Through Mr. R.M. Tufail with Mr. Anwar A. Khan, Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, Mr. Vishal Raj Sehhijpal, Ms. Meenakshi Joshi and Ms. Astha, Advocates STATE versus Through Mr. Varun Goswami, APP ..... Respondent Crl.A.Nos.755/2014, 1480/2014 & 762/2014 Page 1 of 24 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. All the three appeals have been heard together. Arguments have been ad...
Metro Tyres Ltd vs.the Advertising Standards Council of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2017
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DATE OF DECISION:17. H, MARCH2017CS(COMM) 1484/2016 & IA No.13737/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) METRO TYRES LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Pravin Anand & Ms. Kruttika Vijay, Advs. Versus Through: Ms. Avni Singh, Adv. for D-1. ..... Defendants + THE ADVERTISING STANDARDS COUNCIL OF INDIA & ANR CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff, a manufacturer of tyres and tubes for two wheelers and three wheelers, instituted this suit i) for restraining the defendant no.2 MRF Limited (MRF), also a manufacturer of tyres and tubes, from issuing groundless threats to the plaintiff of the plaintiff in the advertisement of its products having plagiarised/infringed the copyright of MRF in the advertisement of MRFs products and liability therefor; ii) for restraining the defendant no.2 MRF from promoting unfair competition with reference to plaintiff in any manner; iii) for declaration that such threats of institution of legal proceedings con...
Brijesh Bavarva vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :7. h FEBRUARY, 2017 DECIDED ON :17. h MARCH, 2017 + W.P.(CRL.) 1945/2016 & CRL.M.A.No.10171/2016 BRIJESH BAVARVA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Santosh Krishnan & Mr.V.Siddharth, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms.Nandita Rao, ASC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner to impugn an order dated 05.05.2016 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.13/2015 arising out of FIR No.528/2014 registered under Sections 376(2)/377/506 IPC at PS Moti Nagar whereby charge under Sections 376(2)/377/506 IPC was ordered to be framed against him. Status report is on record.2. I have heard the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State.3. Learned Senior Counse...
- ‹ Prev
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›
- Last »