Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A.p. Verma & Ors. Vs.engineers India Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.3125/2003 17th March, 2017 A.P. VERMA & ORS. ........ Petitioners None. Through: versus ENGINEERS INDIA LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Raavi Birbal, Adv. for R-1 to 4. Mr. Vikram Jetley, CGSC for R-5. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Twenty two petitioners have filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking directions for allowing these petitioners to have the benefit of Industrial Dearness Allowance (IDA) pattern of pay-scales and allowances w.e.f 1.7.1991 and/or from 1.4.1996 with notional fixation from 1.7.1991. The orders of the respondent No.1/employer dated 28.4.2000, 26.5.2000, 12.9.2000, 5.10.2000 and 27.10.2000 which denied the petitioners the relief of grant of IDA pattern of pay-scales retrospectively are impugned. W.P.(C) No.3125/2003 Page 1 of 6 2. A reading of the pleadings of the parties...
Ratul Puri vs.punjab National Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2017
$~25. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2464/2017 and CM APPL. 10630-32/2017 1. RATUL PURI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rishi Agarwala, Ms. Manisha Dhir, Ms. Niyati Kohli and Mr. Vaibhav Tyagi, Advocates versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK Through: Mr. Sartaj Singh, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % At the outset, counsel for the respondent/Bank states that the Bank is ORDER1703.2017 in the process of withdrawing the impugned notice to show cause dated 06.03.2017, whereunder the petitioner has been called upon to appear personally or through an authorised representative before the Committee of Wilful Defaulters on 21.03.2017. He states that thereafter a fresh notice to show cause shall be issued to the petitioner in accordance with law.2. In view of the fact that the respondent/Bank proposes to withdraw the impugned notice to show cause dated 06.03.2017 and cancel the meeting scheduled for 21.03.2017...
Rajender Prasad Yadav vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2017
$~3. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.2400/2017 Date of decision:17. h March, 2017 RAJENDER PRASAD YADAV ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Robin George, Advocate. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Pratap Singh, Mr. Navneet Tripathi & Mr. Sayad Sadiq Hussain, Advocates for respondent No.1. Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order dated 18th March, 2016 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) whereby TA No.32/2012 filed by the petitioner-Rajender Prasad Yadav and one Dharam Pal Gupta has been dismissed.2. The petitioner was appointed as Kendra Sahayak Centre Attendant on 2nd April, 1973 and was regularised with effect from 1St April, 1974. In 1982, ...
Balmer Lawrie & Company Ltd vs.saraswathi Chemicals Proprietors Sarasw ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2017
$~11 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI EX.P. 280/2012 BALMER LAWRIE & COMPANY LTD ..... Decree Holder Through: Mr Pramod K. Singh, Advocate. versus SARASWATHI CHEMICALS PROPRIETORS SARASWATHI ..... Judgement Debtor LEATHER CHEMICALS (P) LTD Through: Mr P. D. Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr Atul Gupta, Advocates for Objectors. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1703.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J EA(OS) No.340/2013 1. The above captioned petition has been filed under section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for enforcing the arbitral award dated 24.07.2000 entered in favour of the Decree Holder (DH) and against the Judgement Debtor (JD) described as Saraswathi Chemicals, Proprietors Sawaswati leathers Chemicals (P) Ltd. This is an application filed on behalf of the DH, inter alia, praying for 2. amending the execution petition. Essentially, the DH seeks to implead the Directors of JD: Shri Shanker Mundhra, Shri Vijay Mundhra ,Shri Krishan Mundhra, and Shri Aru...
Raj Kumar Sharma vs.dal Chand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2017
$~10 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA6912016 & CM334382016 RAJ KUMAR SHARMA Through : Appellant in person. ..... Appellant versus DAL CHAND Through : None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The appellant, who appears in person, states that he has been able to ORDER1703.2017 negotiate a settlement with the respondent during the pendency of the appeal. He therefore does not wish to press the appeal as he states that he has already paid a sum of Rs.1.22 lacs to the respondent before the trial court, in full and final settlement of all his claims, subject matter of the impugned judgment.2. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The appeal is disposed of along with the pending application. HIMA KOHLI, J MARCH17 2017 sk...
Intercontinental Great Brands Llc & Anr vs.dunn Foods Private Limited ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2017
$~29 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1219/2016 INTERCONTINENTAL GREAT BRANDS LLC & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms Nancy Roy, Advocate. versus DUNN FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR Through ..... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1703.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J IA No.3222/2017 1. This is an application filed on behalf of the plaintiffs under Order VIII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereafter 'the CPC') for judgement and decree as sought in the plaint.2. The learned counsel appearing for the plaintiffs states, at the outset, that plaintiffs are pressing for a decree of injunction and are willing to forego other reliefs including damages. The plaintiffs have filed the above-captioned suit inter alia seeking 3. injunction restraining the defendants from infringing their trademarks, copyright and also from restraining the defendants from passing off the goods of the plaintiffs. CS (COMM) 1219/2016 Page 1 of 6 It is averred in the plaint tha...
M/S Fedders Lloyd Corporation Ltd vs.kss Petron Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2017
% + *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h March, 2017 CS(COMM) 1106/2016 M/S FEDDERS LLOYD CORPORATION LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. P.S. Bindra, Adv. Versus KSS PETRON PVT LTD ..... Defendant Through: Mr. K.K. Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vinod Wadhwa, Adv. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.15408/2016 (of the defendant under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC) 1. The defendant, in this suit for recovery of Rs.1,82,20,511/-, seeks rejection of the plaint on the ground of claim therein being barred by time and this Court not having territorial jurisdiction to entertain the suit.2. The plaintiff has instituted this suit pleading i) that the defendant awarded purchase orders dated 17th January, 2011, 11th January, 2012, 16th October, 2012, 21st February, 2013 and 20th June, 2013 to the plaintiff for supply of fabricated structural steel as per specifications contained in the purchase orders; ii) that as per the purchase orders, the supplies were for d...
Jamia Hamdard University vs.prof M Sridhar Arcaryulu (Madabhushi Srida ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2017
$~34 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 4867/2016 & CM No.20306/2016 Judgment delivered on:17. 03.2017 JAMIA HAMDARD UNIVERSITY ........ Petitioner versus PROF M SRIDHAR ARCARYULU (MADABHUSHI SRIDAR) INFORMATION COMMISSIONER AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Ekta Sikri with Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Advocates Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA None for Respondent No.3 JUDGMENT1703.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.2. None appears for respondent No.3 despite service. The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 04.05.2016 whereby the CIC has held that there appears to be a genuine grievance of non-payment of bills after execution of the contracted work. Further the CIC has issued a show cause notice to the CPIO to show cause as to why maximum penalty be not imposed for not providing complete information and has required the Registrar and the Vice- W.P. (C) No.4867/2016 Page 1 of 5 Chan...
State (Nct of Delhi) vs.raman Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:17. h March, 2017 CRL.A. 1113/2016 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the versus State. RAMAN KUMAR ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Tarun Khanna and Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. The respondent was tried for offences punishable under SectionsIPC and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 (in short POCSO Act) and acquitted vide impugned judgment dated 21st November, 2014. Hence the present appeal by the State after leave to appeal was granted.2. In her deposition before the Court the child victim PW-1 stated: On 13.01.2013 again said 23.01.2013, I was going alone at around 5.00 p.m. to my maternal grandmothers house, which is at the distance of two streets away from my house. Accused met me at the corner of the street. My father was not at home on that day and he was on his duty. Accused to...
Vinod Kumar Bansal vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~Spl.DB-2 * + WP(C) No.1977/2014 VINOD KUMAR BANSAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mr. Khagesh B.Jha, Adv. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mr.Rahul Mehra, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASG for R-1&2. Mr. Srivasts Kaushal, Adv for UOI. Mr. Arjun Pant, Adv with Mr. Mayank Mukherjee, Adv. for DDA. Mr. Anil Grover, Adv. with Ms.Kanika Singh, Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, Ms. Noopur Singhal, Mr. Rishi Vohra, Advs. for NDMC. Ms. Aditi Gupta, Adv. Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Adv. for SMDC. S.I. Ram Tirath, Pairvi Officer, Traffic. for CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER1703.2017 This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed as a % 1. Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking directions for implementation of measures for providing free access to public places to physically challenged persons, was disposed of vide judgment dated 11th February, 2015 is...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »