Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rashtriya Janta Congress vs.election Commission of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-21-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through: Mr. Rajan Sabharwal, Advocate with Mr. Ajay Kumar Gupta, Advocate ........ Petitioner RASHTRIYA JANTA CONGRESS $~33. * + W.P.(C) 2599/2017 and CM APPL. 11237/2017 versus 1. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. P.R. Chopra, Advocate ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The present petition has been filed by the petitioner that describes ORDER2103.2017 itself as a registered political party, registered with the respondent/Election Commission of India on 21.12.1996, praying inter alia that the order dated 21.12.2016 issued by the respondent, intimating the Central Board of Direct Taxes (in short CBDT) that it has deleted 255 political parties including the petitioner from the list of registered unrecognised political parties, be set aside and quashed.2. Mr. Sabharwal, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner came to know about issuance of the letter dated 21.12.2016 by the respondent to the CBD...
Vijay Dixit vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-21-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. h January, 2017 Decided on:21. t March, 2017 CRL.M.C. 2317/2016 VIJAY DIXIT ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Manoj Ohri, Sr. Advocate with versus Mr. Arun Srivastava Abhimanyu Singh, Advs. and Mr. STATE ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State with Insp. Satya Prakash PS EOW Cell. Mr. Nishant Datta and Mr. Mayank Datta, Advs. for the complainant CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 FIR No.82/2011 was registered for offences punishable under Sections 409/420/120B IPC on the complaint of Lt. Col. Surender Pal Singh Aurora. In the complaint against the petitioner Vijay Dixit, Kalpana Dixit promoters of M/s. Senior Mall regd. office at 1/1, Shanti Niketan, New Delhi and other unknown persons it was alleged that Vijay Dixit and Kalpana Dixit representing themselves to be the promoters of M/s. Senior Builders Limited offered lucrative schemes for the purpose of investment in their Shopping Mall n...
Neeraj Kumar vs.jabbar Singh & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-21-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~8 * % + FAO6102016 NEERAJ KUMAR Date of Decision:21. t March, 2017 ...... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashish Sharma, Advocate versus with appellant in person ........ RESPONDENTS JABBAR SINGH & ANR. Through: Respondent No.1 in person. Ms. Vandana Surana, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the impugned order dated 18th October, 2016 whereby a compensation of Rs.2,66,533/- has been awarded to the appellant.2. On 16th March, 2015 at about 08:00 p.m., the appellant was driving vehicle No.HR-55M-3116 under the employment of respondent No.1 and he met with an accident with another vehicle which resulted in fracture of mid shaft bone tibia with intra-medullary nail and fracture of lower 1/3rd shaft tibia and mid shaft fibula. The appellant suffered permanent disability of 43% with respect to both lower limbs. The vehicle being driven by the appellant was owned by respondent No....
Chairman, Managing Committee Bhai Biba Singh Khalsa Sr. Secondary Scho ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-21-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.7733/2013 & conn. matters 21st March, 2017 1. W.P. (C) No.7733/2013 CHAIRMAN, MANAGING COMMITTEE BHAI BIBA SINGH KHALSA SR. SECONDARY SCHOOL ........ Petitioner None. Through: versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .... Respondent Through: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, ASC with Ms. Sona Babbar, Advocate. Mr. Pramod Kumar, DDE, Zone- 16.2. W.P. (C) No.7942/2013 MRS. AMAN BINDRA Through: ........ Petitioner Mr. M. Atyab Siddiqui, Advocate with Ms. Siddiqui, Advocate. Tibah DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. versus ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, ASC with Ms. Sona Babbar, Advocate. Mr. Pramod Kumar, DDE, Zone- 16.3. W.P.(C) No.8052/2013 MS.PARVINDER KAUR Through: versus ........ Petitioner Mr. M. Atyab Siddiqui, Advocate with Ms. Siddiqui, Advocate. Tibah W.P.(C) No.7733/2013 & conn. matters Page 1 of 21 DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION, GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Peeyosh Ka...
M/S Guru Nanak Mill Stores vs.oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-21-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 21, 2017 MAC. APP. 249/2009 & C.M.7269/2009 M/S. GURU NANAK MILL STORES ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Inderjit Singh Kapur and Ms. Purnima Sharma, Advocates versus ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate for respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) JUDGMENT Appellant is the registered owner of Maruti Esteem Car, which was involved in a road accident on 6th October, 2001. Vide impugned Award of 28th January, 2009, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as Tribunal), has directed respondent-Insurer to pay the awarded amount of `2,31,072/- with interest @ 9% per annum, with a right to recover it from appellant, who is registered owner of vehicle in question. The facts already noticed in impugned Award need no reproduction as the only question which arises in this appeal is of liability to pay the MAC. APP.249/2009 Page 1 of 5 awarded am...
Thdc Hydro Development Corporation Limited vs.m/s. Bhagirathi Builders ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-21-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 20/2008 Reserved on : January 2, 2017 Date of decision: March 21, 2017 THDC HYDRO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED Through: Mr. Sachin Dutta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Pritya Sharma, Advocate along with Mr. Sushhil Kumar, Law Officer. ........ Petitioner versus M/S. BHAGIRATHI BUILDERS ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Sharma with Ms. Devyani Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT % 1. This is a petition by Tehri Hydro Development Corporation Limited 21.03.2017 (THDC) against the Respondent, M/s Bhagirathi Builders Engineers and Contractors, under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) challenging an Award dated 22nd September, 2007 passed by the Sole Arbitrator. Background facts 2. THDC invited tenders for construction of 100 houses for economically weaker sections including civil and electrical works. By a letter dated 22nd OMP202008 Page 1 of 23 June, 1995, t...
M/S Kanwal International Represented Through Its Proprietor vs.the Dgm ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-21-2017
$~31. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2588/2017 and CM APPL. 11196/2017 M/S KANWAL INTERNATIONAL REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Himanshu Buttan, Advocate with petitioner in person.1. versus Through: Mr. Abhishek Anand, Advocate THE DGM, IDBI BANK LTD. & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia ORDER2103.2017 ........ RESPONDENTS for issuing directions to the respondents/IDBI Bank to defreeze the account maintained with its Janakpuri Branch.2. Counsel for the respondents/Bank, who appears on advance notice, states that the petitioner has rushed to this Court prematurely without making compliances of the letter dated 06.03.2017 addressed by the Bank, calling upon her to visit the concerned Branch and provide documentary evidence of business related transactions for the past two months.3. Counsel for the respondents/Bank explains that some unusual activity w...
St Marks Sr Sec Public School & Anr vs.director of Education and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: January 03, 2017 Judgment delivered on: March 20, 2017 + W.P.(C) 5784/2016, CM No.23887/2016 ST MARKS SR SEC PUBLIC SCHOOL & ANR Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Mr. Vedanta Verma, Mr. Vibhor Kush, Ms. Apoorva Pandey, Mr. Akhil Kumar Gola, Mr. Sanat Tokas & Mr. Prateek Gautam, Advs. ........ Petitioners versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Mr. R.A. Iyer, Adv. for DoE Mr. Manish Garg & Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Advs. for parents CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by two Schools with the following prayers:-"(i) Allow the present petition and issue a writ, order or direction quashing the order passed by the respondent bearing number DE15Act-I/2016/9720-25 dated 16.06.2016 (ii) Pass any order(s) as the Honble Court may deem fit. W.P.(C) 5784/2016 Page 1 of 17 2. The respondent No.1 had filed its counter-affidavit. ...
Raj Kumar Devraj vs.national Company Law Tribunal & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2017
$~52 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 2084/2017 Judgment delivered on:20. 03.2017 RAJ KUMAR DEVRAJ ........ Petitioner NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL & ANR ....... RESPONDENTS versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Abhishek Kr. Rao and Ms. Bhavya, Advocates. : Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr. Ruchir Ranjan Rai and Mr. P.C. Jain and Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocates for R-1 & 2 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT1 The petitioner impugns order dated 02.02.2017 issued by the President, National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT for short) re- constituting the benches at New Delhi and also the consequential order dated 02.02.2017 (incorrectly typed as 29.06.2016 in the typed copy) whereby the President has reassigned the part-heard matters pending before Smt. Ina Malhotra, Member (Judicial) to other benches.2. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that since the petiti...
Daya Wanti vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2017
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :16. 3.2017 Judgment delivered on :20. 3.2017 + W.P.(C) 8872/2015 DAYA WANTI ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Neha Garg and Mr. Nitin Garg, Advocates versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel for NDMC CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.For order see WP(C) 8722/2015. MARCH20 2017/A INDERMEET KAUR, J...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »