Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Prakash Saini & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2017
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1044/2017 Date of Hearing & Order: March 23rd, 2017 PRAKASH SAINI & ORS ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Anil Garg, Adv. with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR Through Mr.M.S. Oberoi, APP with SI Sareen ..... Respondent Kharb, PS Dwarka South. Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.(Oral) The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by 1. the petitioners, namely, Sh. Parkash Saini and others for quashing of FIR No.570/2014, under Section 498A/406/506/354D/34 IPC registered at Police Station South Dwarka, Delhi on the basis of an amicable settlement between the petitioners and respondent No.2 namely, Smt. Shilpa Saini.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant in the criminal complaint in question.3. The factual matrix of the present case is that the complainant in Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for Crl....
Dr. s.p. Ram vs.national Scheduled Castes Finance and Development Corp ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.3053/2010& conn. matters 23rd March, 2017 1. W.P.(C) No.3053/2010 DR. S.P. RAM ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Advocate with Mr.Rupal Luthra, Advocate. Versus NATIONAL CASTES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION & ANR. SCHEDULED FINANCE AND ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jagat Singh, Advocate with 2. W.P.(C) No.13320/2009 Mr. Apurv Yadav, Advocate. NAND KISHORE Through: Mr. Sahil Mullick, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus with Mr. Bikram Singh, Advocate. CASTES NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION & ORS. SCHEDULED AND FINANCE ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jagat Singh, Advocate with 3. W.P.(C) No.1898/2010 Mr. Apurv Yadav, Advocate. S.S. NAYAGAM Through: Mr. Sahil Mullick, Advocate ........ Petitioner with Mr. Bikram Singh, Advocate. Versus NATIONAL CASTES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION & ANR. SCHEDULED FINANCE AND ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) No.3053/2010 & conn. matters Page 1 of 14 Through: Mr. Jagat Singh, Advocate with Mr....
Vinod Kumar Tandon vs.prem Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2017
* (i) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: March 23, 2017 + VINOD KUMAR TANDON MAC.APP. 304/2008 Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate ..... Appellant versus PREM SINGH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent No.2 MAC.APP. 240/2009 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. Through: Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate ..... Appellant (ii) + versus VINOD KUMAR TANDON & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate for respondent-claimant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL JUDGMENT Vide impugned Award of 11th December, 2007, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as Tribunal) has granted compensation of `6,24,370/- with interest @ 9% per annum on account of injuries suffered by Claimant/Injured-Vinod Kumar Tandon in a road accident on 10th July, 1992. On the basis of the evidence led, impugned Award has been rendered. MAC.APPEALS NO.304/2008 & 240/2009 Page 1 of 4 In the above-captioned first appeal...
Udai Veer vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2017
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 984/2017 Date of Hearing & Order: March 23rd, 2017 UDAI VEER STATE & ANR. Through Mr.Vinod Kumar, Adv. versus ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP with ASI ..... Respondent Jeet Singh, PS Fateh Puri. Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.(Oral) The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by 1. the petitioner, namely, Sh. Udai Veer for quashing of FIR No.430/2013, under Section 451/323/354/509 IPC registered at Police Station Fateh Pur Beri, Delhi on the basis of an amicable settlement between the petitioners and respondent No.2 namely, Smt. Neeraj.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant in the criminal complaint in question. The factual matrix of the present case is that on 22.11.2013 3. around 10AM the accused who is the neighbor and relative of the complainant the in the present matter, came ...
National Highways Authority of India vs.n.k. Toll Road Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2017
$~14 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 126/2017 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr S. Nanda Kumar, Mr Pravnish Singh, Mr M.S. Saran Kumar and Mr Ramdhan Singh Narwal, Advocates. versus N.K. TOLL ROAD LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr Akhil Sibal, Mr Hasan Murtaza and Ms Tanvi Mishra, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2303.2017 The caveat stands discharged as the learned counsel for the VIBHU BAKHRU, J CAV No.247/2017 1. respondent has entered appearance. I.A. No.3311/2017 2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.3. Application stands disposed of. I.A. No.3312/2017 (Condonation of Delay in re-filing) 4. National Highways Authority of India (hereafter NHAI) has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) assailing the arbitral award dated 31.08.2016 (hereafter rendered by the Arbitral Tribunal, the impugned award) O.M.P. (COMM) 126/2017 ...
o.p. Nahar vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2017
$~08 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7630/2016 Date of decision:23. d March, 2017 O.P. NAHAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rakesh Kr. Khanna, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Virendra K. Singh, Ms. Shefail Jain, Ms. Mahima Rathi, Ms. S. Bushra Kazim and Mr. H.S. Sachdeva, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms. Divya Kapur, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) O.P. Nahar, in this writ petition, impugns the order dated 5th February, 2016, whereby OA No.3820/2013 filed by him has been dismissed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal, for short).2. The petitioner, who was earlier a Legal Adviser and ex-officio Additional Secretary (Conveyancing), Department of Legal Affairs, Ministry of Law and Justice, upon selection was appointed as the Chairperson, Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange (ATFE, for short), vide letter dated 16th June, 2005 i...
Alexender John vs.delhi Cantonment Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2017
#23 to 25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + W.P.(C) 9362/2014 & CM APPLs. 21167/2014, 3576/2015 MANISH SARPAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Advocate versus DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Anchit Sharma with Mr. Tarveen Singh Nanda and Mr. Satamita Ghosh, Advocates WITH + W.P.(C) 9403/2014 & CM APPL. 21246/2014 ALEXENDER JOHN ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Advocate versus DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Anchit Sharma with Mr. Tarveen Singh Nanda and Mr. Satamita Ghosh, Advocates AND + W.P.(C) 2928/2015 & CM APPLs. 5239-5240/2015 ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Advocate MANISH HANS versus W.P.(C) No.9362/2014 & connected Page 1 of 4 DELHI CANTONEMENT BOARD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Anchit Sharma with Mr. Tarveen Singh Nanda and Mr. Satamita Ghosh, Advocates. % Date of Decision:23. h March, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present batch o...
New India Assurnace Co. Ltd. Vs.vinod Kumar Tandon & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2017
* (i) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: March 23, 2017 + VINOD KUMAR TANDON MAC.APP. 304/2008 Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate ..... Appellant versus PREM SINGH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent No.2 MAC.APP. 240/2009 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. Through: Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate ..... Appellant (ii) + versus VINOD KUMAR TANDON & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate for respondent-claimant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL JUDGMENT Vide impugned Award of 11th December, 2007, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as Tribunal) has granted compensation of `6,24,370/- with interest @ 9% per annum on account of injuries suffered by Claimant/Injured-Vinod Kumar Tandon in a road accident on 10th July, 1992. On the basis of the evidence led, impugned Award has been rendered. MAC.APPEALS NO.304/2008 & 240/2009 Page 1 of 4 In the above-captioned first appeal...
All India Shwetamber Sthanakwasi Jain Conference (Regd.) vs.the Orient ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2017
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + DATE OF DECISION:23. D MARCH, 2017 CS(OS) NO.688/2008 ALL INDIA SHWETAMBER STHANAKWASI JAIN CONFERENCE (REGD.) ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Sonali Malhotra, Mr. Amit Sanduja & Mr. Anshul Mehta, Advs. Versus THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Bhaskar Tiwari & Mr. Samyak Jain, Advs. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff instituted this suit for ejectment of the defendant from Room Nos.39-40 mezzanine hall along with two toilets on the first floor forming part of Jain Bhawan, 12 Shaheed Bhagat Singh Marg, New Delhi let out by the plaintiff to the defendant and for recovery of Rs.1,43,36,000/- towards arrears of mesne profits / damages for use and occupation from 1st September, 2006 till 29th February, 2008 together with interest @15% per annum and for permanent injunction to restrain the defendant from sub- letting or assigning or parting with possession of the premises.2. The suit was entertaine...
Manish Sarpal vs.delhi Cantonment Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2017
#23 to 25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + W.P.(C) 9362/2014 & CM APPLs. 21167/2014, 3576/2015 MANISH SARPAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Advocate versus DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Anchit Sharma with Mr. Tarveen Singh Nanda and Mr. Satamita Ghosh, Advocates WITH + W.P.(C) 9403/2014 & CM APPL. 21246/2014 ALEXENDER JOHN ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Advocate versus DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Anchit Sharma with Mr. Tarveen Singh Nanda and Mr. Satamita Ghosh, Advocates AND + W.P.(C) 2928/2015 & CM APPLs. 5239-5240/2015 ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Advocate MANISH HANS versus W.P.(C) No.9362/2014 & connected Page 1 of 4 DELHI CANTONEMENT BOARD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Anchit Sharma with Mr. Tarveen Singh Nanda and Mr. Satamita Ghosh, Advocates. % Date of Decision:23. h March, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present batch o...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »