Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajiv Sharma and Ors. Vs.gnctd and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.3386/2003 24th March, 2017 RAJIV SHARMA AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma and Mr. A.K. Mishra, Advocates with petitioner nos. 1 and 3 in person. GNCTD AND ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.K. Singh, Advocate for R-3. Mr. Naresh Kaushik and Mr. Manoj Joshi, Advocates for R-4/UPSC. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. In the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, as originally filed, the following relief clauses were prayed:-"(A) (B) orders: allow this writ petition of the petitioner with costs; issue appropriate writ or writs, direction or directions, order or quashing the Office Orders dated 1st January, 2003 and 10th (i) February, 2003 assigning the current day charge of the post of Manager (T)-Civil to respondents Nos. 5 to 7; (ii) declaring feeder post of Assistant Engineers/Assistant Ex...
Golden Diamond Estate Pvt Ltd vs.lt Governor of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2017
$~R-13. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6249/2011 GOLDEN DIAMOND ESTATE PVT LTD Through: Mr. Sunil Magon, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus LT GOVERNOR OF DELHI AND ORS Through: Ms. Sakshi Popli, Advocate for Mr. Arjun Mitra, Advocate for R-2/NDMC. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER2403.2017 1. Mr. Magon, learned counsel for the petitioner states on instructions that having sold the subject premises, the petitioner/company does not wish to pursue the present petition any further.2. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The petition is disposed of as not pressed. MARCH24 2017 rkb HIMA KOHLI, J...
Pamela Manmohan Singh vs.harnam Kaur (Deceased Through Legal Represent ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2017
% + *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DATE OF DECISION:24. H MARCH, 2017 CS(OS) 206/2016 PAMELA MANMOHAN SINGH Through: Mr. Mahendra Rana, Adv. ..... Plaintiff Versus HARNAM KAUR (DECEASED THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES) & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Praveen Kumar, Adv. for D-1 to 3. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CONT. CAS No.113/1993, CONT. CAS No.45/2007 & CONT. CAS No.46/2007 1. The plaintiff instituted this suit i) for declaration that the sale deeds, all dated 6th December, 1988, executed by the defendant no.4 Sh. K.V. Kohli in favour of defendants no.1 to 3 viz. Mrs. Harnam Kaur, Mrs. Mahinder Kaur and Mr. Jagjit Singh, do not confer any title in the defendants no.1 to 3 and the plaintiff is the owner of 2/3rd of, property No.6-B, Jangpura, Mathura Road, New Delhi; ii) in the alternative for partition declaring that the plaintiff has 2/3rd share in the property No.6-B, Jangpura, Mathura Road, New Delhi and of division of the property by metes and boun...
Karan Mathur vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : MARCH24 2017 BAIL APPLN. 758/2015 + KARAN MATHUR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Rajneesh Vats, Advocate. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP with SI Nitesh, PS Saket. Ms.Anindita Pujari & Mr.Rovins Verma, Advocates for the complainant along with complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in Case FIR No.450/2015 under Sections 323/377/506 IPC registered at Police Station Malviya Nagar. Status report/Additional Status report are on record.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties including the counsel for the complainant and have examined the file.3. The petitioners counsel urged that false and concocted allegations have been leveled by the victim in her written complaint to Bail Appl.758/2015 Page 1 of 5 humiliate the petitioner. No offence, as alleged in the complaint, has been ...
Sanjay Kumar vs.school Management of Jindal Public School & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.2727/2017 and C.M. No.11833/2017 (stay) + % SANJAY KUMAR24h March, 2017 ........ Petitioner Mr. Saurabh Chadda, Advocate. Through: versus SCHOOL MANAGEMENT OF JINDAL PUBLIC SCHOOL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rizwan, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The limited prayer in this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, as argued before this Court is that the charge-sheet dated 29.6.2011, and the consequent disciplinary proceedings held against the petitioner, be set aside on the ground of delay.2. The writ petition is clearly an abuse of process of law and an endeavor by the petitioner to scuttle the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner on account of various acts of gross insubordination alleged against the petitioner including towards the Principal of the school. In fact, there is no delay in the disciplin...
National Insurance Co Ltd vs.smt. Santosh Bhardwaj & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2017
$~R-59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC. APP. No.45/2009 Date of decision: March 24, 2017 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Mr.Shoumik Majumdar, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus SMT. SANTOSH BHARDWAJ & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Arun Srivastava, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL1 JUDGMENT Impugned award of 25th September, 2008, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Rohini Courts (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) grants compensation of `4,87,168/- with interest @7.5% p.a. on account of death of a student aged 19 years in a road accident on 16th May, 2005. While taking notional income of deceased to be `3,493/- and after deducting one-third towards personal expenses and by applying multiplier of 16, the loss of annual contribution by deceased to her family is quantified by Tribunal as `4,47,168/-. After adding funeral expenses of `10,000/- and `30,000/- under the head of loss of love & affection the Mac.App.45/2009 Page 1 of 6 total com...
Gurbir Kaur vs.bdr Builders & Developers P. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2017
$~7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 253/2014 and IA No.1282/2016 GURBIR KAUR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Keshav V. Hegde, Advocate. versus BDR BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Sanjay Goswami, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2403.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J Smt Gurbir Kaur (hereafter Smt Kaur) - a lady of advanced age - has 1. filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) assailing the arbitral award dated 25.02.2011 (hereafter 'the impugned award') rendered by the sole arbitrator in respect of the disputes that had arisen between the parties in connection with an agreement dated 12.05.2010 captioned as "Collaboration Agreement Cum Receipt".2. The present petition was filed on 09.02.2014 and was dismissed by an order dated 22.01.2015 for being filed beyond the period of limitation specified under Section 34(3) of the Act. An appeal was filed against the said...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-4 vs.gulbarga Associates (P) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h March, 2017 ITA522015, CM APPL235222015 Versus $~ * + CIT-7 ODEON BUILDERS PVT. LTD With Versus ITA7552015 + PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 GULBARGA ASSOCIATES (P) LTD. + PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 GULBARGA ASSOCIATES (P) LTD. ITA7562015 Versus And ..... Appellant ....Respondent. ..... Appellant ....Respondent. ..... Appellant ....Respondent Appearance: Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Senior Standing counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Junior Standing counsel for Revenue in ITA52of 2015 Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Lakshmi Gurung, Junior Standing counsel for Revenue in ITA755and 756 of 2015 ITA Nos. 52/2015, 755/2015 & 756/2015 Page 1 of 31 Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Advocate for Respondent in ITA52of 2015 Mr. C.S. Aggarwal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Prakash Kumar and Mr. Rupinder Kumar Aggarwal, Advocates for... RESPONDENTS in ITA755and 756 of 2015. CORAM: JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidha...
Deepak Verma vs.state of Nct Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2017
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 623/2017 Date of Hearing & Order: March 24th, 2017 Through Mr.Pankaj Kumar, Adv. with Mr.Manish Kumar, Adv. DEEPAK VERMA ........ Petitioner versus STATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.M.S. Oberoi, APP for the State. SI Desh Raj Singh, PS Gandhi Nagar. Respondent no.2-Smt.Deepa Tandon in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.(Oral) The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by 1. the petitioner, namely, Sh. Deepak Verma for quashing of FIR No.484/2010, under SectionIPC registered at Police Station Anand Vihar, Delhi on the basis of an amicable settlement between the petitioner and respondent No.2 namely, Smt. Deepa Tandon.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant in the FIR in question.3. The factual matrix of the present case is that on 28.10.2010 at the complainants house some workers were working due to whi...
International Traders vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2017
$~24. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2662/2017 and CM APPL. 11564/2017 1. INTERNATIONAL TRADERS Through: Mr. Sujeet Kumar Mishra, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Gaurang Kanth, CGSC with Ms. Biji Rajesh and Mr. Pushkar Taimni, Advocates for R-1/UOI. Mr. K.S. Parihar, Advocate for R-2 and 3/RBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia ORDER2403.2017 for issuing a writ of mandamus to the respondents No.2 and 3/RBI to accept the deposit of/exchange of specified bank notes in the denomination of Rs.500/- and Rs.1,000/-, as detailed in Annexure P-6.2. Mr. Kanth, learned counsel for the respondent No.1/UOI opposes the maintainability of the present petition in this Court in view of the order dated 16.12.2016 passed by the Supreme Court in W.P.(Civil) No.906/2016 entitled Vivek Narayan Sharma vs. Union of India, wherein it has been clarifie...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »