Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kalpana Verna and Ors vs.canara Bank Thr Its General Manager
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2017
$~7. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11103/2016 1. KALPANA VERNA AND ORS Through: Ms. Archana Kumari, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus CANARA BANK THR ITS GENERAL MANAGER..... Respondent Through: Mr. Premtosh Mishra, Advocate with Mr. Mohit Sonkar and Ms. Anvesha Dwivedi, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % Learned counsel for the petitioners states that she has instructions to ORDER2403.2017 withdraw the present petition as the dispute, subject matter of the present petition has been sorted out with the respondent/Bank.2. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The petition is disposed of. HIMA KOHLI, J MARCH24 2017 rkb...
ms.tamanna vs.state of Nct & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2017
$~26 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :24. h MARCH, 2017 MS.TAMANNA CRL.M.C. 1546/2015 ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Sushant Mukund, Advocate. Versus STATE OF NCT & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. Mr.Salim Malik, Advocate for R2 to R5. S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. Present petition under Section 439 (2) Cr.P.C. read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for setting aside of an order dated 30.09.2014 whereby the respondents No.2 to 5 (hereinafter referred as the respondents) were granted bail in case FIR No.236/2014 registered under Sections 363/376D/34 IPC and Sections POCSO at PS Sonia Vihar. Status report is on record. The petition is contested by the respondents.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. Undisputedly, the respondents are facing trial in case FIR No.236/2014 registered at PS Sonia Vihar. By an order dated 30.09.2014, Cr...
Namgyal Institute for Research on Ladakhi Art & Culture & Anr. Vs.delh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2017
#34 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + W.P.(C) 14645/2006 NAMGYAL INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON LADAKHI ART & CULTURE & ANR. Through None ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rajiv Bansal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Niharika Ahluwalia, Advocates for DDA/ Applicant. Mr. Lalit Gupta with Mr. Siddharth Arora, Advocates for respondent No.5. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal with Ms. Niti Jain, Advocates for UOI. Date of Decision:24. h March, 2017 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) CM APPL. 11495/2017 1. Present application has been filed for recall of the order dated 11th August, 2016. The relevant portion of the order dated 11th August, 2016 is reproduced hereinbelow:-"W.P.(C) 14645/2006 Page 1 of 7 CM Appl. 13722/2015 in W.P.(C) 14645/2006 Learned counsel for respondent No.5 confines his prayer to refund of Rs.10,34,06,259/- provided the refund is made in a time bound manner. As DDA is not in a position...
Cit-7 vs.odeon Builders Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h March, 2017 ITA522015, CM APPL235222015 Versus $~ * + CIT-7 ODEON BUILDERS PVT. LTD With Versus ITA7552015 + PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 GULBARGA ASSOCIATES (P) LTD. + PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 GULBARGA ASSOCIATES (P) LTD. ITA7562015 Versus And ..... Appellant ....Respondent. ..... Appellant ....Respondent. ..... Appellant ....Respondent Appearance: Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Senior Standing counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Junior Standing counsel for Revenue in ITA52of 2015 Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Lakshmi Gurung, Junior Standing counsel for Revenue in ITA755and 756 of 2015 ITA Nos. 52/2015, 755/2015 & 756/2015 Page 1 of 31 Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Advocate for Respondent in ITA52of 2015 Mr. C.S. Aggarwal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Prakash Kumar and Mr. Rupinder Kumar Aggarwal, Advocates for... RESPONDENTS in ITA755and 756 of 2015. CORAM: JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidha...
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs.h.p. Cotton Textile Mills Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:24. 03.2017 O.M.P. (COMM) 123/2017 and IA Nos. 3230/2017 & 3231/2017 + THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent H.P. COTTON TEXTILE MILLS LTD. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr Udyan Srivastava and Ms Swetha Sree. Mr Abhinav Vashisht, Senior Advocate with Ms Shantha Devi Raman, Ms Priya Singh Thakur and Mr Arbaaz Hussain. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J IA No.3230/2017 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. O.M.P. (COMM) 123/2017 and IA No.3231/2017 The Oriental Insurance Company Limited (hereafter the OICL) has 3. filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning an arbitral award dated 19.10.2016 (hereafter the impugned award) passed by the arbitral tribunal comprising of Justice S.N. Sapra...
m.p.tyagi vs.military Engineer Services & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2017
$~29 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 26/2016 & IA No.291/2017 M.P.TYAGI ........ Petitioner Through: Ms Seema Singh, Advocate alongwith petitioner in person. versus MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Pankaj Batra, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2403.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the 1. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act), inter alia, assailing the Minutes of the Dispute Redressal and Reconciliation Committee (hereafter DRRC) held on 30.12.2015 (signed on 09.02.2016). The said minutes are claimed to be the arbitral award disposing of the disputes referred to DRRC. the Meeting of 2. The principal ground urged by the petitioner is that the said award is unreasoned and non-speaking. Ms Seema Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner claims that no statement of defence was filed; an appropriate hearing was not granted to the petition...
Taufik Khan vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2017
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on :24. h March, 2017 + W.P.(C) 7978/2016 TAUFIK KHAN Through: Mr.Shyam, Adv. ........ Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Mr.Vidur Mohan, Adv. for R-1&2. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT Ms.G. ROHINI, CHIEF JUSTICE This petition by way of Public Interest Litigation has been filed with a :1. prayer to direct the respondents to conduct verification of Companies registered outside the territory of India which are trying to obtain the licence for Pre-shipment Inspection Agency.2. Though it is pleaded in the petition that the Director General of Foreign Trade issued public notices dated 18.05.2015 and 05.06.2015 inviting the applications from new companies for grant of licences for Pre-shipment Inspection Agency, a copy of the same has not been filed. The only material placed on record is the Minutes of the Inter-Ministerial...
Sanjeev vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:8. h December, 2016 Decided on:24. h March, 2017 CRL.REV.P. 593/2016 & Crl.M.A. 13756/2016 (stay) SANJEEV Represented by: Mr. Rohit Agarwal and ........ Petitioner versus Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Advocates. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Vishvendra, PS Seema Puri. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 FIR No.894/2014 was registered on the typed complaint of the prosecutrix dated 16th June, 2014 wherein the prosecutrix alleged that in September, 2013 the petitioner made a phone call on her mobile phone and inquired about her address. The prosecutrix intimated her address to the petitioner and same day the petitioner came to her house when she was alone. The petitioner asked for water from the prosecutrix. As she served water to the petitioner he pushed her on the sofa and forcibly raped her. He also threatened the prosecutrix of killing her and her son if any compl...
Nayanika Thakur Mehta vs.mohit Mehta & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :19. h DECEMBER, 2016 DECIDED ON :24. h MARCH, 2017 + CRL.M.C. 407/2016 & CRL.M.A.Nos.6829/2016 & 7088/2016 NAYANIKA THAKUR MEHTA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Anil K.Aggarwal, Advocate. VERSUS MOHIT MEHTA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Mr.Harish Uppal, Advocate with Mr.Tileshwar Prasad, Advocate. S.P.GARG, J.1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 24.09.2015 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge whereby the petitioner was declined interim maintenance earlier granted by the Court of learned Metropolitan Magistrate by an order dated 10.08.2015. The petition is contested by the respondents.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. Petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred as D.V.Act) has been ...
Nisha Sharma vs.anil Kumar Gupta and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2017
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on :24. h March, 2017 + LPA3872016 & CM No.23552/2016 (stay) NISHA SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Deepak Anand, Adv. with Mr. Devesh Tripathi and Mr. Unnati Mishra, Advs. Versus ANIL KUMAR GUPTA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. D.K. Rustagi, Adv. with Mr. Mayank Rustagi, Adv. for R-1 to R-4. Mr. Manish Kumar Srivastava, Adv. for R-5. Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Adv. with Ms. Biji Rajesh and Mr.Rahul Singhal, Advs. for R-6/DJB. Mr. Sunil Goel, Adv. with Mr. Tanuj Agrawal and Mr.Supreet Bimbra, Advs. for R-7, R-8 and R-9. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT Ms.G. ROHINI, CHIEF JUSTICE: CM No.23549/2016 (for condonation of delay) For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. LPA No.387/2016 1. This appeal is preferred against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 30.03.2016 in W.P.(C) No.2095/2016. LPA N...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »