Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S State Construction Integrated Works, Unique Construction (Jv) vs.n ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:15. 03.2017 Judgment delivered on:27. 03.2017 + W.P(C) 1097/2017 & CM50182017 M/S STATE CONSTRUCTION INTEGRATED WORKS, UNIQUE CONSTRUCTION (JV) ..... Appellant versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr Rakesh Khanna, Sr.Adv. with Mr K.G.Sukhwani, Mr P.K.Sukhwani, Mr Anil K.Sharma, Ms Shefali Jain and Ms B. Kazim. For the Respondent No.1 : Mr Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr Mukesh For the Respondent No.2 : Mr Rajiv Nayyar, Sr.Adv. with Ms Namrata Kapoor Sharma and Mr P.P. Kanwar. Kumar, Ms Gunjan S. Jain. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR JUDGMENT ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J1 The petitioner which had participated in the bid, the tender for which was invited on 18.10.2016 for construction of a new 4 Lane Bridge across Varsova Creek and its approaches with interchange from km. 496.100 to km 498.350 (appr...
Kunal Travels (Cargo) vs.commissioner of Customs (Import & General) Ne ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
CUSAA12016 Judgement delivered on:27. 03.2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * % + KUNAL TRAVELS (CARGO) COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT & GENERAL) NEW CUSTOMS HOUSE, IGI AIRPORT, NEW DELHI ..... Respondent ..... Appellant Versus AND CUSAA122016 + KUNAL TRAVELS (CARGO) COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT & GENERAL) Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant: Mr. Amarjeet Singh, Advocate. For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Abhishek Ghai, ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Versus Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.:-"1. These appeals are directed against the impugned order dated 08.06.2015 of the CESTAT, which upheld the order-in-original dated 01.05.2007 passed by the respondent Commissioner of Customs revoking the appellants Customs House Agent (CHA) license and forfeiting its security deposit of Rs.1 lakh. CUSAA12016 & 12-2016 Page 1 of 15 2. The said license w...
New India Assurance Co Ltd. Vs.kumari Lovely (Minor) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
$~R-200 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: March, 27, 2017 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD Through: Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate ..... Appellant + MAC.APP. 313/2008 Versus KUMARI LOVELY (MINOR) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Durgainder Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % O R A L JUDGMENT Appellant is the Insurer of TATA Indica car in question, which was involved in a road accident on 26th September, 2003 and is aggrieved by impugned Award of 2nd February, 2008, which directs appellant to pay awarded amount of `89,185/- with interest @7% p.a. on account of injuries sustained by respondent No.1-injured in the abovesaid road accident. The facts are already noted in the impugned Award and so need no reproduction for the reason that vide order of 27th April, 2009, this appeal was admitted on a limited issue of recovery rights qua respondents No.2 & 3. Though respondent No.3-owner of TATA Indica car in question is Page 1 of 3 MAC.APP.313/2008 repre...
Easun Reyrolle Ltd vs.m/s Sav Engineers
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. 03.2017 CM(M) 923/2016 and CM Nos. 34147/2016 (stay) & 34149/2016 (delay in re-filing) $~A-58 * % + EASUN REYROLLE LTD ........ Petitioner Through Mr.S.D.Kushwawha, Adv. versus M/S SAV ENGINEERS ..... Respondent Through Mohd. Rashid, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. By the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to impugn the order of the trial court dated 15.02.2016 whereby the trial court decided the preliminary issue framed regarding territorial jurisdiction of the court holding that this court has territorial jurisdiction and rejected the contentions of the petitioner.2. The plaintiff/respondent has filed the suit for recovery of Rs.16,64,795/-. The amount is claimed on the allegation that the goods supplied by the petitioner were defective 3. Issue No.1 as framed by the trial court reads as follows:-"Issue No.1: Whether this court has...
Anuj Jaiswal vs.university of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Pronouncement : March 27,2017 LPA5702016 BHIM SHANKAR THAKUR Appellant Through: Mr. Barun Kumar Sinha with Mrs. Pratibha Sinha, Advocates Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR. Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. LPA5712016 ANUJ JAISWAL Appellant Through: Mr. Barun Kumar Sinha with Mrs. Pratibha Sinha, Advocates Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL + + JUDGMENT : Ms. G. ROHINI, CHIEF JUSTICE1 Since common questions of fact and law are involved, these two appeals are heard and decided together.2. LPA No.570/2016 is preferred against the order of the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.9135/2016 by the sole petitioner therein whereas LPA No.571/2016 has been preferred against the order of the learned Single LPA Nos.570 & 571 of 2016 Page 1 of 5 Judge by the... Petitioner No.2 in W.P.(C) No.8601/2016. Both the sa...
Neeta Khungar vs.air India Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % NEETA KHUNGAR W.P.(C) No.2354/2004 27th March, 2017 Through: ........ Petitioner Ms. Maninder Acharya, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Ankita Patnaik and Mr. Sahil Sood, Advocates. versus AIR INDIA LIMITED Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Bhavana, Mr. Madan Lal and Mr. Tejinder, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J1 By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks the relief of her being granted promotions in terms of the promotion policy dated 5.6.1997 of the employer/respondent/Air India Limited.... Petitioner who was appointed as Air Hostess on 4.1.1986 seeks first promotion of Senior Air Hostess as on 4.1.1991 and then of Check Air Hostess as on 4.1.1996.... Petitioner thereafter seeks the third step promotion for Additional Senior Check Hostess with effect from 4.1.2000. I may note that in terms of the promotion policy dated 5.6.1997...
Mahesh vs.oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: March 27, 2017 + MAC.APP.217/2009 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Gaur & Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocates Versus MAHESH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anuj Soni, Advocate with claimant in person + MAC.APP.14/2017 MAHESH Through: Mr. Anuj Soni, Advocate with ..... Appellant Versus claimant in person ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS. ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Gaur & Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT % ORAL1 In the above captioned two appeals, the challenge is to impugned Award of 17th March, 2009 which grants compensation of `9,08,830/- with interest @8% per annum on account of injuries sustained by Claimant-Mahesh in a road accident on 12th April, 2005. Appellant is Insurer of bus in question. The facts as noted in the impugned Award MAC.APP.Nos.217/2009 & 14/2017 Page 1 of 5 need no reproduction. Suffice to note that the challenge in the ab...
Saroj Aggarwal and Anr. Vs.shakuntala Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
$~25 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 617/2011 SAROJ AGGARWAL AND ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr Akhil Anand and Mr Siddharth Agrawal, Advocates. versus SHAKUNTALA AGGARWAL ..... Defendant Through Mr Rajesh Gupta, Mr Harpreet Singh and Mr Pranjal Saran, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2703.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J IA No.3802/2017 This is an application filed on behalf of the defendant, inter alia, 1. praying that the hearing of the application, I.A. No.20352/2014, be advanced and in the alternative ad interim orders be passed permitting the defendant to occupy the suit property - bearing No.12, Road No.42, West Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi - as an interim measure pending disposal of I.A No.20352/2014. The defendant had filed an application (I.A. No.20352/2014), inter 2. alia, seeking permission in terms of paragraph 36 of the order dated 07.01.2013, to occupy the suit property.3. Mr Sibal, learned Senior Counsel a...
J. S. Sehrawat vs.delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: March 17, 2017 Judgment delivered on: March 24, 2017 LPA1902017 & CM No.10676/2017 J.S. SEHRAWAT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Apurb Lal, Adv. with Ms. Meenu Pandey, Adv. versus DELHI URBAN SHELTER IMPROVEMENT BOARD AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. CORAM:-"HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J CM No.10676/2017 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. LPA1902017 1. This Intra-Court appeal has been filed by the appellant challenging the order dated February 27, 2017 of the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.1714/2017 whereby the learned Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed by LPA No.190/2017 Page 1 of 5 the petitioner challenging the order of the Disciplinary Authority dated January 12, 2017, dismissing him from service, which shall ordinarily be disqualification for future employment under the Gove...
Mohit Nagar vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h March, 2017 Decided on:24. h March, 2017 CRL.M.C. 2454/2016 & Crl.M.A. 10521/2016 (stay) MOHIT NAGAR ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Parth Goswami with Mr.Hemant Raj, Advs. versus STATE & ANR Represented by: Mr.Ravi Nayak, APP for State. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Shrey Sharawat with Ms.Kanishk Singh, Advs. for respondent No.2. Inspector Anil Malik, PS Greater Kailash. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By the present petition the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.135/2016 under SectionsIPC registered at PS Greater Kailash-I on the complaint of respondent No.2 and the consequent proceedings thereto including the charge-sheet filed.2. The grounds pressed for quashing of the FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto are that the respondent No.2 has lodged similar FIRs against other persons on the same modus-operandi, FIR was lodged malafidely with an intention to extort money and since at the time of registration o...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »