Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M. Nagarajan vs.state Election Commission & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1441/2017 M. NAGARAJAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. A. Maitri, Advocate with Ms. Radhika Chander Shekhar and Mr. Rattan Lal Goel, Advocates. versus STATE ELECTION COMMISSION & ORS. Through: Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, SC with Mr. Siddhartha Nagpal, Advocate for R-1 Mr. Sanjay Dewan with Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advocates for R-2 and R-3. ....... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER2703.2017 1. Mr. Maitri, learned counsel for the petitioner states that having regard to the view expressed by the Division Bench in a recent judgment dated 23.3.2017 in WP(C) No.1291/2017 and connected writ petitions on the aspect of delimitation, he does not wish to press the second relief prayed for in the present petition. This leaves the relief at prayer (a), which is for issuance of directions to the respondent No.1/SEC to consider the petitioners objection dated 21.9.2016 for the Pushp Vihar Ward, in accordance with Section 9(1) (a) ...
Anil Kumar Tyagi vs.chief Executive Officer, Delhi Jal Board & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~6 * + W.P.(C) 26/2017 Date of Decision :27. March, 2017 ANIL KUMAR TYAGI Through Mr. Suresh Tripathy, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, DELHI JAL BOARD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, Standing Counsel with Mr. Siddhartha Nagpal, Advocate and Mr. Ram Bilas, Office Supdt. DJB]. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The petitioner in this writ petition impugns the order dated 23.12.2016 whereby OA No.3599/2016 filed by him has been disposed of with the following findings:-"In the instant case, I find that it is true that 8. for major penalty were disciplinary proceedings contemplated against the applicant at the time his request for voluntary retirement was considered. However, there is no record to show that the appointing authority had applied his mind the charges contemplated against the applicant and had come to the conclusion th...
Bhim Shankar Thakur vs.delhi University & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Pronouncement : March 27,2017 LPA5702016 BHIM SHANKAR THAKUR Appellant Through: Mr. Barun Kumar Sinha with Mrs. Pratibha Sinha, Advocates Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR. Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. LPA5712016 ANUJ JAISWAL Appellant Through: Mr. Barun Kumar Sinha with Mrs. Pratibha Sinha, Advocates Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL + + JUDGMENT : Ms. G. ROHINI, CHIEF JUSTICE1 Since common questions of fact and law are involved, these two appeals are heard and decided together.2. LPA No.570/2016 is preferred against the order of the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.9135/2016 by the sole petitioner therein whereas LPA No.571/2016 has been preferred against the order of the learned Single LPA Nos.570 & 571 of 2016 Page 1 of 5 Judge by the... Petitioner No.2 in W.P.(C) No.8601/2016. Both the sa...
Golap Saikia vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:27. h March, 2017 CRL.M.C. 5663/2014 GOLAP SAIKIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Aditya Gaur, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.G.M. Farooqui, APP for State S.I. Vipin Kumar, PS IGI Airport CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I. S. MEHTA, J.JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the FIR No.352/2013, under Sections 25/of the Arms Act, 1959 registered at P.S. IGI Airport and all the proceedings emanating there from which are pending before the Court of learned ACMM, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi.2. The brief facts stated are that on 8th December, 2013 a complaint was received at P.S. IGI Airport, Delhi from one Deepak Chadha, Manager on duty of Cathay Pacific Airways that during the inline X-ray and physical search by Airport Operator Delhi International Airport Ltd. observed that the petitioner was in possession of ...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.mahesh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: March 27, 2017 + MAC.APP.217/2009 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Gaur & Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocates Versus MAHESH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anuj Soni, Advocate with claimant in person + MAC.APP.14/2017 MAHESH Through: Mr. Anuj Soni, Advocate with ..... Appellant Versus claimant in person ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS. ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Gaur & Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT % ORAL1 In the above captioned two appeals, the challenge is to impugned Award of 17th March, 2009 which grants compensation of `9,08,830/- with interest @8% per annum on account of injuries sustained by Claimant-Mahesh in a road accident on 12th April, 2005. Appellant is Insurer of bus in question. The facts as noted in the impugned Award MAC.APP.Nos.217/2009 & 14/2017 Page 1 of 5 need no reproduction. Suffice to note that the challenge in the ab...
Dr. Raj Arya vs.govt.of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Pronounced on 27th March, 2017 LPA4252016 DR. RAJ ARYA Through: Ms. Gunjan Sinha Jain, Adv. with Ms. Bhavana Dahoon, Adv. Appellant $~ * % + Versus GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. Respondents Through: Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Mr. R.A. Iyer, Adv. for R-1 & 2. Mr. P. P. Khurana, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Praveen Khattar, Adv. For R-3/Delhi Dental Council. Mr. T. Singhdev, Adv. for MCI CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.1. The unsuccessful petitioner in W.P. (C) No.60is the appellant before us.2. The appellant is challenging the entire election process alleging that the Election held in 2014 by the Delhi Dental Council was in complete violation of the prescribed norms as provided under the Dentist Act, 1948. The learned Single Judge dismissed the WP(C) No.60vide order dated 04.04.2016 and observed that there was no cause of action for setting aside LPA No.425/2016 Page 1 of 10 the s...
Mohit Singh Jadhav vs.delhi Transco Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:27. h March, 2017 + LPA3822016 & CM No.22838/2016 (stay) :1. MOHIT SINGH JADHAV Through: Versus... Petitioner in person with Ms.Sunanda Ayare, Adv. ..... Appellant DELHI TRANSCO LTD & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr.S.K. Chaturvedi with Mr.Sidharth Shanker, Advs. for DTL. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL J U D G M N E T MS. G. ROHINI, CHIEF JUSTICE This appeal is preferred against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 11.05.2016 in W.P.(C) No.2918/2012. The sole respondent in the writ petition is the appellant before us.2. The said writ petition was filed by the respondents herein with a prayer to set aside the order dated 21.02.2012 passed by the District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge-in-Charge, South District, Saket, New Delhi on an appeal under Section 9 of Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 (for short 'Public Premises Act'). LPA No.382 /2016 Pa...
Lalit @ Montu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. h November, 2016 Decided on:27. h March, 2017 CRL.A. 78/2016 LALIT @ MONTU ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Rajendra Kumar, Advocate. STATE versus Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Convicted for offences punishable under Sections 328/3IPC Lalit @ Montu challenges the impugned judgment dated 23rd September, 2015 and the order on sentence dated 30th September, 2015 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three and a half years and to pay a fine of `3,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 328 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of `3,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 379 IPC. Since the convict Pappu @ Amrish has not preferred any appeal, this Court is only concerned with the appeal of Lalit @ Montu.2. Assailing the conviction, learned Counsel for Lalit @ Montu submits that th...
b.s. Promoter & Developers vs.shri Sanjeev Malhotra & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:27. 03.2017 O.M.P. (COMM) 52/2016 & IA No.2705/2016 + SHRI SANJEEV MALHOTRA & ANR ........ Petitioners versus B.S. PROMOTER & DEVELOPERS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners For the Respondent ..... Respondent : Ms Rekha Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr Sanjeev Malhotra. : Mr Akhil Mittal. AND O.M.P. (COMM) 56/2016 & IA No.2982/2016 & 2984/2016 + B.S. PROMOTER & DEVELOPERS ........ Petitioner versus SHRI SANJEEV MALHOTRA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr Akhil Mittal. : Ms Rekha Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr Sanjeev Malhotra. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 These petitions have been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) inter alia for setting aside the arbitral award dated 28.10.2015 (hereafter the impugned award) O.M.P. (COMM) 52/2016 & 56/2016 P...
N I H F W vs.the lt.governor of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
$~7 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 6983/2011 Judgment delivered on:27. 03.2017 N I H F W ........ Petitioner versus THE LT.GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Singh, Advocate. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak with Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for respondent No.1. Mr. Dhanesh Relan with Ms. Akshita Manocha Adv. For Resp.2 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2703.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner, by the present petition seeks a direction to the respondents to handover the possession of land measuring 0.82 acres comprising in Khasra Nos.84and 850/2, village Mohammadpur, Munirka, New Delhi.2. It is contended that the petitioner was allotted land measuring 32 acres of land in the year 1965. Possession of land measuring 28.19 acres were handed over on 07.07.1967. Thereafter, some more land was handed over during the period 1967 to 1977. Acc...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »