Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Government of Nct of Delhi and Others vs.kamal Kant Sharma and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.717/2015 Reserved on :30. h January, 2017 Date of decision:28. h March, 2017 GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS....... Petitioners Through Mr. Sanjoy Ghosh, Mr. Rhishabh Jetely & Ms. Purtishta, Advocates. KAMAL KANT SHARMA AND OTHERS ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through Ms. Kamalakshi Singh Chauhan & Ms Saundarya Singh, Advocates. Through : Mr. Sanjoy Ghosh, Mr. Rhishabh Jetely ........ Petitioners W.P.(C) 720/2015 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. JOHNSON THOMAS & Ms. Purtishta, Advocates. versus ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Kamalakshi Singh Chauhan & Ms Saundarya Singh, Advocates. W.P.(C) 807/2015 ........ Petitioners Through : Mr. Sanjoy Ghosh, Mr. Rhishabh Jetely & Ms. Purtishta, Advocates. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ASHOK KUMAR & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Kamalakshi Singh Chauhan & Ms Saundarya Singh, Advocates. W.P.(C) 808/2015 Through : Mr. Sanjoy Ghosh, Mr. Rhishabh Jetely & Ms. Purtisht...
Syed Aneesh Karikal vs.uoi Rep. Its Joint Secretary Ministry of Financ ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2017
$~8 to 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:28. h March, 2017 + W.P.(CRL) 2129/2016 SHAIKH MOHAMMED RIZWAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradeep Jain, Advocate with Mr.Shubhankar Jha, Mr. Rahul Raheja, Mr.Ashish Bansal, Mr. Vikas Sarin and Ms. Mansi Awasthi, Advocates. versus UOI & ANR. Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with ........ RESPONDENTS Ms.Divya Kapur, Advocate for UOI. + W.P.(CRL) 2305/2016 ABDUL AZEEM SALAMTI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradeep Jain, Advocate with Mr.Shubhankar Jha, Mr. Rahul Raheja, Mr.Ashish Bansal, Mr. Vikas Sarin and Ms. Mansi Awasthi, Advocates. versus UOI REP. ITS JOINT SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE NEW DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr.Abhishek Ghai, Advocate for UOI. + W.P.(CRL) 2306/2016 SYED ALI FURKHAN ........ Petitioner W.P. (CRL) 2129/2016 & 6 Others Page 1 of 15 Through: Mr. Pradeep Jain, Advocate with Mr.Shubhankar Jha, Mr. Rahul Raheja, Mr.Ashish Bansal, Mr. Vikas S...
Haji Mohd. Majid Qureshi & Anr vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Pronouncement:27. h March, 2017 + W. P. (C) 12179/2015 HAJI MOHD. MAJID QURESHI & ANR ..........Petitioner Through : Mr. Raghav Avasthi with Ms. Zohitaksha Shukla, Advocates ......Respondents Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR CORAM HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL : MS. G. ROHINI, CHIEF JUSTICE Through : Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Ms. L. Gangmei, Ms. Namisha Gupta, GP and Mr.Tushar Sannu, Adv. for R-1/UOI1 This petition filed by way of Public Interest Litigation has been filed in the background of certain communal incidents stated to have taken place in the recent past resulting in some of the recipients of Sahitya Academi Puraskars returning their awards.2. It is pleaded by the petitioners that the Sahitya Academi Awards are awarded every year by Sahitya Academi, an autonomous body functioning under the aegis of Ministry of Tourism & Culture, Government of India to the authors of the most outstanding publ...
Hs Vedi vs.ks Kler
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: January 04, 2017. Date of decision: March 27, 2017. CS (OS) 415A/1988 & IA225872014, 22588/2014, 22821/2014, 22822/2014, 25277/2015 K S KLER H S VEDI Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Varma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anita Sahani, Mr. Aman Bhalla, Advocates. ..... Plaintiff versus ..... Defendant Through: Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Ms. Kirti Jaswal, Advocates for LRs. And IA228662014, 22865/2014 in O.M.P. 147/1987 HS VEDI KS KLER ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Ms. Kirti Jaswal, Advocates for LRs. versus Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Varma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anita Sahani, Mr. Aman Bhalla, Advocates. ..... Respondent CS (OS) No.415-A of 1988 & OMP No.147 of 1987 Page 1 of 42 % CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2703.2017 Introduction 1.1 The central issue in these matters concerns an application being I.A. No.22587 of 2014 filed by the Legal Representatives (LRs) of late Mr H. S. Vedi under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil P...
Sh. Sanjeev Kumar & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.5594/2000 + % SH. SANJEEV KUMAR & ORS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 27th March, 2017 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Pardeep Dahiya, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. B.K. Sood, Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Thukral, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek the application of doctrine of equal pay for equal work by treating the petitioners who are employees of the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS)/respondent nos.2 to 4 as to be similarly placed with the similar employees of Government of India and thus for petitioners to be paid the same pay-scales as granted to similarly placed central government employees.2. Originally there were total of seven petitioners.... Petitioner no.1 has not pressed the writ petition, and therefore, th...
Kalawati & Ors vs.intizar Ali
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA5262015 KALAWATI & ORS ..... Appellants Through : Mr. Aakar Bhardwaj, Advocate versus INTIZAR ALI Through : None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER2703.2017 CM No.11441/2017 (by the appellant u/Sec.151 CPC) 1. The present application has been filed by the appellants praying inter alia for permission to withdraw the accompanying appeal.2. Counsel for the appellants states on instructions that the appellants do not wish to pursue the appeal any further.3. The records reveal that the respondent was duly served with the notice in the pending applications on 19.10.2015. However, the said fact was not brought to the notice of the Court on 20.1.2016 on which date it was recorded that notice of the appeal had not been served on the respondent. On the said date, directions were also issued to the appellants to deposit the decretal amount in terms of an earlier order dated 29.9.2015.4. The appellants have not deposit...
‘X’ (Assumed Name) vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + DECIDED ON : MARCH27 2017. CRL.L.P. 251/2016 X (ASSUMED NAME) ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.B.Mahapatra, Advocate. versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. The Prosecutrix X (changed name) has preferred the instant petition for leave to challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 31.03.2016 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.60/2014 arising out of FIR No.460/2013 PS Amar Colony by which the respondent No.2 (hereinafter referred to as respondent) was acquitted under SectionIPC.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as reflected in the charge- sheet was that for about three years till 20.11.2013 at House No.20/7, Gali No.4, Main Market Gali, New Delhi and at various other places, the respondent committed rape upon the prosecutrix against her will on the Crl.L.P.251/2016 Page 1 of 7 pretext to marry her; she was c...
M/S Guruji Enterprises Pvt Ltd. Vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Pronouncement:27. h March, 2017 LPA3672016 & CM No.21606/2016 (stay) M/S GURUJI ENTERPRISES PVT LTD. Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Singh with Mr. D. K.Yadav and Mr.Amit Tomar, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr.Ajay Kalra, Advocates for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL + JUDGMENT : Ms. G. ROHINI, CHIEF JUSTICE1 The unsuccessful petitioner in W.P.(C) No.6562/2012 is the appellant before us.2. The said writ petition was filed challenging the removal of Trademark 'GURUJI' which was initially registered in petitioner's favour. The contention was that the prior notice in Form O-3 which is mandatory under Section 25(3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (for short 'the Act') read with Rule 64 of the Trade Marks Rules, 2002 (for short 'the Rules') was not issued. The said allegation was denied by the respondent No.2 and a copy of the Form O-3...
K S Kler vs.h S Vedi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: January 04, 2017. Date of decision: March 27, 2017. CS (OS) 415A/1988 & IA225872014, 22588/2014, 22821/2014, 22822/2014, 25277/2015 K S KLER H S VEDI Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Varma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anita Sahani, Mr. Aman Bhalla, Advocates. ..... Plaintiff versus ..... Defendant Through: Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Ms. Kirti Jaswal, Advocates for LRs. And IA228662014, 22865/2014 in O.M.P. 147/1987 HS VEDI KS KLER ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Ms. Kirti Jaswal, Advocates for LRs. versus Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Varma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anita Sahani, Mr. Aman Bhalla, Advocates. ..... Respondent CS (OS) No.415-A of 1988 & OMP No.147 of 1987 Page 1 of 42 % CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2703.2017 Introduction 1.1 The central issue in these matters concerns an application being I.A. No.22587 of 2014 filed by the Legal Representatives (LRs) of late Mr H. S. Vedi under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil P...
Shri Sanjeev Malhotra & Anr vs.b.s. Promoter & Developers
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:27. 03.2017 O.M.P. (COMM) 52/2016 & IA No.2705/2016 + SHRI SANJEEV MALHOTRA & ANR ........ Petitioners versus B.S. PROMOTER & DEVELOPERS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners For the Respondent ..... Respondent : Ms Rekha Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr Sanjeev Malhotra. : Mr Akhil Mittal. AND O.M.P. (COMM) 56/2016 & IA No.2982/2016 & 2984/2016 + B.S. PROMOTER & DEVELOPERS ........ Petitioner versus SHRI SANJEEV MALHOTRA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr Akhil Mittal. : Ms Rekha Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr Sanjeev Malhotra. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 These petitions have been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) inter alia for setting aside the arbitral award dated 28.10.2015 (hereafter the impugned award) O.M.P. (COMM) 52/2016 & 56/2016 P...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »