Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
Mtnl vs.m/s Motorola Inc.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-31-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: February 07, 2017 Date of decision on: March 31, 2017 MTNL O.M.P. 11/2014 Through: Mr. L.N. Anchal, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus MOTOROLA INC. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Ciccu Mukhopadhaya, Senior Advocate with Mr Surjendu Das and Ms Rashmi Gogoi, Advocates. AND O.M.P. 380/2015 Through: Mr L.N. Anchal, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus MTNL $~ * + + M/S MOTOROLA INC. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Ciccu Mukhopadhaya, Senior Advocate with Mr Surjendu Das and Ms Rashmi Gogoi, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % JUDGMENT3103.2017 1. These are two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) filed by Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL). OMP Nos. 11 of 2014 & 380 of 2015 Page 1 of 21 2. OMP No.11 of 2014 challenges an Award dated 26th August, 2013 passed by the sole Arbitrator whereas OMP No.380 of 2015 challenges an additional Award dated 21st January, 2015 by the same learned Arbit...
Mohd. Zahid vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-31-2017
$~ * . IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. No.879/2002 Date of Decision :31. t March, 2017 MOHD. ZAHID ..... APPELLANT Through Mr.K. Singhal, Adv. with Mr.Sachin Aggarwal, Adv. versus STATE ..... RESPONDENT Through Mr.Subhash Bansal, Standing Counsel for NCB with Mr.Shaswat Bansal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J1 The present appeal has been filed by the appellant aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 30th January, 2002, convicting the appellant finding him guilty under Section 29 read with Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as NDPS Act) as well as order on sentence dated 14th February, 2002 vide which the sentence was passed against the appellant to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of fifteen years and to pay fine of Rs.1,50,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 29 read with Section 21 of the NDPS Act in view of the provisions of Section 31(ii) of the NDPS Act, in default ...
Onkar Singh Chadha & Ors. Vs.gurpreet Singh Dhodi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-31-2017
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : MARCH31 2017 + CRL.M.C. 179/2016 & CRL.M.A.Nos.177& 7ONKAR SINGH CHADHA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr.Anshul Garg, Advocate. VERSUS GURPREET SINGH DHODI ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Mr.Manjit Singh Ahluwalia, Advocate. S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioners to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 20.11.2015 of learned Metropolitan Magistrate whereby application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. moved by the respondent to examine himself in pre- charge evidence was allowed. The petition is contested by the respondent.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. Undisputedly, the petitioners were summoned to face trial for commission of offences under Sections 406/420/506/120-B IPC in a Crl.M.C.179/2016 Page 1 of 3 complaint case by an order dated 27.01.2004. The respondent h...
Mtnl vs.motorola Inc.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-31-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: February 07, 2017 Date of decision on: March 31, 2017 MTNL O.M.P. 11/2014 Through: Mr. L.N. Anchal, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus MOTOROLA INC. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Ciccu Mukhopadhaya, Senior Advocate with Mr Surjendu Das and Ms Rashmi Gogoi, Advocates. AND O.M.P. 380/2015 Through: Mr L.N. Anchal, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus MTNL $~ * + + M/S MOTOROLA INC. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Ciccu Mukhopadhaya, Senior Advocate with Mr Surjendu Das and Ms Rashmi Gogoi, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % JUDGMENT3103.2017 1. These are two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) filed by Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL). OMP Nos. 11 of 2014 & 380 of 2015 Page 1 of 21 2. OMP No.11 of 2014 challenges an Award dated 26th August, 2013 passed by the sole Arbitrator whereas OMP No.380 of 2015 challenges an additional Award dated 21st January, 2015 by the same learned Arbit...
National Buildings Construction Corp. (Nbcc) Ltd. Vs.m/s Natavarlal M. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-31-2017
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 552/2008 Reserved on:7. h February, 2017 Decided on:31. t March, 2017 NATIONAL BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTION CORP. (NBCC) LTD. Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar Dass, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus M/S NATAVARLAL M. PATEL ..... Respondent Through: Ms Meenakshi Arora, Senior Advocate and Mr Vasav Anantharaman, Advocates WITH O.M.P. 553/2008 NATIONAL BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTION CORP. (NBCC) LTD. Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar Dass, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus M/S NATAVARLAL M. PATEL ..... Respondent Through: Ms Meenakshi Arora, Senior Advocate and Mr Vasav Anantharaman, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR O.M.P. 552/2008 & O.M.P. 553/2008 Page 1 of 30 % JUDGMENT3103.2017 Introduction 1. These are two petitions under section 34 read with section 28 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 by the... Petitioner M/s National Building Construction Corporation (NBCC) Ltd.2. The challenge in OMP No.552 of 2008 is to the common Award dated 10th Jul...
Varun Dave vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-31-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. No.776/2003 Date of Decision :31. t March, 2017 ..... APPELLANT VARUN DAVE Through Ms.Geeta Luthra, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Parul Sharma, Adv. Versus STATE ..... RESPONDENT Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J The present appeal has been filed by the appellant aggrieved 1. by the judgment of conviction dated 15th November, 2003 convicting the appellant finding him guilty under Sections 7 & 13 (1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as PC Act, 1988 for brevity) and order on sentence dated 19th November, 2003 vide which the sentence was passed against the appellant to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and also to pay fine of Rs.3,000/-, in default further RI for three months on each count for his conviction under Sections 7 & 13(1)(d) of the PC Act, 1988. The substantive sentence of imprisonment on both c...
Prem Mardi vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-31-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on: March 31st, 2017 + LPA7882015 & CM No.25836/2015 (stay) PREM MARDI Through: Mr.Ashok Agrawal and Mr.Anuj ..... Appellant Versus Kapoor, Advocates UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sanjay Jain, ASC with Mr.Jasmeet Singh, CGSC, Ms.Astha Sharma, Mr.Akash Nagar, Ms.Bani Dikshit, Ms.Astha Jain, Mr.Srivats Kaushal and Ms.Ruchi Jain, Advs. for UOI. Mr.Gautam Narayan, ASC with Mr.Shatrajit Banerji, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr.Mohit Kathur, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Sanjay Katyal, Mr.Mukesh Kumar Sharma and Mr.Bhaskar Bhardwaj, Advocates for R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JUDGMENT : Ms.G.ROHINI, CHIEF JUSTICE1 The unsuccessful petitioner in W.P.(C) No.8883/2015 is the appellant before us. LPA No.788/2015 Page 1 of 7 2. The said writ petition was filed with a prayer to quash the certificate granted to the movie MSG2The Messenger and further to direct the Union of India, Ministry of Information &...
Ramesh Nagpal and Anr vs.m/s Indusind Bank and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-31-2017
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2985/2017 & CM129882017 1. RAMESH NAGPAL AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through : Ms. Aastha Dhawan, proxy counsel versus M/S INDUSIND BANK AND ORS Through : Mr. Puneet S. Dhir, proxy counsel ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % At the outset, proxy counsel appearing for counsel for the respondent ORDER3103.2017 No.1/UOI states that the present petition, wherein the petitioner seeks directions to the respondents to accept old demonetized notes of the denomination of Rs.500/- and Rs.1,000/- and exchange them with new currency notes, is not maintainable in this court in view of the order dated 16.12.2016 passed by the Supreme Court in W.P.(Civil) No.906/2016 entitled Vivek Narayan Sharma vs. Union of India, wherein it has been clarified that no other Court shall entertain, hear or decide any writ petition/proceedings on the issue or in relation to or arising from the decision of the Government of India to demo...
Madhusudan Meher vs.harvinder Pal Singh Kohli
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-31-2017
$~13 & 14 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA1782015 MADHUSUDAN MEHER ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Aastha Dhawan, proxy counsel versus HARVINDER PAL SINGH KOHLI Through : Mr. Puneet S. Dhir, proxy counsel ..... Respondent + RFA3952015 & CM107212015 AND HARVINDER PAL SINGH KOHLI Through : Mr. Puneet S. Dhir, proxy counsel ..... Appellant versus MADHUSUDAN MEHAR ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Aastha Dhawan, proxy counsel CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % On 28.2.2017, counsels for the parties had jointly stated that they have ORDER3103.2017 arrived at a settlement before the Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre on 22.3.2017. As the Settlement Agreement was not on record on the said date, the appeals were adjourned for today.2. Now, the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre has forwarded a Settlement Agreement dated 22.3.2017, duly signed by both the RFA1782015 and RFA3952015 Page 1 of 3 parties, their respective counsels as also by the learn...
Neeraj Kumar vs.venkateshwar Global School and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-31-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: March 31, 2017 + W.P.(C) 7945/2016 & CMs 7936/2017, 32976/2016 NEERAJ KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. N.K.Upadhyay, Adv. versus VENKATESHWAR GLOBAL SCHOOL AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, Ms.Pratishtha Vij, Mr.Rhishabh Jetley, Advs. for R-2-4 + W.P.(C) 9069/2016, CM No.36734/2016 MASTER VANSH THROUGH FATHER RAVINDER KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.K.B.Jha, Adv. versus VENKATESHWAR GLOBAL SCHOOL & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.O.S.Soran, Adv. for R-1-2 Mr.Gautam Narayan, ASC with Mr.S.Banerji, Adv. GNCTD along with Mr.Shyam Behari, LA, Zone- 13 + W.P.(C) 9144/2016, CM No.36997/2016 MASTER DEVANSH AHUJA THR MOTHER BHARTI AHUJA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.K.B.Jha, Adv. versus W.P.(C) 7945/2016 Page 1 of 36 VENKATESHWAR GLOBAL SCHOOL & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.O.S.Soran, Adv. for R-1-2 Mr.Gautam Narayan, ASC with Mr.S.Banerji, Adv. GNCTD along with Mr.Shyam Behari, LA, Z...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »