Delhi Court February 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union Public Service Commission vs.tarun Arora
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~12 * + W.P.(C) 3003/2016, CM Nos. 12596/2016 and 2359/2017 Date of Decision:1. t February, 2017 UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Through Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus TARUN ARORA ..... Respondent Through Ms. Satya Siddique, Mr. Dalip Singh and Ms. Nukul Baisoya, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) The petitioner- Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) impugns the order dated 27th January, 2016 whereby OA No.1051/2014 filed by Dr. Tarun Arora, the respondent before us, has been allowed. The impugned order directs that the respondent should be considered for the post of Assistant Professor (Pharmacology).2. The respondent had approached the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) by way of aforesaid OA after his representations dated 17th February, 2014 and 20th February, 2014 were considered and rejected by the UPSC by th...
Managing Committee, St. Columba’s School and Ors. Vs.mrs. Neena Thom ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.6769/2008 + % MANAGING COMMITTEE, ST. COLUMBAS SCHOOL AND ORS. 1st February, 2017 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Romy Chacko, Advocate with Mr. Varun Mudgal, Advocate. versus MRS. NEENA THOMAS & ANR. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Siddharth Dutta, Advocate for GNCTD. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners today only urges one aspect for seeking setting aside of the impugned judgment of the Delhi School Tribunal (DST) dated 27.8.2008. This point which is argued is that once the DST found the disciplinary proceedings to be vitiated on account of the violation of principles of natural justice in the form of non supply of documents, non granting of adjournments, examining quite a number of witnesses on one date, non supply of the enquiry report before passing of the order by the disciplinary authority etc etc, then in such a ...
Sgs Constructions & Developers Pvt. Ltd vs.housing and Urban Developme ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 01,2017 + LPA2212016 & CM Nos.12231, 12232/2016 HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD (HUDCO) Versus SGS CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS. ..... Appellant ....... RESPONDENTS LPA2232016 & CM Nos.12347, 12348, 12351, 12352, 12353/2016 HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD (HUDCO) ..... Appellant Versus K M REALCON PVT LTD & ORS ....... RESPONDENTS + + + LPA2252016 & CM Nos.12401, 12403/2016 SGS CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD. ..... Appellant Versus HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS LPA2482016 & CM Nos.13926-28/2016 MAHARAJI EDUCATION TRUST ..... Appellant Versus HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS LPAs No.221, 223, 225, 248 & 249 of 2016 & WP(C) Nos.2604/2013, 4412/2013, 7261/2015 & 3047/2016 Page 1 of 33 + LPA2492016 & CM Nos.13931-32, 15107-08/2016 MAHARAJI EDUCATION TRUST ..... Appellant Versus HOUSING AND URBAN...
Mohd. Akram & Anr. Vs.maqsood Ahmad Bajaj
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2017
$~127 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:1. t February, 2017 FAO552017 & CM40532017 MOHD. AKRAM & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Atul Kumar Sharma, Adv. versus MAQSOOD AHMAD BAJAJ Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) CM40532017 The delay of 13 days in filing the appeal is condoned. The application is disposed of. FAO552017 1. The appellants have challenged the order dated 30th August, 2017 whereby the appellants, who are defendants no.1 and 2 before the Trial Court, have been restrained from selling, transferring, alienating or creating any third party interest in the suit property till the disposal of the suit.2. The defendants have filed a suit for possession against the appellants who are contesting the same primarily on the ground of adverse possession. The learned Trial Court has observed that the question of adverse possession raised by the appellants would require evidence and the suit property needs to be...
Dr. Shabnam Khare vs.medical Council of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2017
$-50 * IN THE HIGH CO URT O F DE L HI AT NEW DE LHI % Judgment delivered on:01. 02.2017 ........ Petitioner + W.P.(C) 718/2017 DR. SHABNAM KHARE versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr. A.K. Behera and Mr. Aman Pandey, Advocates For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. T. Singhdev, Ms. Biakthansangi and Ms. Puja Sarkar, Advocates for R- 1/MCI Mr. Praveen Kattar, Adv. for R-2 with Sh. L.D.S. Uppal, Assistant Secretary. Mr. Kush Sharma and Mr. Ekant Luthra, Advocates for R-3 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGEMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J CM No.3292/2017 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C)718/2017 & CM No.3293/2017 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking setting aside of order dated 02.01.2017 passed by the Delhi Medical Council on the ground that the order is to come into force on 02.02.2017 prior to the expiry of the WP(C) 718/2017 Page 1 of 3 period of limitation p...
Sgs Constructions & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs.housing and Urban Developm ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 01,2017 + LPA2212016 & CM Nos.12231, 12232/2016 HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD (HUDCO) Versus SGS CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS. ..... Appellant ....... RESPONDENTS LPA2232016 & CM Nos.12347, 12348, 12351, 12352, 12353/2016 HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD (HUDCO) ..... Appellant Versus K M REALCON PVT LTD & ORS ....... RESPONDENTS + + + LPA2252016 & CM Nos.12401, 12403/2016 SGS CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD. ..... Appellant Versus HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS LPA2482016 & CM Nos.13926-28/2016 MAHARAJI EDUCATION TRUST ..... Appellant Versus HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS LPAs No.221, 223, 225, 248 & 249 of 2016 & WP(C) Nos.2604/2013, 4412/2013, 7261/2015 & 3047/2016 Page 1 of 33 + LPA2492016 & CM Nos.13931-32, 15107-08/2016 MAHARAJI EDUCATION TRUST ..... Appellant Versus HOUSING AND URBAN...
Sangeeta James & Ors vs.uoi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2017
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment dated 1st February, 2017 + W.P. (C) No.1196/2002 SANGEETA JAMES & ORS ........ Petitioners UOI & ORS Through Mr.Aseem Mehrotra, Adv. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj, Adv. with Ms.Priyanka M. Bhardwaj & Mr.M.D.Jangra, Advs. for R-1 & 2. Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Rule DB was issued in this matter on 19.02.2002. The writ petition was allowed by the judgment dated 30.09.2011. Subsequently, a Review Petition filed by respondent No.4 (private respondent) was also dismissed. A Civil Appeal filed before the Supreme Court of India was decided by an order of 02.05.2014 by virtue of which the appeal was allowed and the matter was remitted back to this Court for de novo consideration after hearing counsels for all the contesting parties. This is the fifth round of litigation between the parties.2. The petitioners herein an...
Council of the Instt. Of Chartered Accountants of India vs.anil Kumar ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2017
$~R-2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : February 01, 2017 CHAT.A.REF.2/2011 COUNCIL OF THE INSTT. OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Rakesh Aggarwal, Advocate versus ANIL KUMAR & ANR. Represented by: None for R-1 ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Sandeep Kumar, Advocate for the complainant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. None appeared for the respondent yesterday. The matter was retained on Board. The matter has reached for hearing today. None appears even today for the respondent.2. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.3. Avtar Vinayak, the complainant and a member of Hilansh CGHS Cooperative Group Housing Society made a complaint against M/s.Anil Garg & Co. informing in the complaint that Anil Garg & Co. were the auditors of the society and had audited the account of the society for the financial years 1999-00, 2000-01, 2001-02, and 2002...
Maharaji Education Trust vs.housing and Urban Development Corp Ltd & O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 01,2017 + LPA2212016 & CM Nos.12231, 12232/2016 HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD (HUDCO) Versus SGS CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS. ..... Appellant ....... RESPONDENTS LPA2232016 & CM Nos.12347, 12348, 12351, 12352, 12353/2016 HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD (HUDCO) ..... Appellant Versus K M REALCON PVT LTD & ORS ....... RESPONDENTS + + + LPA2252016 & CM Nos.12401, 12403/2016 SGS CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD. ..... Appellant Versus HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS LPA2482016 & CM Nos.13926-28/2016 MAHARAJI EDUCATION TRUST ..... Appellant Versus HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS LPAs No.221, 223, 225, 248 & 249 of 2016 & WP(C) Nos.2604/2013, 4412/2013, 7261/2015 & 3047/2016 Page 1 of 33 + LPA2492016 & CM Nos.13931-32, 15107-08/2016 MAHARAJI EDUCATION TRUST ..... Appellant Versus HOUSING AND URBAN...
Suresh Kumar vs.banwari Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 01, 2017 RSA1052016 SURESH KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ravinder K.Tyagi, Advocate with BANWARI LAL appellant in person. versus Through: Mr.Santosh Kumar & Mr.Rajiv Ranjan Mishra, Advocates with respondent in person. ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT (Oral) RSA1052016 1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is filed by the appellant/defendant impugning the concurrent decision of the two courts below; i.e. judgment dated 28th March, 2016 passed by the First Appellate Court in RCA No.5/2016 and judgment dated 14.12.2015 passed by the learned Trial Court in Civil Suit No.882/2012, decreeing the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff for possession and permanent & mandatory injunction with respect to Property No.9492, Gali Mata Wali, Tokri Walan, Delhi as shown green in the site plan Ex.PW3/4.2. Both the parties are claiming to be adopte...
- ‹ Prev
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 62
- Next ›
- Last »