Delhi Court February 2017 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Feb 16 2017

Dwarka Sector 6 Vendor Association vs.mcd & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-16-2017

$~22 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA802016 Date of Judgment:16. h February, 2017 DWARKA SECTOR6VENDOR ASSOCIATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Shandilya, Advocate. Versus MCD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate for MCD. Mr. Virender Pratap Singh Charak, Advocate with Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey & Ms. Shubhra Parashar, Advocates for SDMC. Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, ASC for GNCTD with Ms.Sona Babbar & Ms. Pritika Kumar, Advocates with Insp. Adith Lily and SI Mukesh Kumar of PS Dwarka (South). Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate for R-6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Challenge in this LPA is to the order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 15.10.2015 by which the writ petition filed by the appellant association seeking a direction to the respondents not to LPA802016 Page 1 of 20 dispossess the members of the appellant association from their hawking sites i.e. Dwarka Sector-6 Market, Ne...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2017

Lalit Aggarwal vs.state (Cbi)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-16-2017

* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h February, 2017 Decided on:16. h February, 2017 CRL.REV.P. 448/2016 & Crl.M.A. 10118/2016 (stay) ATUL JAIN ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. versus Advocate with Mr. Aishwarya Sinha, Advocate. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Adv. CRL.REV.P. 528/2016 & Crl.M.A. 12461/2016 (stay) LALIT AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Rajesh Kaushik, Advocate. versus STATE (CBI) Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with ..... Respondent CRL.REV.P. 539/2016 & Crl.M.A. 12707/2016 (stay) Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Advocate. SYED SADAKAT ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. S.M. Jamal, Advocate. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Advocate. CRL.REV.P. Nos. 448/2016, 528/2016 & 539/2016 Page 1 of 7 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPT...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2017

Lotus Nikko Hotels Travel Pvt Ltd vs.ashok Chopra & Co & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-16-2017

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On : February 06, 2017 Judgment Delivered On : February 16, 2017 EFA (OS) No.2/2011 LOTUS NIKKO HOTELS TRAVEL PVT. LTD. .... Appellant Represented by: Mr.L.K.Singh, Mr.Sonal Sinha, Ms.Saira Parveen & Ms.Tanvi Khurana, Advocates. versus ASHOK CHOPRA & CO & ORS ....... RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr.Rohit K Agarwal, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr.Sanjeev Sindhwani, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.R.S. Mathur and Mr.Amitabh Marwah, Advocates for respondent No.2/ ITDC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. Indian Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the ITDC) owned various buildings in different cities in India wherein Hotels were established. One such building is in Gaya. A hotel by the name Hotel Bodhgaya Ashok was being run from the building. The respondent No.1 : M/s Ashok Chopra & Company was the successful bidder to execute civil,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2017

Subhash Chand vs.delhi Pinjra Pole Society

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-16-2017

$~20 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBHASH CHAND Date of Decision: February 16, 2017 RSA552017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Pramod Kumar, Advocate with appellant in person. versus DELHI PINJRA POLE SOCIETY ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Gaurav and Mr.Vikramjeet, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT (Oral) CM No.6118/2017 1.2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. RSA552017 1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been preferred by the appellant against the concurrent finding of the Courts below i.e. judgment dated 08th December, 2016 passed by the First Appellate Court and dated 26th May, 2016 passed by the learned Trial Court declaring the status of the appellant to be that of a licensee in the suit property and that the licence stood terminated by the respondent. Vide impugned judgment, the appellant was also directed to pay mesne profit/damages at the rate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2017

Gulshan Homes and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs.cit (Appeals) and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-16-2017

Through : Sh. P. Roychaudhuri, Sr. Standing Counsel. ........ RESPONDENTS * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8085/2014, C.M. APPL.18876/2014 RAJESH PROJECTS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Reserved on:16. 01.2017 Decided on:16. 02.2017 Through : Sh. Prakash Kumar and Ms. Rashmi Singh, Advocates. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS)-II AND ORS. + W.P.(C) 7682/2015 AJAY ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through : Sh. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Vidhi Goel and Ms. Shagun Parashar, Advocates. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) AND ORS. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Sh. Jasmeet Singh and Sh. Nitesh Shrivastava, Advocates. Sh. P. Roychaudhuri, Sr. Standing Counsel. + W.P.(C) 10896/2015 IITL-NIMBUS, THE HYDE PARK, NOIDA ........ Petitioner Through : Sh. Neil Chatterjee, Advocate, for Sh. Debesh Panda, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Sh. Jasmeet Singh and Sh. Nitesh Shrivastava, Advocates. Sh. ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2017

Shweta & Anr vs.vimal Kumar

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-16-2017

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA882017 & CM30322017 1. SHWETA & ANR ..... Appellants Through : Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Advocate versus VIMAL KUMAR Through : None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The appellants/defendants impugn the judgment and decree dated ORDER1602.2017 18.10.2016 passed by the learned trial court in a suit for recovery instituted by the respondent/plaintiff (husband of the appellant No.1 and son-in-law of the appellant No.2).2. The facts of the case lie in a narrow compass. The case of the respondent/plaintiff in the suit was that his marriage was solemnised with the appellant No.1/defendant No.1 on 25.4.2012 at Lucknow as per the Hindu rites and ceremony. After the marriage, the parties had shifted to Delhi and started residing in a tenanted premises at Rohini. Within a few months of their marriage, disputes and differences had arisen between the parties. From 14.7.2012, the respondent/plaintiff started residing separately RFA...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2017

Engineering Projects (India) Ltd. & Anr. Vs.unitech Limited

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-16-2017

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: January 02, 2017 Date of Decision: February 16, 2017 O.M.P. 427/2007 + ENGINEERING PROJECTS (INDIA) LTD. & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dwivedi, Ms. Shweata Mishra Jain & Mr. Vivekananda Jha, Advocates for... Petitioner No.1. Mr. S.K. Chandwani, Advocate... Petitioner No.2. for UNITECH LIMITED versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S.K. Maniktala & Mr. Swetab Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT % 1. Engineering Projects (India) Limited (EPIL) has in this petition under 16.02.2017 Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) challenged an Award dated 7th March, 2007, passed by the sole Arbitrator in the disputes between EPIL and the Respondent, Unitech Limited (Unitech), arising out of an Agreement dated 29th July, 1993 between the parties whereby the work of Modernisation of Air Traffic Control Services, Construction of Technical Building, Control Tower, Utility Blocks an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2017

Sanjay Bhargava and Anr vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation of Delhi ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-16-2017

$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:02. 02.2017 Judgment delivered on:16. 02.2017 + W.P.(C) 7285/2012 & C.M. No.13774/2015 SANJAY BHARGAVA AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Sanjeev Ralli and Mr.Trinayan Sonowal, Advocates. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Puja Kalra, Advocate for North DMC/R-1 along with Mr.Vinod Mantoo, ALO, City Zone (Land & Estate Department), Mr. Jeewan Singh, S.O. City Zone, Mr. Virender Singh (Patwari), Mr.Balbir Singh, PHILand & Estate Department Mr.Ashwani Garg, Advocate R-2/PWD. for Mr.Ravi Gupta, Sr.Adv.with Mr.Ankit Jain, Mr.Sachin Jain and Mr.Naman Sarswat, Advocates for R-3. Mr.Nimesh Chib, Advocate for R-4. Mr.Lalit Gupta, Mr.Dhananjaya Sud, Mr. Siddhartha Arora, Advocates. Page 1 of 24 W.P.(C) 7285/2012 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1... Petitioners (Sanjay Bhargava and Sandeep Bhargava) claim themselves to be the owners of premises...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2017