Delhi Court February 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Exotica Housing Private Limited vs.cit (Appeals) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-16-2017
Through : Sh. P. Roychaudhuri, Sr. Standing Counsel. ........ RESPONDENTS * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8085/2014, C.M. APPL.18876/2014 RAJESH PROJECTS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Reserved on:16. 01.2017 Decided on:16. 02.2017 Through : Sh. Prakash Kumar and Ms. Rashmi Singh, Advocates. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS)-II AND ORS. + W.P.(C) 7682/2015 AJAY ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through : Sh. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Vidhi Goel and Ms. Shagun Parashar, Advocates. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) AND ORS. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Sh. Jasmeet Singh and Sh. Nitesh Shrivastava, Advocates. Sh. P. Roychaudhuri, Sr. Standing Counsel. + W.P.(C) 10896/2015 IITL-NIMBUS, THE HYDE PARK, NOIDA ........ Petitioner Through : Sh. Neil Chatterjee, Advocate, for Sh. Debesh Panda, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Sh. Jasmeet Singh and Sh. Nitesh Shrivastava, Advocates. Sh. ...
Arsh Goel vs.central Board of Secondary Education & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-16-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16th February, 2017 + W.P.(C) 7926/2015 ARSH GOEL Through: Mr. Vipul Goel, Adv. versus ........ Petitioner CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION & ANR. Through: Mr. Amit Bansal & Ms. Seema ........ RESPONDENTS Dolo, Advs. for R1. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:-" It is, therefore, humbly prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased; a) to issue a writ, order and direction to the respondent No.2 to make necessary correction in its record; b) to issue a writ, order and direction to the respondent No.1 (CBSE) to make necessary correction in its record and to issue a Class 10th Certificate and mark-sheet with the correct date of birth of the petitioner i.e 07.11.1995; c) and may pass such other or further order as this Honble Court may deem think fit in the facts and circumstances of the W.P.(C) No.7926/2015 Page ...
Roshan Lal vs.delhi Transport Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-16-2017
$~19. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.11309/2016 Date of decision:16. h February, 2017 ROSHAN LAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Vinay Sabharwal, Advocate. versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through Mr. Vibhor Mathur, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The petitioner-Roshan Lal impugns the order dated 4th April, 2016 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) dismissing TA No.22/2012.2. The petitioner, a Security Guard in Delhi Transport Corporation, was served with the charge memorandum dated 25th June, 2007, which, when translated in English, reads:-"that the petitioner had been made excess payment of salary for 154 days on account of forged attendance slips furnished and given to Pay Bill Clerk for the period between January, 2002 to August, 2002, September, 2004 to July, 2005 and August, 2006 to January, 2...
Husan Ara vs.akhtar Jahan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-16-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: February 16, 2017 $~A-18 * % + RC.REV. 197/2016 and CM No.12682/2016 HUSAN ARA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Shaad Anwar & Ms.Shabnam Advs. versus AKHTAR JAHAN ..... Respondent Through Mr.Nitin Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present Revision Petition filed under section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) the petitioner seeks to challenge the order dated 17.2.2016 by which the application of the petitioner/tenant seeking leave to defend was dismissed and an eviction order was passed against her under section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act.2. The respondent/landlord filed the eviction petition regarding property No.3388, Bagichi Achheji, Bara Hindu Rao, Delhi-110006. It was averred that the suit property is required for the residence of her son Shahrukh who is about 21years old. The family of the respondent is said to consist of 16 RC.R...
Seema Thakur vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-16-2017
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. h January, 2017 Pronounced on:16. h February, 2017 + Crl.M.A.19647/2012 (under Section 340 Cr.P.C), IA No.24788/2015 (under Section 151 CPC for directions), and IA No.16243/2016 (under Section 151 CPC by SHO, Tughlak Road for directions) in CS(OS) 100/2010 SEEMA THAKUR ..... Plaintiff Mr. Vijay Kapoor, attorney of the plaintiff Through: versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh and Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Advocates for D-1/UOI Ms. Seema Singh, Advocate for D-3 Mr. Gurman Chahal, Advocate for the SHO Tuglak Road CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER The civil suit CS(OS) No.100/2010, from which the issues being considered and adjudicated upon here arise, was instituted by Smt. Seema Thakur, wife of late Sh. Bansi Lal Thakur (the first noticee) through her attorney Sh. Vijay Kapoor (the second noticee) besides against the Union of India, through Ministry of Urban Development and Land and Develo...
Malachi Oguama vs.cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-16-2017
$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :16. h FEBRUARY, 2017 + CRL.REV.P.834/2016 & CRL.M.B. 2282/2016 MALACHI OGUAMA ........ Petitioner CBI Through : Ms.Sushma Sharma, Advocate. VERSUS ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, SPP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. Present Revision Petition has been preferred by the petitioner to challenge the judgment dated 23.09.2016 of learned District and Sessions Judge (South), Saket, in CIS-CA-8250-2016 whereby the judgment dated 30.05.2016 and order on sentence dated 24.06.2016 of learned CMM, South in RC No.221/2016/E/0004 were upheld. Status report is on record.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. Undisputedly, charges under Section 471 IPC and Section 14 of Foreigners Act were framed against the petitioner by the Trial Court and to prove it, the prosecution examined eight witnesses. In 313 Cr.P.C. statement, the petitioner denied his involvement in t...
Ajay Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs.assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Td ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-16-2017
Through : Sh. P. Roychaudhuri, Sr. Standing Counsel. ........ RESPONDENTS * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8085/2014, C.M. APPL.18876/2014 RAJESH PROJECTS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Reserved on:16. 01.2017 Decided on:16. 02.2017 Through : Sh. Prakash Kumar and Ms. Rashmi Singh, Advocates. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS)-II AND ORS. + W.P.(C) 7682/2015 AJAY ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through : Sh. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Vidhi Goel and Ms. Shagun Parashar, Advocates. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) AND ORS. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Sh. Jasmeet Singh and Sh. Nitesh Shrivastava, Advocates. Sh. P. Roychaudhuri, Sr. Standing Counsel. + W.P.(C) 10896/2015 IITL-NIMBUS, THE HYDE PARK, NOIDA ........ Petitioner Through : Sh. Neil Chatterjee, Advocate, for Sh. Debesh Panda, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Sh. Jasmeet Singh and Sh. Nitesh Shrivastava, Advocates. Sh. ...
Ashutosh Bhardwaj vs.oriental Bank of Commerce & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-16-2017
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 241/2017 & CM11872017 1. ASHUTOSH BHARDWAJ ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Prakash Gautam, Advocate versus ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Ekta Sikri and Ms. Adwaita Sharma, Advocates with Mr. Ved Prakash (AR) in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia ORDER1602.2017 for issuing directions to the respondent/Bank to de-seal/release four Cash Deposit Receipts (CDRs) belonging to him and his wife and the HUF and to call upon the respondent/Bank to identify the concerned officers of the Bank, who have committed dereliction of duty in the present case.2. On the last date of hearing, Ms.Sikri, learned counsel for the respondent/Bank was directed to obtain instructions from the Bank in the context of the letter dated 3.10.2016, issued by the respondent/Bank to the petitioner (Annexure-P-10).3. Today, counsel for the resp...
Jeet Singh vs.dashrath Yadav
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-16-2017
$~12 to 15. * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA8152015, 818/2015, 821/2015 and 822/2015 JEET SINGH Through: Mr. S.B.S. Vashistha, Advocate ..... Appellant versus DASHRATH YADAV SHIV SHANKAR RADHEY SHYAM MOTI CHAND MAHTO ..... Respondent ..... Respondent ..... Respondent ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.M. Aggarwal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % In the present four appeals, the appellant/plaintiff has assailed a ORDER1602.2017 common order dated 15.07.2015, passed by the learned trial court, allowing four separate applications filed by the respondents/defendants under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and rejecting the plaints in all the four suits for possession instituted by him against the respondents/defendants, all residents of Khasra No.36/23, 36/24, and 38/18, Delhi, on the ground that the said suits are barred under Section 185 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act,1954 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).2. With the consent of the parties, RFA8152015 is treated as...
Atul Jain vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-16-2017
* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h February, 2017 Decided on:16. h February, 2017 CRL.REV.P. 448/2016 & Crl.M.A. 10118/2016 (stay) ATUL JAIN ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. versus Advocate with Mr. Aishwarya Sinha, Advocate. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Adv. CRL.REV.P. 528/2016 & Crl.M.A. 12461/2016 (stay) LALIT AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Rajesh Kaushik, Advocate. versus STATE (CBI) Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with ..... Respondent CRL.REV.P. 539/2016 & Crl.M.A. 12707/2016 (stay) Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Advocate. SYED SADAKAT ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. S.M. Jamal, Advocate. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Advocate. CRL.REV.P. Nos. 448/2016, 528/2016 & 539/2016 Page 1 of 7 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPT...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »