Delhi Court February 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ajay Dhingra & Anr vs.raj Kumar Rajora & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-17-2017
$~A-47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:17. 02.2017 + CM(M) 192/2017 and CM Nos. 6271-6273/2017 AJAY DHINGRA & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Rishi Manchanda, Advocate. versus RAJ KUMAR RAJORA & ORS Through Mr.R.S.D. Dixit, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek to challenge the order dated 20.09.2016 by which an application filed by the respondents/plaintiffs under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC has been allowed.2. The respondents/plaintiffs have filed the suit for permanent injunction. As per the plaint, the respondents claim to be the joint owners of the property in Dev Nagar, Karol Bagh, New Delhi having purchased the same from the previous owner vide sale deed dated 28.10.2015 and 05.11.2015. It is averred that at the time of purchase of the property only constructive/symbolic possession of the property was...
Trf Ltd. Vs.energo Engineering Projects Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-17-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: February 9, 2017 Date of Decision: February 17, 2017 O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 66/2017 Through: Mr. Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kaushik Poddar, Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Mr. Gautam Singh, Mr. Rohan Alva, Mr. Vivek Raja, Advocates. ........ Petitioner + TRF LTD. versus ENERGO ENGINEERING PROJECTS LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dhruv Dewan, Ms. Reena Choudhary, and Ms. Aakashi Lodha, Advocates. + TRF LTD. WITH O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 67/2017 Through: Mr. Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kaushik Poddar, Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Mr. Gautam Singh, Mr. Rohan Alva, Mr. Vivek Raja, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus ENERGO ENGINEERING PROJECTS LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dhruv Dewan, Ms. Reena Choudhary, and Ms. Aakashi Lodha, Advocates. OMP (I) (COMM) Nos. 66, 67, 68, 69, 70/2017 Page 1 of 34 + TRF LTD. WITH O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 68/20...
Jagan Nath Sharma vs.kishan Chand Sharma & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-17-2017
$~5. * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA10322016 & CMs 48205-06/2016 and 6434/2017 JAGAN NATH SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. T.C. Sharma, Advocate versus KISHAN CHAND SHARMA & ORS Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The appellant/plaintiff has assailed the judgment dated 24.9.2016, ORDER1702.2017 dismissing his suit for partition and permanent injunction instituted against his siblings, in respect of a residential premises bearing No.MS-29/III, MS Block, Hari Nagar, Ghanta Ghar, New Delhi.2. The facts germane for deciding the present appeal are that Smt.Shanti Devi, mother of the parties, was the absolute owner in possession of the suit premises purchased by her by virtue of a Sale Deed dated 17.8.1971. Smt. Shanti Devi expired intestate on 12.5.1981, leaving behind her husband, Shri S.R. Sharma, five sons and two daughters. After the demise of Smt. Shanti Devi, her husband also expired, leaving behind seven legal heirs. Allegi...
Procter & Gamble Home Products Private Limited vs.hindustan Unilever L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-17-2017
% *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h February, 2017 + CS(OS) No.459/2016 & IA No.11244/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) PROCTER & GAMBLE HOME PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Mr. Sandeep Sethi and Ms. Prathiba M. Singh, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Mr. Siddhanth Sharma, Ms. Eesha Mohapatra, Ms. Ruby Singh Ahuja, Ms. Akanksha Munjal, Mr. Arvind Chari and Mr. Devanshu Khanna, Advs. Versus HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LTD. ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Abhinav Vasisht, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sameer Parekh, Mr. D.P. Mohanty, Ms. Rukhmani Bobde, Ms. Nandita Bajpai, Ms. Swati Bhardwaj and Mr. Abhiram Naik, Advs. + CS(OS) No.463/2016 & IA No.11360/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) AND HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sameer Parekh, Mr. D.P. Mohanty, Ms. Rukhmani Bobde, Ms. Nandita Bajpai, Ms. Swati Bhardwaj and Mr. Abhiram Naik, Advs. Versus PROCTER & GAMBLE HOME PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Defenda...
M. Nagarajan vs.state Election Commission & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-17-2017
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1462/2017 M. NAGARAJAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. A. Maitri, Ms. Radhika Chandrashekhar and Mr. Rattan Lal Goel, Advocates. versus STATE ELECTION COMMISSION & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Siddhartha Nagpal proxy counsel for Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, Advocate for R-1. Mr. P.R. Chopra, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER1702.2017 W.P.(C) 1462/2017 and CM Nos. 6690-6691/2017 1. Mr. A. Maitri, learned counsel seeks leave to withdraw the present application by reserving the right of his client to file a petition before the Division Bench for being heard along with Writ Petition No.1291/2017 entitled We, the Citizens through Secretary vs. Union of India & Ors..2. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. It shall be open for the petitioner to institute a fresh petition before the Division Bench for raising the grievances raised in the present petition.3. The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn alon...
Rahul Saraf vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-17-2017
$~7. * + % W.P.(CRL) 2572/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:17. 02.2017 RAHUL SARAF ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Chayan Sarkar, S.K. Singhi and Arjit Pratap Singh, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC with Ms.Priyanka Singh for UOI Mr. Nikhil Goel and Mr. Ashutosh Ghade for CBI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to seek the setting aside/ quashing of the request for legal assistance dated 18.09.2015 issued by the Russian Federation to the Union of India. The petitioner also seeks a restraint against respondent No.1 and 2 i.e. Union of India and the CBI from taking any action or steps in pursuance of the said letter of request dated 18.09.2015. The petitioner W.P.(CRL) 2572/2016 Page 1 of 20 seeks a direction that coercive steps be not taken ...
Dilip Tuli & Anr vs.the Country Club & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-17-2017
$~A-44 * % + CM(M) 189/2017 DILIP TULI & ANR versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:17. 02.2017 ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Rupesh Kumar, Advocate. THE COUNTRY CLUB & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Anoop Bagai, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Ankit Jain and Mr. Anand Sharma, Advocates for R-1 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) CAV1542017 Since the counsel for caveator has entered appearance, the caveat stands discharged. CM(M) 189/2017 and CM Nos. 6240-41/2017 1. By the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek to impugn the order dated 01.02.2017 passed by the appellate court dismissing the appeal of the petitioner. The petitioner had filed an appeal against the order of the trial court dated 22.12.2016 dismissing the interim application filed under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC by the petitioner/plaintiff.2. Respondent No.1 is a Society registered under the provisions of the CM(M) 189/2...
Udit Raj Poonia vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-16-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 135/2017 Date of Decision: February 16th, 2017 UDIT RAJ POONIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Viraj R. Datar, Mr.Bijan Singh, Mr.Rajtilak Guha Roy and Mr.Jahangir Ahmed, Advocates. ` versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Mr.S.B.K. Singh, Special Commissioner, Mr.Satish Golcha, Special Commissioner, Inspector Manish SHO and ASI Devender Kumar, Police Station Madhu Vihar, Delhi. Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with Mr.Harsh K. Sharma, Mr.Manish Tiwari, Ms.Ragini, Ms.Vaibhavi Sharma, Mr.Rohit Gaur, Mr.Raghav Ghei, Ms.Mehak Nakra, Mr.Ajay Aroraa, Lal, Mr.Kapil Ms.Surbhi for Complainant. Dutta, Ms.Diksha Gupta, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S. TEJI, J1 The present application has been filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the petitioner/accused for the grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.413/2016...
Aia Engineering Limited vs.bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd (Bhel) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-16-2017
$ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. h January, 2017 Pronounced on:16. h February, 2017 CS (COMM) 1576/2016 & IA No.564/2017 (under Order VII Rule 10 CPC) AIA ENGINEERING LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Pratibha M. Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sanjeev K. Tiwari, Mr. Devang Nanawati, Mr. Rishit Bhatt, Mr. Prateek Sehrawat and Mr. Saurabh Anand, Advocates versus BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD (BHEL) & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Ashim Vachher, Advocate for D-1 Mr. Puneet Taneja and Ms. Shaheen, Advocates for D-2 Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Ms. Julien George and Mr. Ranjeet Singh Sindhu, Advocates for D-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER The civil suit in the course of which application for return of the plaint under Rule 10 of Order VII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), it being IA No.564/2017, has been filed by the third CS (Comm) 1576/2016 Page 1 of 29 defendant (Shri Balaji Industrial Products Limited, ...
Mr. Ram Kala vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-16-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % MR. RAM KALA W.P. (C) No.7400/2007 16th February, 2017 Through: ........ Petitioner Mr. S.S.Nehra, Mr. Neeraj Dutt Gour and Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advs. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arjun Mitra and Ms. Jaskaran Kaur, Advs. with Mr. Hari Ram, Assistant Parvi Officer Zone-29, for R-1 and 2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks the relief of being granted arrears of senior scale of pay as a TGT from 1.4.1997 till 7.1.2003 including interest for this period on the arrears at 24% per annum simple.... Petitioner seeks the relief by seeking quashing of the impugned order of the respondent no.2/Director of Education dated 21.4.2007, and which order reads as under:-" ORDER . . W.P.(C) No.7400/2007 Page 1 of 5 AND WHERAS, Sh. Ram Kala,... Petitioner No....
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »