Delhi Court February 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Zohra Sheikh vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:11. 01.2017 Judgment delivered on:20. 02.2017 BAIL APPLN. 1481/2016 ZOHRA SHEIKH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Sharma, Mr. Manu Sharma Ridhima Mandhar, and Ms. Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP along with SI Rohit, PS-Crime Branch, for State. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.JUDGMENT1 The Applicant herein, Zohra Sheikh has preferred the present bail application seeking regular bail under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) read with Section 21(4) of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (MCOCA) in case FIR No.4under sections of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act), of the Arms Act,of Indian Penal Code (IPC) read with sections 3 & 4 of MCOCA titled State v. Sharafat Sheikh pending BAIL APPLN. 1481/2016 Page 1 of 26 adjudication before Ld. ASJ, Saket District Courts, Ne...
s.k.kalra vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 11160/2016, W.P.(C) 11156/2016, W.P.(C) 10993/2016, W.P.(C) 11177/2016 % + W.P.(C) 11160/2016 S.K.KALRA20h February, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. N.C.Gupta and Mr. Deepak Singh, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Brajesh Kumar, CGSC for + W.P.(C) 11156/2016 R-1. Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Kr. Singh, Adv. for R-2. Mr. Rajat Arora, Adv. for R-3. P.K.SINGLOO ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. N.C.Gupta and Mr. Deepak Singh, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Brajesh Kumar, CGSC for R-1. Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Kr. Singh, Adv. for R-2. Mr. Rajat Arora, Adv. for R-3. + W.P.(C) 10993/2016 N K MEHTA ........ Petitioner W.P.(C) No.11160/2016 & conn. Page 1 of 6 Through: Mr. N.C.Gupta and Mr. Deepak Singh, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for R-1. Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Kr. Singh,...
The Commissioner Central Excise & Ors vs.usha Vaish & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
$~16 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA9902016 & C.M. No.46740-41/2016 THE COMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Amish Aggarwala and Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Advocates. versus USHA VAISH & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER2002.2017 1. The appellants/defendants have assailed the judgment and decree dated 10.12.2015 passed by the learned trial court in favour of the respondents/plaintiffs in a suit for possession, permanent injunction, arrears of rent and mesne profit etc. in respect of flat No.312A, 8, Deep Shikha Building, Rajendra Place, New Delhi-110008.2. During the pendency of the aforesaid suit, the appellants/defendants had handed over vacant peaceful possession of the suit property to the respondents/plaintiffs in the October, 2010, which date was however disputed by the other side before the trial court. This left the dispute with regard to the arrears of rent/mesne profits.3. Under the impu...
Narvir Singh vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
* % + W.P.(C) 1863/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on: February 20, 2017 NARVIR SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Krishna Kumar Mishra, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ......... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA ORDER INDIRA BANERJEE, J1 This writ petition is directed against an order dated 10.09.2014 passed by the Staff Selection Commission, Northern Region being the respondent No.2, cancelling the candidature of the petitioner for recruitment to the post of Sub Inspector in the Border Security Force (BSF).2. Pursuant to an employment notification in the Employment News published on 16.03.2013, inter alia for recruitment of ===================================================================== W.P.(C) No.5952/2016 Page 1 of 4 Sub Inspectors in the Central Armed Police Forces, the petitioner applied.3. The petitioner, who belongs to the Jat community of Harya...
M/S Geo Miller & Co Pvt Ltd vs.bihar Urban Infrastructure Development ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:03. 01.2017 Judgment delivered on:20. 02.2017 FAO(OS) 382/2016 * % + M/S GEO MILLER & CO PVT LTD BIHAR URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PVT LTD & ANR versus ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr S.D. Singh with Mr Rahul Kr. Singh & Mr For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr Shivam Singh with Mr Vikram Singh Jitender Singh. Chauhan. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR JUDGMENT ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J CM477792016 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. FAO(OS) 382/2016 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 06.12.2016 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in the appellants petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 being OMP (I) FAO(OS) 382/2016 Page 1 of 8 No.290/2015 whereby it was held by the learned single Judge that such petition was not maintainable by the appellant i...
Sanjay vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 600/2000 Judgment reserved on :31. t January, 2017 Date of decision :20. h February, 2017 Through: Mr.M.L.Yadav, Adv. versus Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, Addl. P.P. for the ..... Respondent ..... Appellant SANJAY STATE State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA ANU MALHOTRA, J.JUDGMENT1 This judgment shall dispose of Criminal Appeal No.600/2000 filed on 30.09.2000, whereby the appellant Sanjay S/o Veer Singh has assailed the impugned judgment dated 19.09.2000 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Shahdara, in State Case in FIR No.153/99, PS Bhajanpura whereby the appellant was convicted for the commission of rape on the prosecutrix as defined under Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and was convicted thereunder. The appellant has also assailed the impugned order on sentence dated 20.09.2000 in the said case whereby he was sentenced to undergo imprisonme...
Ajay Kumar vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :15. h NOVEMBER, 2016 DECIDED ON :20. h FEBRUARY, 2017 AJAY KUMAR ..... Appellant CRL.A. 847/2014 Through : Mr.N.Hariharan, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Vaibhav Sharma, Mr.Avnish Rana, Mr.Siddharth S.Yadav & Mr.Aditya Vaibhav Singh, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + S.P.GARG, J.The present appeal stands disposed of in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.662/2014 titled Parveen Kumar vs. State. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE FEBRUARY20 2017 / tr...
Shikha Mathur vs.sushila Mathur & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 20, 2017 RSA572017 SHIKHA MATHUR ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Saqib, Advocate with Appellant in person. versus SUSHILA MATHUR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mohd. Qamar Ali & Mr.Amit Punj, Advocates for R-1. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT (Oral) 1. On 15th February, 2017, when this appeal came up for hearing, learned counsel for the appellant was heard on the substantial question of law raised in this appeal and following order was passed: 1. Counsel as above appears for the appellant with the appellant in person.2. After some arguments on not being able to convince the Court that the instant appeal raises a substantial question of law, the appellant who is present in person sought permission to make her submissions. The appellant submits that she does not want to press the 3. appeal on merits, her request is limited to the extent that she be given one month time to vacate. Limited notice 4. ...
Yash Pal vs.director General, Council of Scientific & Industrial Resea ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1400/2017 Date of Decision :20. h February, 2017 YASH PAL Through versus... Petitioner in person ........ Petitioner DIRECTOR GENERAL, COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC & INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH & ANR. Through ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The petitioner-Yash Pal has appeared in person.2. This Bench on an earlier occasion had passed the following order dated 24.11.2016 in W.P. (C) 11175/2016 titled Yash Pal v. Director General, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research:-"1. The petitioner, Yash Pal has appeared in person and we have examined the merits of the impugned order dated 9th September 2016, whereby OA No.4190/2013 has been dismissed as not maintainable on the ground of res judicata and constructive res judicata.2. We are in agreement with the reasoning given by the tribunal. WP(C) No.1400/2017 Page 1 of 7 3. The petitioner is a retired empl...
Arunkumar Shrivastava vs.m/s t.c.communications pvt.ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-17-2017
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:17. h February, 2017 CRL.M.C. 2247/2016 & Crl.M.A. 9452/2016 (stay) ARUNKUMAR SHRIVASTAVA Represented by: Mr. Hrishikesh S. Chitaley, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus M/S T.C.COMMUNICATIONS PVT.LTD. Represented by: Dr. Alok, Adv. CRL.M.C. 2256/2016 & Crl.M.A. 9475/2016 (stay) MILIND VASANT BODHANKAR ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Hrishikesh S. Chitaley, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus M/S T.C. COMMUNICATIONS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Represented by: Dr. Alok, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Complaint case No.4309/2015 was filed by the respondent M/s. T.C. Communications Pvt. Ltd. (in short T.C.) against Abhijeet Projects Ltd. (in short the accused company) and 9 other persons who were its senior DGM, Senior DM, Managing Directors, authorized signatories etc. under Section CRL.M.C. Nos. 2247/2016 & 2256/2016 Page 1 of 4 138 read with Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (in sho...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »