Delhi Court February 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jaspal Kaur vs.municipal Corporation of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :16.02.2017 Judgment delivered on :20.02.2017 + W.P.(C) 717/2010 JASPAL KAUR Through Mr. R.K. Saini, Mr. Varun Nagram ........ Petitioner and Ms. Minal Sehgal, Advs. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI Versus ..... Respondent Through Ms Puja Kalra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The petitioner before this Court is Jaspal Kaur. She is the widow of Hardev Singh. Hardev Singh was running transport business under a proprietorship in the name of New Delhi Madhya Pradesh Transport Service. Pursuant to a proposal circulated by the respondent to develop a transport nagar (Sanjay Gandhi Transport Nagar), the husband of the deceased in his capacity as proprietor of M/s New Delhi Madhya Pradesh Transport Service along with similarly situated persons had made applications for allotment of a plot. On 31.11.1987 pursuant to the demand notice, total payment of Rs.1,18,800/- was made by him. This was at ...
M/S Strategic Energy Technology Systems Private Limited vs.union of In ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:20. 02.2017 LPA2552016 & C.M.No.14618/2016 M/S STRATEGIC ENERGY TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Gopal Jain, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Siddharth Sharma, Mr.Abhishek Roy, Ms.Trishala Kulkarni & Ms. Nandini Gore, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Mr.Siddharth Thakur, Mr.Sumant Bhushan and Mr.Shivi Sanyam, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MS. G. ROHINI, CHIEF JUSTICE: * % + 1. The unsuccessful petitioner in W.P.(C) No.1741/2016 is the appellant before us. The said writ petition was dismissed by the learned Single Judge by order dated 02.03.2016.2. We have heard the learned counsel for both the parties.3. The appellant/writ petitioner filed W.P.(C) No.1741/2016 with a prayer to quash the order of the respondent No.1/Government of India, Ministry of Coal dated 24.06.2015 whereby the petitioner's repre...
National Highways Authority of India vs.gammon Atlanta (Jv)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:20. 01.2017 Judgment delivered on:20. 02.2017 FAO(OS) 21/2017 + NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Appellant GAMMON ATLANTA (JV) versus ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR : Mr Ramesh Kumar. : Mr Sumit Goel with Mr Akash Jindal & Ms Raveena Rai. JUDGMENT ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J CM23362017 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. FAO(OS) 21/2017 1. The appellant, NHAI, has challenged the judgment of the learned single Judge dated 15.11.2016 whereby the two OMPs, one filed by the appellant (OMP No.107/2008) and the other by the respondent (OMP No.99/2008) was disposed of by a common judgment.2. The appellant had put up a challenge to the award with respect to the claim Nos.1.1, 1.4, 1.5, 1.9, 2.1 and 2.2, all of which have been FAO(OS) 21/2017 Page 1 of 11 upheld by the learned s...
Poonam Rani vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on :20. h December, 2016 Date of decision :20. h February, 2017 CRL.A. No.711/2012 POONAM RANI ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Anu Narula, Adv. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT GITA MITTAL, J.1. By way of the instant appeal, the appellant assails the judgment dated 9th April, 2012 in Sessions Case No.1arising out of FIR No.2under Section 3IPC registered by the police station Hauz Khas finding her guilty of the commission of offence under Section 302 of the IPC as well as the consequential order on sentence dated 21st April, 2012 whereby she was sentenced to undergo rigorous Crl.App.711/2012 Page 1 of 89 imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `10,000/-, in default of payment of fine, sentenced to undergo one years simple imprisonment.2. It was the case of the prosecution that at 2:23 a.m. on 7th August, 201...
Raju Singh vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
$~22 * + W.P.(C) 343/2017 RAJU SINGH IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Paney and Mr. Prakash Verma, Advs. with petitioner ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Ruchir Ranjan Rai, Adv. Mr. Brijesh Kumar Tamber with Ms. Poonam Gupta, Advs. for R-3 & 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER2002.2017 1. Pursuant to the last order, Mr. Brijesh Kumar Tamber, learned counsel enters appearance on behalf of the respondent nos. 3 and 4/Indian Bank and states that he has been nominated by the Bank to accept advance copies of petitions filed in the High Court and his name has been duly displayed on the website of the High Court for future reference.2. Though notice of the petition has not yet been issued, counter affidavit stands filed by the respondents No.3 and 4/Bank wherein it is stated that a term loan was disbursed to the petitioner to purchase certain machineries, which wer...
Rajesh Kr. Jain vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : February 20th, 2017 CRL.A. No.570/2000 RAJESH KR. JAIN ..... Appellant Through Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Vivek Sharma, Adv. & Mr.Neeraj K. Sharma, Adv. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for the State with SI Mahesh Chand, PS Lajpat Nagar. Mr. V.K. Malik, Adv. with Mr.Rahul Raj Malik, Adv. for the complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.JUDGMENT1 Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 16.08.2000 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi convicting the appellant-Rajesh Kumar Jain for the offence punishable under Section 498A/304-B of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as I.P.C.) and order on sentence dated 18.08.2000, whereby the appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years for the offence under Section 304-B IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a Crl. A. No.570/2000 Page 1 of 10 period of three years ...
Ex. Ct. Madan Mohan vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: December 02, 2016 Judgment delivered on: February 20, 2017 + W.P.(C) 18883/2005 EX. CT. MADAN MOHAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Meet Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ravi S. S. Chauhan, Mr. Manjeet Chawla & Ms. Pallak Singh, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Adv. with Mr. Arvind Sharma, DC, BSF CORAM: HONBLE MS JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed with the following prayers:-"(i) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned SSFC trail proceedings by which the petitioner has been sentenced to dismissal from service vide Annexure P-5 (Colly) as well as Ministry of Home Affairs, Directorate General Border Security Force letter dated Feb 2005, upholding the said findings and sentence. W.P. (C) 4810/2015 Page 1 of 28 (ii) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the...
M/S Cdm Smith India Private Ltd. Vs.national Highways & Infrastructure ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
$~68 * % + W.P.(C) 1422/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:20. 02.2017 M/S CDM SMITH INDIA PRIVATE LTD. ........ Petitioner versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr. C.D. Mulherkar and Ms. Anushka Arora, Advocates. Mr. Amit Mishra, Mr. Abhijeet Sinha, Ms. Devna Arora and Mr. Kabir Bose, Advocates CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2002.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.6539/2017 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 1422/2017 & CM No.6538/2017(interim relief) 1. The petitioner impugns letter dated 09.11.2016, whereby, inter alia, the petitioner has been debarred from participating in future projects of the National Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited with immediate effect. WP(C) 1422/2017 Page 1 of 3 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that prior t...
Smt. Mitali Chakrabarty Dutta vs.chairman, Rajya Sabha & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.1503/2017 + % SMT. MITALI CHAKRABARTY DUTTA ........ Petitioner Bora, Advocate with Ms. Archana Singh, Advocate. 20th February, 2017 Through: Ms. Madhusmita CHAIRMAN, RAJYA SABHA & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Advocate with Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocate and Ms. Samia Malik, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. Abhishek Khanna, Advocate for respondent No.4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) +W.P.(C) No.1503/2017 and C.M. Nos.6853/2017 6854/2017 (under Section 151 CPC) (stay) & 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner impugns the order dated 29.7.2016 passed by the disciplinary authority of the employer/Rajya Sabha Secretariat terminating the services of the petitioner on account of her W.P.(C) No.1503/2017 Page 1 of 10 unauthorized absence i.e petitioner remaining absent from duty w...
Bharti Axa General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.gyan Chand & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
$~32 * % + MAC.APP.1143/2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. h February, 2017 Through: Mr.Navneet Kumar, Mr.Vikas Bhadana, Advs. BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. GYAN CHAND & ORS versus .... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anshuman Bal, Adv. for R- 1 to R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.21,43,800/- has been awarded to respondents No.1 to 4.2. The accident dated 11th June, 2013 resulted in the death of Juli Bai. The deceased aged 36 years was a house wife survived by her husband, two sons and one daughter who filed the claim petition before the Claims Tribunal. The Claims Tribunal took minimum wages of Rs.8,582/- in respect of a skilled person, added 25% towards future prospects and applied the multiplier of 15 to compute the loss of dependency as Rs.19,18,800/-. The Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.1,00,000/- towards loss of love an...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »